Why is blowing PV's bad?

[deLechuga]

This is a game that incites you to kill other players (And don't tell me it's not that way because some of the awards are about killing as much players, not NPC, as you can) anyway, why is bad to blow PV's? it's a really nice way to get even with someone, or to get him angry if you want to.

 

Don't get me wrong here! you'd still have to pay the insurance. But if someone it's griefing you in his tank, why wouldn't you be allowed to destroy his car some time after without being punished?

 

The essence of this game it's to have fun, and having fun in freeroam it's all about killing/destroying (and this is because everybody it's so fcking rude in FR, otherwise we would be all having fun doing some fun stuff)

 

Anyway, I think you all get the point of this thread. Blowing PV's is FUN. Anyone who says the opposite it's because is trying to look polite and nice in a game about killing.. If not, ¿why players have been looking the way to destroy PV's without being punished for it? first with the cargobob, jerry can, shooting a car in the engine, etc.

 

 

I'm not saying that we should be blowing every player PV all the time, but it'd be good to not be punished for an act that is so common to see. It's like if when playing Fifa you were not able to make a foul while playing online.

 

So, that's it. ¿What's your opinion?

[SLUGFly]

It's because people complained about spawn trappers in IV. Seriously. It makes THAT much sense.

[Odesza]

Realistically it should be changed to getting BS when you blow up the same person's PV in a certain amount of time. While blowing up multiple PVs over time is just fine I can see a clear problem with player griefing of someone following another player around and spawn killing him and his vehicle every time he tries to get away.

[vipprimo]

I don't get half the stuff going on in this game from players to design. I would think the big no no would be killing someone in passive mode, but that didn't even get a slap on the wrist for this.

[Blingy]

This is a game that incites you to kill other players (And don't tell me it's not that way because some of the awards are about killing as much players, not NPC, as you can) anyway, why is bad to blow PV's? it's a really nice way to get even with someone, or to get him angry if you want to.

 

Don't get me wrong here! you'd still have to pay the insurance. But if someone it's griefing you in his tank, why wouldn't you be allowed to destroy his car some time after without being punished?

 

The essence of this game it's to have fun, and having fun in freeroam it's all about killing/destroying (and this is because everybody it's so fcking rude in FR, otherwise we would be all having fun doing some fun stuff)

 

Anyway, I think you all get the point of this thread. Blowing PV's is FUN. Anyone who says the opposite it's because is trying to look polite and nice in a game about killing.. If not, ¿why players have been looking the way to destroy PV's without being punished for it? first with the cargobob, jerry can, shooting a car in the engine, etc.

 

 

I'm not saying that we should be blowing every player PV all the time, but it'd be good to not be punished for an act that is so common to see. It's like if when playing Fifa you were not able to make a foul while playing online.

 

So, that's it. ¿What's your opinion?

 

IT JUST DOES.

Edited March 18, 2014 by Blingy

[deLechuga]

I'd love to blow some pv's when boring.

[darkwar854]

The game isn't about killing.

[gnad.1992]

It's GT f*cking A

 

Badsport is BS

 

Option 1.

[deLechuga]

The game isn't about killing.

Yeah you are right, I forgot gta it's all about friendship and coloring books! oh oh and that non-letal place where u buy all those non-letal weapons! idiot.

[Tupiz]

I saw your "ramming is fun" -thread and now this...

 

Even the game is about killing (never was in fact), it doesn't mean you have to blow up every single vehicle you spot and slaughter all the fellow players. It does not mean you can't do teamwork.

 

Idiot.

Edited March 18, 2014 by /Tuomaz

[BSEANO]

You don't HAVE to blow up someone's car to kill them. I think that's what people don't understand.

[deLechuga]

I saw your "ramming is fun" -thread and now this...

Yeah, I guess that I like to have fun while playing, when I want to be polite I play other games, not one where everybody it's killing each other.

[Biohazard Abyss]

This is a game that incites you to kill other players (And don't tell me it's not that way because some of the awards are about killing as much players, not NPC, as you can)

 

LOL this is stupid

[chrisscorsese88]

My vote is that we shouldn't be punished for it with a bad rep, and that paying their insurance is enough "punishment". I honestly don't care if someone blows up my PV that has insurance since it's not like it'll be gone forever, so I really don't see why it would consider us to be "bad sports" in a game that's dedicated to killing and stealing. Like you said, it's not about purposely going around and constantly blowing up every PV you see for hours for absolutely no reason, but doing it once in a while, especially to those who might deserve it, shouldn't give you a bad rep.

[hugh750]

i don't think its ok to blow up other player's pv, because the pv's owner usually has to pay the insurence.

[deLechuga]

My vote is that we shouldn't be punished for it with a bad rep, and that paying their insurance is enough "punishment". I honestly don't care if someone blows up my PV that has insurance since it's not like it'll be gone forever, so I really don't see why it would consider us to be "bad sports" in a game that's dedicated to killing and stealing. Like you said, it's not about purposely going around and constantly blowing up every PV you see for hours for absolutely no reason, but doing it once in a while, especially to those who might deserve it, shouldn't give you a bad rep.

Finally someone who understands me. I see people saying that GTA it's not about killing.. wtf? what is gta about then? puzzles?

[tomuk3]

This is a game that incites you to kill other players (And don't tell me it's not that way because some of the awards are about killing as much players, not NPC, as you can)

 

Which is why death matches exist

[deLechuga]

 

This is a game that incites you to kill other players (And don't tell me it's not that way because some of the awards are about killing as much players, not NPC, as you can)

 

Which is why death matches exist

 

Ok. So in your opinion, freeroam it's only for recreation? well, I'll send a message to R* advising them that they forgot to disable weapons in FR.

[tomuk3]

 

 

This is a game that incites you to kill other players (And don't tell me it's not that way because some of the awards are about killing as much players, not NPC, as you can)

 

Which is why death matches exist

 

Ok. So in your opinion, freeroam it's only for recreation? well, I'll send a message to R* advising them that they forgot to disable weapons in FR.

 

 

The awards, which you began your point on, were created to be won in death matches.

[deLechuga]

 

 

 

This is a game that incites you to kill other players (And don't tell me it's not that way because some of the awards are about killing as much players, not NPC, as you can)

 

Which is why death matches exist

 

Ok. So in your opinion, freeroam it's only for recreation? well, I'll send a message to R* advising them that they forgot to disable weapons in FR.

 

 

The awards, which you began your point on, were created to be won in death matches.

 

No. They were created to be won. The award don't say "only in dm" If u can do it in freeroam it's totally legal.

[godziller]

Deathmatches in gta online suck compared to free roam battles though...I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking this...

[deLechuga]

Deathmatches in gta online suck compared to free roam battles though...I'm sure I'm not alone in thinking this...

In a certain way you're right, in DM most of the maps are sh*t, people setting the time to 1 hour, etc.

[Soran Is On]

The way I looked at insurance was a way to keep people from blowing up everything in sight with a tank. That made sense. Then they removed just that part...

 

So now I look at it as a way of dealing damage to a player without killing them.

 

Gta has always been about f*cking enemies over by violent or monetary means.

 

Nearly every gta mission since race'nchase has been about destroying people or property for your own gain.

 

Causing insurance cost to a vehicles owner is a fundamental.

[godziller]

The way I looked at insurance was a way to keep people from blowing up everything in sight with a tank. That made sense. Then they removed just that part...

 

So now I look at it as a way of dealing damage to a player without killing them.

 

Gta has always been about f*cking enemies over by violent or monetary means.

 

Nearly every gta mission since race'nchase has been about destroying people or property for your own gain.

 

Causing insurance cost to a vehicles owner is a fundamental.

Never thought of it like that...I like your train of thought there

[CarimboHanky]

you have no idea how much i complained in the R* newswire when they first announced the badsport thing...

 

in a game that youre allowed to carry vast amount of guns, ammo and explosives, its simply contradictory to have a bad sport system.

[Ninjambie]

I'm sorry, but I don't "blow" PV's. I blow them up, if that's what you mean.

 

I can't even add an "On Topic:" because the OP is talking about blowing PV's and I don't do that.

[deLechuga]

you have no idea how much i complained in the R* newswire when they first announced the badsport thing...

 

in a game that youre allowed to carry vast amount of guns, ammo and explosives, its simply contradictory to have a bad sport system.

Here, have this grenade launcher but don't destroy any cars, shoot some buildings that can't be destroyed.

[CarimboHanky]

The awards, which you began your point on, were created to be won in death matches.

if those award were ment to be done only in DMs that would have been specified and you wont be able to achieve the awards by killing players in freeroam.

 

maybe DM was the ideal place but reality is other, freeroam battles are 1000 times better than boring DM mode.

[tomuk3]

 

The awards, which you began your point on, were created to be won in death matches.

if those award were ment to be done only in DMs that would have been specified and you wont be able to achieve the awards by killing players in freeroam.

 

maybe DM was the ideal place but reality is other, freeroam battles are 1000 times better than boring DM mode.

 

 

That's up to you but I see it as being cheap since most people that die in free roam aren't actually after a fight, they just want to get around. There are those who come back for a war but the majority of kills in FR just seem unfair

[CarimboHanky]

 

 

you have no idea how much i complained in the R* newswire when they first announced the badsport thing...

 

in a game that youre allowed to carry vast amount of guns, ammo and explosives, its simply contradictory to have a bad sport system.

Here, have this grenade launcher but don't destroy any cars, shoot some buildings that can't be destroyed.

yep, have this rpg, sticky bombs, AP pistol, autoshutgun, merryweather airstrikes, etc etc etc...

 

have the buzzard, tank, jets have all this but make sure you dont destroy any PVs.

 

logic = NONE!