Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!   (84,731 visits to this link)

    2. News

    1. GTA Online

      1. Find Lobbies & Players
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Vehicles
      4. Content Creator
      5. Help & Support
    2. Crews

      1. Events
      2. Recruitment
    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

    2. GTA Next

    3. GTA V

      1. PC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    4. GTA IV

      1. Episodes from Liberty City
      2. Multiplayer
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
      5. GTA Mods
    5. GTA Chinatown Wars

    6. GTA Vice City Stories

    7. GTA Liberty City Stories

    8. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    9. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    10. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    11. Top Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    12. Wiki

      1. Merchandising
    1. GTA Modding

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    3. Featured Mods

      1. DYOM
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

    2. Red Dead Redemption

    3. Rockstar Games

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Programming
      5. Movies & TV
      6. Music
      7. Sports
      8. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    1. Forum Support

    2. Site Suggestions

wiizardii

Is there anyone who thinks the city is too small?

Recommended Posts

wiizardii

I Personally like the size, Although LA in real life is bigger, I heard a guy saying in a video in YT or in a thread saying that the city of LS is too small and it should have been extended atleast up to Los Santos County. Does anyone agree with this statement or just think LS is actually much smaller and lacks some things Liberty City did not?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hodgey.

I think the map is big enough but when you look at the desert and the forest I think the map should of been made bigger to accomodate them more and make the feeling of tranistioning from the desert to the forest a bit more realistic.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Vanto

The map is good at this size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Officer Ronson

I think its quite big.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
universetwisters

I always thought the ghetto/slums would be bigger, like in reality

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shenmue18

I was hoping the actual city area would be bigger instead of being more countryside than city, I also agree with Universe that the ghetto should have been a lot bigger.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
V 9 L U K 3 4 V

its a good size city i guess it could have been a tad bigger maybe make the ghetto bigger and more separate from down town instead of being down the road also the buildings themselves i don't know why but the skyscrapers don't seem that tall i know i know they are tall but when im on the top i looking down and think oh is that it like on gta 4 i was like wow im up high.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
wiizardii

Oh for some guys who misunderstood, I only ment the City, not the entire map itself. The city is Los Santos, the south area of San Andreas.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hellyeah3:16

That is really my only gripe about the game's map, they did an amazing job with the Blaine County, Sandy Shores area of the map but the city part of the game could've been way better. I'm not saying it should've been as big as LA but it could've been way bigger that it was. There's no way in hell that city is bigger than Liberty City.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
~Tiger~

The city is plenty big enough and serves it's purpose well.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hodgey.

Oh for some guys who misunderstood, I only ment the City, not the entire map itself. The city is Los Santos, the south area of San Andreas.

 

Oh well, the city itself is plenty big enough.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Terrato137

The map is a good size, however I personally think the city should've been slightly spread out more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Zolag

I expected the city to be bigger, there's too much desert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Meekail

I expected the city to be bigger, there's too much desert.

If anything, there's less desert.

 

I think the map is pretty good for me at least.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Official General

The city map is a good size, but it could have been designed and laid out in a much better way. Firstly, the roads were too wide. Narrower roads could have meant more buildings and more space for other structures. Secondly, there was not enough balance in residential areas - there were not enough general working-class districts or middle-class suburbs, it was mostly just ghettos and very wealthy neighborhoods. The city could have been spread out across the map a bit more too.

 

Having said all that, I do think Rockstar could and should have made Los Santos much bigger than it is, especially seeing how there is so much countryside and desert.

Edited by Official General

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
one55

I think Los Santos is perfectly fine the way it is. If the entire map was full of city area then you'd still get people coming on here making stupid threads "LS city should be bigger!!"

 

I spend most of my time playing in the city and then I remember that there's all this countryside/desert/mountain areas as well. You can get lost in it. You won't find another video game city like it.

 

I think that if there was any more city area then it should have gone towards making a separate city from LS. I wish Rockstar would have removed Mt. Gordo and added a smaller city there. Just imagine it...driving/flying from LS up to the other side of the map to this other city. From the city you'd still have mountains surrounding it (the city would be in the shadow of Mt. Chilliad). Grapeseed would be the countryside area and Paletto bay would be a short drive away. The city would also have a beach that it shares with paletto bay that is going along the north coast.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AndyC-M

i would of liked the city bigger with more motorways, and generally the island to be bigger, with already mentioned, the transition into dessert more realistic

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
xenorama

The city map is a good size, but it could have been designed and laid out in a much better way. Firstly, the roads were too wide. Narrower roads could have meant more buildings and more space for other structures.

 

 

Yes it is really weird that the roads in some places are so insanely wide, I have noticed a bit of uneven sizing throughout the game. Safe houses seem smaller than they should be, except Franklin's pad in Vinewood Hills, and the cars are VERY small compared to the characters. If you look closely, the characters' knees are usually clipping into the underside of the dashboard, and standing next to cars makes it obvious they are too small. It would be just about impossible to actually drive one of these cars without putting the seat way back.

 

If the roads had more lanes to use the space, and the characters were smaller (meaning everything else was scaled up), then it would look a bit more realistic. Or just make the cars bigger to use the extra space on the roads, and let the safehouses be the sizes they are.

 

It seems Rockstar had trouble balancing the sizes of things like houses and garages against the sizes of cars and roads and the characters. They were most likely all designed by different teams within the company. A project this big is bound to have issues like this.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLOOD

Liberty City (GTA 4)

Players:Boring,Small,No Countryside

 

Southern San Andreas (GTA 5)

Players:Too Big,No enough City blahblahblah.

 

Oh Lord what wrong with Gamers tbh,Why do they love complaining.i am sure this would be a future trend for future GTAs.

 

OP:IMO Los Santos Size is okay.

Edited by Blood-Is-in-Diamond

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PeriodZeroHero

The city map is a good size, but it could have been designed and laid out in a much better way. Firstly, the roads were too wide. Narrower roads could have meant more buildings and more space for other structures. Secondly, there was not enough balance in residential areas - there were not enough general working-class districts or middle-class suburbs, it was mostly just ghettos and very wealthy neighborhoods. The city could have been spread out across the map a bit more too.

 

Having said all that, I do think Rockstar could and should have made Los Santos much bigger than it is, especially seeing how there is so much countryside and desert.

 

roads are like that in LA tho. We are really famous for our wide Freeways and Streets! Also the only thing needed was make that eastern part of the map extended into ocean a bit for some middle class OC. :D Edited by SuburbansWorst

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Official General

 

The city map is a good size, but it could have been designed and laid out in a much better way. Firstly, the roads were too wide. Narrower roads could have meant more buildings and more space for other structures. Secondly, there was not enough balance in residential areas - there were not enough general working-class districts or middle-class suburbs, it was mostly just ghettos and very wealthy neighborhoods. The city could have been spread out across the map a bit more too.

 

Having said all that, I do think Rockstar could and should have made Los Santos much bigger than it is, especially seeing how there is so much countryside and desert.

roads are like that in LA tho. We are really famous for our wide Freeways and Streets! Also the only thing needed was make that eastern part of the map extended into ocean a bit for some middle class OC. :D

 

 

Nah disagree. I still think Los Santos's roads should have been scaled down a bit in size. I don't mind them a bit wide, because it's typical of LA roads, but they were just too wide for a GTA game. The freeways and highways were fine as they were, I'm more talking about the regular LS city streets and roads.

 

Another thing that kinda annoyed me was the way East LS was created, it was nearly all industrial areas, with hardly any residential areas. East LA is home to a massive Hispanic ghetto and neighborhood, hardly any of this was reflected in East LS, which was quite disappointing. Even East LS in San Andreas had a Hispanic ghetto.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLOOD

@Official General

Good to see you back bro.but yeah the Roads are too wide,it actually makes it more immersive IMO.and what do you mean by "East LS in San Andreas? is it the game (SA) or the 3D Era San Andreas ?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Official General

@Official General

Good to see you back bro.but yeah the Roads are too wide,it actually makes it more immersive IMO.and what do you mean by "East LS in San Andreas? is it the game (SA) or the 3D Era San Andreas ?

 

I'm talking about the game SA from the III-era. In it's own version of East Los Santos, it had a big Hispanic neighborhood with many Chicano gang members, the Vagos.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLOOD

 

 

@Official General

Good to see you back bro.but yeah the Roads are too wide,it actually makes it more immersive IMO.and what do you mean by "East LS in San Andreas? is it the game (SA) or the 3D Era San Andreas ?

I'm talking about the game SA from the III-era. In it's own version of East Los Santos, it had a big Hispanic neighborhood with many Chicano gang members, the Vagos.

No arguement,but with GTA 5's HD Graphics ,i think East LS looks Great (i guess).

Edited by Blood-Is-in-Diamond

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
RatchetAZ

Los Santos itself is fine if it was made too big there wouldn't be much of a desert or countryside. But there should of been some gap between where the outskirts of LS is and the start of the desert is, as in a few miles of nothing but highway with one or two service stations along the way until you reach the desert, and the same with the journey to the countryside a highway. But maybe less desert and more countryside with more a forest look.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
pilscy

It is too small. Theres a shot load of dessert and underwater sh*t that I particularly dont care about. I wanted a full good size hood(s).. we got some jam up sh*t. I wanted a bigger downtown. . Got some small scale crap. Then there's part of the map thats just forest and trees... potentially wasteful land

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Black & White

The map is big. But the map doesn't have much going on. Blaine County is pretty much empty. The deserts are huge but you can't really do anything out there. It's pretty much plain. Los Santos is active, but the other part isn't.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Dope_0110

I'd say the city sizes they have in HD era are just about perfect. If cities were bigger they would just be a drag to drive around.

And just to comment on your comparison with real life, of course it's smaller. About a 100 times smaller than real life LA (I think it's about 400-500 square miles in real life, while in game it would probably be some 5-6 square miles of pure city surface)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Kevert

It was too small but my real beef with the map is the countless number of hills with nothing on them except poor textures and small rocks. Taking away a few of them would have left room for a bigger or second city, more dense forest area and perhaps a more interesting desert as piling too much content into the present one would have seemed odd given its size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shenmue18

I rarely if ever do anything in the desert, I usually just play in the city, so for me I would have liked for the majority of the map to be the city, if not all of it. Instead of a good majority of it being desert.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.