Bullet proof windows really should be an option...

[Jimrod]

Just because nearly every lobby I see nowadays consists of people driving Entity's and Jesters backwards down the street shooting at each other. It's a bit ridiculous. Bullet proof windows would mean at least there's a bit more variety in the game...

 

Oh and while they're at it either remove auto-aim or at least fix it so it shoots at the guy trying to do a drive-by in front of me rather than the random pedestrian/police officer half a block away. It would be better if it just wasn't in the game (I know there are empty free-aim lobbies but they're, well, empty.)

 

Thanks

Edited March 11, 2014 by Jimrod

[Killzone3265]

i'd be okay with it if it would make us unable to use weapons while in the car

[HopalongCasidy]

i'd be okay with it if it would make us unable to use weapons while in the car

not sure if srs. Would the op have us be unable to roll down the windows, too? is this thread sponsored by the girl scouts?

Edited March 11, 2014 by HopalongCasidy

[robboy18]

You can just go into a free aim lobby if you don't like auto aim.

 

Bulletproof glass would be ridiculous. You want everyone driving round in tanks?

[Killzone3265]

 

i'd be okay with it if it would make us unable to use weapons while in the car

not sure if srs

 

yeah on second thought, fk that lol

[KrazyFace]

i'd be okay with it if it would make us unable to use weapons while in the car

 

Exactly. The reason we don't have bullet-proof windows in cars is because if we did have em, then cars would be like really fast tanks - without the turret. Imagine a group of four people that are hard-core veterans in a 100% armored up car AND bullet-proof windows! The noobs wouldn't stand a chance...

[GTA-Freak-Vi]

What killzone said

 

Speaking of wishes, I'd also like 'stickie-bomb proof' option for our PVs

[Coin]

i'd be okay with it if it would make us unable to use weapons while in the car

 

Doesn't even make sense though. Obviously if you are using weapons from your car, you are forfeiting the protection the glass provides.

 

Sit in a fully armoured Patriot? One shot kill through the window with a pistol. Reverse up in an armoured entity? You're all goooooooood.

 

Bullet resistant glass is a must.

[Biohazard Abyss]

RPG.

[Vehicles]

They should make it like if you have bulletproof windows people cannot shoot you and you can't shoot out of your vehicle,sound fair?

[Jimrod]

Yeah, it would be far less ridiculous for everyone to be in armoured cars (which can still be blown up easily enough - happens to me all the time!) but everyone driving around in reverse in one of a couple of bullet-proof (from the rear) cars is far more sensible?

 

I'm not butt-hurt about anything, it's a game where you play to generally be an asshole, I was just in a lobby last night happily sniping from a roof and thought it looked stupid that everyone was driving up and down the street trying to kill each other in reverse. How about an easier option - no bullet proof cars at all? Maybe you get a little more protection in certain cars but the thin steel would still be penetrated by any bullet, make it more like the kind of protection the bullet-proof vest gives maybe.

 

Oh and "everyone driving around in tanks" - I thought that pretty much WAS this game now?

Edited March 11, 2014 by Jimrod

[Misanthrope Z]

certain cars (including some of my own) already have bullet proof butts

 

bulletproof windows would be kinda pushing it imo

[HopalongCasidy]

They should make it like if you have bulletproof windows people cannot shoot you and you can't shoot out of your vehicle,sound fair?

No. It sounds ridiculous and nothing like the game. Not being able to kill a player who backs up to you is a product of one of two things:

 

1. inability to process the strategy and defend it; or

 

2. a common desire for the game to play just how you subjectively desire it.

 

I don't care if you like to be on foot fighting people all the time. Clearly, this game offers more than that. Should you want that, might I suggest certain deathmatches, or even COD.

 

In the meantime, if a player shoots at my car, I take offense and will back up and kill him, spin out on his lifeless corpse, and then honk my horn to say goodbye.

Edited March 11, 2014 by HopalongCasidy

[Misanthrope Z]

No. It sounds ridiculous and nothing like the game. Not being able to kill a player who backs up to you is a product of one of two things:

 

1. inability to process the strategy and defend it; or

 

2. a common desire for the game to play just how you subjectively desire it.

 

I don't care if you like to be on foot fighting people all the time. Clearly, this game offers more than that. Should you want that, might I suggest certain deathmatches, or even COD.

i like you already

[Coin]

In this thread: Entity owners calling it a bad idea because they don't want to lose their edge.

[Biohazard Abyss]

In this thread: Entity owners calling it a bad idea because they don't want to lose their edge.

 

RPG > All edges

[Jimrod]

No. It sounds ridiculous and nothing like the game. Not being able to kill a player who backs up to you is a product of one of two things:

 

1. inability to process the strategy and defend it; or

 

2. a common desire for the game to play just how you subjectively desire it.

 

I don't care if you like to be on foot fighting people all the time. Clearly, this game offers more than that. Should you want that, might I suggest certain deathmatches, or even COD.

 

1. I can easily kill a player backing up to me, I'll just do what everyone else does - put all my cash on my second character and RPG/Grenade/Sticky them so they pay the bill. Sorry if I offended your favourite strategy of play.

 

2. I'd just prefer the game to be balanced better, as it is the majority of players will end up in one of a couple of cars due to being more immune from gunfire, how boring.

[Misanthrope Z]

In this thread: Entity owners calling it a bad idea because they don't want to lose their edge.

as a vacca, infernus, jester and former entity owner, i beg to differ

 

to a lower level, that'd be like fighting a tank moving at 120MPH

 

and (deity of your choice) forbid someone go into passive mode, retreat to a fully armored personal vehicle and have his way with a defenseless lvl10

Edited March 11, 2014 by OriginalCharacter

[HopalongCasidy]

In this thread: Entity owners calling it a bad idea because they don't want to lose their edge.

Entity, Adder, tourismo, Karin Rebel with certain Mods, the Jester even seems to have this property.

 

It would seem that the designers of the game wanted to balance out the strength of a pedestrian being able to lock on to someone in a car.

Edited March 11, 2014 by HopalongCasidy

[Crunch McThornbody]

I've love to have the option of going into a Passive Mode Session, where guns cannot be fired at all, not even if you're in your vehicle or your vehicle has them onboard (buzzard, tank, annihilator).

 

Such a situation would lend itself to having more creative ways of people trying to kill each other, crashing vehicles etc., especially the flying ones, and when players got bored of that they'd team up and start doing silly stuff in large groups which is why I joined a crew, so I can roll with the others knowing they won't intentionally try and kill me as soon as my dot appears on their radar.

[Coin]

 

In this thread: Entity owners calling it a bad idea because they don't want to lose their edge.

 

RPG > All edges

 

 

And sticky bombs!

 

 

In this thread: Entity owners calling it a bad idea because they don't want to lose their edge.

Entity, Adder, tourismo, Karin Rebel with certain Mods, the Jester even seems to have this property.

 

It would seem that the designers of the game wanted to balance out the strength of a pederstrian being able to lock on to someone in a car.

 

 

Yes, I'm aware that the Entity isn't the only one capable of doing it. Just the most well known.

 

It isn't to balance out the strength of lock on, we'd have bullet proof windows if that was the case. I mean, unless you can make a legitimate case for someone being able to shoot through a solid surface on one side and not the other?

[LogScottWood]

I think bulletproof glass could work. But it should be really expensive, like $300,000 or something.

[Jimrod]

I think bulletproof glass could work. But it should be really expensive, like $300,000 or something.

 

Yup, and Rockstar would surely be all in favour of more ways to spend the cash!

[Biohazard Abyss]

Bulletproof glass comes free with a cash card purchase

[HopalongCasidy]

 

 

 

 

In this thread: Entity owners calling it a bad idea because they don't want to lose their edge.

Entity, Adder, tourismo, Karin Rebel with certain Mods, the Jester even seems to have this property.

 

It would seem that the designers of the game wanted to balance out the strength of a pederstrian being able to lock on to someone in a car.

 

Yes, I'm aware that the Entity isn't the only one capable of doing it. Just the most well known.

 

It isn't to balance out the strength of lock on, we'd have bullet proof windows if that was the case. I mean, unless you can make a legitimate case for someone being able to shoot through a solid surface on one side and not the other?

They are shooting through very small windows, which are not a solid surface.

 

You want bullet proof windows in GTA? Go get in a tank, you gaping vag.

 

Or load up your second character, keep shooting at me in my car, and keep trying to blow me up. I will make you run out of rpg ammo or get you a dunce cap trying.

Edited March 11, 2014 by HopalongCasidy

[Coin]

 

They are shooting through very small windows, which are not a solid surface.

 

You want bullet proof windows in GTA? Go get in a tank, you gaping vag.

 

Or load up your second character, keep shooting at me in my car, and keep trying to blow me up. I will make you run out of rpg ammo or get you a dunce cap trying.

 

 

You are aware that you are the one sounding like, and I quote, "a gaping vag".

 

I have literally no problems dealing with your type. Sticky bomb you and then I move on. Good luck getting me a dunce cap though.

Edited March 11, 2014 by Insert-Coin-To-Continue

[HopalongCasidy]

I just realized you were not the same guy advocating the second character. I thought you were, so I apologize for the gaping vag comment. Just so I understand, you are for bulletproof windows, or just against the strategy?

[_PANiC_]

Bullet proof windows!....lol ....grow a pair ..or stay in your tank

[GTA Banjo]

They (we) would still blow you up bro.

[DangerZone77]

My level 125 toon has no $ in the bank... for this exact reason... RPG > Chradder or Chrentity. No cheap kills.

 

BTW my level 56 alt has $3 million and I only play missions and races with her.