CantThinkOfOne2013 Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 (edited) But I wasn't talking about vehicle variety in the first place, WAS I? You're being dense. I originally mention vehicle variety, and you turned it into car variety. You brought up that I mentioned vehicle variety and I was referring to cars in actuality. Now do you understand? No, I don't understand because this argument started because you called peluche503 and Tennax "hardcore and blinded, ignoramus defenders of this video game" and I said that it wasn't fair coming from you of all people because you once said (I was referring to a time before this post) said that GTA IV had better vehicle variety (and yes, you said vehicle variety then).Oh crickey, I'm arguing with an imbecile. If you would have thoroughly read my earlier argument about vehicle variety, YOU WOULD HAVE understood that I was referring to car variety regardless of the fact that I said vehicle variety. If you still don't understand that, please just stop posting replies towards me because you're not worth my time. Of course I understood the fact that you were talking about car variety but still used the words 'vehicle variety' but it felt like a cop out response for an excuse to hate on GTA V and defend GTA IV, and while I have nothing against you liking GTA IV better (everyone is entitled to their own opinion), calling people "hardcore and blinded, ignoramus defenders" and then doing it yourself is hypocritical. EDIT: I smell a locked thread coming. Edited March 9, 2014 by CantThinkOfOne2013 strakan7 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raavi Posted March 9, 2014 Share Posted March 9, 2014 This is how threads get locked. Algonquin Assassin, coach_wargo and Gnocchi Flip Flops 3 – overeducated wonk who fetishises compromise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts