Chris Fromage Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) LOL. Wow. Only a five year old would think "lol post the code". Well, if 10 years old can perfectly mod a game, why not? Digging yourself even deeper into a whole isn't doing you any favours. Every post you're making about this makes you look even more clueless. Oh the Irony... Instead of trying to push away knowledge and insist that you're right without actually knowing how things work, why don't you embrace the idea that you don't know everything and admit that you're wrong and learn from your mistakes? I will, if you make a perfectly working mod like any other 10 year old. Then I will accept that a 10 year old can indeed mod a game. Until that, I will just ingore your comments and wait for your mod... Edited May 3, 2014 by Chris Fromage Gummy 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Basically. So are you crazy? I think this is the second time you've posted this. Chris Fromage and iNero 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Detective Phelps Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 How many are they gonna release more? Over 9000! And all of them will involve 'Murica saving the day from Russians, Arabs, and Chinese Commies! They will all end with the antagonist dying, and 'Murica will be attacked in the beginning. THE GHETTO JEZUS 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) LOL. Wow. Only a five year old would think "lol post the code". Well, if 10 years old can perfectly mod a game, why not? Digging yourself even deeper into a whole isn't doing you any favours. Every post you're making about this makes you look even more clueless.Oh the Irony... Instead of trying to push away knowledge and insist that you're right without actually knowing how things work, why don't you embrace the idea that you don't know everything and admit that you're wrong and learn from your mistakes? I will, if you make a perfectly working mod like any other 10 year old. Then I will accept that a 10 year old can indeed mod a game. Until that, I will just leave your comments as they are wait for your mod... Wow. Just wow. Why would I go out and buy Call of Duty Ghosts and make a mod just to prove something for you? Run speed and jump height being determined by a value is just a fact. You're sitting there trying to deny a common fact and making yourself look like an absolute mroon in the process. By your flawed logic, you might as well walk around town saying "the moon doesn't exist", and telling people to "fly there" whenever they try to say otherwise. Edited May 3, 2014 by Guest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Th3MaN1 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 GTAForums. Where everything goes off-topic. Are you two seriously going to argue about coding a game and whatnot? Does is really matter that much? Take it to PM if it's so important to you two. Detective Phelps 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTA-iFruit Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 People who are asking Blackops 3, treyarch are giving a little more time by Activision with there COD games, the reason being is because this Advanced Warfare is a sledgehammer game they've never made there own COD game before but have worked with IW on MW3 but that was only the MP side of things!!!!! So as many of you know by now there are 3 developers on this COD franchise!! IW, Sledgehammer & Treyarch. so there will be a 3 year development to each team to focus on the games future instalments maybe new game engines, innovative, ect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranklinDeRoosevelt Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 3 teams yes, but each game is developed just like before, only a 1 year development period which is still the same stinking sh*t as before. Right now Sledgehammer will be finishing off this game and polishing it, and once it's out, the next team starts developing the next game. COD will never have a development period over 1 year which is sad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTA-iFruit Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 no that's not true the teams have least 3years to make COD of there own game, a specific team will release a COD game an then gets 3 years to make its next instalment but even though we are getting COD every year the only difference is the teams. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranklinDeRoosevelt Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) So how is that a 3 year development cycle? Do you even realize what you're saying? All COD's are being developed only for one year, and each team releases their game every year over a period of 3 years only because they are seperate developments. It's not a 3 year development period, it's a one year period for each game. Each team releases their game the year after the previous one. Edited May 3, 2014 by FranklinDeRoosevelt Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE GHETTO JEZUS Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Here's my Wishlist for this game. - No customizable killstreaks, go back to 3-5-7. UAV-Aistrike-Chopper - No Pro Perks - One attachment - Pistols or Launchers only for secondary The series started dropping when everything got too complex. Just give me my rifle and a whole lotta headshots - Naw I think they should go back to the way it was up until Black Ops, like screw the Support and Specialist killstreaks. - I think Pro Perks are okay if its balanced out with other perks that can counter that, maybe go back to the simple days when we had less perks around. Like having guys running around with 3 perks instead of 20+ as it is right now. - That I think is something they should do - Again, I guarantee all the 5 year olds that haven't played COD back then would be freaking out when they can't run around with 2 assault rifles. True, for me it was when MW3 got launched and when Black Ops 2 got released then it just went downhill from there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNero Posted May 3, 2014 Author Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) I made a Avatar and Wallpaper from the different layers of the website. Put on the logo and changed the pictures a bit. Avatar: https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6l7vI8J9StJMTVqZzZmS0lGOHc/edit?usp=sharing Wallpaper (1920x1080) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6l7vI8J9StJYXNtWklXTHBXT2s/edit?usp=sharing (1600x914 - was the original size of the layers on the website) https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B6l7vI8J9StJNlBFUGw3MjlRWjA/edit?usp=sharing I dont know if GTAF resizes the Avatars if they are too big. You have to try it. Edited May 3, 2014 by iNero Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE GHETTO JEZUS Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Pretty much ( Saw this on Facebook ) SingularSoul, Target13, Detective Phelps and 2 others 5 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zancudo Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 omg, whatcha talkin' bout, dere's Kevin Spacey, its a revolution in gaming, am soooo interested in the storyline now. ... and again, millions of people buy the next iteration of this mediocrity. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleBlueTroll Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 These photos are so funny guys keep them coming. Said nobody, ever. Seriously, if you hate Call Of Duty and want to slag it off to high heaven that is your decision. Your opinion is your own and that's what a forum is for. But spamming it with photos and memes is a fast track way of getting this topic locked, and ruining it for people who want to talk about it properly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 You guys are worse than the people who hate Beiber. You "hate"it, but you you can't stfu about it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuareg Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) Yeah seriously, it's 2014, kiddos. Hating cod doesn't make you cool anymore. Take the bandwagoning f*ck sh*t here if you can't keep it together http://gtaforums.com/topic/705663-has-the-call-of-duty-franchise-reached-its-deadline/page-2 Edited May 3, 2014 by tuareg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE GHETTO JEZUS Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Well I actually said something about this game a few pages back about how that they should just stop it with the Sci-FI based games. But for real tho, why are they just going Sci-Fi now ? I honeslty think having a game based in the past ( maybe like 20 years ago or so ) would be much better than the 2025 thing or w.e. Not sure why you guys have to spazz out like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) Lol two games set in the "future" and everyone is acting like that's all they do. Edited May 3, 2014 by DarthShinobi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
THE GHETTO JEZUS Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Lol two games set in the "future" and everyone is acting like that's all they do. Actually it wasn't just two games as MW1, MW2, MW3 were also set in the future but wasn't set that far into from their release Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SingularSoul Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Why don't they go back to the roots of the franchise? I know WW2 has been done to death... but there's still a million stories left to tell.... COD 3 approached things from a pretty cool angle (The polish and french campaigns). Why not do something similar? Or go back to WW1? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LittleBlueTroll Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Why don't they go back to the roots of the franchise? I know WW2 has been done to death... but there's still a million stories left to tell.... COD 3 approached things from a pretty cool angle (The polish and french campaigns). Why not do something similar? Or go back to WW1? What worries me the most is will this futuristic, advanced warfare become the norm? It has been a long time since Call Of Duty done a World War 1/2 title. Since COD 4 every title has essentially been utilizing high tech guns and attachments with high tech killstreaks ETC. Will they ever have the balls to turn around and do a game set in world war 2, where you have old fashioned weaponry? Will they ever have the balls to strip it back and say ''this is the direction we are taking this time around' My answer is i doubt it. With this title due out, the one to follow will be Black Ops 3 and i highly doubt they will jump right back into the past, and then it will be Ghosts 2, which will essentially carry on where Ghosts left off. I think one of the only hope we have of seeing a title set in a past time frame, is if Treyarch scratch Black Ops and do another World At War title for 2015. Abel. 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNero Posted May 3, 2014 Author Share Posted May 3, 2014 They finally need to make a Beta again. I think BO1 was the last CoD that had a Closed Beta. There were some leaks of gameplay back then. MW2 had leaks to, but MW3, BO2 and Ghosts didnt had it. They just made those public events and think they can get enough feedback from them. Mainly of those so called "pro" gamers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dutch Psycho Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) So how is that a 3 year development cycle? Do you even realize what you're saying? All COD's are being developed only for one year, and each team releases their game every year over a period of 3 years only because they are seperate developments. It's not a 3 year development period, it's a one year period for each game. Each team releases their game the year after the previous one. So they have more development time. Black ops 2 was released in 2012 by treyarch. 2013 ghost by IW and 2014 advanced warfare by sledgehammer. So 2015 is for treyarch again. Do you think they only start making a new cod when the other one is finished?what are treyarch and IW doing when sledgehammer is making cod AW? Jacking off? That's 3 years dev time. Is it that hard to understand? Edited May 3, 2014 by Dutch Psycho OnceAgainYoungFitzpatrick 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 (edited) @iNero CoD4 had it too, and I agree. All games where multiplayer is a big part of the game should have a Beta. Edited May 3, 2014 by DarthShinobi Dutch Psycho 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FullMetal Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Beta's for consoles are pretty much nothing but crowdpleasers/demos. They serve no real serious purpose. PC gaming has a need of betas because the plethora of unique PC machine builds there are and all the possible errors that could occur on all these different platforms and what it could be the problem for. That being said: I still believe delivering a buggy/shoddy console game shows the quality of a developer. On PC on the other hand I can believe the whole process of delivering a rather unstable product and having to fix it. /sidetrack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Still couldn't hurt, man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNero Posted May 3, 2014 Author Share Posted May 3, 2014 Beta's for consoles are pretty much nothing but crowdpleasers/demos. They serve no real serious purpose. PC gaming has a need of betas because the plethora of unique PC machine builds there are and all the possible errors that could occur on all these different platforms and what it could be the problem for. That being said: I still believe delivering a buggy/shoddy console game shows the quality of a developer. On PC on the other hand I can believe the whole process of delivering a rather unstable product and having to fix it. /sidetrack lol. How were Betas crowdpleasers?! They help a lot with the balancing and bug fixing. There are no Betas anymore. EA calls it Beta 4 weeks before release, while its just a Demo of the Game in Beta Stage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Target13 Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 I don't hate the franchise. I hate its Fanboys. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FranklinDeRoosevelt Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 So how is that a 3 year development cycle? Do you even realize what you're saying? All COD's are being developed only for one year, and each team releases their game every year over a period of 3 years only because they are seperate developments. It's not a 3 year development period, it's a one year period for each game. Each team releases their game the year after the previous one. So they have more development time. Black ops 2 was released in 2012 by treyarch. 2013 ghost by IW and 2014 advanced warfare by sledgehammer. So 2015 is for treyarch again. Do you think they only start making a new cod when the other one is finished?what are treyarch and IW doing when sledgehammer is making cod AW? Jacking off? That's 3 years dev time. Is it that hard to understand? Seriously, have you ever been to school and done some maths? It is ONE year dev time on EACH game. Three on ALL games put together. You are confusing yourself. It literally is not making any difference whatsoever because EACH game will still be developed in one year Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FullMetal Posted May 3, 2014 Share Posted May 3, 2014 Beta's for consoles are pretty much nothing but crowdpleasers/demos. They serve no real serious purpose. PC gaming has a need of betas because the plethora of unique PC machine builds there are and all the possible errors that could occur on all these different platforms and what it could be the problem for. That being said: I still believe delivering a buggy/shoddy console game shows the quality of a developer. On PC on the other hand I can believe the whole process of delivering a rather unstable product and having to fix it. /sidetrack lol. How were Betas crowdpleasers?! They help a lot with the balancing and bug fixing. There are no Betas anymore. EA calls it Beta 4 weeks before release, while its just a Demo of the Game in Beta Stage. Most of the real bugfixing and balancing gets done ages before. And you should read what I said.... the entire post. Betas as we have seen them for popular FPS games these last years are nothing but glorified demos. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now