Jump to content

Assassin's Creed: Unity


iNero

Recommended Posts

ojrxzdlagqakgvwkledr.png
dcbc08cqhxtspmtpiiag.png
tiqke0prxcukw3r7v3if.png

 

 

One of this fall's big Assassin's Creed games, called or code-named Unity, is set at least partly in 18th-century Paris, according to early leaked screenshots obtained by Kotaku.

These screenshots, sent to me by a source who requested anonymity, show Unity's new assassin roaming around what appears to be Paris. You can see Notre Dame, the Seine River, and other Parisian landmarks, and the shots are very clearly from an early version of the game.

What's more, this is just one of two major Assassin's Creed games that will be out later this year, according to a number of sources. Unity will be for the current-gen consoles—Xbox One and PS4—while a second game, possibly called or code-named Comet, will be released on Xbox 360 and PS3. Presumably one or both versions will also be on PC. Sorry, Nintendo fans: I haven't yet heard anything about Wii U.

http://kotaku.com/leaked-images-reveal-one-of-this-falls-two-assassins-1547111652?utm_campaign=Socialflow_Kotaku_Twitter&utm_source=Kotaku_Twitter&utm_medium=Socialflow

 

 

Its one of the two Games. As the article states, one gets released on current gen, the other on old gen.

 

 

 

The other is called "Comet". Seems like its only a codename though.

 

 

 

Update:

 

 

Edited by iNero
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FranklinDeRoosevelt

Well I know this is an early version, but this definitely doesn't look like a next gen game.

 

And why are they releasing two versions? For f*cks sake.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dutch Psycho

Well I know this is an early version, but this definitely doesn't look like a next gen game.

 

And why are they releasing two versions? For f*cks sake.

First ubi said that they are focusing on next gen only with the ac series and then they say there's still a big market in old gen. Edited by Dutch Psycho
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FranklinDeRoosevelt

They should stop with the f*cking AC series until the NG market grows. Focus on WD you scumbags. You downgrade the game to make it look worse than IV and now you want to become like Apple by releasing two products simultaneously for both LG and CG.

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

AznDragon89

Ubisoft is milking this series to the ground. Like Activision to COD

I love the AC series but they need to end it

AC3 was really bad

didn't get Ac4 tho

Link to comment
Share on other sites

iiConTr0v3rSYx

Got milk?

 

Sad to see how far from grace the series has fallen. Two games a year now? SMH.

 

Atleast the location is interesting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ubisoft is milking this series to the ground. Like Activision to COD

I love the AC series but they need to end it

AC3 was really bad

didn't get Ac4 tho

 

AC IV: Black Flag was probably the best game in the series in my opinion. Ok AC III wasn't amazing and somewhat of a let down but they did seem to turn it around with AC IV.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Jensen

It looks like Assassin's Creed we know and love. Big city with lots of rooftops for free running.

 

I don't understand this secrecy about what game developers are working on. Gaming industry is the only entertainment industry that I know of that exercises such secrecy. And to what end? We already know they're making an AC game every year so it is kind of pointless to be secretive about it. Tell the people what it is and they'll talk about it. And that's a good thing.

Edited by The Yokel
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unity, Fraternity, Equality. I get it now :p

 

Game looks the same as the last 2 ACs, just different location

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, 1 year development time from a studio that also works on Watch_Dogs (Ubi Montreal) at the same time... you can imagine how much different it will be to the previous ACs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Lol and AC is just a 7 years old franchise Wtf is wrong with B**BISOFT? Lol :)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is going way too far. AC IV was likeable because pirates (seriously, not kidding), but if this continues, AC will be treated as the new COD. I mean, gamers are used to COD being released every year, but with a series like AC? Seriously, f*ck Ubisoft. I've tried to ignore all they did with WD, but god damn it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Jensen

This is going way too far. AC IV was likeable because pirates (seriously, not kidding), but if this continues, AC will be treated as the new COD. I mean, gamers are used to COD being released every year, but with a series like AC? Seriously, f*ck Ubisoft. I've tried to ignore all they did with WD, but god damn it.

You people baffle me. Sure, AC is a yearly release. But just because something is released on a yearly basis doesn't automatically make it bad. The only AC game that wasn't as good as AC tends to be was AC3. But they keep making compelling titles with great stories and great settings every time. And as long as they can keep doing that it's fine.

  • Like 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FranklinDeRoosevelt

Sorry but no. Just no. AC Revelations, 3 are the worst in the series. Hell it went down since 2.

 

 

I don't give a sh*t what you think, yearly releases should not be supported. They are doing 2 games in a row now, in the same f*cking time period. Go suck their dicks. Ubisoft is officially the new Apple.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

^blame it on money

True,but is Rockstar (Take2) not a Company and also needs money,but you dont see them annualising their Franchises esp. GTA,recently Take2 said GTA will never be annualised and that a 17 years old franchise which is a shame to B**BISOFT and AC,yeah CoD get annualised but it sells alot and people buy the games but i dont see Activision Annualising their other Games i.e. Prototype,unlike B**BI with all their games,even WD will be annualised,if they continue this path they will be the next THQ.

Edited by Blood-Is-in-Diamond
  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't give a sh*t what you think, yearly releases should not be supported. They are doing 2 games in a row now, in the same f*cking time period. Go suck their dicks. Ubisoft is officially the new Apple.

 

If I want to buy a game then I'm going to buy a game. If you dont agree with that then that's your choice but dont go around saying people shouldn't do something because you dont agree with it.

 

Like The Yokel said the only game that I wasn't to keen on was AC 3 but I still liked the story aspect and could/should of been better.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

yearly release is bad.

 

Look at other open world games.

 

GTA = 5 years since the new era

Saints Row = 2-3 Years

Mafia = probably the same as GTA ( MAFIA 3 is very likely when readint the latest hints )

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

This is going way too far. AC IV was likeable because pirates (seriously, not kidding), but if this continues, AC will be treated as the new COD. I mean, gamers are used to COD being released every year, but with a series like AC? Seriously, f*ck Ubisoft. I've tried to ignore all they did with WD, but god damn it.

You people baffle me. Sure, AC is a yearly release. But just because something is released on a yearly basis doesn't automatically make it bad. The only AC game that wasn't as good as AC tends to be was AC3. But they keep making compelling titles with great stories and great settings every time. And as long as they can keep doing that it's fine.

 

So it doesn't really matter if they take their time or just sh*t out the sequels? Think about it; if they would actually give themselves 2 or 3 years, they could make better games than what they're doing right now. Sure, the setting are awesome. Story? Not so. It's average at best. But what about gameplay? AC IV got the naval combat, but, is there anything actually new? Also, when the f*ck did I ever say in my post that AC is turning to be sh*t? I've never said it's bad, but eventually, people will treat this game for the worse. They'll find the milking a reason to bash on the game, and it's general knowledge; more time put into a product = better product (for the most time).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yearly release is bad.

 

Look at other open world games.

 

GTA = 5 years since the new era

Saints Row = 2-3 Years

Mafia = probably the same as GTA ( MAFIA 3 is very likely when readint the latest hints )

God bless this comment.and yeah Prototype and Uncharted should be included.I didnt like SR3/4 but that 2-3 years is great and should be that way same with GTA's 5 years cycle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

esmittystud101

So two games in the same year? This doesn't sound good at all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

FranklinDeRoosevelt

 

I don't give a sh*t what you think, yearly releases should not be supported. They are doing 2 games in a row now, in the same f*cking time period. Go suck their dicks. Ubisoft is officially the new Apple.

 

If I want to buy a game then I'm going to buy a game. If you dont agree with that then that's your choice but dont go around saying people shouldn't do something because you dont agree with it.

 

Like The Yokel said the only game that I wasn't to keen on was AC 3 but I still liked the story aspect and could/should of been better.

 

That's not what I was saying. I said stop supporting a disgusting company who release games annually, and now Ubisoft decided to release two AC games in the same time period. AC is a sh*t series now. Therefore if you are agreeing with what they are doing, it's people like you that's helping them to milk their games.

Edited by FranklinDeRoosevelt
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Adam Jensen

I don't give a sh*t what you think, yearly releases should not be supported.

See this? Your biggest problem is the fact that it's released on a yearly basis. That's not a valid agrument against something. If the quality is good the timing doesn't matter.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm with The Yokel, AC has a great story and setting, if they can keep it up, then let them release yearly.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This reminds me that I havent played AC4 since early December. I think I will fire it up later today.

Edited by gtamann123
Link to comment
Share on other sites

FranklinDeRoosevelt

 

I don't give a sh*t what you think, yearly releases should not be supported.

See this? Your biggest problem is the fact that it's released on a yearly basis. That's not a valid agrument against something. If the quality is good the timing doesn't matter.

 

I've been a fan of the series since the original and it's gone downhill ever since 2. Only Brotherhood managed to keep the same quality.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't care, I'll buy it.

 

AC in paris sounds awesome.

  • Like 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Doublepulse

People will complain even if it was not being milked every year. There is always a complaint to be made. Right now AC Unity kind of looks like Assassins Creed 1, am I not the only one who thinks that?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.