[V] Steam (Part 1)

[eastriver]

 

Then this thread should be renamed to GTA V PC General Chat

 

This is R* fault, not Michael's. 75% of people frequenting this thread wouldn't be chatting here if R* hadn't delayed GTA V for the 6375 time.

3 times

 

Fall 2014

Jan 27th 2015

March 24th 2015

i can see the fourth delay

 

Two times, actually.

 

Fall 2014 was the original release date, no delays there.

Then it was delayed to January for the first time and then it was delayed till March for the second time (And hopefully last).

Edited February 14, 2015 by IG_

[Trash_Ok]

Dying Light doesn't have a vehicle system with calculated paths for pedestrians and vehicles... and is... a completely different game that runs on a completely different engine... You can't base your Dying Light benchmark on how well V will run. LOL what kind of analysis is that anyway?

 

I'd recommend getting a PC not a laptop if you're gonna play V... Otherwise your should run it at a steady 30 FPS at 1280x720 and low/med settings...

You're laughing at my analysis and you just poop in your own mouth because what you said is ridiculous.

 

1. Laptops are becoming almost as powerful as desktops, we have enough of the console vs PC wars so stop making laptops another race already please, it's annoying. Most of the people who say the one and only sentence "Laptops aren't good for games" haven't owned a powerful laptop or imagine them as Macbooks or other office kinds..

 

2. GTA V has vehicles blah blah blah ... GTA V hasn't got photorealistic visuals, therefore comparing it to Dying Light which has incredible graphics, especialy in stormy nights when it's even closer to cinematic experience is I would say more than okay in this way.

 

3. And that last sentence is just utter bullcrap you made up without any knowledge, I've never played a game on those settings on it ever. GTA V has even lower specs than most of the big titles released in the last two years including 2015.

 

To make it short - decent laptops will run GTA V without a problem, and therefore I stand behind my original statement comparing it to Dying Light

 

 

[xHC17x]

 

Dying Light doesn't have a vehicle system with calculated paths for pedestrians and vehicles... and is... a completely different game that runs on a completely different engine... You can't base your Dying Light benchmark on how well V will run. LOL what kind of analysis is that anyway?

 

I'd recommend getting a PC not a laptop if you're gonna play V... Otherwise your should run it at a steady 30 FPS at 1280x720 and low/med settings...

You're laughing at my analysis and you just poop in your own mouth because what you said is ridiculous.

 

1. Laptops are becoming almost as powerful as desktops, we have enough of the console vs PC wars so stop making laptops another race already please, it's annoying. Most of the people who say the one and only sentence "Laptops aren't good for games" haven't owned a powerful laptop or imagine them as Macbooks or other office kinds..

 

2. GTA V has vehicles blah blah blah ... GTA V hasn't got photorealistic visuals, therefore comparing it to Dying Light which has incredible graphics, especialy in stormy nights when it's even closer to cinematic experience is I would say more than okay in this way.

 

3. And that last sentence is just utter bullcrap you made up without any knowledge, I've never played a game on those settings on it ever. GTA V has even lower specs than most of the big titles released in the last two years including 2015.

 

To make it short - decent laptops will run GTA V without a problem, and therefore I stand behind my original statement comparing it to Dying Light

 

 

 

well... u know... the engine R* used in GTAIV is the same as GTAV (ofc lot more upgraded with GTAV i hope), but my point here is that even if u tried run GTAIV on ultra u couldnt thx to the awful port of the engine, so since Dying Light as a completly different engine and u can run it decently that proves nothing about being able to run GTAV with no problems, the game isnt even out yet so we cant assume nothing

[r34ld34l]

 

Dying Light doesn't have a vehicle system with calculated paths for pedestrians and vehicles... and is... a completely different game that runs on a completely different engine... You can't base your Dying Light benchmark on how well V will run. LOL what kind of analysis is that anyway?

 

I'd recommend getting a PC not a laptop if you're gonna play V... Otherwise your should run it at a steady 30 FPS at 1280x720 and low/med settings...

You're laughing at my analysis and you just poop in your own mouth because what you said is ridiculous.

 

1. Laptops are becoming almost as powerful as desktops, we have enough of the console vs PC wars so stop making laptops another race already please, it's annoying. Most of the people who say the one and only sentence "Laptops aren't good for games" haven't owned a powerful laptop or imagine them as Macbooks or other office kinds..

 

2. GTA V has vehicles blah blah blah ... GTA V hasn't got photorealistic visuals, therefore comparing it to Dying Light which has incredible graphics, especialy in stormy nights when it's even closer to cinematic experience is I would say more than okay in this way.

 

3. And that last sentence is just utter bullcrap you made up without any knowledge, I've never played a game on those settings on it ever. GTA V has even lower specs than most of the big titles released in the last two years including 2015.

 

To make it short - decent laptops will run GTA V without a problem, and therefore I stand behind my original statement comparing it to Dying Light

 

 

 

1. That is not true. They might be powerfull but not as powerfull as High-End PC. And lets not mention heat...

 

2. GTA V will be more CPU hungry than GPU. As I noticed Dying Light is more GPU hungry, don't get me wrong, I enjoy Dying Light from first few seconds till last "worst boss battle" (That was most retarded way to end a game...)

GTA V is more open world, Dying Light has 4 sections and few "apparments" sections, but damn I was impressed with how many buildings or flats you can move in freely, more than in Unity.

 

"decent laptops" I doubt that, decent laptops are bad, because they arent for games, but for internet and other stuff.

[Braindawg]

LOL You've simply convinced yourself you'll have a "great time running GTA V" cause you got 35 FPS playing Dying Light on LOW...

"That's my evidence"

This is not an arguement. You simply being able to play Dying Light on low or whatever doesn't confirm the fact you'll get the same result while playing V what so ever.

Edited February 14, 2015 by MinnieMan121249

[xHC17x]

 

Then this thread should be renamed to GTA V PC General Chat

 

This is R* fault, not Michael's. 75% of people frequenting this thread wouldn't be chatting here if R* hadn't delayed GTA V for the 6375 time.

3 times

 

Fall 2014

Jan 27th 2015

March 24th 2015

i can see the fourth delay

 

then u better have a check up in ur eyes because how can they delay the game so many times when they already released the pre order, released specs, pics and now only thing left is a trailer?

u know if they delay after this there is gonna be lots of ppl asking refund and even a wave of rage over R*

they arent stupid enough to hurt themselves in a way that would take years to recover

they released the pre order after this last delay because they are sure that the game will be "fully" ready by that date, u can even see that the beta testing in steam has stopped, which means that now is all about minor bug fixing

plus dun forget the main reason they delayed GTAV this last time... Profit.. u saw what happened when Evolve and Dying Light came out, GTAV in best sellers went from 1st to even gone from the list, so just imagine how much this would hurt the sales of R*

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

Edited February 15, 2015 by xHC17x

[fefenc]

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

There is a 31.74% chance of a third delay being announced at March.

 

As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version while they were grabbing the shark cards money by investing their full time on useless GTA Online vehicles/anti-hackers updates when the game was last gen exclusive (nearly 1 year wasted).

 

The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date.

 

Delaying the game for the third time would be a shot on their own foot like you said, their reputation among the PC community would be as damaged as their reputation was after the release of the xbox emulator version of GTA IV. Several people would cancel their preorders and the game release would be a disaster (surely not like the Simcity release, but...)

Edited February 15, 2015 by fefenc

[TheDeathRises]

 

Then this thread should be renamed to GTA V PC General Chat

 

This is R* fault, not Michael's. 75% of people frequenting this thread wouldn't be chatting here if R* hadn't delayed GTA V for the 6375 time.

3 times

 

Fall 2014

Jan 27th 2015

March 24th 2015

i can see the fourth delay

 

You can see the fourth delay? Damn, I gotta get my eyes checked, because I see the release next month.

[xHC17x]

 

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

There is a 31.74% chance of a third delay being announced at March.

 

As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version while they were grabbing the shark cards money by investing their full time on useless GTA Online vehicles/anti-hackers updates when the game was last gen exclusive (nearly 1 year wasted).

 

The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date.

 

Delaying the game for the third time would be a shot on their own foot like you said, their reputation among the PC community would be as damaged as their reputation was after the release of the xbox emulator version of GTA IV. Several people would cancel their preorders and the game release would be a disaster (surely not like the Simcity release, but...)

 

I like to be optimistic

And true that, they only started working on PC Version after PS4 and XONE release

Im sure R* would never do such a thing... i grew up with their games, from GTA to Manhunt, i always thought R* was the "good guy" on Game Industry, so i rlly hope they dun change my mind, or else i will be rlly dissapointed

Plus we all knows the main reason of this last delay was because of Profit, and we witnessed just that last weeks, so lets hope that in ends of february/Begins of March R* starts giving a bit more attention to us PC gamers and delivers us a great game

[TheDeathRises]

 

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

There is a 31.74% chance of a third delay being announced at March.

 

As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version while they were grabbing the shark cards money by investing their full time on useless GTA Online vehicles/anti-hackers updates when the game was last gen exclusive (nearly 1 year wasted).

 

The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date.

 

Delaying the game for the third time would be a shot on their own foot like you said, their reputation among the PC community would be as damaged as their reputation was after the release of the xbox emulator version of GTA IV. Several people would cancel their preorders and the game release would be a disaster (surely not like the Simcity release, but...)

 

The f*ck are you on about? They didn't bother developing the game for PC? Bitch are you blind or something? Compare some PS4 screens to PC screens and you'll see the bloody difference. Some say that the PC version had a lower draw distance. Well, first of all, that's adjustable. And even on the screens it's further than on the consoles. You just notice it more there because the screens are in BLOODY 4K! AA? That sh*t was running at 4K resolution. A blurry texture? It happens. It's not like they can't fix that till release, right?

 

They're grabbing the shark-card money to bring you FREE f*ckING DLC. But sure, complain.

 

GTA V PC development started back in f*cking 2012. Take a look at the build logs.

 

Check yo'self before you wreck yo'self. Maybe try being less of a twat.

[fefenc]

 

 

 

 

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

There is a 31.74% chance of a third delay being announced at March.

 

As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version while they were grabbing the shark cards money by investing their full time on useless GTA Online vehicles/anti-hackers updates when the game was last gen exclusive (nearly 1 year wasted).

 

The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date.

 

Delaying the game for the third time would be a shot on their own foot like you said, their reputation among the PC community would be as damaged as their reputation was after the release of the xbox emulator version of GTA IV. Several people would cancel their preorders and the game release would be a disaster (surely not like the Simcity release, but...)

 

The f*ck are you on about? They didn't bother developing the game for PC? Bitch are you blind or something? Compare some PS4 screens to PC screens and you'll see the bloody difference. Some say that the PC version had a lower draw distance. Well, first of all, that's adjustable. And even on the screens it's further than on the consoles. You just notice it more there because the screens are in BLOODY 4K! AA? That sh*t was running at 4K resolution. A blurry texture? It happens. It's not like they can't fix that till release, right?

 

They're grabbing the shark-card money to bring you FREE f*ckING DLC. But sure, complain.

 

GTA V PC development started back in f*cking 2012. Take a look at the build logs.

 

Check yo'self before you wreck yo'self. Maybe try being less of a twat.

...and today we've learned that this is a clear example of hostile fanboyism that should never be followed. Edited February 15, 2015 by fefenc

[Evan-KCR]

 

 

 

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

There is a 31.74% chance of a third delay being announced at March.

 

As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version while they were grabbing the shark cards money by investing their full time on useless GTA Online vehicles/anti-hackers updates when the game was last gen exclusive (nearly 1 year wasted).

 

The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date.

 

Delaying the game for the third time would be a shot on their own foot like you said, their reputation among the PC community would be as damaged as their reputation was after the release of the xbox emulator version of GTA IV. Several people would cancel their preorders and the game release would be a disaster (surely not like the Simcity release, but...)

 

The f*ck are you on about? They didn't bother developing the game for PC? Bitch are you blind or something? Compare some PS4 screens to PC screens and you'll see the bloody difference. Some say that the PC version had a lower draw distance. Well, first of all, that's adjustable. And even on the screens it's further than on the consoles. You just notice it more there because the screens are in BLOODY 4K! AA? That sh*t was running at 4K resolution. A blurry texture? It happens. It's not like they can't fix that till release, right?

 

They're grabbing the shark-card money to bring you FREE f*ckING DLC. But sure, complain.

 

GTA V PC development started back in f*cking 2012. Take a look at the build logs.

 

Check yo'self before you wreck yo'self. Maybe try being less of a twat.

...and this is an example of famboyism that should never be followed, kids.

 

He's probably right though.

Edited February 15, 2015 by Evan-KCR

[fefenc]

 

 

 

 

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

<lowering the quote train>

<fanboyism>

...and this is an example of famboyism that should never be followed, kids.He's probably right though.

Is he right by acting like I offended his family because I put the cards on the table or right by probably making an assumption that I probably played the online version? Ah yeah, this is the internet.

 

I'm not moaning about ViIV, it's an awesome project limited by the emulator, but the PC screenshots are so scrapped and LODish that it remembered me from ViIV. R* hadn't bothered to make them bullshots when they first released them... At least they has taken some real ingame SS.

 

A fanboy starts cursing and making assumptions of everyone who call their fav companies out, this guy has all these traits.

Edited February 15, 2015 by fefenc

[eastriver]

 

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

There is a 31.74% chance of a third delay being announced at March.

 

As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version while they were grabbing the shark cards money by investing their full time on useless GTA Online vehicles/anti-hackers updates when the game was last gen exclusive (nearly 1 year wasted).

 

The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date.

 

Delaying the game for the third time would be a shot on their own foot like you said, their reputation among the PC community would be as damaged as their reputation was after the release of the xbox emulator version of GTA IV. Several people would cancel their preorders and the game release would be a disaster (surely not like the Simcity release, but...)

 

I would really like to hear more about your methodology of calculating the probability of GTA V getting delayed.

 

Please lay down the specific ground works of how you got a number exact as 31.74%.

 

You must have used really complicated formula involving a lot of variables...

I'm certain a number that precise couldn't have been pulled out of someones ass.

 

Anyways... I'll stop being sarcastic.

 

"TheDeathRises" made a lot of great points to refute many of the arguments you made in your reply...

 

But you didn't even bother to make any sort of counter argument and simply evaded debate with "...and today we've learned that this is a clear example of hostile fanboyism that should never be followed."

Man that's such a good way to defend your points... refusing to debate with someone just because they used a couple of swear words in their arguments. Sure, I don't agree with excessively using swear words, but that doesn't discredit the points he made... because his points, with or without swear words, were great points that you just decided to avoid.

 

Fact is, "TheDeathRises" made many great points and you didn't even bother to acknowledge and simply decided to dodge them by calling him a hostile fanboy.

Edited February 15, 2015 by IG_

[fefenc]

 

 

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

There is a 31.74% chance of a third delay being announced at March.

 

As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version while they were grabbing the shark cards money by investing their full time on useless GTA Online vehicles/anti-hackers updates when the game was last gen exclusive (nearly 1 year wasted).

 

The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date.

 

Delaying the game for the third time would be a shot on their own foot like you said, their reputation among the PC community would be as damaged as their reputation was after the release of the xbox emulator version of GTA IV. Several people would cancel their preorders and the game release would be a disaster (surely not like the Simcity release, but...)

 

I would really like to hear more about your methodology of calculating the probability of GTA V getting delayed.

 

Please lay down the specific ground works of how you got a number exact as 31.74%.

 

You must have used really complicated formula involving a lot of variables...

I'm certain a number that precise couldn't have been pulled out of someones ass.

 

Anyways... I'll stop being sarcastic.

 

"TheDeathRises" made a lot of great points to refute many of the arguments you made in your reply...

 

But you didn't even bother to make any sort of counter argument and simply evaded debate with "...and today we've learned that this is a clear example of hostile fanboyism that should never be followed."

Man that's such a good way to defend your points... refusing to debate with someone just because they used a couple of swear words in their arguments. Sure, I don't agree with excessively using swear words, but that doesn't discredit the points he made... because his points, with or without swear words, were great points that you just decided to avoid.

 

Fact is, "TheDeathRises" made many great points and you didn't even bother to acknowledge and simply decided to dodge them by calling him a hostile fanboy.

I don't see the need of debating against someone who I never talked with before which started cursing me for nothing, debating against a fanboy like him would be a waste of time, he would totally ignore my points and start calling me as an asshole... again...

 

If you really wanna know, these numbers were pulled off from the same source as the late march delay that I used to preach last year after the fall delay. I'm being realistic here, you can even call me as an optimist because I'm giving 68.26% chance of the game being released at march, so let's cheer up and drink a beer, shall we?

Edited February 15, 2015 by fefenc

[eastriver]

 

 

 

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

There is a 31.74% chance of a third delay being announced at March.

 

As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version while they were grabbing the shark cards money by investing their full time on useless GTA Online vehicles/anti-hackers updates when the game was last gen exclusive (nearly 1 year wasted).

 

The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date.

 

Delaying the game for the third time would be a shot on their own foot like you said, their reputation among the PC community would be as damaged as their reputation was after the release of the xbox emulator version of GTA IV. Several people would cancel their preorders and the game release would be a disaster (surely not like the Simcity release, but...)

 

I would really like to hear more about your methodology of calculating the probability of GTA V getting delayed.

 

Please lay down the specific ground works of how you got a number exact as 31.74%.

 

You must have used really complicated formula involving a lot of variables...

I'm certain a number that precise couldn't have been pulled out of someones ass.

 

Anyways... I'll stop being sarcastic.

 

"TheDeathRises" made a lot of great points to refute many of the arguments you made in your reply...

 

But you didn't even bother to make any sort of counter argument and simply evaded debate with "...and today we've learned that this is a clear example of hostile fanboyism that should never be followed."

Man that's such a good way to defend your points... refusing to debate with someone just because they used a couple of swear words in their arguments. Sure, I don't agree with excessively using swear words, but that doesn't discredit the points he made... because his points, with or without swear words, were great points that you just decided to avoid.

 

Fact is, "TheDeathRises" made many great points and you didn't even bother to acknowledge and simply decided to dodge them by calling him a hostile fanboy.

I don't see the need of debating against someone who I never talked with which started cursing me for nothing, debating against a fanboy like him would be a waste of time, he would totally ignore my points and start calling me as an asshole... again...

 

If you really wanna know, these numbers were pulled off from the same source as the late march delay that I predicted last year after the fall delay.

 

You're just using petty excuses to get away from an argument.

 

"He would totally ignore my points"

You have no reason to believe that... in fact you should believe in the direct opposite. You made some points in your original comment and the "TheDeathRises" responded to your claims in the comments by actually giving COUNTER-ARGUMENTS. Although he did use swear words... he did actually provide counter-arguments. So he actually acknowledged your points and refuted them (In an aggressive manner). In contrast, the only counter-argument you were able to provide was "he's a hostile fanboy" and "I don't reply to people who swear". Not the best counter-arguments, I would say.

 

If you really refuse to respond to his claims, please respond to mine... I never insulted you so you don't seem to have an excuse.

 

Your Claim #1: "As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version"

Below are two screenshots that compare the PS3, PS4 and PC versions.

 

 

 

 

 

After looking at those screenshots, can you honestly say with a straight face that Rockstar "didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version". Because I reasonably believe that any impartial person would say that the PC version is superior looking.

 

Your Claim #2: "The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date."

You provided no real evidence back this up... nor do I know of any evidence that would suggest development of the PC version began only a month after the PS4/Xbox One release.

 

First of all, there are build logs dating back to 2012 that show that Rockstar has been working on the PC version.

Second of all, as I showed in the screenshots above, the PC version is clearly superior... and no one can pull off that much of a difference by only beginning work on the PC version only a month after the PS4/Xbox One release. They have clearly been working on the PC version for quite some time now and it's clearly been developed in parallel and is not a port. If they did only begin work one month after the PS4/Xbox One release... the PC version would look pretty similar to the PS4/Xbox One version... but it doesn't... it looks way better.

 

 

And finally...

"If you really wanna know, these numbers were pulled off from the same source as the late march delay that I predicted last year after the fall delay."

Can you pretty please go through the trouble of citing these sources? That sentence in itself doesn't make much sense... and I don't think explaining your methodology again should be that difficult. So... can you just please simply explain your methodology? You did actually CALCULATE that 31.74%... right?

 

 

Edited February 15, 2015 by IG_

[BS_BlackScout]

He (T.D.Rises) may not have stated his points through the best way, but.... Don't think he is wrong.

You can call me fanboy or something for agreeing with him, I don't take this as an offense...

 

One last thing.

AMD.

No, no, no, I don't prefer any. Both are great. You'll understand.

[fefenc]

Huge quote train ahead, stay off from the rails

 

 

 

 

 

 

There is 0% chance the game is getting delayed so pls stop with that talk, i had my dose in the begins of January, and im sure all the ppl that follow this thread long enough are tired of that too

There is a 31.74% chance of a third delay being announced at March.

 

As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version while they were grabbing the shark cards money by investing their full time on useless GTA Online vehicles/anti-hackers updates when the game was last gen exclusive (nearly 1 year wasted).

 

The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date.

 

Delaying the game for the third time would be a shot on their own foot like you said, their reputation among the PC community would be as damaged as their reputation was after the release of the xbox emulator version of GTA IV. Several people would cancel their preorders and the game release would be a disaster (surely not like the Simcity release, but...)

 

I would really like to hear more about your methodology of calculating the probability of GTA V getting delayed.

Please lay down the specific ground works of how you got a number exact as 31.74%.

You must have used really complicated formula involving a lot of variables...
I'm certain a number that precise couldn't have been pulled out of someones ass.

Anyways... I'll stop being sarcastic.

"TheDeathRises" made a lot of great points to refute many of the arguments you made in your reply...

But you didn't even bother to make any sort of counter argument and simply evaded debate with "...and today we've learned that this is a clear example of hostile fanboyism that should never be followed."
Man that's such a good way to defend your points... refusing to debate with someone just because they used a couple of swear words in their arguments. Sure, I don't agree with excessively using swear words, but that doesn't discredit the points he made... because his points, with or without swear words, were great points that you just decided to avoid.

Fact is, "TheDeathRises" made many great points and you didn't even bother to acknowledge and simply decided to dodge them by calling him a hostile fanboy.

I don't see the need of debating against someone who I never talked with which started cursing me for nothing, debating against a fanboy like him would be a waste of time, he would totally ignore my points and start calling me as an asshole... again...

 

If you really wanna know, these numbers were pulled off from the same source as the late march delay that I predicted last year after the fall delay.

 

You're just using petty excuses to get away from an argument.

"He would totally ignore my points"
You have no reason to believe that... in fact you should believe in the direct opposite. You made some points in your original comment and the "TheDeathRises" responded to your claims in the comments by actually giving COUNTER-ARGUMENTS. Although he did use swear words... he did actually provide counter-arguments. So he actually acknowledged your points and refuted them (In an aggressive manner). In contrast, the only counter-argument you were able to provide was "he's a hostile fanboy" and "I don't reply to people who swear". Not the best counter-arguments, I would say.

If you really refuse to respond to his claims, please respond to mine... I never insulted you so you don't seem to have an excuse.

Your Claim #1: "As we could see on the PC screenshots, R* didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version"

Below are two screenshots that compare the PS3, PS4 and PC versions.

After looking at those screenshots, can you honestly say with a straight face that Rockstar "didn't bothered too much for developing the PC version". Because I reasonably believe that any impartial person would say that the PC version is superior looking.

Your Claim #2: "The GTA V PC development "really started" after 1 month from the PS4/Xbox One versions release date."
You provided no real evidence back this up... nor do I know of any evidence that would suggest development of the PC version began only a month after the PS4/Xbox One release.

First of all, there are build logs dating back to 2012 that show that Rockstar has been working on the PC version.
Second of all, as I showed in the screenshots above, the PC version is clearly superior... and no one can pull off that much of a difference by only beginning work on the PC version only a month after the PS4/Xbox One release. They have clearly been working on the PC version for quite some time now and it's clearly been developed in parallel and is not a port. If they did only begin work one month after the PS4/Xbox One release... the PC version would look pretty similar to the PS4/Xbox One version... but it doesn't... it looks way better.


And finally...
"If you really wanna know, these numbers were pulled off from the same source as the late march delay that I predicted last year after the fall delay."
Can you pretty please go through the trouble of citing these sources? That sentence in itself doesn't make much sense... and I don't think explaining your methodology again should be that difficult. So... can you just please simply explain your methodology? You did actually CALCULATE that 31.74%... right?

 

 

Here we go then...

 

The PC screenshots felt kind like the human eye which focus on a single spot to make a very detailed image and blurrying/scrapping the area around, the red car screenshot has made my nose bleed.

 

According to you, the PC version is +~3 years in development and according to some people at R*, they've started developing GTA V much before than 2012. At first they didn't wanted to do a PC version, but the demand was big and they needed to fix their reputation after the IV disaster.

 

It was stated that GTA V was in development for 5 years before it was released on the LG consoles, then it means that the PC version is in development for ~7 years. Now I ask you, how can a port (new gen) be done before its source with 7 years of development? How can a son become older than his father? Can you see the logic here? Because I'm failing to do it.

 

I've put ("really started") in quotation marks because I knew that a functional illiterate would only pass their blind eyes on my text and think that I mean R* only started to code the PC version from the scratch at late 2014, they were coding it for a long time, but they were with less intensity to null at 2013/2014, the true PC development just started at late 2014, it was so obvious that the game would be delayed again because it's too much work to they finish within 2 months, optimizations, video editor, fps, possible 4K issues, etc... and there's the console milking thing.

 

This is where the source came from, even a dumb person that follows this stupid situation can see that the chances of the game being delayed is low due to the preorder. The problem is they released a dubious system spec that "can be increased/updated with time" at january 13 because they acknowledge the 2 weeks rule from ESRB and they put a late march release date on the game so that in the case of they not managing to meet the deadline again, they won't see themselves pressed to find another placeholder release date if they need to delay the game again. The chance is there, if you refuse to see it just like the january delay, the problem is yours, I won't be frustrated if they delay the game again, I'll become a bit disappointed, but not frustrated as I became at the fall delay.

 

I don't wanna scare anyone here, but let's wake up from the matrix to the real world. The difference between the january release date and the march release date is that the january delay chance was much much very much bigger than the possible march delay because now they have more time to "polish the game" until it get chromed.

Edited February 15, 2015 by fefenc

[Spider-Vice]

The build logs specifically state there is PC progress since at least 2012. A game doesn't need to be complete to be "ported", because all we know, the base for the next-gen version could have been the PC version. Rockstar is big, they can work on several things at the same time. I think the build logs found in the console image files should be enough to convince you it's an actual developmental effort and not a crappy next-gen port because if anything, next-gen was a port from PC.

The build logs specify actual QA testing for the PC build, so full development started around 2012, what I think is that there was a pause to get the last-gen versions out, then they continued to develop the PC version, dropped it to "port it" to next-gen and are now continuing to dev it.

[fefenc]

I don't remember when I recently told on my last comments that the PC version is a port from the next-gen versions if not being sarcastic about the fear from the possible GTA IV². I know that the next-gen version is a port from the PC version. I'm talking that it's quite odd that the port was released before the source version, hence the $ony and m$ deal thing.

 

The problem here is they restarted developing it a bit too late, the game has been delayed 2 times and there's a small chance that it'll become post-poned for the third time due to the mismanagement on R*. They could work on some different things at the same time, but the devs aren't indian gods with plenty of arms, they're actually humans, but R* forgot about it and they put more useless DLC work onto them instead of focusing on the PC version to fix their image with the PC community, image that's very damaged.

 

If they hadn't focused too much on the 2014 worthless overpriced masks and cars DLCs and took care of finishing the game for PC like they seems to be doing right now, this situation wouldn't be happening right now.

Edited February 15, 2015 by fefenc

[RedIndianRobin]

 

Edited February 15, 2015 by RedIndianRobin

[Barrett_killz]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DjORFg20GIo

[Antaxi]

so where is pc news

[Antaxi]

The build logs specifically state there is PC progress since at least 2012. A game doesn't need to be complete to be "ported", because all we know, the base for the next-gen version could have been the PC version. Rockstar is big, they can work on several things at the same time. I think the build logs found in the console image files should be enough to convince you it's an actual developmental effort and not a crappy next-gen port because if anything, next-gen was a port from PC. I assume the 4K screenshots don't have much eye candy due to the fact they probably don't even have powerful enough machines, because yes, Rockstar is a bit greedy and is mismanaged, but they aren't as dumb as everyone makes them be.

The build logs specify actual QA testing for the PC build, so full development started around 2012, what I think is that there was a pause to get the last-gen versions out, then they continued to develop the PC version, dropped it to "port it" to next-gen and are now continuing to dev it.

 

wrong... tnen game will be support 32 bit systems

 

they just vanish old 32 bit Rage version from 2012(they use it for old gen)

 

and make brand new on 64 bit Rage engine version (they use it for cg and pc)

imo

Edited February 15, 2015 by Antaxi

[raburs]

so where is pc news

 

Late-February if u ask me..

 

If not..then Mid-March..

[Xerukal]

The more you talk about the d-word, the greater the chance of it happening.

 

Stop it, please.

 

Think happy things.

[Yoona]

Let's also hope recommended requirements are for high 1080p 60 fps rather than high 1080p 30 fps.

You never know :c

 

By the way http://mafro.ca/v/ doesn't work for half a day now.

Edited February 15, 2015 by Yoona

[TheSun]

The more you talk about the d-word, the greater the chance of it happening.

 

Stop it, please.

 

Think happy things.

At the moment

Delay

is my least favorite word in English.

Edited February 15, 2015 by TheSun

[Trash_Ok]

 

The more you talk about the d-word, the greater the chance of it happening.

 

Stop it, please.

 

Think happy things.

At the moment

Delay

is my least favorite word in English.

 

 

So is Rockstar's we hope

Edited February 15, 2015 by Trash99

[Uncle Sikee Atric]

Let's also hope recommended requirements are for high 1080p 60 fps rather than high 1080p 30 fps.

You never know :c

 

By the way http://mafro.ca/v/ doesn't work for half a day now.

Since the PS4 is basically running at the rec specs, especially the GPU, I would suggest those specs are for that performance, but since the frame rate is unlocked, it should be higher, hopefully 40 to 45....

 

I am going to see if I can experiment with a possible frame rate lock and adapting the settings to compensate, see if I can get a better result that way than just running as standard.

 

I hope the Steam overlay works as I have bought it that way. If so I should be able to run the fps counter now included, rather than having to use 3rd party software....