Does it look better than Watch_Dogs?

[Cebra]

 

 

So... I kind of found this video.

 

 

Not trying to join in or anything. Just found it hilarious.

 

 

face it there is nothing wrong with watch dogs and the only way to call it crap is by saying it doesnt have the gta features.

 

Are you seriously that f*cking blind? Sounds like you're just a W_D fanboy, or a troll.

 

Actually watch the whole video.

Someone who goes out of their way just to find glitches in a game they don't like has to be insecure. By the way, this was all patched on the week of release.

[Red Hat]

I sometimes agree and disagree ( ) when people say that W_D looks better than GTAV. I mean, just look at Watch_Dogs' graphics with that E3 Mod. It look's good, but since it's a mod, I can't say that W_D's graphics are better than that of GTAV, but I can't comment about GTAV either since the next gen version of the game hasn't released yet. I guess GTAV next gen might look better than W_D(next gen version).

[Krysalis]

sorry im neither. and the whole video is nitpicking all of the tiny little "issues" with the game. did you seem to forget that gta 5 was the most overhyped game. its full of glitches and more so than this biased video. its obvious that some guys who got wd play gta and since they dont get exactly what they get in gta, they get mad. now for graphics look at my older posts and you will find your answer. gta 5 has bad textures.

Tiny little issues with the game? Ubisoft said Watch Dogs will be real next gen game, and this video shows that definition of Watch Dog's next gen is a complete lie. Seriously look at physics for example, does it look like a next gen to you at all? Ofcourse GTA V has bad textures, PS3 and X360 had 512MB RAM, take a look at Watch Dog's PS3 and Xbox360's textures, they look nothing like on PC and CG consoles. Its your problem for not accepting big flaw's that ''next gen'' title has, and Watch Dogs is the most overhyper dissapointment ever, like it or not.

Edited July 13, 2014 by Andreas
Removed quote-train.

[Detective Phelps]

Well, a current gen title will only be a current gen experience on current gen consoles, not last gen.

[Krysalis]

 

Those graphics look nothing like the graphics we recieved for PS4 and they don't look better than GTA IV modded:

 

 

That's the actual graphics for PS4.

Fact GTA V has better graphics, animations, and textures. The weather effects goes to watch Dogs.

those are actually the graphics of the ps4 version. its called rain and it makes the game look totally different.

 

better animations? gta 5 doesnt have moving clothes like watch dogs.

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M3r69w856x

 

better textures?

 

http://cdn4.dualshockers.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/Watch_DogsPC-5.jpg?57efa4

http://i.imgur.com/6el66QZ.jpg

 

and better graphics?

 

http://cdn.segmentnext.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/Watch-Dogs-TheWorseMod-1024x576.jpg

http://i.imgur.com/RWhdIp9.jpg

 

as of right now watch dogs is photo realistic and gta 5 is somewhat realistic.

 

and thanks for saying that you just hate it because it was overhyped. now i know that you are using your hate for it to give the illusion that it looks bad.

 

You are comparing PC/PS4 footage to GTA V's PS3/Xbox 360's footage, you idiot. And btw, that picture with awesome textures is taken on PC with graphics mod, i know that mod that gets at least half of graphical details from E3 2012 demo. Not a fair comparation. And as for moving clothes, i've seen that with coats only, i might be wrong though, but thats not important, IGN made a video about GTA V impressions, and Mike's sandal's were moving realisticaly, there's more physical impressions in GTA V too, you need to pay more attention or watch more videos about GTA V's details and impressions.

 

 

they are still better than the npcs in gta 5. i dont mean the driving ai that is. i mean the walking ai. in gta most ai movements are standing around. but in watch dogs it can go from making out to freestyle rap battling. besides most people in real life dont attack you for no reason. that makes wd more realistic.

 

and as for next gen gta 5 we will just have to wait and see. right now im not seeing any significant differences apart from more cars, foilage, and car interiors.

 

the wd ai also does more things than the gta 5 ai.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f7cBXCCKe_E

 

it feels like i know all the actions of the ai in gta 5 while watch dogs feels like they can do anything. they dont feel much more advanced than the gta 4 ai.

 

and so far no game has perfect npcs. in gta they react to you, but have sort of robotic type movements. in watch dogs they dont really react to you but they still have an unpredictability about them that gta doesnt. if gta wouldnt use the same animations for all the ai they may be better, but so far they all just seem the same.

Thats a small impression of the game, but it does no changes to actual gameplay and graphics whats so ever. In GTA V you can see guys working out on the beach, people camping, playing golf, taking selfies, etc. etc.. so what?? Now on CG we'll see far more detailed and better AI. Edited July 13, 2014 by Andreas
Removed IMG tags and quote-train.

[DopeFresh]

people seem to think that gta 5 looks better which it doesnt. and the graphics mod doesnt change anything apart from adding bloom and changed lighting. the ai change the whole gameplay by a ton. you have to act like them to play the multiplayer hacking, and it makes the game look much more realistic. id rather feel like im in a living breathing world instead of a robot world like gta. feels unrealistic which makes it look worse. the ai are the same as they were 5 years ago. and it doesnt matter what you see them doing. the animations are just so unrealistic and robot like that it takes away from immersion.

Edited July 13, 2014 by Andreas
Removed quote-train.

[Delta India Echo]

and the graphics mod doesnt change anything apart from adding bloom and changed lighting.

Then why the f*ck did you use it in the first place.

[DopeFresh]

 

and the graphics mod doesnt change anything apart from adding bloom and changed lighting.

Then why the f*ck did you use it in the first place.

 

cuz its the only picture i found that shown how good the textures are.

[Krysalis]

people seem to think that gta 5 looks better which it doesnt. and the graphics mod doesnt change anything apart from adding bloom and changed lighting. the ai change the whole gameplay by a ton. you have to act like them to play the multiplayer hacking, and it makes the game look much more realistic. id rather feel like im in a living breathing world instead of a robot world like gta. feels unrealistic which makes it look worse. the ai are the same as they were 5 years ago. and it doesnt matter what you see them doing. the animations are just so unrealistic and robot like that it takes away from immersion.

Im'a say this once again, you were comparing PC/PS4/Xbox One Watch Dog's footage to GTA V on PS3 and X360 which is not fair at all. I wont repeat my self again, but if you repeat your self again with ignoring what i said you are troll then, or probably another Watch Dogs fanboy exposed. That graphics mod made lighting, visuals, bloom indeed and textures look nice. I know about that mod, its called something like Wors3 Mod for W.D. Your claim about unrealistic and robotic animations in GTA V is invalid. I dont see anything realistic in Watch Dogs, you might think AI is realistic because of some stupid rap and couple kissing, yeah right. I already listed you activites that pedestrians do in GTA V on LG, and you ignored it. You also said how there was less foliage on GTA V's trailer scene, you took scene from rail way, instead of showing something like this: http://www.igta5.com/images/trailer-5-cougar-moves-in.jpg http://www.igta5.com/images/trailer-5-trevor-waking-up.jpg and then this http://www.igta5.com/images/trailer-5-the-day-is-shot.jpg

 

In these pics vegetation is more detailed than in Watch Dogs, in Watch Dogs its all just copy and paste stupid low quality coloured grass, as i said Project Oblivion Mod for GTA SA was better than that.

 

So you are eighter troll, ignorant, or Watch Dogs fanboy.

Edited July 13, 2014 by Krysalis

[DopeFresh]

 

people seem to think that gta 5 looks better which it doesnt. and the graphics mod doesnt change anything apart from adding bloom and changed lighting. the ai change the whole gameplay by a ton. you have to act like them to play the multiplayer hacking, and it makes the game look much more realistic. id rather feel like im in a living breathing world instead of a robot world like gta. feels unrealistic which makes it look worse. the ai are the same as they were 5 years ago. and it doesnt matter what you see them doing. the animations are just so unrealistic and robot like that it takes away from immersion.

Im'a say this once again, you were comparing PC/PS4/Xbox One Watch Dog's footage to GTA V on PS3 and X360 which is not fair at all. I wont repeat my self again, but if you repeat your self again with ignoring what i said you are troll then, or probably another Watch Dogs fanboy exposed. That graphics mod made lighting, visuals, bloom indeed and textures look nice. I know about that mod, its called something like Wors3 Mod for W.D. Your claim about unrealistic and robotic animations in GTA V is invalid. I dont see anything realistic in Watch Dogs, you might think AI is realistic because of some stupid rap and couple kissing, yeah right. I already listed you activites that pedestrians do in GTA V on LG, and you ignored it. You also said how there was less foliage on GTA V's trailer scene, you took scene from rail way, instead of showing something like this: http://www.igta5.com/images/trailer-5-cougar-moves-in.jpg http://www.igta5.com/images/trailer-5-trevor-waking-up.jpg and then this http://www.igta5.com/images/trailer-5-the-day-is-shot.jpg

 

In these pics vegetation is more detailed than in Watch Dogs, in Watch Dogs its all just copy and paste stupid low quality coloured grass, as i said Project Oblivion Mod for GTA SA was better than that.

 

So you are eighter troll, ignorant, or Watch Dogs fanboy.

 

everyone else is comparing it to next gen wd. and my claim for those unrealistic animations is very valid. every npc has the exact same animation for every action. not like watch dogs where they have multiple animations.

 

and they both have foliage but you cant tell me that an unreleased game will have more than a released game. because so far we only saw one trailer and that was it. a lot can change in a few months. why are you so dense that you cant realize that watch dogs looks better at the moment?

 

you are either a troll, ignorant, or a gta fanboy.

 

not to mention look at those textures.

 

Edited July 13, 2014 by DopeFresh

[fefenc]

Watch_Downgrs should be compared to GTA IV, not GTA V.

 

bye hugz :>

[Krysalis]

So what if we have only one trailer? Rockstar might show us some more who knows. Why would Rockstar change anything for more powerful systems? Yeah they did change many things from first official trailer and other trailers after they did it in order for LG to run game decently at 30fps and 720p scale. Textures look decent on GTA V's CG picture, so you are eighter blind or mentaly challenged. And no your claim about unrealistic and robotic animations was not valid. Ofc, Watch Dogs has only edge so far because its on both LG and CG which gives one advantage and that is textures and ammount of vegetation which still looks crap. Textures are horrible on Watch Dog's LG. You are Watch Dogs fanboy, damn admit it, so GTFO from GTA Forums.

Edited July 13, 2014 by Barefoot Tiger

[DopeFresh]

 

 

 

its no secret that watch dogs has the most detailed npcs out of all open world games. and fyi how can i be a fanboy when im using obvious logic to show that watch dogs looks much better? textures are better, rain is better, cars are more detailed, lighting is better. its all just overall better than gta 5. seriously you guys are overhyping gta 5 again for next gen. i dont expect it to look much better on next gen apart from the foliage increase. textures look a bit better but not much. you cant tell me that im a fanboy when you will do anything to say that gta 5 looks better than watch dogs. gta 5 looks great on last gen, but so does watch dogs.

 

can you imagine how good gta 5 would look if the map wasnt so big? it would look amazing! but given the big map, the textures for the countryside had to be worse to keep the city looking nice. now if it is a port (which i believe it is) i doubt we will see any significant difference in textures.

Edited July 13, 2014 by Barefoot Tiger

[_Kindled_]

It's not about the textures, it's about the content. And please stop comparing a recent console to a nine year old one. Use justifiable evidence.

 

 

And for saying, that foliage will be the only thing improved, we've only seen a minute long trailer, along with some wordings.

 

And:

 

 

Grand Theft Auto V will take full advantage of the power of the PlayStation 4, Xbox One and PC with across-the-board graphical and technical improvements to deliver a stunning new level of detail. Increased draw distances, finer texture details, denser traffic, and enhanced resolutions all work together to bring new life to the cities, towns, deserts and oceans of Rockstar North’s epic re-imagining of Southern California.

 

Read.

Edited July 13, 2014 by Barefoot Tiger

[IDAS Leader]

You still have to admit GTA V has better graphics. Everyone's saying it. Everyone can't be lying. I have Watch Dogs for the Xbox One, and GTA V out shines it in graphics.

oks bad.

Edited July 13, 2014 by Barefoot Tiger

[DopeFresh]

are you blind? how can you not see the attention to detail that watch dogs has? there is no way that gta 5 has better graphics. at least not now. next gen? maybe, but dont get your hopes up.

Edited July 13, 2014 by Barefoot Tiger

[..GhosT]

You still have to admit GTA V has better graphics. Everyone's saying it. Everyone can't be lying. I have Watch Dogs for the Xbox One, and GTA V out shines it in graphics.

 

Oh my f*cking god, really?

Everyones saying it because most people here are GTA fanboys, just look at his post, he has shown perfect examples.

 

GTA V Next Gen -> Watch Dogs -> GTA V Cur. Gen

[DopeFresh]

 

You still have to admit GTA V has better graphics. Everyone's saying it. Everyone can't be lying. I have Watch Dogs for the Xbox One, and GTA V out shines it in graphics.

 

Oh my f*cking god, really?

Everyones saying it because most people here are GTA fanboys, just look at his post, he has shown perfect examples.

 

GTA V Next Gen -> Watch Dogs -> GTA V Cur. Gen

 

gta 5 next gen maybe > watch dogs. not enough information to make a clear statement.

[IDAS Leader]

are you blind? how can you not see the attention to detail that watch dogs has? there is no way that gta 5 has better graphics. at least not now. next gen? maybe, but dont get your hopes up.

 

 

Yes it does. That's a fact. Just because it's on next gen doesn't mean it has better graphics. There are plenty of games on current gen that outshine WD in graphics.

 

GTA V

BF4 (Current gen)

Halo 4

TLOU

RE6

AC4 (Current Gen)

Uncharted 3

 

Like I said before everyone's saying it. Everyone can't be lying.

Edited July 14, 2014 by Barefoot Tiger

[DopeFresh]

wd looks better than gta 5 accept it.

Edited July 14, 2014 by DopeFresh

[IDAS Leader]

 

You still have to admit GTA V has better graphics. Everyone's saying it. Everyone can't be lying. I have Watch Dogs for the Xbox One, and GTA V out shines it in graphics.

 

Oh my f*cking god, really?

Everyones saying it because most people here are GTA fanboys, just look at his post, he has shown perfect examples.

 

GTA V Next Gen -> Watch Dogs -> GTA V Cur. Gen

 

How about you go online and see for yourself? Websites that aren't GTA websites agree. I even have posted with a bunch of links on page 4 to prove it.

 

PS I'm fanboy because I don't defend crappy games with waterdown graphics? You're a fanboy.

Edited July 14, 2014 by rahjee

[Krysalis]

 

You still have to admit GTA V has better graphics. Everyone's saying it. Everyone can't be lying. I have Watch Dogs for the Xbox One, and GTA V out shines it in graphics.

 

Oh my f*cking god, really?

Everyones saying it because most people here are GTA fanboys, just look at his post, he has shown perfect examples.

 

GTA V Next Gen -> Watch Dogs -> GTA V Cur. Gen

 

What perfect examples? Him comparing PC/CG Watch Dog's footage to GTA V's LG? You are retarded just like him. Fact is, GTA V looks way better during the day even on LG, regardless of crappier textures, these same crappy textures exist on Watch Dog's LG version, go and check comparations for your self on YouTube you ignorant moron. I dont see any attention to detail much in Watch Dogs, all i see is different coloured vagatation which looks like crap too, roads look better on GTA V too btw. This is GTA Forums so what do you expect? We are not only expressing opinions but also facts. I gotta love fake reflections in Watch Dogs,

 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lF64i_WZJ1M

 

 

 

 

I dont see whats the point of cockpit view in Watch Dogs, speedometer doesnt move and Aiden is controling steering wheel with one arm only whole the time which is impossible in real life.

Edited July 14, 2014 by Krysalis

[BLOOD]

Saints Row 2>>>>>>>>>>Watch_Dogs

 

 

 

 

 

Note:Anyways Congrats to the Germans' World Cup Victory

Edited July 14, 2014 by Blood-Is-in-Diamond

[Krysalis]

 

its no secret that watch dogs has the most detailed npcs out of all open world games. and fyi how can i be a fanboy when im using obvious logic to show that watch dogs looks much better? textures are better, rain is better, cars are more detailed, lighting is better. its all just overall better than gta 5. seriously you guys are overhyping gta 5 again for next gen. i dont expect it to look much better on next gen apart from the foliage increase. textures look a bit better but not much. you cant tell me that im a fanboy when you will do anything to say that gta 5 looks better than watch dogs. gta 5 looks great on last gen, but so does watch dogs.

 

can you imagine how good gta 5 would look if the map wasnt so big? it would look amazing! but given the big map, the textures for the countryside had to be worse to keep the city looking nice. now if it is a port (which i believe it is) i doubt we will see any significant difference in textures.

Watch Dogs the most detailed NPC's out of all open world games? Are you seriously that stupid? Check this clip please:

 

Now tell me how much detailed are NPC's in Watch Dogs than any other open world game. Like that other guy said, NPC's in W.D dont respond to sirens from eighter police or ambulance, NPC's dont help each other after chaos happens in final product, and this video here shows some bullsh*t AI in the game too:

you cant debunk this video btw, because everything that is shown here is true.

 

Graphicaly, Watch Dogs has only two advantages better textures and more vegetation, thats just it, as for lighting, we have seen those in many games over 5 years ago, its too strong in Watch Dogs btw, its more like a ''make up'' for actual graphics. Cars look nice on both games, no need to compare them, rain is awesome in both games so therefore not comparable. During the night, both games look great nothing to compare there neighter, ofc im talking about GTA V's LG vs Watch Dogs CG, because only things improved on W.D's CG is textures. Btw look at this video:

 

In this video CG shows not only better graphics but vector images too, on LG it shows bitmap images and lower graphical quality, less lighting and crappier textures.

 

Btw, its normal for GTA V to have crap textures on LG, GTA V pushed alot for LG, 250 cars comparable to sh*tty Watch Dog's 60 vehicles, having flyable aircrafts where W.D has none, buyable properties where W.D has none, customatizations where W.D has none only ability to change colours of outfits and thats it, explorable ocean where W.D has none, animals where W.D has none, should i go on?? I reminded my self again of something funny in Watch Dogs, that is when you flip over with the car your character just pops out of it, so much for ''next gen'' title isnt it?? Go and get your brain check kid.

 

Now as for AI and detail in GTA V, this video made by IGN shows way more impressions in the game of that matter:

 

 

Edited July 14, 2014 by Krysalis

[BLOOD]

^True Words have never been said

 

 

 

 

V have Animals (Wild and Domestic),NPCs in Shooting Ranges,NPCs taking their baths in the Beachside,NPCs with their dogs in the parks,The Most Aggressive Wanted System in an OWG Ever,Gangs Shoot-out,Drive-by Shooting,Rain Puddles,Amazing Sun Flares,and that just the last-gen version even with it 512mb Outdated Hardware and it issues like Aliasing and GTAO-Bugs Syndrome (Lol).Watch_Dogs is not even close to 2008's Saints Row 2 talk less of saying the 5th Main Game in a Legendary Franchise.

Edited July 14, 2014 by Blood-Is-in-Diamond

[DopeFresh]

 

 

its no secret that watch dogs has the most detailed npcs out of all open world games. and fyi how can i be a fanboy when im using obvious logic to show that watch dogs looks much better? textures are better, rain is better, cars are more detailed, lighting is better. its all just overall better than gta 5. seriously you guys are overhyping gta 5 again for next gen. i dont expect it to look much better on next gen apart from the foliage increase. textures look a bit better but not much. you cant tell me that im a fanboy when you will do anything to say that gta 5 looks better than watch dogs. gta 5 looks great on last gen, but so does watch dogs.

 

can you imagine how good gta 5 would look if the map wasnt so big? it would look amazing! but given the big map, the textures for the countryside had to be worse to keep the city looking nice. now if it is a port (which i believe it is) i doubt we will see any significant difference in textures.

Watch Dogs the most detailed NPC's out of all open world games? Are you seriously that stupid? Check this clip please:

 

Now tell me how much detailed are NPC's in Watch Dogs than any other open world game. Like that other guy said, NPC's in W.D dont respond to sirens from eighter police or ambulance, NPC's dont help each other after chaos happens in final product, and this video here shows some bullsh*t AI in the game too:

you cant debunk this video btw, because everything that is shown here is true.

 

Graphicaly, Watch Dogs has only two advantages better textures and more vegetation, thats just it, as for lighting, we have seen those in many games over 5 years ago, its too strong in Watch Dogs btw, its more like a ''make up'' for actual graphics. Cars look nice on both games, no need to compare them, rain is awesome in both games so therefore not comparable. During the night, both games look great nothing to compare there neighter, ofc im talking about GTA V's LG vs Watch Dogs CG, because only things improved on W.D's CG is textures. Btw look at this video:

 

In this video CG shows not only better graphics but vector images too, on LG it shows bitmap images and lower graphical quality, less lighting and crappier textures.

 

Btw, its normal for GTA V to have crap textures on LG, GTA V pushed alot for LG, 250 cars comparable to sh*tty Watch Dog's 60 vehicles, having flyable aircrafts where W.D has none, buyable properties where W.D has none, customatizations where W.D has none only ability to change colours of outfits and thats it, explorable ocean where W.D has none, animals where W.D has none, should i go on?? I reminded my self again of something funny in Watch Dogs, that is when you flip over with the car your character just pops out of it, so much for ''next gen'' title isnt it?? Go and get your brain check kid.

 

Now as for AI and detail in GTA V, this video made by IGN shows way more impressions in the game of that matter:

 

 

 

these features have nothing to do with how well the game looks. you just admitted it yourself that watch dogs is better looking than gta 5 at the moment. also, dont bother talking about all those gta exclusive features. i can play that game as well. does gta have digital trips, hacking, online hacking, police that search for you instead of drive to your location then spot you, many enterable interiors, the ability to spawn any car of your choice, hide in cars, a working stealth mode, a good cover system, parkour... so that argument is invalid.

 

Btw, its normal for GTA V to have crap textures on LG, GTA V pushed alot for LG. I reminded my self again of something funny in Watch Dogs, that is when you flip over with the car your character just pops out of it, so much for ''next gen'' title isnt it?? Go and get your brain check kid.

 

thats your true argument. gta 5 pushed last gen but lacked in textures. every game has its fair share in glitches and bugs. dont even try to deny that. gta 5 still has glitches that arent fixed. so does watch dogs. but thats not the point of this discussion. the point of this discussion is which looks better, and you just confirmed that watch dogs looks better than gta 5 at the moment.

 

and to prove it here this is watch dogs on the ps3

 

 

 

notice how the textures still look fair on the ps3.

 

 

notice how the textures are blurrier.

 

comparison

 

 

notice how watch dogs textures are sharper and therefore dont need to have as many different patches and whatnot? then look at the gta 5 textures, they are more blurry and try to make up for it with having more patches and details in the road.

 

overall though watch dogs is better because of its sharpness. thats not to say that gta 5 doesnt look good. it does and i cant wait until next gen comes out to see the best graphics it has.

 

bottom line, watch dogs has better graphics because the textures are similar between next gen and last gen. now once gta 5 comes out on next gen, then we will really have a true comparison. but until then, watch dogs is a clear winner. end of story.

 

source : http://gearnuke.com/watch-dogs-looks-lowest-settings-pc/

Edited July 14, 2014 by DopeFresh

[hitrho5]

Based on the pics you all have posted (I have GTA V on PS3, but Watch Dogs on PS4), Watch Dogs looks notably better because of sharper textures. However, nobody pushes the boundaries of visuals like R* (maybe except for Naughty Dog), so I'm sure that the PS4 version of GTA 5 will look better than Watch Dogs. On a side note, I'm looking forward to a lower frequency of glitches and faster load times on the PS4. Can't wait for the fall!

[Geralt of Rivia]

you cant debunk this video btw, because everything that is shown here is true.

Nope.

 

Got clobbered by a train within 2 hours of playing.

 

BTW: A video showing only negatives will always make the game look bad.

 

I bet you I can find some videos that make GTA V look like absolute horsesh*t, but that accomplishes nothing.

 

^^^[Not talking about graphics]^^^

 

However, that still has nothing to do with anything.

 

Watch Dogs looks better than GTA V. Of course it does. What do you expect when it's a game released on more than a single generation?

 

^^^[Talking about graphics]^^^

Edited July 14, 2014 by TheMasterfocker

[DopeFresh]

Based on the pics you all have posted (I have GTA V on PS3, but Watch Dogs on PS4), Watch Dogs looks notably better because of sharper textures. However, nobody pushes the boundaries of visuals like R* (maybe except for Naughty Dog), so I'm sure that the PS4 version of GTA 5 will look better than Watch Dogs. On a side note, I'm looking forward to a lower frequency of glitches and faster load times on the PS4. Can't wait for the fall!

like i said, you never know. maybe it will maybe it wont. until we see some more trailers/screenshots, watch dogs looks better.

[..GhosT]

 

 

You still have to admit GTA V has better graphics. Everyone's saying it. Everyone can't be lying. I have Watch Dogs for the Xbox One, and GTA V out shines it in graphics.

 

Oh my f*cking god, really?

Everyones saying it because most people here are GTA fanboys, just look at his post, he has shown perfect examples.

 

GTA V Next Gen -> Watch Dogs -> GTA V Cur. Gen

 

How about you go online and see for yourself? Websites that aren't GTA websites agree. I even have posted with a bunch of links on page 4 to prove it.

 

PS I'm fanboy because I don't defend crappy games with waterdown graphics? You're a fanboy.

 

 

No, im not, i played the story of WD and im through it, i dont like it.

Its just my opinion, i prefer the WD graphics over the V graphics. Maybe thats because i run WD on 1080p, ~100FPS and ultra settings while im stuck with V on the PS3 on lowest settings with no anti aliasing, low textures and crappy FPS.

 

Why dont you just accept that some people have different opinions than you do? Calm down.