Yoona Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Building a PC from scratch for recommended settings with i5 4460, 8 gigs of ram, R9 270 is about 630 euro. Pretty sure that gives you at least the same level of graphics as PS4 and twice the frame rate, so not a bad deal. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raburs Posted February 24, 2015 Author Share Posted February 24, 2015 I checked using CYRI,GD and other various threads and they all say it will work without a hitch. I ran FC4 and WD without any probs and their requirements were much higher than this. Never ever again use those sites... Those are just BS.. I didn't mean to say. that you won't run it.. Dual-cores should be able to run the game..but not like pure quad-core.. If you can run FC4, WD, then you should be able to run GTAV. Building a PC from scratch for recommended settings with i5 4460, 8 gigs of ram, R9 270 is about 630 euro. Pretty sure that gives you at least the same level of graphics as PS4 and twice the frame rate, so not a bad deal. You're good. That should be the same level as that of PS4 , if not more.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OysterBarron Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Running? Yeah. With decent framerates? Not so sure. I am sure. I would say it's going to be Ram that's going to be the bottleneck more than anything, considering the amount of issues IV suffered from not utilising it properly. I think 8GB should be enough... IV was a different story then... what do you guys think about the AMD Phenom II quad core? 3.2GHz... Along with an Nvidia 750ti 2GBvram DDR5 You did not mention the exact model..for the CPU. Also the RAM. The only reason I think that it will be the ram is they've obviously decided they needed a 64bit requirement in order to run the game. With a 64bit machine it allows the game running to use more ram than a 32bit is limited to. 8gb for recommended is still pretty steep in comparison to other games so I recon at least 16 gb would be preferable with every other application and Os running in the back ground. K20 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yoona Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 I checked using CYRI,GD and other various threads and they all say it will work without a hitch. I ran FC4 and WD without any probs and their requirements were much higher than this. Never ever again use those sites... Those are just BS.. I didn't mean to say. that you won't run it.. Dual-cores should be able to run the game..but not like pure quad-core.. If you can run FC4, WD, then you should be able to run GTAV. Building a PC from scratch for recommended settings with i5 4460, 8 gigs of ram, R9 270 is about 630 euro. Pretty sure that gives you at least the same level of graphics as PS4 and twice the frame rate, so not a bad deal. You're good. That should be the same level as that of PS4 , if not more.. Actually I wasn't talking about myself, but more about my friend's future build My PC is a bit better than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
samneseema Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Thnx btw Mine is just little above the min. specs. I am saved Can't wait now Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrindoLindo Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 (edited) Will be like MP3 PC version, all PC will can play the game. If you have a hig end PC you will play with amazing graphics and if you have a low end PC you will still can play the game. R wants money, so the game will allow all kind of PCS. mp3 is a very small game in comparison. of course it runs good. most of it is cutscenes or loading screens in disguise, a bit overrated imo. like an interactive die hard. at least you can skip the cutscenes in the gta games. shame there are zero mods for mp3, would've been cool if it got a 1st person mod like mp1 & 2. Edited February 24, 2015 by GrindoLindo Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNIKEL Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Battlefield 4 is cpu heavy game? Really? It flyes like crazy on old crappy i7 870...(2009 year of production!) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raburs Posted February 24, 2015 Author Share Posted February 24, 2015 (edited) Battlefield 4 is cpu heavy game? Really? It flyes like crazy on old crappy i7 870...(2009 year of production!) i7 870 is still a very decent CPU.... Its comparable to the FX4300, or even the FX6300 for that matter.. Plus single-threaded performance is brilliant, better than FX8350 Edited February 24, 2015 by raburs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minde95s Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Quad core cpu I only have triple core . Maybe it not take a lot of performance. At least I don't have dual core cpu Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaskDagger Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 Quad core cpu I only have triple core . Maybe it not take a lot of performance. At least I don't have dual core cpu What is that? Am I retarded for never having heard of that? LOl Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thalyn Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 (edited) Quad core cpu I only have triple core . Maybe it not take a lot of performance. At least I don't have dual core cpu What is that? Am I retarded for never having heard of that? LOl Yes it's exist lol He has a Phenom "I" X3 8450 (see on his youtube profile): Good luck with this rig for GTAV . It was another trick from AMD (AM2+ and some AM3) with the Phenom I & II. For example, all Phenom X3 (3 cores) were actually Phenom X4 (4 cores), but with a deactivated core due to a partial defect (during the final quality tests). All the imperfect X4 (with 1 or 2 deficient cores) were sold as X3 or X2 (with one or two deactivated core(s)). Sometimes it's possible for example to "transform" a Phenom II X3 720 2.8GHz (Black Edition - Codename "Heka") to a Phenom II X4 925 2.8GHz (Black Edition - Codename "Deneb"), for example. Then the BIOS, Windows and CPU-Z really recognize this Phenom II X3 to a Phenom II X4. And with a little OC to 3 Ghz, this Phenom II X3 720 (now X4) is as good as a Phenom II X4 945 ... Unfortunally, this trick works only for the Phenom II and not for the Phenom I (like this Phenom X3 8450). With a compatible motherboard, it's possible to reactivate (not always) this 4th Core (or these 3rd and 4th cores) with the BIOS: -> Advanced Clock Calibration" (or "Advanced Clock configuration") on: Auto or Enabled. -> And (sometimes) "Unleashing Mode" to: Enable. Edited February 24, 2015 by Thalyn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GrindoLindo Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 yeah doesn't always work, the dodgy cores were disabled for a reason. bit like the old geforce cards that had disabled pipelines, rivatuner could enable them, but it didn't always work. i had a 6800 once and enable the disabled pipelines and though it work, i got a few white dots in some games. i've had a few phenoms and none of them unlocked, just resulted in a reboot or a lockup on boot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minde95s Posted February 24, 2015 Share Posted February 24, 2015 OMG old GPU, I have new one a few months ago. Now time to upgrade CPU. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sleepy Dude Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 Hope FX 6300 is good enough combined with R9 270X(recommended gpu) for ultra/high settings! Forget about it! The recommened CPU is a FX8350 and recommened doesn't mean Ultra. FX 6300 with a R9 270X can run it on High... Running? Yeah. With decent framerates? Not so sure. Please no more Max Payne 3 comparisons. Completely differently designed games. Corridor shooters are ALWAYS easy on CPUs while open world games annihilate them. If MP3 shouldn't be compared then the only game left to be compared to GTA 5 is Watch_Dogs. If that's the case, expect some requirements as hefty as WD. If GTA 5 is compared to GTA 4, expect a ludicrous requirement since 2008 and 2014 has a huge gap in technology. Sarcasm aside, We should compare GTA 5 to LA Noire. Makes perfect sense because both these games are set on LA and the requirements should be similar if not, a little higher. Thats a terrible comparison. For one thing, the cities are NOTHING alike. Also, LA noir uses the havok engine, and GTA V uses the rage engine Havok is only a physics engine, not a game engine. The game engine of L.A. Noire isn't Havoc, but an unknown one. V uses Euphoria and L.A. Noire uses Havok. That would be the right sentence. Ah, i see what you mean. But either way, LA Noir doesnt use RAGE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aikor Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 i have an AMD FX 8300 AT 3.7Ghz and a MSI R9 280X 3GB I was able to run most games like Watch dogs...project CARS at 50-60FPS..which is pretty smooth for me... GTA IV with IC enhancer it runs at around 45FPS(with view and draw distance at max)..which actually looks like its on 60FPS!!I never noticed this until i used FRAPS...45fps is pretty smooth So considering GTA V will be optimized i hope for 50-60FPS at around 50% draw dist and vehicle density Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raburs Posted February 26, 2015 Author Share Posted February 26, 2015 i have an AMD FX 8300 AT 3.7Ghz and a MSI R9 280X 3GB I was able to run most games like Watch dogs...project CARS at 50-60FPS..which is pretty smooth for me... GTA IV with IC enhancer it runs at around 45FPS(with view and draw distance at max)..which actually looks like its on 60FPS!!I never noticed this until i used FRAPS...45fps is pretty smooth So considering GTA V will be optimized i hope for 50-60FPS at around 50% draw dist and vehicle density You should be able to play it..at 60fps. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Th3MaN1 Posted February 26, 2015 Share Posted February 26, 2015 Well I pass the minimum in all except one. Pentium G3220 Dual Core at 3.0 GhZ. If it's well optimized, I expect the game to accept what I have, considering Shadow of Mordor ran on it. And that game was well optimized, along with having way bigger requirements than GTA V. But I'd need some thoughts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raburs Posted February 26, 2015 Author Share Posted February 26, 2015 Well I pass the minimum in all except one. Pentium G3220 Dual Core at 3.0 GhZ. If it's well optimized, I expect the game to accept what I have, considering Shadow of Mordor ran on it. And that game was well optimized, along with having way bigger requirements than GTA V. But I'd need some thoughts. Maybe...you should run it.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedIndianRobin Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 Well I pass the minimum in all except one. Pentium G3220 Dual Core at 3.0 GhZ. If it's well optimized, I expect the game to accept what I have, considering Shadow of Mordor ran on it. And that game was well optimized, along with having way bigger requirements than GTA V. But I'd need some thoughts. Maybe...you should run it.. Change maybe to definitely unless Rockstar are trying to pull some sh*t like Ubisoft by locking the requirements. And the G3220 is no joke. You highly under-estimate dual core setups Raburs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaskDagger Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 (edited) Change maybe to definitely unless Rockstar are trying to pull some sh*t like Ubisoft by locking the requirements. And the G3220 is no joke. You highly under-estimate dual core setups Raburs. I think you over-estimate them... Edited February 27, 2015 by TaskDagger Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RedIndianRobin Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 Change maybe to definitely unless Rockstar are trying to pull some sh*t like Ubisoft by locking the requirements. And the G3220 is no joke. You highly under-estimate dual core setups Raburs. I think you over-estimate them... ...nope. Haswell pentiums are meant for budget gaming systems. Most games runs 40+ fps(on high settings) on that CPU if you have a decent setup. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Th3MaN1 Posted February 27, 2015 Share Posted February 27, 2015 The guy did run most newer games on 30 fps on mid-low settings, which is good enough for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
raburs Posted February 27, 2015 Author Share Posted February 27, 2015 Change maybe to definitely unless Rockstar are trying to pull some sh*t like Ubisoft by locking the requirements. And the G3220 is no joke. You highly under-estimate dual core setups Raburs. "Maybe" means it may or may not run... Also not all Dual-Core CPU are strong..... RedIndianRobin 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now