Hazencoke Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 If so it's confirmed next gen version will be 60 fps? Hopefully battlefield 4 made a big difference with the ps3 counterpart with 60 fps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oCrapaCreeper Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 Pretty sure it hangs at 30 FPS and lower depending on what's going on. I doubt even next gen consoles will run it at 60 with how much Rockstar is likely going to push them. PC will most likely be the platform to get to 60, depending on hardware and settings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BLOOD Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 (edited) 26-29.9 fps both PS3 and XB360...I am sure NG (PS4/XB1) would be a stable 30fps and 1080p lol what Openworld Game on Next-Gen runs at 60fps? it just no possible,but PCs could (even though my PC aint that powerful)...although seeing the game was played and captured on PS4 it looks 100x Stunning and i expect same with XB1 and PC. Edited June 23, 2014 by Blood-Is-in-Diamond Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzknuckles Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 Frame rate discussions NEED. TO. STOP. Who really cares? Like REALLY cares? Does the game run well? Is it perceptibly bad? Does it run well enough that you'll never really notice whether it's 30, 60, 400 frames per second? Who actually really gives a sh*t? Is this just one of those 'I've heard the phrase, I'm going to use it' type phenomena? Or is this actually a genuine concern for people? If the latter, I despair. Flachbau, Mr. Tibbs, Kampret and 2 others 5 Signatures are dumb anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Drill Sergeant Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 400 frames per second would be useful for slow motion. But I don't care about fps as long as it doesn't look jittery. Kampret 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AhmadJ Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 (edited) rockstar announced it will be around 90-120fps Edited June 23, 2014 by AhmadJ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
oCrapaCreeper Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 rockstar announced it will be around 90-120fps Direct link to source please. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AhmadJ Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 rockstar announced it will be around 90-120fps Direct link to source please. find it yourself huehue Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
..GhosT Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 Frame rate discussions NEED. TO. STOP. Who really cares? Like REALLY cares? Does the game run well? Is it perceptibly bad? Does it run well enough that you'll never really notice whether it's 30, 60, 400 frames per second? Who actually really gives a sh*t? Is this just one of those 'I've heard the phrase, I'm going to use it' type phenomena? Or is this actually a genuine concern for people? If the latter, I despair. Bullsh*t. With the right screen you can easily tell the difference between 30 60 and 400. The game overall is smoother, controls are better and it looks way better. Most people (except console kids) especially PC people do really care about FPS. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
eclaireN7 Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 I'd rather a stable 30fps than a choppy 50-60fps. Kampret and Fuzzknuckles 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johan Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 rockstar announced it will be around 90-120fps Direct link to source please. Don't believe that crap. And GTA V runs at around 28 fps or so, not that there's a problem with it.. since I barely notice it at all, it's just right most of the time to the point where I don't notice how "low" it really is compared to PC games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzknuckles Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 (edited) Frame rate discussions NEED. TO. STOP. Who really cares? Like REALLY cares? Does the game run well? Is it perceptibly bad? Does it run well enough that you'll never really notice whether it's 30, 60, 400 frames per second? Who actually really gives a sh*t? Is this just one of those 'I've heard the phrase, I'm going to use it' type phenomena? Or is this actually a genuine concern for people? If the latter, I despair. Bullsh*t. With the right screen you can easily tell the difference between 30 60 and 400. The game overall is smoother, controls are better and it looks way better. Most people (except console kids) especially PC people do really care about FPS. PC gamers need to assess their priorities. Most people (except console kids) especially PC people do really care about FPS. Most people, especially PC people? You've excluded 'console kids' there, so that only leaves PC people. Why the need to say console 'kids'? I have pretty much all the consoles, barring the bone and wii U, and I'm 37. I also have a gaming PC, but I prefer my consoles. Why are PC gamers such defensive pricks? Edited June 23, 2014 by Fuzzknuckles ForJagler 1 Signatures are dumb anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ForJagler Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 (edited) Frame rate discussions NEED. TO. STOP. Who really cares? Like REALLY cares? Does the game run well? Is it perceptibly bad? Does it run well enough that you'll never really notice whether it's 30, 60, 400 frames per second? Who actually really gives a sh*t? Is this just one of those 'I've heard the phrase, I'm going to use it' type phenomena? Or is this actually a genuine concern for people? If the latter, I despair. Bullsh*t. With the right screen you can easily tell the difference between 30 60 and 400. The game overall is smoother, controls are better and it looks way better. Most people (except console kids) especially PC people do really care about FPS. PC gamers need to assess their priorities. Most people (except console kids) especially PC people do really care about FPS. Most people, especially PC people? You've excluded 'console kids' there, so that only leaves PC people. Why the need to say console 'kids'? I have pretty much all the consoles, barring the bone and wii U, and I'm 37. I also have a gaming PC, but I prefer my consoles. Why are PC gamers such defensive pricks? This ^^^ Seriously I'm a pc gamer but I don't go around and shove it "lulz master race 5000fps 4k uhd lulz" on forums. One day.... all players will just zip it and play it... and am still waiting for that day. Edited June 23, 2014 by ForJagler Fuzzknuckles 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Osho Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 I don't think they're going to achieve 60 fps locked and complete in all the details bumped for the PS4/X1 hardware to handle and expect that it runs buttery smooth. Nah... no ways that's gonna happen. I can only expect to run at 60fps on PC and even that requires a good powerful config. to play on such an impressive scale of the game world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twilight Sky Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 FPS is only a big deal when it gets so low that it becomes annoying noticable to the eyes. In this case < 30 FPS. IIRC anything > 60 and the eyes wouldn't be able to tell the difference. Also take in account the power of your monitor too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BubbaGoom Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 FPS is only a big deal when it gets so low that it becomes annoying noticable to the eyes. In this case < 30 FPS. IIRC anything > 60 and the eyes wouldn't be able to tell the difference. Also take in account the power of your monitor too. Trust me, if you play on 120 fps, even 5 seconds of 60 fps will feel disgusting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzknuckles Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 (edited) Seriously I'm a pc gamer but I don't go around and shove it "lulz master race 5000fps 4k uhd lulz" on forums. One day.... all players will just zip it and play it... and am still waiting for that day. You? You're OK. Most people (except console kids) especially PC people do really care about FPS. This one? Reaaaal f*cking ugly. PC Gamers, you are the aliens from They Live - elitist, snobbish bores that need to get over themselves, or get the f*ck off my planet. Edited June 23, 2014 by Fuzzknuckles Signatures are dumb anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kampret Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 FPS is only a big deal when it gets so low that it becomes annoying noticable to the eyes. In this case < 30 FPS. IIRC anything > 60 and the eyes wouldn't be able to tell the difference. Also take in account the power of your monitor too. Trust me, if you play on 120 fps, even 5 seconds of 60 fps will feel disgusting. Not if the monitor is only 60Hz. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andreas Posted June 23, 2014 Share Posted June 23, 2014 We do know for a fact that they are aiming for 1080p on both consoles. I think that the game will run with stable 30 frames per second, which would be an improvement over the PS360 versions. Anyway, if this hasn't run its course, then I really don't know anymore. This has been discussed countless times in various threads of the forum, no need for yet another topic on the subject. GTAForums Crew Chat Thread - The Sharks Chat Thread - Leone Family Mafia Chat Thread Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts