GTAV map bigger than SA, RDR and IV combined?

[Muthaphuckaa]

I remember before the release of V there was this big hype about the map being bigger than the RDR, SA and IV combined.. it don't really think it's close to being bigger SA, mostly likely IV and maybe RDR, but no way in comparision with SA. V didn't disappoint terribly but it did disappoint in a few areas.

 

When I first head it was going to be bigger than those 3 R* games maps i thought "Holy mole, this map is going to be HUGE!" and when i got the game I thought the map was amazing but as time went on i started to dislike and realize the map isn't big as said to be. (or maybe it just me) Especially with that biiiig open wild space, now that was huuuge disappointment to me.

 

You kind of just stayed in the city and that's where everything was mostly at. You'd do a few mission out there up in Sandy shores but nothing really. So there was no real reason to head up there unless you like to roam as hit deer or mess with the military base. So overall it was basically the city being used.

 

In SA you had 4 different island or whatever choose, and they were HUGE and if you go play SA you might feel the same way i do. There was so much to do in each of those island, if you got bored of oen place you'd cross the bridge and do something else in another. Nothing went to waste on SA,

 

What do you guys think?

[FilthyEsquire]

I remember before the release of V there was this big hype about the map being bigger than the RDR, SA and IV combined.. it don't really think it's close to being bigger SA, mostly likely IV and maybe RDR, but no way in comparision with SA. V didn't disappoint terribly but it did disappoint in a few areas.

 

When I first head it was going to be bigger than those 3 R* games maps i thought "Holy mole, this map is going to be HUGE!" and when i got the game I thought the map was amazing but as time went on i started to dislike and realize the map isn't big as said to be. (or maybe it just me) Especially with that biiiig open wild space, now that was huuuge disappointment to me.

 

You kind of just stayed in the city and that's where everything was mostly at. You'd do a few mission out there up in Sandy shores but nothing really. So there was no real reason to head up there unless you like to roam as hit deer or mess with the military base. So overall it was basically the city being used.

 

In SA you had 4 different island or whatever choose, and they were HUGE and if you go play SA you might feel the same way i do. There was so much to do in each of those island, if you got bored of oen place you'd cross the bridge and do something else in another. Nothing went to waste on SA,

 

What do you guys think?

I think you should boot up San Andreas, and drive around first and take in the sights, then do that in V...

 

I played IV for an hour last week. Maybe because I lived in Liberty for four years, but I love the way the cars handle, but it feels like NY with the odd roadways, and congestions.

 

I highly doubt San Andreas has much to see.

[Choco Taco]

Using the in-game stats to measure the sizes of the maps gives you the result below. The comparisons were made by 3 different people and they all came to the same conclusion.