GTA V coming to PS4, Xbox One and PC this fall!

[TheSuspect007]

 

 

*cough* and my interpretation was right *cough*

To be fair, I don't even think the guy came back.

 

@Silver

Some things in the Chiliad shot was altered. Things were added and/or edited, things that never were intended to be in the final product on any version.

 

 

Fair enough. Rockstar wanted to catch the attention and it did work.

 

Now, have they done the same thing with the CG/PC announcement trailer?

Edited July 9, 2014 by TheSuspect007

[pandalin]

According to this http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/more-trippe-a-titles-to-support-mantle.html , GTAV will support mantle. Interesting...thought R* had something with Nvidia.

[TheSuspect007]

According to this http://www.guru3d.com/news-story/more-trippe-a-titles-to-support-mantle.html , GTAV will support mantle. Interesting...thought R* had something with Nvidia.

 

They probably are in bed with R* since the announcement of the PC version was made on Nvidia website as well on June 10th.

 

http://www.geforce.com/whats-new/articles/visually-enhanced-grand-auto-v-launching-on-pc-this-fall

 

Can a game be in bed with Nvidia and support Mantle?

[Ash_735]

Can a game be in bed with Nvidia and support Mantle?

You're basically asking if a game can work on both AMD and Nvidia cards, ....yes, they have the voodoo magic these days to work on more than one type of GPU, crazy, I know! Mantle probably came about from the next gen version, so it would have been easy to also include in the PC version as an extra option for those who want it.

[pandalin]

 

Can a game be in bed with Nvidia and support Mantle?

You're basically asking if a game can work on both AMD and Nvidia cards, ....yes, they have the voodoo magic these days to work on more than one type of GPU, crazy, I know! Mantle probably came about from the next gen version, so it would have been easy to also include in the PC version as an extra option for those who want it.

 

 

What are you talking about. Mantle isn't a console API, it was made only for PC. So it couldn't have came from any other version. Not to say that R* most likely made the pc version before the CG ones.

[Deji]

What are you talking about. Mantle isn't a console API, it was made only for PC. So it couldn't have came from any other version. Not to say that R* most likely made the pc version before the CG ones.

Check yo'self before you wreck yo'self: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mantle_(API)

 

 

Mantle was designed as an alternative to Direct3D and OpenGL, primarily for use on personal computers, although the hardware is fully available in the PlayStation 4 and at least partly available in the XBox One.

It sounds pretty neat. Definitely needed for all that NG V stuff.

[Ash_735]

What are you talking about. Mantle isn't a console API, it was made only for PC. So it couldn't have came from any other version. Not to say that R* most likely made the pc version before the CG ones.

It's design came about to be more console style "coding to the metal" but on PC, but since the current gen consoles are heavily AMD based, AMD extended support to PS4 and Xbox One too. http://www.dualshockers.com/2014/03/28/amd-ready-to-provide-mantle-support-for-ps4-and-xbox-one-could-push-performance-of-both-further/

 

"Neal talked about the fact that Mantle is intended for use on Radeon graphics in a PC. However, we said that Mantle was designed from the beginning to be extensible to other platforms, as well. AMD stands ready to share the technology with our [console] partners should they choose to want it."

 

And as for when each version was made, it's already known the PC version went full force from September 2012 with the PS4 version going full force from January 2013 and Xbox One version much later.

[TheSuspect007]

 

Can a game be in bed with Nvidia and support Mantle?

You're basically asking if a game can work on both AMD and Nvidia cards, ....yes, they have the voodoo magic these days to work on more than one type of GPU, crazy, I know! Mantle probably came about from the next gen version, so it would have been easy to also include in the PC version as an extra option for those who want it.

 

 

Maybe. But AFAIK, all games that support mantle are part of the AMD program. BF4 and Thief are good exemples.

[Xerukal]

In a perfect world, Rockstar could do both NVIDIA's Gameworks, or at least the "good" parts of it, and AMD's Mantle partnership at the same time.

 

Thanks NVIDIA for not making this a perfect world. Good job.

Edited July 9, 2014 by Xerukal

[XXVIII]

The 9th of July, 2014. Not to be construed as your typical day, for this very day is emblematic of two instances of media enacted by Rockstar. The Official Gameplay trailer roared into cyberspace one year prior with a surge of excitement, and New-Gen Grand Theft Auto: V teased one month prior. It is hard not to be contemplative as to exactly what Rockstar is engaging in at this very moment. My presumption would be optimization. I really do hope that the release date or just something is imminent soon.

[Gdog]

The 9th of July, 2014. Not to be construed as your typical day, for this very day is emblematic of two instances of media enacted by Rockstar. The Official Gameplay trailer roared into cyberspace one year prior with a surge of excitement, and New-Gen Grand Theft Auto: V teased one month prior. It is hard not to be contemplative as to exactly what Rockstar is engaging in at this very moment. My presumption would be optimization. I really do hope that the release date or just something is imminent soon.

lol

[technick89]

I need some updates!

[TheDeaconBosco]

Did somebody make a detailed analysis of the latest trailer, apparently there's a female member of the families but I didn't see her.

Edited July 9, 2014 by TheDeaconBosco

[Deji]

Did somebody make a detailed analysis of the latest trailer, apparently there's a female member of the families but I didn't see her.

 

Where the "gang a.i." text is (between it and the green text), the one with a bandanna looks female...

Or it could be a young "he" with dreads and a feminine look, of course. These are textures/models we're talking about

Edited July 9, 2014 by Deji

[Kris194]

Nearly one month passed and we are still waiting for any info. Few weeks or so i would say

Edited July 9, 2014 by Kris194

[Packing_Heat]

The wait for info is excruciating.

 

This is the only game i'm super hyped for this year... Just like last year.

 

Hopefully the Xbox One version is good too. They're being so quiet on everything though.

Edited July 9, 2014 by Packing_Heat

[Lemans]

Well, once you brighten it up a little, it centainly looks like a gangster girl, but who knows.

[Deji]

Well, once you brighten it up a little, it centainly looks like a gangster girl, but who knows.

Yeah, the face is definitely female. The only thing that makes me have doubts is the lack of baby-feeders

 

How any respectable game designer can create a female in a game and NOT give her huge knockers, I've no idea... it's almost like a sin. Didn't they learn anything from every Tomb Raider game ever?

 

[/games_are_sexist_stereotype]

 

[/using_fake_bb_code_to_explain_obvious_jokes_because_people_always_act_insulted]

Edited July 9, 2014 by Deji

[TheDeaconBosco]

 

Well, once you brighten it up a little, it centainly looks like a gangster girl, but who knows.

Yeah, the face is definitely female. The only thing that makes me have doubts is the lack of baby-feeders

 

How any respectable game designer can create a female in a game and NOT give her huge knockers, I've no idea... it's almost like a sin. Didn't they learn anything from every Tomb Raider game ever?

 

[/games_are_sexist_stereotype]

 

[/using_fake_bb_code_to_explain_obvious_jokes_because_people_always_act_insulted]

 

 

Man, Woman or Ladyboy, It's definitely not somebody I saw in the current gen version, and that makes me happy. I felt like GTA V's pedestrian pool was way smaller than GTA IV's (f*ck me in the Ass guy is everywhere in LS), huge downer as far as immersion's concerned. Hopefully they rectified it in this version.

[Deji]

Well, once you brighten it up a little, it centainly looks like a gangster girl, but who knows.

Oh yeah, those red/blue lights in the background above that vehicle... clearly an emergency vehicle when you see it in action, yet that vehicle itself isn't one and there's not a single frame in that video where I can spot anything which looks like a police car, so is the vehicle we can see actually an undercover car itself?

 

Not having played much of V, I'm not sure if undercover police vehicles existed before. Either way, the fact it's just sat there with its lights on in the middle of a gang neighbourhood is pretty damn interesting.

[TheDeaconBosco]

 

Well, once you brighten it up a little, it centainly looks like a gangster girl, but who knows.

Oh yeah, those red/blue lights in the background above that vehicle... clearly an emergency vehicle when you see it in action, yet that vehicle itself isn't one and there's not a single frame in that video where I can spot anything which looks like a police car, so is the vehicle we can see actually an undercover car itself?

 

Not having played much of V, I'm not sure if undercover police vehicles existed before. Either way, the fact it's just sat there with its lights on in the middle of a gang neighbourhood is pretty damn interesting.

 

 

What makes it even more interesting is that I'm almost positive that this car is a Washington, a car model that doesn't have any sort of emergency variant in GTA V... As of now.

 

Also there is actually an undercover car but it's based on a Stanier, which is a totally different car.

[Deji]

 

Oh yeah, those red/blue lights in the background above that vehicle... clearly an emergency vehicle when you see it in action, yet that vehicle itself isn't one and there's not a single frame in that video where I can spot anything which looks like a police car, so is the vehicle we can see actually an undercover car itself?

 

Not having played much of V, I'm not sure if undercover police vehicles existed before. Either way, the fact it's just sat there with its lights on in the middle of a gang neighbourhood is pretty damn interesting.

What makes it even more interesting is that I'm almost positive that this car is a Washington, a car model that doesn't have any sort of emergency variant in GTA V... As of now.

 

Also there is actually an undercover car but it's based on a Stanier, which is a totally different car.

 

The car of Toreno! FBI Washington, maybe?

 

Looks like the one!

[Lemans]

By the look of it in the trailer, I think it's a regular police car. It's right behind the yellow-ish car behind the "girl".

 

But now is see it, it does not seem to have white doors... so I don't know

 

Edit: Ok, I think I messed it up with the perspective. What I have drawn like the side, it's actually the rear window and viceversa, that's why you can't see the white doors, they are behind the electricity post. Forget the wheel, it must be some other detail.

Edited July 9, 2014 by Lemans

[TheDeaconBosco]

By the look of it in the trailer, I think it's a regular police car. It's right behind the yellow-ish car behind the "girl".

 

But now is see it, it does not seem to have white doors... so I don't know

 

Edit: Ok, I think I messed it up with the perspective. What I have drawn like the side, it's actually the rear window and viceversa, that's why you can't see the white doors, they are behind the electricity post. Forget the wheel, it must be some other detail.

 

The rear's a perfect match with the Washington though.

 

Actual police car? Not so much.

 

[Deji]

There's more.. there's clearly a driver in the Washington, and he has a helmet on...

 

Given the fact that the vehicle we see is indeed a Washington (I would've never recognised that, so good eye, TheDeaconBosco!), it'd be too much of a coincidence for this to not be an FBI Washington, which was a police vehicle with *lights* in Vice City.

 

There's no such thing as coincidences

 

For me, this is enough to add to the theory that R* have extra juicy details they've not mentioned yet.

[TheDeaconBosco]

The more I look at it the more I think that there's a police car right in front of that Washington.

R* trailers are sneaky like that, I remember it all too well, spending my time looking at the trailers desperatly trying to find a car I didn't see before when it turns out that you did see it before...

 

I guess what I'm trying to say is, don't get your hopes up to high, pal.

Edited July 9, 2014 by TheDeaconBosco

[Deji]

The more I look at it the more I think that there's a police car right in front of that Washington.

 

R* trailers are sneaky like that, I remember it all too well, spending my time looking at the trailers desperatly trying to find a car I didn't see before when it turns out that you did see it before...

 

Don't get your hopes up to high, pal.

I don't need hopes, I've not even played the stock game, so anything's good for me... but that clip had me scratching my head for ages when I was making my analysis video because no matter how I looked at it, I couldn't see there possibly being another vehicle there. For starters, where would it go? There's no space for another vehicle on that road, or on the side of that road, what with that car being there. If it was another car there, it'd seem like a messy bug, which especially considering I already spotted a buggy A.I. response in that very clip, I don't think is too likely (two bugs in one shot and they didn't retry?). And in every frame there's no hint of the glaringly distinctive colours of a police vehicle. So the only other possibility is that it's an undercover vehicle that just so happens to be behind a Washington, a model previously used as an undercover vehicle... hmm.

 

Then there's the other car that drives past, and in my analysis I even pointed out the A.I. response of the driver to the police lights. That also seemed weird, because the police lights are on since the beginning of the shot, and the driver looks back as if he's spooked, which could only be because of the police vehicle. But perhaps, if you accept that games aren't perfect and the A.I. might have been a bit slow in responsiveness, he was responding to the sirens just being activated - and if so, that's because he didn't realise there was a police vehicle there before. A.I. being one of my favourite subtleties about games, it was my main focus when I decided to analyse this trailer (for no other reason than to test my computers HD rendering ability, really - but if my YT views go up high enough, I might try to do the next trailer to and $$$ off it ).

 

The only reason I let it go was because I figured it was a known undercover car model which was already in the current GTA V, but now that you've pointed out the model of the vehicle, it makes much more sense that it would be an FBI Washington. What are the odds that this is all just a coincidence? For me, too small. I like to make definite decisions in my mind, even if there's no CLEAR proof, but just based on what seems most likely. I don't mind being wrong.

 

 

I'm not getting my hopes up. I'm not even the one to WAIT for a game usually - the only reason I started doing was because the GTA V PC topic got hilarious at times, so I frequently read it until I'd become fascinated with the story behind all these peoples long and tiresome wait. Really, I've not even seen all of the V trailers - that's how much of a lousy a "fan" I am. But now, more than anything, I've mostly become interested in other peoples anticipation and speculation towards this game.

 

Me, I'm a modder, whatever GTA V doesn't have that I want, I'll add it, but the hype train is pretty fun, and I regret never boarding it for any other game ever

[BS_BlackScout]

I see a Police Car and a Washington behind =S

[THE_TREVALEV]

Well, once you brighten it up a little, it centainly looks like a gangster girl, but who knows.

[Deji]

I see a Police Car and a Washington behind =S

WHERE do you see a police car? It's DEFINITELY not in front of the Washington, it'd be clear as day!

 

And what's the white spherical thing in the Washington?

 

I would like an alternate answer that makes as much sense, because I went through every frame staring at it for ages and it drove me insane, since I wanted to explain what it was in the video, but I just couldn't find any way it made sense. This FBI Washington theory is the only thing that fits everything that we can actually SEE OBSERVE.

 

Don't make me start quoting Sherlock Holmes!

 

 

 

Why's the T-Shirt different? Custom 'Online' logo?

Edited July 9, 2014 by Deji