Should invincibility from cars be added in passive mode?

[zQUEENz]

Do you think invincibility from player's cars should be added in Paasive mode, similar to non contact races?

 

Because I find it cheap that players can still kill in passive mode with their cars. -,-

Edited July 19, 2014 by zQUEENz

[Shaundi.]

Yes.

[BatFerYou]

Yup. Big discussio aboot this in the "R* logic" thread.

[dudclub55]

Vehicular manslaughter.

So no.

[BeatEmmmUpppp]

Yes. Especially to prevent from tank griefing.

[The_B1u3_Jay]

No. Just make it were if you shoot or kill someone in passive mode, it automatically disables itself with a ten second timer before you're able to use weapons again.

Edited July 19, 2014 by Awesom-0

[Daniel_B]

Vehicular manslaughter.

So no.

I think you missed the part where OP suggested it'd be like non-contact races. In other words, a player in passive tries to run you down (or vice versa) they'd just ghost right thru you.

 

So, yes.

[Maxxeine]

Yes.

 

TL;DR: Yes

[AlienOne]

no.

I love killing people in passive mode trying to drive away from me

[CatchMeTrolling]

Exploit waiting to happen

[MetalThrasherXtreme]

Yes, in addition to making it so your car becomes invincible to other players AND to prevent PM griefers using their cars as weapons, make the cars pass through other players like in non-contact races. It's stupid you can't drive around while in PM.

The way it is, passive mode is essentially broken.

Edited July 19, 2014 by MetalThrasherXtreme

[Daniel_B]

Exploit waiting to happen

Such as?

 

A no vote on this is just shorthand for "I'm a sh*tty player who gets a lot of my kills on defenseless players who are just trying to mind their own business. Don't you dare take that away from me!"

[Shootinalloveryourface]

Passive mode is just an additional griefer tactic.

 

"Hey I'm in passive it's cool I ain't gonna do anything but oh look I can still blow you up and shoot you"

[CatchMeTrolling]

 

Exploit waiting to happen

Such as?

 

A no vote on this is just shorthand for "I'm a sh*tty player who gets a lot of my kills on defenseless players who are just trying to mind their own business. Don't you dare take that away from me!"

 

Hell are you talking about dude...

[Zwenkwiel]

no, they should f*ck off with this silly passive sh*t all together and just make friendly fire an option

if it ain't broke don't fix it!

[Daniel_B]

 

 

Exploit waiting to happen

Such as?

 

A no vote on this is just shorthand for "I'm a sh*tty player who gets a lot of my kills on defenseless players who are just trying to mind their own business. Don't you dare take that away from me!"

 

Hell are you talking about dude...

 

The second part is pretty self-explanatory, I think. The first part was, too, tbh, but I'll ask again: give us an example of how it could be exploited.

[CatchMeTrolling]

 

 

 

Exploit waiting to happen

Such as?

 

A no vote on this is just shorthand for "I'm a sh*tty player who gets a lot of my kills on defenseless players who are just trying to mind their own business. Don't you dare take that away from me!"

 

Hell are you talking about dude...

 

The second part is pretty self-explanatory, I think. The first part was, too, tbh, but I'll ask again: give us an example of how it could be exploited.

 

You never seen the rest of the exploits involving being invincible ill take it.

[Mr. Crowley]

Yes.

NPCs should be able to run you down, but players shouldn't.

[Daniel_B]

 

 

 

 

Exploit waiting to happen

Such as?

 

A no vote on this is just shorthand for "I'm a sh*tty player who gets a lot of my kills on defenseless players who are just trying to mind their own business. Don't you dare take that away from me!"

 

Hell are you talking about dude...

 

The second part is pretty self-explanatory, I think. The first part was, too, tbh, but I'll ask again: give us an example of how it could be exploited.

 

You never seen the rest of the exploits involving being invincible ill take it.

 

No, I just started playing GTAO 2 days ago. ( <- sarcasm)

 

Yes, of course I have. But A) I'm not a glitcher and have no idea if passive mode is somehow involved in any of the godmode glitches. B) R* has done a pretty good job at patching those out, and I think they'll probably continue to do so (and glitchers will keep finding new methods). And C) I've only ever run into a very few of those losers in all the time I've been playing, so they don't affect a huge portion of the rest of the players; I think passive mode working in vehicles will help a lot more people than the few who get hurt by people exploiting it...

[_Rei]

no, they should f*ck off with this silly passive sh*t all together and just make friendly fire an option

if it ain't broke don't fix it!

Wtf dude, passive is broken.

[CatchMeTrolling]

 

 

 

 

 

Exploit waiting to happen

Such as?

 

A no vote on this is just shorthand for "I'm a sh*tty player who gets a lot of my kills on defenseless players who are just trying to mind their own business. Don't you dare take that away from me!"

 

Hell are you talking about dude...

 

The second part is pretty self-explanatory, I think. The first part was, too, tbh, but I'll ask again: give us an example of how it could be exploited.

 

You never seen the rest of the exploits involving being invincible ill take it.

 

No, I just started playing GTAO 2 days ago. ( <- sarcasm)

 

Yes, of course I have. But A) I'm not a glitcher and have no idea if passive mode is somehow involved in any of the godmode glitches. B) R* has done a pretty good job at patching those out, and I think they'll probably continue to do so (and glitchers will keep finding new methods). And C) I've only ever run into a very few of those losers in all the time I've been playing, so they don't affect a huge portion of the rest of the players; I think passive mode working in vehicles will help a lot more people than the few who get hurt by people exploiting it...

 

First off lighten up youre overthinking my comment, all i said was its an exploit waiting to happen, i never said yes or no...

[Dottie]

Passive players should:

Not take any player damage whatsoever- includes vehicular kills- players can be hit by player vehicles but not die from it.

Not take player damage whilst in a vehicle but that cannot use weapons while driving. If the vehicle is destroyed by a player, the passive mode player can just simply get out like in friendly GTA IV

Entering a tank, attack choppers, jets, immediately disables passive mode

The countdown from passive mode to regular mode should be removed since you're vulnerable to player attack during this time

Edited July 19, 2014 by Winning001

[am30]

Passive mode should actually be ghost mode. And your blip shouldn't change until you are able to draw a weapon, not after a 10 second wait. In fact there shouldn't be a 10 second wait.

[fw3]

I think they should get rid of Passive Mode, altogether. I mean Passive Mode... in GTA?

Next, kittens and mice will be playing together!

[Doland J. Trump]

The whole idea of Passive Mode is so you don't die...I don't see why this shouldn't be added.

[BoJack Cognac]

If you voted "Yes", you obviously don't know how to use Passive Mode effectively.

I already grief the hell out of players by killing them and then going Passive Mode, running away, then coming back and repeating the process over and over for entire sessions.

Do you really want to give me the ability to suicide-bomb you and then stand in the middle of the street giving you the finger while you can't do ANYTHING to get me back?

Passive Mode is perfect the way it is. Don't give assholes like me even more ways to be a pussy.

[Misanthrope Z]

The whole idea of Passive Mode is so you don't die...I don't see why this shouldn't be added.

because some micropenised PvPers want the satisfaction that they "totally pwned" a defenseless player by running them over with a piece'a sh*t adder or a tank.

 

passive mode should make you completely ghost, not turn you into a bullseye for vehicular manslaughter

[BoJack Cognac]

The whole idea of Passive Mode is so you don't die...I don't see why this shouldn't be added.

"Passive" means to take abuse but not to dish it out.

Passive Mode is exactly that.

 

The whole idea of Passive Mode is so you don't die...I don't see why this shouldn't be added.

"Passive" means to take abuse but not to dish it out.

Passive Mode is exactly that.

And to the people complaining that they can still be run over by cars and tanks, have you ever heard of the "Kill Yourself" option?

Try selecting it some time in Passive Mode a mere second before a vehicle touches your body. It will be a suicide on impact, not a kill for the other player.

[Misanthrope Z]

If you voted "Yes", you obviously don't know how to use Passive Mode effectively.

I already grief the hell out of players by killing them and then going Passive Mode, running away, then coming back and repeating the process over and over for entire sessions.

Do you really want to give me the ability to suicide-bomb you and then stand in the middle of the street giving you the finger while you can't do ANYTHING to get me back?

Passive Mode is perfect the way it is. Don't give assholes like me even more ways to be a pussy.

then again, there is that

 

why did R* get rid of friendly lobbies and replace them with some half-assed feature that basically turns you into a punching bag?

 

i swear, that is a huge step back.

[BoJack Cognac]

Edit - Double Post

Edited July 19, 2014 by BoJack Cognac