Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!

    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

      1. Gameplay
      2. Missions
      3. Help & Support
    2. Red Dead Online

      1. Gameplay
      2. Find Lobbies & Outlaws
      3. Help & Support
    1. Crews & Posses

      1. Recruitment
    2. Events

    1. GTA Online

      1. Arena War
      2. After Hours
      3. Find Lobbies & Players
      4. Guides & Strategies
      5. Vehicles
      6. Content Creator
      7. Help & Support
    2. Grand Theft Auto Series

    3. GTA Next

    4. GTA V

      1. PC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    5. GTA IV

      1. Episodes from Liberty City
      2. Multiplayer
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
      5. GTA Mods
    6. GTA Chinatown Wars

    7. GTA Vice City Stories

    8. GTA Liberty City Stories

    9. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    10. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    11. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    12. Top Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    13. Wiki

      1. Merchandising
    1. GTA Modding

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    3. Featured Mods

      1. DYOM
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Red Dead Redemption

    2. Rockstar Games

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Programming
      5. Movies & TV
      6. Music
      7. Sports
      8. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    1. News

    2. Forum Support

    3. Site Suggestions

mariana_dm1989

Paleto Forest Discussion

Recommended Posts

Upggrade

I also hope GTA 6 or a Future Spinoff stict to the Realism and seriousness of GTA 4 and GTA 5 not the wacky and over-the-top fun and Overrated San Andreas,we dont need recycled Gangwars,Drugwars or stupid Sidemissions.GTA 6 should incorparate both the High Octane and Straight to the point missions of GTA 5 and also a Serious and Gritty(Emotional)way of GTA 4.Tbh the San Andreas fanboys need to stop with all this nonsense about gangwars and drugwars,and a need to have a San Andreas V2.0.I hope in a future GTA it so grounded to reality that we can fly planes or do stupid stuffs or even fly a plane.The fanboys do like San Andreas is the only game in the series,comeon there are 15 games in the series.without GTA 3,San Andreas wont happen,i think Vice City was better than it and i know alot of people that love the series and when you ask them the say Vice City.Even TLaD makes San Andreas feels like an abomination and a Saints Row Game,please the San Andreas vs GTA 5 needs to stop.

I know man, fun is so bad.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
skittlez86

San Andreas was the Stupidity of the GTA Series that why the saints row series was a rip-off of it.

1.It has Dildos

2.Stupid recycled and boring Drugwars and Gangwars

3.Stupid myths about Aliens and bigfoot

4.Not even 1% of Realism,Jetpacks,hydraulics,too much wackiness

5.Bad Graphics for a 2004 game even Vice City has better graphics

6.Wack cheat codes

7.Dumb ass npcs unlike GTA 5

8.no cover system

9.now wanted system like GTA 4 and GTA 5

10.Too much gang stuffs makes it so boring,i see why Rockstar didnt do it for Franklin in GTA 5 plus Franklin hate that sh*t

Although it was a great game 10 years ago but by today standard GTA 5 sh*t all over it or let me say TLaD.sorry for being off topic OP

what's wrong with hydraulics

Edited by bikerman3

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLOOD

@replyit a great game and a Classic one but i hate when people compare an almost 10years old spin-off to a Main Game.San Andreas was great but did dont anything new or try to be unique,gangwars are overused and so boring,same is the 1 protagonist system and i am sure GTA 5 3 protags system is a new and great idea to games in future,atleast it break that traditional 1 protag system for once it makes us use 3 different people that we can switch to at anytime in real-time,people with different backgrounds,same is the Main focus on heists,for the first time in a GTA game we can plan did way we want to do the heist i.e A-break in B-silent way,those heists were not much but we so detailed and highly set up,you can get you crew and the more they are experience the more there are great,The Jewel Store heist and Blitz play are my best missions in video game history,and i hope Rockstar makes GTA Online heists also detailed like GTA 5.Then the Graphics and Visuals of this game is just mindblowing,the draw distance makes me think for a second how did Rockstar pull this off,i can be at Mt Chiliad and can be seeing LS from a distances,i think that why some people think San Andreas is bigger than GTA 5,then the mechanics are great,just like Gears of war 2 you can rodeo run and shoot or take cover,Rockstar even did what Gears of War didnt do by making you turn around a cover(I love it),I am sure with the 3 Protags system There is no need for an episodic expansions like TLaD and TBoGT,because we got 3 endings and i am sure Rockstar we make it great(i need an Alien Expansion for Michael though).and then the game was the Fastest selling game of all timd,earning 1bn in 3 days,7 Guiness record and 30ml copies.GTA Online have it problems since it inception in October but it great and unique to the openworld genre it terms of muliplayer,that mmo vibes and it own universe,you can do missions,jobs,TDM,DM,create your own stuffs with the Content Creator(which is still in Beta)i cant imagine the final version plus there is capture mode something you only find in FPS game,sure GTA Online has been a Flaw game since October but when Rockstar realise the potential it would definitely change openworld online gaming just like how GTA 3 change the genre forever.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Showstopper 26

Why do you keep calling SA a spinoff? Are you a moron?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
nuer

You people are great.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLOOD

Why do you keep calling SA a spinoff? Are you a moron?

Because it is,it doesnt have a number after it like 1,2,3,4 or 5 instead it has a Subtitle(name).so you are the moron

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Matty

I agree, it would have been nice if the forest area in GTA V was similar to that of Tall Trees in Red Dead Redemption - though I guess the different time periods that Red Dead Redemption and GTA V are set in and the like has a lot to do with it too.

 

For example, it makes more sense to have a 'large' dense forest in Red Dead Redemption, being set in the early 20th century then it would in GTA V being set in the present day. Same can also be said for the animals situation. But I do nonetheless agree that it would have been great to have an actual forest/wilderness area in GTA V that didn't have roads or any other evidence of civilisation going through it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Asunder

 

 

San Andreas was the Stupidity of the GTA Series that why the saints row series was a rip-off of it.

1.It has Dildos

2.Stupid recycled and boring Drugwars and Gangwars

3.Stupid myths about Aliens and bigfoot

4.Not even 1% of Realism,Jetpacks,hydraulics,too much wackiness

5.Bad Graphics for a 2004 game even Vice City has better graphics

6.Wack cheat codes

7.Dumb ass npcs unlike GTA 5

8.no cover system

9.now wanted system like GTA 4 and GTA 5

10.Too much gang stuffs makes it so boring,i see why Rockstar didnt do it for Franklin in GTA 5 plus Franklin hate that sh*t

Although it was a great game 10 years ago but by today standard GTA 5 sh*t all over it or let me say TLaD.sorry for being off topic OP

Yeah okay.....

 

That's why people still talk about the SA in awe, they compare it to GTA V, and some even claim it's still better than V. Even though it's a 9-year old game.

Who cares? San Andreas was amazing. So is V. But I can't play SA all the time. Don't think about what others feel about the game, it's what YOU think about it. Edited by Asunder

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLOOD

@Asunder

Nice Comment bro.I love This Legendary Franchise an all it 15 games even though i didnt play the 2d and Most of the 3d games but they are all great,San Andreas was great for it time,it not stupid(i was just angry with how the SA Fan boys behaves toward the other games in the series)but in 2013,It is seen as a classic.I love GTA 5 and i have been playing it since release day,to me it the best GTA game ever and best game of this generation.but San Andreas was a great spin-off to the series it actually influenced the gangster genre and it was what inspired saints row but pls SA Fan boys please just like GTA 5 for what it is and not what it isnt.

merry christmas everyone

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
~Joseph~

I wish it had more forest like SA had.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLOOD

Paleto bay is creepy at night,i was just there with Trevor,i had to kill myself with sticky bomb,the Forest my not be lush but it a great forest in this awesomd town of Paleto Bay

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Luddite

Thank you for returning to the topic.... the forest.

 

I've seen rest areas with more trees. Hardly a "forest" at all.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BLOOD

Thank you for returning to the topic.... the forest.

 

I've seen rest areas with more trees. Hardly a "forest" at all.

No Problem,as a loyal fan i love the 3 Generations of the series(2d,3d,Hd) and i am excited for the future of this Legendary Series.(Sorry to be a bit off there).but yeah that because Paleto Bay is a Modern rural town unlike the Forest village in Red Dead Redemption

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hulkhogan1

Lets also keep in mind that the game can and did change over the course of development time. For all we know, Paleto Forest could have initially been much more dense. But due to framerate/pop in issues, they had to remove alot of the trees. Which is pretty evident when comparing earlier shots of the game to the final product, it's pretty clear that they had to remove lots of trees and other small details to make sure the game was running as well as they wanted it to. Personally I'm surprised the game runs as well as it does considering how much you can have going on at once. I have yet to see any noticeable drops in framerate. We should be glad that they gave us as many varied environments as they did, even if they might not be as perfect as we might like. Just my two cents on the subject.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Frantz Fuchs

Damn, I'm getting flashbacks of Tall Trees.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
esato

Well... I really expect a MODAf*ckIN' masterpiece Complete Edition with a HUGE map... LS, SF and LV... all connected. A real big deal desert, forest and real endless highways/freeways!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Little Red Nurgling

Well... I really expect a MODAf*ckIN' masterpiece Complete Edition with a HUGE map... LS, SF and LV... all connected. A real big deal desert, forest and real endless highways/freeways!

A man can only dream...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cicero The Great

Lets also keep in mind that the game can and did change over the course of development time. For all we know, Paleto Forest could have initially been much more dense. But due to framerate/pop in issues, they had to remove alot of the trees. Which is pretty evident when comparing earlier shots of the game to the final product, it's pretty clear that they had to remove lots of trees and other small details to make sure the game was running as well as they wanted it to. Personally I'm surprised the game runs as well as it does considering how much you can have going on at once. I have yet to see any noticeable drops in framerate. We should be glad that they gave us as many varied environments as they did, even if they might not be as perfect as we might like. Just my two cents on the subject.

You're partially right

Partially because those beautiful forest screenshots were probably taken from a PC/ next gen version

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fuzzknuckles

 

Lets also keep in mind that the game can and did change over the course of development time. For all we know, Paleto Forest could have initially been much more dense. But due to framerate/pop in issues, they had to remove alot of the trees. Which is pretty evident when comparing earlier shots of the game to the final product, it's pretty clear that they had to remove lots of trees and other small details to make sure the game was running as well as they wanted it to. Personally I'm surprised the game runs as well as it does considering how much you can have going on at once. I have yet to see any noticeable drops in framerate. We should be glad that they gave us as many varied environments as they did, even if they might not be as perfect as we might like. Just my two cents on the subject.

You're partially right

Partially because those beautiful forest screenshots were probably taken from a PC/ next gen version

 

 

Despite them being confirmed as taken from a PS3, like the trailers?

 

The trees were removed, to make things run better. Too many objects on screen would have punished the consoles, certainly in motion. Popping a camera into the world when there's nothing else going on wouldn't have been affected by performance.

 

Whilst I would have loved a denser forest, I'm happier that the game runs smoothly on my playstation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Xerukal

 

 

Lets also keep in mind that the game can and did change over the course of development time. For all we know, Paleto Forest could have initially been much more dense. But due to framerate/pop in issues, they had to remove alot of the trees. Which is pretty evident when comparing earlier shots of the game to the final product, it's pretty clear that they had to remove lots of trees and other small details to make sure the game was running as well as they wanted it to. Personally I'm surprised the game runs as well as it does considering how much you can have going on at once. I have yet to see any noticeable drops in framerate. We should be glad that they gave us as many varied environments as they did, even if they might not be as perfect as we might like. Just my two cents on the subject.

You're partially right

Partially because those beautiful forest screenshots were probably taken from a PC/ next gen version

 

 

Despite them being confirmed as taken from a PS3, like the trailers?

 

The trees were removed, to make things run better. Too many objects on screen would have punished the consoles, certainly in motion. Popping a camera into the world when there's nothing else going on wouldn't have been affected by performance.

 

Whilst I would have loved a denser forest, I'm happier that the game runs smoothly on my playstation.

 

Was it Rockstar that "confirmed" they were taken from a PS3? Rockstar has the ability and advantage of lying. Just like every other human being.

 

Remember when they said LA Noire wouldn't be coming to PC? That was fun.

 

Oh, and when they expressed fascination with how well GTA IV ran on PC, that it performed "beautifully"? That was a riot, as well.

 

These are all PC-oriented issues, of course. And I'm sure I'll get shat on for coming in here with my scorned PC pride and ruining the fun.

 

But hey, the simple point I'm making is just the fact that there is a possibility that Rockstar lied about those screenshots. Just a thought. An "opinion". If that saves me from the flame.

Edited by Xerukal

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
esato

 

Well... I really expect a MODAf*ckIN' masterpiece Complete Edition with a HUGE map... LS, SF and LV... all connected. A real big deal desert, forest and real endless highways/freeways!

A man can only dream...

 

Who knows... maybe in GTAVI... hahahahha

 

Dreams become true when we believe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
willyum32

playing Red Dead Redemption makes me want to pack my bags and go camping for a week.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Cicero The Great

 

 

 

 

 

 

Lets also keep in mind that the game can and did change over the course of development time. For all we know, Paleto Forest could have initially been much more dense. But due to framerate/pop in issues, they had to remove alot of the trees. Which is pretty evident when comparing earlier shots of the game to the final product, it's pretty clear that they had to remove lots of trees and other small details to make sure the game was running as well as they wanted it to. Personally I'm surprised the game runs as well as it does considering how much you can have going on at once. I have yet to see any noticeable drops in framerate. We should be glad that they gave us as many varied environments as they did, even if they might not be as perfect as we might like. Just my two cents on the subject.

 

You're partially right

Partially because those beautiful forest screenshots were probably taken from a PC/ next gen version

 

Despite them being confirmed as taken from a PS3, like the trailers?

 

The trees were removed, to make things run better. Too many objects on screen would have punished the consoles, certainly in motion. Popping a camera into the world when there's nothing else going on wouldn't have been affected by performance.

 

Whilst I would have loved a denser forest, I'm happier that the game runs smoothly on my playstation.

The mentioned screenshots from forest were not taken from ps3 or Xbox 360 gameplay If We have to bet

 

In the worst scenario they were clearly ''manipulated''

 

Yeah, some tree has been removed to avoid rdr tall trees poor framerate etc.

But not so many...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Il_Tifossi

LEL

 

dat Trevor mission where you go for elks with the redneck. Do you remember the teasers when we were all hyped up, noting the arrow with the wind direction and so on. We didn't notice goddamn highway 20 meters to the left.

 

Seriously, worst forest ever. And desert is sh*tty as well. I didn't think of a desert until i found out it is meant to be one. Then i was all like. LEL

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
cp1dell

The entirety of the wilderness is broken.

 

The desert is more like a sandlot than a full fledged desert.

 

The forest is more like a few trees along the side of the road.

 

The mountains are barren and ugly. No rocky cliffs or details save for the small ones asking zancudo.

 

Absolutely no vegetation anywhere. Massive open areas where there's nothing but flat terrain geometry.

In the prerelease screenshots there were a lot more trees and objects in the forests. And I think in GTA: Online there is less vegetation than in Single Player.

 

I won't be surprised if there might be an option in the PC version for vegetation.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Echolex

 

The entirety of the wilderness is broken.

 

The desert is more like a sandlot than a full fledged desert.

 

The forest is more like a few trees along the side of the road.

 

The mountains are barren and ugly. No rocky cliffs or details save for the small ones asking zancudo.

 

Absolutely no vegetation anywhere. Massive open areas where there's nothing but flat terrain geometry.

Agreed. Skyrim did it so much better.

 

Why do you make comparisons like this?

 

Skyrim is a COMPLETELY different game with a COMPLETELY different goal.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
lazloisdavrock

People expecting lots of foliage on 8 year old consoles. lol

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
dyz

GTA 5 does not have more trees because of the consoles if GTA 5 is released for new gen or pc the game will look much better! they will add more trees and not have them 20 meter apart but every thing else in GTA 5 is great, i think the desert is awesome it is fun and it is a great size.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
universetwisters

 

Why do you keep calling SA a spinoff? Are you a moron?

Because it is,it doesnt have a number after it like 1,2,3,4 or 5 instead it has a Subtitle(name).so you are the moron

 

Are you a joke? Games like LCS, VCS, Advance, Chinatown Wars, the DLC for IV, those are spinoffs, you flip friggin knob.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  • 1 User Currently Viewing
    0 Members, 0 Anonymous, 1 Guest

×

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.