Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!   (84,950 visits to this link)

    2. News

    1. GTA Online

      1. Find Lobbies & Players
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Vehicles
      4. Content Creator
      5. Help & Support
    2. Crews

      1. Events
      2. Recruitment
    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

    2. GTA Next

    3. GTA V

      1. PC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    4. GTA IV

      1. Episodes from Liberty City
      2. Multiplayer
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
      5. GTA Mods
    5. GTA Chinatown Wars

    6. GTA Vice City Stories

    7. GTA Liberty City Stories

    8. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    9. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    10. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    11. Top Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    12. Wiki

      1. Merchandising
    1. GTA Modding

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    3. Featured Mods

      1. DYOM
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

    2. Red Dead Redemption

    3. Rockstar Games

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Programming
      5. Movies & TV
      6. Music
      7. Sports
      8. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    1. Forum Support

    2. Site Suggestions

CaliMeatWagon

First Person GTA

  

170 members have voted

  1. 1. Should GTA ever include a true first person view.



Recommended Posts

Murray Bunyan

I'll leave it for the mods.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geralt of Rivia

Either people don't know what an option is, or people don't want the game to be more diverse.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Official General

Either people don't know what an option is, or people don't want the game to be more diverse.

 

Sometimes I just wonder about certain people on this thread. You know what, why not just add more bullsh*t into GTA like zombies, dragons, wizards, elves, fairies, unicorns, wooly mammoths, dinosaurs and centaurs . It could benefit with more diversity right ? Why not just change everything about GTA and make it something so different from what it already is ? Let's do it to the point that it is GTA no more.

 

There, you happy now ?

Edited by Official General

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shade04rek

 

Either people don't know what an option is, or people don't want the game to be more diverse.

 

Sometimes I just wonder about certain people on this thread. You know what, why not just add more bullsh*t into GTA like zombies, dragons, wizards, elves, fairies, unicorns, wooly mammoths, dinosaurs and centaurs . It could benefit with more diversity right ? Why not just change everything about GTA and make it something so different from what it already is ? Let's do it to the point that it is GTA no more.

 

There, you happy now ?

 

Don't become a lawyer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Proletariat

No. Not FPGTA. f*ck that idea. Whoever came up with this idea ought to be banned from these forums. Day by day. I see someone on these forums wanting to ruin the very fundamentals of GTA. Then, R* takes notice, implements it into the game, and then the true GTA fans suffer. No thank you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
darkwar854

I wouldn't mind the driving to be first person. But that's all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLOOD

No. Not FPGTA. f*ck that idea. Whoever came up with this idea ought to be banned from these forums. Day by day. I see someone on these forums wanting to ruin the very fundamentals of GTA. Then, R* takes notice, implements it into the game, and then the true GTA fans suffer. No thank you.

Great Comment bro.and also people GTA is a Crime-related Stories Franchise not COD,Far Cry,or GTA Clones i.e.Sleeping dogs or Sausage(Saints)Row

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Official General

No. Not FPGTA. f*ck that idea. Whoever came up with this idea ought to be banned from these forums. Day by day. I see someone on these forums wanting to ruin the very fundamentals of GTA. Then, R* takes notice, implements it into the game, and then the true GTA fans suffer. No thank you.

 

Nah bro, you're wrong. Don't you get it ? We should embrace a much more diverse approach to GTA according to some people on here. Despite the fact that these 'diverse' approaches would probably ruin the franchise for what it's known for and that GTA would no longer feel like GTA, I hear it's still a great thing.

Edited by Official General

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLOOD

Like wtf,GTA is the only few game Franchise(and the only one in the genre)with Unique Camera Modes,if anything the 4th Camera Modes in Vehicles in future GTA should be Cockpit like Forza then that fine

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CaliMeatWagon

 

No. Not FPGTA. f*ck that idea. Whoever came up with this idea ought to be banned from these forums. Day by day. I see someone on these forums wanting to ruin the very fundamentals of GTA. Then, R* takes notice, implements it into the game, and then the true GTA fans suffer. No thank you.

 

Nah bro, you're wrong. Don't you get it ? We should embrace a much more diverse approach to GTA according to some people on here. Despite the fact that these 'diverse' approaches would probably ruin the franchise for what it's known for and that GTA would no longer feel like GTA, I hear it's still a great thing.

 

 

 

You guys are acting like the idea is about making it mandatory first person. It's already quasi there for most of the vehicles. I'm talking about it being an option.

 

Lets say they implement it into GTA VI, this is how it would look:

 

"What? I thought this was first person. Oh, I press select/back and it cycles between 3rd person and 1st person. That's cool I have the option as I feel GTA should be in 3rd person/1st person."

 

Not: "Awww ma gaawwd they ruined GTA forevas phuck roosterstar"

 

You guys who are amazing sometimes. Acting like something that is technically already in the coding of the game is going to ruin the game. You better not let your character stand idle for too long. You might go into 1st person.

 

I mean look at how much they ruined GTA by getting rid of the top down camera for all gameplay, I mean they just destroyed the franchise with that decision. What were they ever thinking.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Proletariat

Even though I love GTA V and I think it truly is a masterpiece (COMPARED TO EVERY OTHER GAME {besides TLOU} AND NON-R* GAMES), GTA V could have been much more. GTA V needed heavy emphasis on gang elements as this is a real issue in SoCal. GTA V needed more emphasis on drug smuggling, narcotics trade, etc. GTA V needed more emphasis (I think R* is onto something, but they could have added more) on Heists. Robbing one or two banks ain't gonna cut it these days. We want more underworld/cime activities in GTA, more explorable interiors, better/smarter/responsive AI's and NPC's, additional cities. But instead of planning for the future, people here want First Person? Online? Are you f*cking kidding me? Was I the only who was pissed off when R* announced an online component? I knew that spelt trouble for GTA SP. But no, mindless sheep here want crews, MP heists, and other sh*t. I'm glad I don't waste money on Xbox Live for MP. R* could've really made GTA V more special, if they didn't f*cking worry about online. But hey, let the sheeple have their online fun. I'll still be playing VC/SA on my iPad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BoomBoomMAN

I would cancel my preorder instantly like a mofo if that thing was real.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Proletariat

 

 

No. Not FPGTA. f*ck that idea. Whoever came up with this idea ought to be banned from these forums. Day by day. I see someone on these forums wanting to ruin the very fundamentals of GTA. Then, R* takes notice, implements it into the game, and then the true GTA fans suffer. No thank you.

 

Nah bro, you're wrong. Don't you get it ? We should embrace a much more diverse approach to GTA according to some people on here. Despite the fact that these 'diverse' approaches would probably ruin the franchise for what it's known for and that GTA would no longer feel like GTA, I hear it's still a great thing.

 

 

 

You guys are acting like the idea is about making it mandatory first person. It's already quasi there for most of the vehicles. I'm talking about it being an option.

 

Lets say they implement it into GTA VI, this is how it would look:

 

"What? I thought this was first person. Oh, I press select/back and it cycles between 3rd person and 1st person. That's cool I have the option as I feel GTA should be in 3rd person/1st person."

 

Not: "Awww ma gaawwd they ruined GTA forevas phuck roosterstar"

 

You guys who are amazing sometimes. Acting like something that is technically already in the coding of the game is going to ruin the game. You better not let your character stand idle for too long. You might go into 1st person.

 

I mean look at how much they ruined GTA by getting rid of the top down camera for all gameplay, I mean they just destroyed the franchise with that decision. What were they ever thinking.

 

1. You want first person view? Don't touch your controller for like 3 minutes, and you'll have you camera angle that you so desperately want.

 

2. Your top-down argument is laughable at best. I can't even....someone wanna tell this guy why changing to First Person is not the samething thing as getting rid of top down view?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BoomBoomMAN

I think far camera in GTA V is too far and near camera is too near.

Edited by BoomBoomMAN

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CaliMeatWagon

 

 

 

No. Not FPGTA. f*ck that idea. Whoever came up with this idea ought to be banned from these forums. Day by day. I see someone on these forums wanting to ruin the very fundamentals of GTA. Then, R* takes notice, implements it into the game, and then the true GTA fans suffer. No thank you.

 

Nah bro, you're wrong. Don't you get it ? We should embrace a much more diverse approach to GTA according to some people on here. Despite the fact that these 'diverse' approaches would probably ruin the franchise for what it's known for and that GTA would no longer feel like GTA, I hear it's still a great thing.

 

 

 

You guys are acting like the idea is about making it mandatory first person. It's already quasi there for most of the vehicles. I'm talking about it being an option.

 

Lets say they implement it into GTA VI, this is how it would look:

 

"What? I thought this was first person. Oh, I press select/back and it cycles between 3rd person and 1st person. That's cool I have the option as I feel GTA should be in 3rd person/1st person."

 

Not: "Awww ma gaawwd they ruined GTA forevas phuck roosterstar"

 

You guys who are amazing sometimes. Acting like something that is technically already in the coding of the game is going to ruin the game. You better not let your character stand idle for too long. You might go into 1st person.

 

I mean look at how much they ruined GTA by getting rid of the top down camera for all gameplay, I mean they just destroyed the franchise with that decision. What were they ever thinking.

 

1. You want first person view? Don't touch your controller for like 3 minutes, and you'll have you camera angle that you so desperately want.

 

2. Your top-down argument is laughable at best. I can't even....someone wanna tell this guy why changing to First Person is not the samething thing as getting rid of top down view?

 

 

 

Are you able to read where I said as an option with the standard view being 3rd with an "OPTIONAL" first person view. Everybody seems so hostile to the idea of an additional camera angle to have at our disposal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geralt of Rivia

 

No. Not FPGTA. f*ck that idea. Whoever came up with this idea ought to be banned from these forums. Day by day. I see someone on these forums wanting to ruin the very fundamentals of GTA. Then, R* takes notice, implements it into the game, and then the true GTA fans suffer. No thank you.

 

Nah bro, you're wrong. Don't you get it ? We should embrace a much more diverse approach to GTA according to some people on here. Despite the fact that these 'diverse' approaches would probably ruin the franchise for what it's known for and that GTA would no longer feel like GTA, I hear it's still a great thing.

 

An option for a different perspective would ruin a franchise? :panic:

 

I mean, GTA was ruined when it moved to mandatory 3rd person, right?

 

Oh wait...This won't be mandatory, and it won't ruin a franchise...

Edited by TheMasterfocker

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Proletariat

 

 

 

 

No. Not FPGTA. f*ck that idea. Whoever came up with this idea ought to be banned from these forums. Day by day. I see someone on these forums wanting to ruin the very fundamentals of GTA. Then, R* takes notice, implements it into the game, and then the true GTA fans suffer. No thank you.

 

Nah bro, you're wrong. Don't you get it ? We should embrace a much more diverse approach to GTA according to some people on here. Despite the fact that these 'diverse' approaches would probably ruin the franchise for what it's known for and that GTA would no longer feel like GTA, I hear it's still a great thing.

 

 

 

You guys are acting like the idea is about making it mandatory first person. It's already quasi there for most of the vehicles. I'm talking about it being an option.

 

Lets say they implement it into GTA VI, this is how it would look:

 

"What? I thought this was first person. Oh, I press select/back and it cycles between 3rd person and 1st person. That's cool I have the option as I feel GTA should be in 3rd person/1st person."

 

Not: "Awww ma gaawwd they ruined GTA forevas phuck roosterstar"

 

You guys who are amazing sometimes. Acting like something that is technically already in the coding of the game is going to ruin the game. You better not let your character stand idle for too long. You might go into 1st person.

 

I mean look at how much they ruined GTA by getting rid of the top down camera for all gameplay, I mean they just destroyed the franchise with that decision. What were they ever thinking.

 

1. You want first person view? Don't touch your controller for like 3 minutes, and you'll have you camera angle that you so desperately want.

 

2. Your top-down argument is laughable at best. I can't even....someone wanna tell this guy why changing to First Person is not the samething thing as getting rid of top down view?

 

 

 

Are you able to read where I said as an option with the standard view being 3rd with an "OPTIONAL" first person view. Everybody seems so hostile to the idea of an additional camera angle to have at our disposal.

 

The "Optional" slot would still ruin the uniqueness of the GTA Franchise. Idle Camera suffices. GTA doesn't have to take the path of Skyrim.

Edited by Proletariat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Zodape

 

Either people don't know what an option is, or people don't want the game to be more diverse.

 

Sometimes I just wonder about certain people on this thread. You know what, why not just add more bullsh*t into GTA like zombies, dragons, wizards, elves, fairies, unicorns, wooly mammoths, dinosaurs and centaurs . It could benefit with more diversity right ? Why not just change everything about GTA and make it something so different from what it already is ? Let's do it to the point that it is GTA no more.

 

There, you happy now ?

 

Actually, zombies worked fine on UN, so I wouldn't mind them in V.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Official General

 

 

Either people don't know what an option is, or people don't want the game to be more diverse.

 

Sometimes I just wonder about certain people on this thread. You know what, why not just add more bullsh*t into GTA like zombies, dragons, wizards, elves, fairies, unicorns, wooly mammoths, dinosaurs and centaurs . It could benefit with more diversity right ? Why not just change everything about GTA and make it something so different from what it already is ? Let's do it to the point that it is GTA no more.

 

There, you happy now ?

 

Actually, zombies worked fine on UN, so I wouldn't mind them in V.

 

 

If Rockstar can add bullsh*t to GTA V like yoga, snow and Santa Claus, then you will probably get more bullsh*t like zombies.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bonnano

 

 

 

Either people don't know what an option is, or people don't want the game to be more diverse.

 

Sometimes I just wonder about certain people on this thread. You know what, why not just add more bullsh*t into GTA like zombies, dragons, wizards, elves, fairies, unicorns, wooly mammoths, dinosaurs and centaurs . It could benefit with more diversity right ? Why not just change everything about GTA and make it something so different from what it already is ? Let's do it to the point that it is GTA no more.

 

There, you happy now ?

 

Actually, zombies worked fine on UN, so I wouldn't mind them in V.

 

 

If Rockstar can add bullsh*t to GTA V like yoga, snow and Santa Claus, then you will probably get more bullsh*t like zombies.

 

I wonder what your reaction would be if and IF drug dealing was included in the game and it was in first person... hmmmmm

Edited by Bonnano

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Official General

 

 

 

 

Either people don't know what an option is, or people don't want the game to be more diverse.

 

Sometimes I just wonder about certain people on this thread. You know what, why not just add more bullsh*t into GTA like zombies, dragons, wizards, elves, fairies, unicorns, wooly mammoths, dinosaurs and centaurs . It could benefit with more diversity right ? Why not just change everything about GTA and make it something so different from what it already is ? Let's do it to the point that it is GTA no more.

 

There, you happy now ?

 

Actually, zombies worked fine on UN, so I wouldn't mind them in V.

 

 

If Rockstar can add bullsh*t to GTA V like yoga, snow and Santa Claus, then you will probably get more bullsh*t like zombies.

 

I wonder what your reaction would be if and IF drug dealing was included in the game and it was in first person... hmmmmm

 

 

I'd hate that. Using FPS would just totally ruin GTA for me, even if it everything I wanted.

Edited by Official General

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Proletariat

 

 

 

Either people don't know what an option is, or people don't want the game to be more diverse.

 

Sometimes I just wonder about certain people on this thread. You know what, why not just add more bullsh*t into GTA like zombies, dragons, wizards, elves, fairies, unicorns, wooly mammoths, dinosaurs and centaurs . It could benefit with more diversity right ? Why not just change everything about GTA and make it something so different from what it already is ? Let's do it to the point that it is GTA no more.

 

There, you happy now ?

 

Actually, zombies worked fine on UN, so I wouldn't mind them in V.

 

 

If Rockstar can add bullsh*t to GTA V like yoga, snow and Santa Claus, then you will probably get more bullsh*t like zombies.

 

Rockstar already cleverly added aliens under the pretense of hallucination and "getting high", so anything is possible these days when the fans demand something. Why don't fans demand Cartel and Italian/Mexican Mafia missions? Instead they demand First Person Shooter? I really hope R* doesn't listen to this First Person crap.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geralt of Rivia

 

 

 

 

 

No. Not FPGTA. f*ck that idea. Whoever came up with this idea ought to be banned from these forums. Day by day. I see someone on these forums wanting to ruin the very fundamentals of GTA. Then, R* takes notice, implements it into the game, and then the true GTA fans suffer. No thank you.

 

Nah bro, you're wrong. Don't you get it ? We should embrace a much more diverse approach to GTA according to some people on here. Despite the fact that these 'diverse' approaches would probably ruin the franchise for what it's known for and that GTA would no longer feel like GTA, I hear it's still a great thing.

 

 

 

You guys are acting like the idea is about making it mandatory first person. It's already quasi there for most of the vehicles. I'm talking about it being an option.

 

Lets say they implement it into GTA VI, this is how it would look:

 

"What? I thought this was first person. Oh, I press select/back and it cycles between 3rd person and 1st person. That's cool I have the option as I feel GTA should be in 3rd person/1st person."

 

Not: "Awww ma gaawwd they ruined GTA forevas phuck roosterstar"

 

You guys who are amazing sometimes. Acting like something that is technically already in the coding of the game is going to ruin the game. You better not let your character stand idle for too long. You might go into 1st person.

 

I mean look at how much they ruined GTA by getting rid of the top down camera for all gameplay, I mean they just destroyed the franchise with that decision. What were they ever thinking.

 

1. You want first person view? Don't touch your controller for like 3 minutes, and you'll have you camera angle that you so desperately want.

 

2. Your top-down argument is laughable at best. I can't even....someone wanna tell this guy why changing to First Person is not the samething thing as getting rid of top down view?

 

 

 

Are you able to read where I said as an option with the standard view being 3rd with an "OPTIONAL" first person view. Everybody seems so hostile to the idea of an additional camera angle to have at our disposal.

 

The "Optional" slot would still ruin the uniqueness of the GTA Franchise. Idle Camera suffices. GTA doesn't have to take the path of Skyrim.

 

How?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Bonnano

 

 

 

 

 

Either people don't know what an option is, or people don't want the game to be more diverse.

 

Sometimes I just wonder about certain people on this thread. You know what, why not just add more bullsh*t into GTA like zombies, dragons, wizards, elves, fairies, unicorns, wooly mammoths, dinosaurs and centaurs . It could benefit with more diversity right ? Why not just change everything about GTA and make it something so different from what it already is ? Let's do it to the point that it is GTA no more.

 

There, you happy now ?

 

Actually, zombies worked fine on UN, so I wouldn't mind them in V.

 

 

If Rockstar can add bullsh*t to GTA V like yoga, snow and Santa Claus, then you will probably get more bullsh*t like zombies.

 

I wonder what your reaction would be if and IF drug dealing was included in the game and it was in first person... hmmmmm

 

 

I'd hate that. Using FPS would just totally ruin GTA for me, even if it everything I wanted.

 

Well... GTA CTW's slinging was in first person, if they continue with the substance, then next time it's introduced, I got bad news for you...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Algonquin Assassin

First person yoga? Now wouldn't that be a nauseating mess lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Geralt of Rivia

First person yoga? Now wouldn't that be a nauseating mess lol.

I call that RPing to the extreme lol.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Luddite

Don't mind options. Might be fun whilst driving. I bought FC2 and returned it because I don't dig the first person angle.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Shane_Dbns

No, even R* themselves said they would stay away from FPS games

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
PeriodZeroHero

I'd rather have first person driving with steering wheel view with detailed interiors of the vehicles.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
LosSantosKing

HELL NO

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.