An idea for a new Weapon & Aircraft

[Solo Wing Pixy]

SUGGESTION 1:

 

Getting killed by aircraft such as the Lazer and the Buzzard can be very annoying, the worst part is that we don't have a weapon that is specialized on taking out aircraft. Why not we have that Lock-On Launcher from GTA-SA? Instead of locking on both ground and air vehicles the launcher will only lock-on to aircraft (to prevent the RPG from being obsolete). That way we won't be completely defenseless against air vehicles.

 

The Lock-On Launcher will be available at rank 110 at the price of 40,000.

The launcher will only lock-on to air vehicles

Cannot be fired without lock-on

 

SUGGESTION 2:

 

We should have an aircraft that is specialized for ground targets. Before you say "we already have the lazer and the buzzard, we don't need another one" well the Lazer is an air superiority fighter. The Buzzard is multirole. This aircraft would be a bomber. This bomber will be able to switch to a belly camera which will guide bombs towards a target. When at belly view the bomber will be on-auto pilot mode to prevent it falling down like a rock. The armaments the bomber would posses are: 6 bombs that cause a big explosion and one large missile that causes a massive explosion. However there will be NO lock-on for any of these weapons (for the sake of balancing)

 

The Bomber will be available at level 90 for purchase

Cannot lock-on

Bomber automatically goes into auto-pilot when using belly camera for weapons

Price at 3 Million

 

What do you all think about this idea (if you don't like it you can suggest me an alteration for the idea)

[Ezza.]

Meh. Maybe make the Launcher only lock on to Armed Planes, and no helicopters. Option 2 needs balancing. Titan size + speed can be bought at level 200. Give something to work for

[The Angel King]

Screw it. Add all that and more vehicles. Let's get all Battlefield like in freemode.

[Solo Wing Pixy]

Screw it. Add all that and more vehicles. Let's get all Battlefield like in freemode.

 

K.

[Sean O'God]

For suggestion 2, I think a bomber is a little extreme. I think you could just go for an attack/strike aircraft, like an A-10. But overall I like your suggestions.

[k33g]

I like both ideas, we definitely need some Anti-Aircraft weapon. I'd like suggestion #2 as long as it's not too OP

[Hotfuzz128]

Well how many rockets can you store? Would be like Bf4 with non-stop beeping every time you get in a air vehicle.

[Not A Nice Person]

Well how many rockets can you store? Would be like Bf4 with non-stop beeping every time you get in a air vehicle.

Most likely 20 but after 10 its a longer reload.

[SimpleJack_420]

I like two. But it should definitely have at least a 30-40sec cool down time if you're completely out of bombs.

[US Marshal1911]

It would be cool to just lock on to someone without firing just to see them panic and crash for trying to evade.

[SemperJ550]

Meh. Maybe make the Launcher only lock on to Armed Planes, and no helicopters. Option 2 needs balancing. Titan size + speed can be bought at level 200. Give something to work for

This. If the launcher locked onto choppers it would completely ruin them.

[CaptainMental]

Tanks are already nerfed and not much of a problem. Lazers has been somewhat nerfed with the latest patch since the pilot cannot see the bullets anymore (totally unneccessary imo)

 

People who bitch and moan about tanks and lazers needs to learn how to take cover and defend themselves or learn how to use the passive mode function.

 

Only thing we could use is that the Buzzard would autolock on tanks and bountys.

 

The bomber idea seems interesting enough.

 

Btw, there is actually a heat seeking RPG in the game already. Its being carried by a soldier in Zancudo which he uses to fire rpgs after players who tries to steal lazers. Just for Rockstar to make it available to us.

[SimpleJack_420]

Tanks are already nerfed and not much of a problem. Lazers has been somewhat nerfed with the latest patch since the pilot cannot see the bullets anymore (totally unneccessary imo)

 

People who bitch and moan about tanks and lazers needs to learn how to take cover and defend themselves or learn how to use the passive mode function.

 

Only thing we could use is that the Buzzard would autolock on tanks and bountys.

 

The bomber idea seems interesting enough.

 

Btw, there is actually a heat seeking RPG in the game already. Its being carried by a soldier in Zancudo which he uses to fire rpgs after players who tries to steal lazers. Just for Rockstar to make it available to us.

NO AUTO LOCK is not needed. You can (with quite a bit of practice) kill a player on ground or in a vehicle with my beloved whirlybird. They shouldn't make it easy to use. If you want to be effective in one, just practice. Otherwise it'll be just like the jet where common sense and very little flying time will make you an Ace to the ppl on the ground.

[earlofsandw1ch]

No destructible environment makes having a bomber dumb. I like option one though

[SpidersWeb]

I like the Bomber concept

Came to mind myself a few weeks ago, would definitely support this, would be great for the central LSC.

 

I probably wouldn't want the belly cam though, makes it a bit too easy, I'd rather just get the timing right.

[HalaluSlakt187]

NO, YOU PUSSY NOOB. I'VE SHOT DOWN A LOT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS WITH RPG. I'VE SCOPED A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS. I DON'T NEED THAT sh*t. I'M ONE DEADLY BEAST. I'M THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME. I PWN EVERYONE

[SimpleJack_420]

NO, YOU PUSSY NOOB. I'VE SHOT DOWN A LOT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS WITH RPG. I'VE SCOPED A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS. I DON'T NEED THAT sh*t. I'M ONE DEADLY BEAST. I'M THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME. I PWN EVERYONE

Cool.

[Khelandros]

NO, YOU PUSSY NOOB. I'VE SHOT DOWN A LOT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS WITH RPG. I'VE SCOPED A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS. I DON'T NEED THAT sh*t. I'M ONE DEADLY BEAST. I'M THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME. I PWN EVERYONE

 

In a tank, or in the deathmatch you made that gets you 115 kills in a row. Don't believe me?? See for yourself: http://socialclub.rockstargames.com/member/halaluslakt/games/gtav/career/stats/gtaonline/weapons

 

OT. After hating the surface to air lock on option in the past, having to deal with the douchebags that do the infinite lazer respawn glitch, I am all for it now.

[CaptainMental]

 

Tanks are already nerfed and not much of a problem. Lazers has been somewhat nerfed with the latest patch since the pilot cannot see the bullets anymore (totally unneccessary imo)

 

People who bitch and moan about tanks and lazers needs to learn how to take cover and defend themselves or learn how to use the passive mode function.

 

Only thing we could use is that the Buzzard would autolock on tanks and bountys.

 

The bomber idea seems interesting enough.

 

Btw, there is actually a heat seeking RPG in the game already. Its being carried by a soldier in Zancudo which he uses to fire rpgs after players who tries to steal lazers. Just for Rockstar to make it available to us.

NO AUTO LOCK is not needed. You can (with quite a bit of practice) kill a player on ground or in a vehicle with my beloved whirlybird. They shouldn't make it easy to use. If you want to be effective in one, just practice. Otherwise it'll be just like the jet where common sense and very little flying time will make you an Ace to the ppl on the ground.

 

I would say the Buzzard requires less skill than the Lazer. Regardless of that, I still think the Buzzard and Lazer should have autolock on bountys, targets and tanks. It simply makes sense because thats how its meant to work and thats would make bountys and tanks being much more of a target - which they are supposed to be. Does it make sense that cops and aircrafts are the only things the autolock works on?

[Hylskriksen]

Sniper and minigun are good enough for taking out buzzards. The fighter jets can be pain in the ass, but can be taken out by the same weapons. Dont think the game need an auto-lock launcher

[Solo Wing Pixy]

Sniper and minigun are good enough for taking out buzzards. The fighter jets can be pain in the ass, but can be taken out by the same weapons. Dont think the game need an auto-lock launcher

The thing is, that not everyone has a minigun and not everyone can aim very well with the slow movement ADS speed of the sniper.

 

A bit off topic but suggestion 2 looks contested, might change some of the concepts on it though.

[TheKidKid415]

SUGGESTION 1:

 

Getting killed by aircraft such as the Lazer and the Buzzard can be very annoying, the worst part is that we don't have a weapon that is specialized on taking out aircraft. Why not we have that Lock-On Launcher from GTA-SA? Instead of locking on both ground and air vehicles the launcher will only lock-on to aircraft (to prevent the RPG from being obsolete). That way we won't be completely defenseless against air vehicles.

 

The Lock-On Launcher will be available at rank 110 at the price of 40,000.

The launcher will only lock-on to air vehicles

Cannot be fired without lock-on

 

SUGGESTION 2:

 

We should have an aircraft that is specialized for ground targets. Before you say "we already have the lazer and the buzzard, we don't need another one" well the Lazer is an air superiority fighter. The Buzzard is multirole. This aircraft would be a bomber. This bomber will be able to switch to a belly camera which will guide bombs towards a target. When at belly view the bomber will be on-auto pilot mode to prevent it falling down like a rock. The armaments the bomber would posses are: 6 bombs that cause a big explosion and one large missile that causes a massive explosion. However there will be NO lock-on for any of these weapons (for the sake of balancing)

 

The Bomber will be available at level 90 for purchase

Cannot lock-on

Bomber automatically goes into auto-pilot when using belly camera for weapons

Price at 3 Million

 

What do you all think about this idea (if you don't like it you can suggest me an alteration for the idea)

The bomber like Trevor's drug missions should of been added online the exact plane and with only 5 bombs.

[ten-a-penny]

 

--OR--

 

 

 

/thread.

[Argonaut]

 

--OR--

 

 

 

/thread.

 

Not enough 'Murica

 

[SimpleJack_420]

 

 

 

Tanks are already nerfed and not much of a problem. Lazers has been somewhat nerfed with the latest patch since the pilot cannot see the bullets anymore (totally unneccessary imo)

 

People who bitch and moan about tanks and lazers needs to learn how to take cover and defend themselves or learn how to use the passive mode function.

 

Only thing we could use is that the Buzzard would autolock on tanks and bountys.

 

The bomber idea seems interesting enough.

 

Btw, there is actually a heat seeking RPG in the game already. Its being carried by a soldier in Zancudo which he uses to fire rpgs after players who tries to steal lazers. Just for Rockstar to make it available to us.

NO AUTO LOCK is not needed. You can (with quite a bit of practice) kill a player on ground or in a vehicle with my beloved whirlybird. They shouldn't make it easy to use. If you want to be effective in one, just practice. Otherwise it'll be just like the jet where common sense and very little flying time will make you an Ace to the ppl on the ground.

 

I would say the Buzzard requires less skill than the Lazer. Regardless of that, I still think the Buzzard and Lazer should have autolock on bountys, targets and tanks. It simply makes sense because thats how its meant to work and thats would make bountys and tanks being much more of a target - which they are supposed to be. Does it make sense that cops and aircrafts are the only things the autolock works on?You on PSN? I'll change your mind on the Buzzards right now. I'll make you wish it had NO missiles at all, let alone lock on. In my hands (or any experienced pilots) that thing would be super OP and easy to use for anyone (like yourself, seeing as you need lock on to kill someone) Why do you need AA if you just said they're easier to fly than the jet? That doesn't even make sense, considering how easy it is to kill and avoid being killed in your jet... PLEASE give me your PSN. Edited September 1, 2014 by SimpleJack_420

[CaptainMental]

 

 

 

Tanks are already nerfed and not much of a problem. Lazers has been somewhat nerfed with the latest patch since the pilot cannot see the bullets anymore (totally unneccessary imo)

 

People who bitch and moan about tanks and lazers needs to learn how to take cover and defend themselves or learn how to use the passive mode function.

 

Only thing we could use is that the Buzzard would autolock on tanks and bountys.

 

The bomber idea seems interesting enough.

 

Btw, there is actually a heat seeking RPG in the game already. Its being carried by a soldier in Zancudo which he uses to fire rpgs after players who tries to steal lazers. Just for Rockstar to make it available to us.

NO AUTO LOCK is not needed. You can (with quite a bit of practice) kill a player on ground or in a vehicle with my beloved whirlybird. They shouldn't make it easy to use. If you want to be effective in one, just practice. Otherwise it'll be just like the jet where common sense and very little flying time will make you an Ace to the ppl on the ground.

 

I would say the Buzzard requires less skill than the Lazer. Regardless of that, I still think the Buzzard and Lazer should have autolock on bountys, targets and tanks. It simply makes sense because thats how its meant to work and thats would make bountys and tanks being much more of a target - which they are supposed to be. Does it make sense that cops and aircrafts are the only things the autolock works on?

You on PSN? I'll change your mind on the Buzzards right now. I'll make you wish it had NO missiles at all, let alone lock on. In my hands (or any experienced pilots) that thing would be super OP and easy to use for anyone (like yourself, seeing as you need lock on to kill someone) Why do you need AA if you just said they're easier to fly than the jet? That doesn't even make sense, considering how easy it is to kill and avoid being killed in your jet... PLEASE give me your PSN.

 

Don't be so hostile. I'll be glad to see your skills on the Buzzard, maybe I can learn something. My PSN is the same as my nick here.

[Maxxi]

 

NO, YOU PUSSY NOOB. I'VE SHOT DOWN A LOT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS WITH RPG. I'VE SCOPED A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS. I DON'T NEED THAT sh*t. I'M ONE DEADLY BEAST. I'M THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME. I PWN EVERYONE

Cool.Story.

[Davey Boy]

 

 

NO, YOU PUSSY NOOB. I'VE SHOT DOWN A LOT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS WITH RPG. I'VE SCOPED A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS. I DON'T NEED THAT sh*t. I'M ONE DEADLY BEAST. I'M THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME. I PWN EVERYONE

Cool.

Story.

 

Bro.

[ten-a-penny]

 

 

 

NO, YOU PUSSY NOOB. I'VE SHOT DOWN A LOT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS WITH RPG. I'VE SCOPED A LOT OF PEOPLE OUT OF JETS AND BUZZARDS. I DON'T NEED THAT sh*t. I'M ONE DEADLY BEAST. I'M THE GREATEST OF ALL TIME. I PWN EVERYONE

Cool.

Story.

Bro.

Aah, was too late.

[OwensRacing]

Only thing I'd suggest about a ground to air missile is that it can't lock on to an aircraft with no weapons.

 

Basically say a Velum flying over. Isn't a threat and shouldn't be locked on.

 

They could easily make the current RPG have a heat seeking option that will lock on to the three armed aircrafts.