I just remembered why I don't play this game anymore...

[Cutter De Blanc]

Beyond everything else it's inconsistent. I was out in the Great Chapparal having wrecked yet another SUV. Looked 360 degrees to make sure NO ONE was there, and I was on a hill so I had a good vantage point. I put a sticky bomb on on the thing and plotted my escape route. Boy wasn't I suprised when I blew the bomb up and got no stars! I think that's the first time the police haven't come running with blood in their eye when I've caused an explosion.

[SmoothGetaway]

So you guys just want to be able to shoot people and not get stars/a wanted level?

 

That sounds...terrible and boring.

 

And I think there are games already out that let you kill with impunity.

[..GhosT]

Hell, you get a wanted. For shooting a deer. In the middle of f*cking nowhere. Next town is a few miles off. Next road is too.

20 seconds later cops come by with speedhack and go full auto with their aimbot pistols, giving you head- and chestshots all the time while not missing.

Not to mention the wallhack they have when you hide in some random alley where no one seen you turn in and you lost the previous copcars a few blocks behind.

 

GTA V is literally the "no fun allowed" GTA in this series.

 

 

//Edit: III, VC and SA were perfect at this. I dont remember IV that good but it wasnt that horrible there either.

Edited December 15, 2013 by ..GhosT

[Cutter De Blanc]

So you guys just want to be able to shoot people and not get stars/a wanted level?

 

That sounds...terrible and boring.

 

And I think there are games already out that let you kill with impunity.

No, I don't think that's what people are saying. Thyre saying it makes no sense to get a wanted level in the middle of nowhere with no one else around except the person you just killed.

[SmoothGetaway]

Maybe they weren't as alone as they thought?

 

I don't know man, I expect to get police attention when I commit crimes in GTA. Why is it that people are so upset about it?

[Officer Ronson]

Can't people please stop ass-licking the negative opinions of others which are mostly wrong or are actually sh*t.

 

Cops don't have X-ray vision, they have ears. And their spawning system ins't actually broken, it's the GPS that takes its time to actually detect the Police, because the Police blips work just as enemy blips, if enemies doesn't make the slightest noise their blip will start fading away, thats what happens with cops because they don't turn they sirens on, their blip will not appear, fairly a lot of cops were actually spawned before the GPS could actually detect them all.

 

Silenced Kills:

 

I killed a Park Ranger near two hillbillies = One star

I killed a Park Ranger with no one around = Absolutely nothing!

 

I killed a cop in an alley where no one was able to see me = NOTHING!

I killed a cop just at the back of another cop! = THREE STARS (Because he was able the hear me)

 

I shot a silenced pistol just at a Wall at the side of a cop when he was not watching me = Absolutely no stars

 

I shot a silenced pistol just at a Wall at the side of a cop, WHEN SOMEBODY SAW ME = Two stars

 

I unloaded an unsilenced SMG at a warehouse in the docks, no witness and then proceed to kill an union worker with a silenced pistol = NO STARS! BECAUSE THERE WAS NO WITNESSES

 

It all depends on witnesses..

[El Zodape]

Maybe they weren't as alone as they thought?

 

I don't know man, I expect to get police attention when I commit crimes in GTA. Why is it that people are so upset about it?

You are missing the point, man. Cutter explained to you perfectly what this thread was all about.

 

@ Tenxax

 

I'm starting to think some people have different versions or something.

Edited December 15, 2013 by Zodape

[Bertanius]

 

 

 

No matter how broken and annoying the police system is, just remember one thing: PC version with a trainer. You pretty much can only start having fun in GTA V when the PC version comes out and gets a trainer, you will be able to bump a hiker without automatically having 10 police vehicles fly up the mountain with their ridiculous rubber banding that makes them 10 times faster than the speed of light. I agree that you can't have fun in this game without having to run away from the police every 10 seconds, no matter where you are, it's ridiculous. Their spawning is horrible, Rockstar didn't even try to hide the spawning system for them, they just spawn right in front of you (making you crash into them). I seriously think they spent about 10 minutes coding all the police mechanics, there's no way it feels complete. They always know where you are, and who you are, there's no trying, it's so boring doing the same thing over and over, running away from them, I don't know who would find that fun...

 

Rockstar's number one focus was multiplayer, that's the reason for the broken single player, they just don't care about it.

Oh Bert, even when you make a sensible post, you have to ruin it with the nonsense about Online. It's quite sad, really, how obsessed you are over a delusion.

 

Maybe you should stop clinging onto Rockstar and realise they only care about their online mode. Oh yeah, and I can keep mentioning it as much as I like, there's no rules against it, and I'm certainly not going to let some user act like they can tell other users what they can and can't do. If it really rustles your jimmies that much, the site has an 'ignore' system, put my name on there, and you won't see any of my posts again, it's that simple, you say I keep complaining about online, yet all I see you do is complain about me, do something about it, stop acting like I'm going to do something about it.

 

 

No matter how broken and annoying the police system is, just remember one thing: PC version with a trainer. You pretty much can only start having fun in GTA V when the PC version comes out and gets a trainer, you will be able to bump a hiker without automatically having 10 police vehicles fly up the mountain with their ridiculous rubber banding that makes them 10 times faster than the speed of light. I agree that you can't have fun in this game without having to run away from the police every 10 seconds, no matter where you are, it's ridiculous. Their spawning is horrible, Rockstar didn't even try to hide the spawning system for them, they just spawn right in front of you (making you crash into them). I seriously think they spent about 10 minutes coding all the police mechanics, there's no way it feels complete. They always know where you are, and who you are, there's no trying, it's so boring doing the same thing over and over, running away from them, I don't know who would find that fun...

 

Rockstar's number one focus was multiplayer, that's the reason for the broken single player, they just don't care about it.

I concur, and I don't think the "Learn how to avoid them" responses actually address the topic, which is that the whole setup is a fail.

 

Exactly, you can't try to avoid them, because they automatically spawn right next to you, and always know where you are, you just have to keep moving or go into a tunnel, the game says you can hide, but that's a lie.

 

"Maybe you should stop clinging onto Rockstar and realise they only care about their online mode."

 

I'm not gonna go over the whole Online thing with you again. You're wrong, get over it. If they only cared about Online, then they wouldn't even add a SP, because they'd be too busy working on Online. Or, better yet, they wouldn't allow the server problems that plagued Online in the beginning, and they sure as hell wouldn't release it with so many bugs.

 

But, you know, f*ck logic and thinking, right? Of course you would, because your argument holds absolutely no merit at all.

 

"Oh yeah, and I can keep mentioning it as much as I like, there's no rules against it, and I'm certainly not going to let some user act like they can tell other users what they can and can't do."

 

lolwat? I never said you couldn't mention it, nor did I say anything to even insinuate that. I don't know what you read, but it sure as Hell wasn't my comment.

 

"If it really rustles your jimmies that much, the site has an 'ignore' system, put my name on there, and you won't see any of my posts again, it's that simple"

 

It doesn't 'rustle my jimmies' at all, it's entertainment to me. Infact, I'd say it rustles your jimmies more, since it seems to work you up every time I destroy your argument.

 

"I destroy your argument"

Haha, I lost it there, wow, that's funny. "destroy your argument"? What? You're just trying to make yourself feel better, I know your kind, you always think you're right, and that others are always wrong, how did you "destroy my argument" when all you did was complain about me talking about online? Not to mention I'm not getting worked up at all... Getting worked up would involve me yelling at you, but I find your lack of common sense funny, you act like my posts are important to you, as you keep replying to them, yet you always show a disinterest to whatever I post, it makes no sense.

Just remember, there really is no need to be upset. Let the tears flow, then add me to your ignore list so my posts won't upset you any further.

[SmoothGetaway]

@Zodape

 

Read my post after the one you quoted.

 

I don't think I'm missing the point. GTA is about committing crimes and getting away from law enforcement.

 

Anyone who is 'annoyed' by the police in GTA isn't playing the right game.

Edited December 15, 2013 by SmoothGTA

[..GhosT]

Can't people please stop ass-licking the negative opinions of others which are mostly wrong or are actually sh*t.

 

Cops don't have X-ray vision, they have ears. And their spawning system ins't actually broken, it's the GPS that takes its time to actually detect the Police, because the Police blips work just as enemy blips, if enemies doesn't make the slightest noise their blip will start fading away, thats what happens with cops because they don't turn they sirens on, their blip will not appear, fairly a lot of cops were actually spawned before the GPS could actually detect them all.

 

Silenced Kills:

 

I killed a Park Ranger near two hillbillies = One star

I killed a Park Ranger with no one around = Absolutely nothing!

 

I killed a cop in an alley where no one was able to see me = NOTHING!

I killed a cop just at the back of another cop! = THREE STARS (Because he was able the hear me)

 

I shot a silenced pistol just at a Wall at the side of a cop when he was not watching me = Absolutely no stars

 

I shot a silenced pistol just at a Wall at the side of a cop, WHEN SOMEBODY SAW ME = Two stars

 

I unloaded an unsilenced SMG at a warehouse in the docks, no witness and then proceed to kill an union worker with a silenced pistol = NO STARS! BECAUSE THERE WAS NO WITNESSES

 

It all depends on witnesses..

 

Makes sense, but, when you get witnessed.

Why instantly 1-3 wanteds and the cops immediatly know how you look like and where exactly they can find you. If you run away after being witnessed and hide in a dumpster or some sh*t they always walk past there misteriously and find you.

[E•MO•TION]

I don't think I'm missing the point. GTA is about committing crimes and getting away from law enforcement.

 

lolwut? Where have you been the past decade or so?

[SmoothGetaway]

What the f*ck does that even mean?

[E•MO•TION]

What the f*ck does that even mean?

Experience in the V Section has taught me that I should not to argue with an idiot but I can't resist. GTA is an open world game, i.e. create-your-own-adventure. It has evolved from a game "about committing crimes and getting away from law enforcement". If that weren't the case, then it wouldn't include side activities such as bowling and golf.

[Geralt of Rivia]

 

 

 

 

No matter how broken and annoying the police system is, just remember one thing: PC version with a trainer. You pretty much can only start having fun in GTA V when the PC version comes out and gets a trainer, you will be able to bump a hiker without automatically having 10 police vehicles fly up the mountain with their ridiculous rubber banding that makes them 10 times faster than the speed of light. I agree that you can't have fun in this game without having to run away from the police every 10 seconds, no matter where you are, it's ridiculous. Their spawning is horrible, Rockstar didn't even try to hide the spawning system for them, they just spawn right in front of you (making you crash into them). I seriously think they spent about 10 minutes coding all the police mechanics, there's no way it feels complete. They always know where you are, and who you are, there's no trying, it's so boring doing the same thing over and over, running away from them, I don't know who would find that fun...

 

Rockstar's number one focus was multiplayer, that's the reason for the broken single player, they just don't care about it.

Oh Bert, even when you make a sensible post, you have to ruin it with the nonsense about Online. It's quite sad, really, how obsessed you are over a delusion.

 

Maybe you should stop clinging onto Rockstar and realise they only care about their online mode. Oh yeah, and I can keep mentioning it as much as I like, there's no rules against it, and I'm certainly not going to let some user act like they can tell other users what they can and can't do. If it really rustles your jimmies that much, the site has an 'ignore' system, put my name on there, and you won't see any of my posts again, it's that simple, you say I keep complaining about online, yet all I see you do is complain about me, do something about it, stop acting like I'm going to do something about it.

 

 

No matter how broken and annoying the police system is, just remember one thing: PC version with a trainer. You pretty much can only start having fun in GTA V when the PC version comes out and gets a trainer, you will be able to bump a hiker without automatically having 10 police vehicles fly up the mountain with their ridiculous rubber banding that makes them 10 times faster than the speed of light. I agree that you can't have fun in this game without having to run away from the police every 10 seconds, no matter where you are, it's ridiculous. Their spawning is horrible, Rockstar didn't even try to hide the spawning system for them, they just spawn right in front of you (making you crash into them). I seriously think they spent about 10 minutes coding all the police mechanics, there's no way it feels complete. They always know where you are, and who you are, there's no trying, it's so boring doing the same thing over and over, running away from them, I don't know who would find that fun...

 

Rockstar's number one focus was multiplayer, that's the reason for the broken single player, they just don't care about it.

I concur, and I don't think the "Learn how to avoid them" responses actually address the topic, which is that the whole setup is a fail.

 

Exactly, you can't try to avoid them, because they automatically spawn right next to you, and always know where you are, you just have to keep moving or go into a tunnel, the game says you can hide, but that's a lie.

 

"Maybe you should stop clinging onto Rockstar and realise they only care about their online mode."

 

I'm not gonna go over the whole Online thing with you again. You're wrong, get over it. If they only cared about Online, then they wouldn't even add a SP, because they'd be too busy working on Online. Or, better yet, they wouldn't allow the server problems that plagued Online in the beginning, and they sure as hell wouldn't release it with so many bugs.

 

But, you know, f*ck logic and thinking, right? Of course you would, because your argument holds absolutely no merit at all.

 

"Oh yeah, and I can keep mentioning it as much as I like, there's no rules against it, and I'm certainly not going to let some user act like they can tell other users what they can and can't do."

 

lolwat? I never said you couldn't mention it, nor did I say anything to even insinuate that. I don't know what you read, but it sure as Hell wasn't my comment.

 

"If it really rustles your jimmies that much, the site has an 'ignore' system, put my name on there, and you won't see any of my posts again, it's that simple"

 

It doesn't 'rustle my jimmies' at all, it's entertainment to me. Infact, I'd say it rustles your jimmies more, since it seems to work you up every time I destroy your argument.

 

"I destroy your argument"

Haha, I lost it there, wow, that's funny. "destroy your argument"? What? You're just trying to make yourself feel better, I know your kind, you always think you're right, and that others are always wrong, how did you "destroy my argument" when all you did was complain about me talking about online? Not to mention I'm not getting worked up at all... Getting worked up would involve me yelling at you, but I find your lack of common sense funny, you act like my posts are important to you, as you keep replying to them, yet you always show a disinterest to whatever I post, it makes no sense.

Just remember, there really is no need to be upset. Let the tears flow, then add me to your ignore list so my posts won't upset you any further.

 

"I know your kind, you always think you're right,"

 

I don't think I'm right. I know I'm right. Your argument consists of "I'm stupid and delusional because I think GTA 5 is 95% broken, even though that's impossible because the game's playable, obviously they focused on Online, even though I provide absolutely nothing valid to back it up!" I then prove you wrong every single time, just like I did in my other post (Notice how you never even touched on that subject. Of course you didn't, because I destroyed your argument), and you promptly never post about it again until another thread, in which I destroy your argument there. Rinse and repeat.

 

"how did you "destroy my argument" when all you did was complain about me talking about online?"

 

What? When did I ever complain about you talking about Online? I think your reading comprehension skills need a little work there Bert.

 

"but I find your lack of common sense funny,"

 

Oooh, now that's funny. I'm the one with the lack of common sense, even when, somehow, the game is 95% broken to you? Fun fact: If a game is 95% broken, it won't work because it's so broken. And yet, you can play, complete, and do everything in the game just fine. And yet, somehow, that translates to 95% broken to you? Now, who's the one without common sense?

 

"then add me to your ignore list so my posts won't upset you any further."

 

I don't want to add you to my ignore list. It's fun destroying your arguments and making you (Just like with your last comment to me) not even touch on the subject again. Plus, reading the complete and utter false bullsh*t you post is really, really entertaining.

[OOM 313]

I killed a cop in an alley where no one was able to see me = NOTHING!

I killed a cop just at the back of another cop! = THREE STARS (Because he was able the hear me)

 

It all depends on witnesses..

 

You're either a f*cking liar or delusional Cockstar employee. You may be able to stealth kill 1 civilian (but no more, 2 is automatic wanted level) but you CANNOT I repeat CANNOT stealth kill a single cop in this game. Instant 3 stars and a Helo spawning 50 feet away. Just another example of this WORTHLESS STEALTH MECHANIC and a fangirl making up lies and sucking sh*tstars cock

[E•MO•TION]

I don't want to add you to my ignore list. It's fun destroying your arguments and making you.

Destroying his arguments by repeatedly stating you destroyed his arguments. That logic.

[SmoothGetaway]

@2281

 

No sh*t dude.

 

I didn't think I'd need to spell it out that I'm aware of non crime activities in GTA games. Especially on a forum dedicated to the games.

 

Anyway the thread is about how the police are annoying. I disagree because the police are as much GTA as hookers are GTA.

 

What was your point again?

[Geralt of Rivia]

 

I don't want to add you to my ignore list. It's fun destroying your arguments and making you.

Destroying his arguments by repeatedly stating you destroyed his arguments. That logic.

 

I actually did it in my second reply to him. Here, let me quote it:

 

"I'm not gonna go over the whole Online thing with you again. You're wrong, get over it. If they only cared about Online, then they wouldn't even add a SP, because they'd be too busy working on Online. Or, better yet, they wouldn't allow the server problems that plagued Online in the beginning, and they sure as hell wouldn't release it with so many bugs.

But, you know, f*ck logic and thinking, right? Of course you would, because your argument holds absolutely no merit at all."

There's a lot more I can add to further my argument, but that is enough in itself to properly do the job.

[Bertanius]

 

 

 

 

 

No matter how broken and annoying the police system is, just remember one thing: PC version with a trainer. You pretty much can only start having fun in GTA V when the PC version comes out and gets a trainer, you will be able to bump a hiker without automatically having 10 police vehicles fly up the mountain with their ridiculous rubber banding that makes them 10 times faster than the speed of light. I agree that you can't have fun in this game without having to run away from the police every 10 seconds, no matter where you are, it's ridiculous. Their spawning is horrible, Rockstar didn't even try to hide the spawning system for them, they just spawn right in front of you (making you crash into them). I seriously think they spent about 10 minutes coding all the police mechanics, there's no way it feels complete. They always know where you are, and who you are, there's no trying, it's so boring doing the same thing over and over, running away from them, I don't know who would find that fun...

 

Rockstar's number one focus was multiplayer, that's the reason for the broken single player, they just don't care about it.

Oh Bert, even when you make a sensible post, you have to ruin it with the nonsense about Online. It's quite sad, really, how obsessed you are over a delusion.

 

Maybe you should stop clinging onto Rockstar and realise they only care about their online mode. Oh yeah, and I can keep mentioning it as much as I like, there's no rules against it, and I'm certainly not going to let some user act like they can tell other users what they can and can't do. If it really rustles your jimmies that much, the site has an 'ignore' system, put my name on there, and you won't see any of my posts again, it's that simple, you say I keep complaining about online, yet all I see you do is complain about me, do something about it, stop acting like I'm going to do something about it.

 

 

No matter how broken and annoying the police system is, just remember one thing: PC version with a trainer. You pretty much can only start having fun in GTA V when the PC version comes out and gets a trainer, you will be able to bump a hiker without automatically having 10 police vehicles fly up the mountain with their ridiculous rubber banding that makes them 10 times faster than the speed of light. I agree that you can't have fun in this game without having to run away from the police every 10 seconds, no matter where you are, it's ridiculous. Their spawning is horrible, Rockstar didn't even try to hide the spawning system for them, they just spawn right in front of you (making you crash into them). I seriously think they spent about 10 minutes coding all the police mechanics, there's no way it feels complete. They always know where you are, and who you are, there's no trying, it's so boring doing the same thing over and over, running away from them, I don't know who would find that fun...

 

Rockstar's number one focus was multiplayer, that's the reason for the broken single player, they just don't care about it.

I concur, and I don't think the "Learn how to avoid them" responses actually address the topic, which is that the whole setup is a fail.

 

Exactly, you can't try to avoid them, because they automatically spawn right next to you, and always know where you are, you just have to keep moving or go into a tunnel, the game says you can hide, but that's a lie.

 

"Maybe you should stop clinging onto Rockstar and realise they only care about their online mode."

 

I'm not gonna go over the whole Online thing with you again. You're wrong, get over it. If they only cared about Online, then they wouldn't even add a SP, because they'd be too busy working on Online. Or, better yet, they wouldn't allow the server problems that plagued Online in the beginning, and they sure as hell wouldn't release it with so many bugs.

 

But, you know, f*ck logic and thinking, right? Of course you would, because your argument holds absolutely no merit at all.

 

"Oh yeah, and I can keep mentioning it as much as I like, there's no rules against it, and I'm certainly not going to let some user act like they can tell other users what they can and can't do."

 

lolwat? I never said you couldn't mention it, nor did I say anything to even insinuate that. I don't know what you read, but it sure as Hell wasn't my comment.

 

"If it really rustles your jimmies that much, the site has an 'ignore' system, put my name on there, and you won't see any of my posts again, it's that simple"

 

It doesn't 'rustle my jimmies' at all, it's entertainment to me. Infact, I'd say it rustles your jimmies more, since it seems to work you up every time I destroy your argument.

 

"I destroy your argument"

Haha, I lost it there, wow, that's funny. "destroy your argument"? What? You're just trying to make yourself feel better, I know your kind, you always think you're right, and that others are always wrong, how did you "destroy my argument" when all you did was complain about me talking about online? Not to mention I'm not getting worked up at all... Getting worked up would involve me yelling at you, but I find your lack of common sense funny, you act like my posts are important to you, as you keep replying to them, yet you always show a disinterest to whatever I post, it makes no sense.

Just remember, there really is no need to be upset. Let the tears flow, then add me to your ignore list so my posts won't upset you any further.

 

"I know your kind, you always think you're right,"

 

I don't think I'm right. I know I'm right. Your argument consists of "I'm stupid and delusional because I think GTA 5 is 95% broken, even though that's impossible because the game's playable, obviously they focused on Online, even though I provide absolutely nothing valid to back it up!" I then prove you wrong every single time, just like I did in my other post (Notice how you never even touched on that subject. Of course you didn't, because I destroyed your argument), and you promptly never post about it again until another thread, in which I destroy your argument there. Rinse and repeat.

 

"how did you "destroy my argument" when all you did was complain about me talking about online?"

 

What? When did I ever complain about you talking about Online? I think your reading comprehension skills need a little work there Bert.

 

"but I find your lack of common sense funny,"

 

Oooh, now that's funny. I'm the one with the lack of common sense, even when, somehow, the game is 95% broken to you? Fun fact: If a game is 95% broken, it won't work because it's so broken. And yet, you can play, complete, and do everything in the game just fine. And yet, somehow, that translates to 95% broken to you? Now, who's the one without common sense?

 

"then add me to your ignore list so my posts won't upset you any further."

 

I don't want to add you to my ignore list. It's fun destroying your arguments and making you (Just like with your last comment to me) not even touch on the subject again. Plus, reading the complete and utter false bullsh*t you post is really, really entertaining.

 

I'll have you know my reading skills are at top level, therefore I cannot "work" on my reading skills, sorry. Now please, tell me how you are "destroying" my "argument" (I'm not even arguing), all I see from you is the classic "Internet tough guy" who thinks whatever they post is superior. How pointless is this? Trying to defeat a random user on a forum over the Internet, it won't solve anything, but I guess you're incapable of understand such a sentence. Oh well, you can keep crying to me all you want, I don't know why I keep replying, all I'm going to get is "I destroyed your argument". Come on, if you're going to reply, at least say something other than "I destroyed your argument".

 

What do you honestly expect to get out of an Internet argument? A story to tell to your friends about the one time you told a user on the Internet you destroyed his argument? It seems every thread I post in gets derailed by you because you can't accept the opinions of others, have you ever thought my "95% broken" statement was a hyperbole? Of course I know the game works, but many major aspects (such as the police) are flawed. Now, are you going to keep this up? It's so pointless... Makes me wonder why you would waste your time with it... Hey, better yet, your signature does say you make video game scripts, why not make a massive game that involves you typing to a user on the Internet? If you win, a big "you destroyed his argument" message comes up. Here's the twist: You can't lose.

 

It seems I'm also wasting my time, there's no point in reasoning with most Internet users, they're always right...

[Officer Ronson]

@..Ghost

 

I destroyed around two vehicles getting a two-star wanted level in Paleto, I ran until I decided to actually use the stealth mode so I hid on the Training building in the LSCoFD Station and I actually saw that cops were searching on the last place where I was making noise, they didn't run towards me but rather opposite or at the other sides, one officer was heading towards my location until the stars vanished. Thus making it a 23 second Chase.

[rojovo74]

 

I killed a cop in an alley where no one was able to see me = NOTHING!

I killed a cop just at the back of another cop! = THREE STARS (Because he was able the hear me)

 

It all depends on witnesses..

 

You're either a f*cking liar or delusional Cockstar employee. You may be able to stealth kill 1 civilian (but no more, 2 is automatic wanted level) but you CANNOT I repeat CANNOT stealth kill a single cop in this game. Instant 3 stars and a Helo spawning 50 feet away. Just another example of this WORTHLESS STEALTH MECHANIC and a fangirl making up lies and sucking sh*tstars cock

 

No, he's right on this one...it depends on witnesses or if the cops manage to find you while you're hiding...I was at the Sandy Shores airfield and just for fun I blew up 2 of the large tanks, along with the car, and I hid in the large garage (just inside the entrance) - the cops eventually showed up (while the stars were flashing), but amazingly, they drove right past me and didn't see me. I waited for them to turn around and pull far enough past the entrance and then I exit, and they STILL didn't see me lol. The stars disappeared shortly after. If you stay out of their field of vision, you should be fine.

[OOM 313]

YOU CANNOT STEALTH KILL POLICE IN THIS GAME. INSTANT 3 STARS. STOP MAKING sh*t UP f*ckING FANGIRLS. THE STEALTH MECHANIC IS NON-EXISTANT

[Geralt of Rivia]

 

I'll have you know my reading skills are at top level, therefore I cannot "work" on my reading skills, sorry. Now please, tell me how you are "destroying" my "argument" (I'm not even arguing), all I see from you is the classic "Internet tough guy" who thinks whatever they post is superior. How pointless is this? Trying to defeat a random user on a forum over the Internet, it won't solve anything, but I guess you're incapable of understand such a sentence. Oh well, you can keep crying to me all you want, I don't know why I keep replying, all I'm going to get is "I destroyed your argument". Come on, if you're going to reply, at least say something other than "I destroyed your argument".

 

What do you honestly expect to get out of an Internet argument? A story to tell to your friends about the one time you told a user on the Internet you destroyed his argument? It seems every thread I post in gets derailed by you because you can't accept the opinions of others, have you ever thought my "95% broken" statement was a hyperbole? Of course I know the game works, but many major aspects (such as the police) are flawed. Now, are you going to keep this up? It's so pointless... Makes me wonder why you would waste your time with it... Hey, better yet, your signature does say you make video game scripts, why not make a massive game that involves you typing to a user on the Internet? If you win, a big "you destroyed his argument" message comes up. Here's the twist: You can't lose.

 

It seems I'm also wasting my time, there's no point in reasoning with most Internet users, they're always right...

 

"I'll have you know my reading skills are at top level, therefore I cannot "work" on my reading skills, sorry."

 

Now that's just wrong. Because, somehow, me leaving a comment praising you for giving a sensible post, and then mocking you for ruining it, is 'complaining' to you. I'd say you need some work.

 

"Now please, tell me how you are "destroying" my "argument""

 

Well, according to you, R* only cares about Online. I tell you that's not true, and I prove it. When I do that, you never touch on the subject again except on other topics, where you hope people with IQ's below average will listen to your constant preaching of false bullsh*t. Hence, I destroy your argument, but you just never stop spewing your argument, so I must destroy it again, and again, and again. Like I said before; rinse and repeat.

 

"How pointless is this?"

 

How pointless is it to repeat the same thing over and over and over, especially when it's wrong? Answer me that.

 

"Trying to defeat a random user on a forum over the Internet, it won't solve anything, but I guess you're incapable of understand such a sentence."

 

When I argue with you, it's to try and get some sense knocked into that head of yours. And it actually worked...kinda.

 

"Oh well, you can keep crying to me all you want, I don't know why I keep replying, all I'm going to get is "I destroyed your argument"."

 

The reason you keep getting that is because you refuse to see how, even though I've done it multiple times, and even once in the quote train we have, I have destroyed your argument. It's not hard when you make claims such as "95% of the game is broken". Not hard at all.

 

"Come on, if you're going to reply, at least say something other than "I destroyed your argument"."

 

I have. Every single time I responded to you in this thread I have. But, then again, I forgot your reading comprehension skills are a little rusty, so I'll forgive you.

 

"What do you honestly expect to get out of an Internet argument?"

 

What do you expect to get out of just spewing the same untrue thing over and over?

 

"have you ever thought my "95% broken" statement was a hyperbole?"

 

Of course it is. But you kept using it, so I had to keep using it as an example of your delusions.

 

"Of course I know the game works, but many major aspects (such as the police) are flawed."

 

Ok, and since when do flaws = broken? They don't.

 

"Now, are you going to keep this up?"

 

I'm gonna keep it up as long as you keep it up.

 

"It seems I'm also wasting my time, there's no point in reasoning with most Internet users, they're always right..."

 

Except in this case, I actually am right.

 

OOM 313: Lol umad bro? Your title sure suits you...

Edited December 16, 2013 by TheMasterfocker

[Bertanius]

Here we go again, "I'm right, you're wrong" is all I'm getting from this. I liked how you ignored the last part, and only focused on replying to the points you could respond to. You have no idea what makes a good point, do you think I used the "95 %" broken statement because I couldn't think of anything? No, it's called repetition, and it's used to make that point stand out and be remembered. I also like how you say I need to improve my reading, but you have no idea what it means, you also gave me small responses. I need to improve my reading skill, even though you can't type more than a sentence for a reply? How disappointing. No, you didn't "knock sense into me", why would I ever take advice from such an impaired and one-sided user? Flaws mean something has gaps, is broken, is imperfect, while nothing can be perfect, a game with flaws means something isn't done right, or behaves irregularly, therefore it's broken, the police in this game are broken, they don't work in the intended way.

 

Once again, you typed "I have destroyed your argument" again, wow, no, wait, multiple times. You should make it your signature, it's all I see you say, so instead of responding, I'll simply read your signature. Come on, give me an intelligent response, all you give me is the same thing, your vocabulary is terrible too, yet I'm the one who needs to improve? Just shows how you think you're right. Anyway, I find this fun, it gives me an insight to how typical Internet users act. You always want to start something, I offered to stop this as it's pointless, but you demand we continue, fine, but why here? Why must we spam this post about broken mechanics? Maybe it should be taken to messaging? Wait, no, I know you won't do that, because that's the logical thing to do. Don't worry, this post will be locked from all the off-topic posting, I don't mind. You seem to be great at taking things off-topic. It's like my post went straight through you, I told you I was using a hyperbole (you most likely had no idea what that was), yet you insist I'm still overreacting. I guess you could say I... "destroyed your argument".

 

There are too many flaws in your posts, but you assume they're masterpieces.

[McGyver55]

Fanboys suck.

I like the game but I'm realistic about its flaws.

The wanted system/ police AI is antiquated, tired and lazy programing.

The cops in GTA V are not much better then back in GTA III (LC)... They just have more realistic rigging, more animations and better lines... their AI is as crappy as in 2002...

It wasn't crappy back then because it was new and open to improvement... but more than ten years later you'ed expect it to be somewhat improved.

Looks better yes, but it is a total buzzkill.

While there have been occasions where I made some mayhem in the city and managed to get away before the cops could swarm me, that is an exception rather then the rule... it is particularly annoying to be set upon for destroying a car or something in the middle of the night at the top of a deserted mountain... No, actually its just plain unrealistic and stupid.

Mountain lions and deer do not have cell phones.

Challenging? No. Annoying? Yes.

If the AI is so great how come I can just hover my helicopter like 50-75 ft from the edge of a cliff and the the cops will continue to drive off the edge one after another, until I either get bored or two cars crash into each other and they get out and start shooting at me with 90% accuracy or better.

It is very easy to program an adversary that is highly accurate, all seeing and super aggressive... it not like your console doesn't know what the player is up to... Line of sight, visual barriers, accurate visual range are all harder to program for... its far more difficult to program a realistic adversary that can't see through walls, or identify the character from a block away...

Can you still have fun in the game? Yeah, but you constantly have the threat of the cops hanging over your head.

They are like annoying wasps at a picnic... yeah, you can kill them, you can run away from them... but if you tell me to enjoy them flying in face and landing in my food I say "f**k you"...

Same here...

[Geralt of Rivia]

Here we go again, "I'm right, you're wrong" is all I'm getting from this. I liked how you ignored the last part, and only focused on replying to the points you could respond to. You have no idea what makes a good point, do you think I used the "95 %" broken statement because I couldn't think of anything? No, it's called repetition, and it's used to make that point stand out and be remembered. I also like how you say I need to improve my reading, but you have no idea what it means, you also gave me small responses. I need to improve my reading skill, even though you can't type more than a sentence for a reply? How disappointing. No, you didn't "knock sense into me", why would I ever take advice from such an impaired and one-sided user? Flaws mean something has gaps, is broken, is imperfect, while nothing can be perfect, a game with flaws means something isn't done right, or behaves irregularly, therefore it's broken, the police in this game are broken, they don't work in the intended way.

 

Once again, you typed "I have destroyed your argument" again, wow, no, wait, multiple times. You should make it your signature, it's all I see you say, so instead of responding, I'll simply read your signature. Come on, give me an intelligent response, all you give me is the same thing, your vocabulary is terrible too, yet I'm the one who needs to improve? Just shows how you think you're right. Anyway, I find this fun, it gives me an insight to how typical Internet users act. You always want to start something, I offered to stop this as it's pointless, but you demand we continue, fine, but why here? Why must we spam this post about broken mechanics? Maybe it should be taken to messaging? Wait, no, I know you won't do that, because that's the logical thing to do. Don't worry, this post will be locked from all the off-topic posting, I don't mind. You seem to be great at taking things off-topic. It's like my post went straight through you, I told you I was using a hyperbole (you most likely had no idea what that was), yet you insist I'm still overreacting. I guess you could say I... "destroyed your argument".

 

There are too many flaws in your posts, but you assume they're masterpieces.

Ugh, god, so much stupidity...Alright, where do I begin?

 

"Here we go again, "I'm right, you're wrong" is all I'm getting from this."

 

If that's all you're getting from this, then something else is wrong with your brain than what we already know. 2 out of 11 of my answers to your quotes involved "I destroyed your arguments" and those same 2 out of 11 involve "I'm right, you're wrong". A couple others only include "You're wrong". It's still only about half my comment if you count those.

 

"I liked how you ignored the last part, and only focused on replying to the points you could respond to."

 

I didn't ignore the last part at all. Infact, I responded to five separate statements of your last part. The others I didn't need to respond to, because it was just gibberish such as "You should write scripts about proving me wrong!" or "Make it your signature!"

 

"You have no idea what makes a good point, do you think I used the "95 %" broken statement because I couldn't think of anything?"

 

You used it to try and help prove your point that all R* cared about was Online. So, yes, I do think you used it because you have nothing, because there's literally no reason to use that statement, because it simply is not true.

 

"No, it's called repetition, and it's used to make that point stand out and be remembered."

 

Ok? That doesn't change the fact that it isn't true, and it's why I constantly fight you every time you post. You're like a console fanboy, constantly saying one console is better than the other while providing absolutely nothing valid and just making a fool out of yourself.

 

"I also like how you say I need to improve my reading, but you have no idea what it means, you also gave me small responses."

 

You do need to improve your reading. Like I said in my last comment: "Because, somehow, me leaving a comment praising you for giving a sensible post, and then mocking you for ruining it, is 'complaining' to you."

 

I have no idea what it means? How does that even make sense?

 

And I gave you small responses? Well, no sh*t, you gave me simple, easy statements. Am I supposed to write a paragraph from "Now, are you going to keep this up?"

 

"I need to improve my reading skill, even though you can't type more than a sentence for a reply?"

 

I typed more than a sentence for a reply plenty of times. Most times, actually. 8 times out of 11 in my last comment to you.

 

"No, you didn't "knock sense into me", why would I ever take advice from such an impaired and one-sided user?"

 

No, I actually did knock sense into you. You constantly cried that the game is 95% broken, but then you said you know the game works, so that means you knew you were spewing bullsh*t. And impaired and one-sided? Mhmmm, impaired how? And especially one-sided how? I acknowledge GTA 5's flaws. I admit the story sucked. It wasn't a masterpiece. Wow, I'm so f*cking one-sided!!

"Flaws mean something has gaps, is broken, is imperfect, while nothing can be perfect, a game with flaws means something isn't done right, or behaves irregularly, therefore it's broken, the police in this game are broken, they don't work in the intended way."'

 

Flaw: a mark, fault, or other imperfection that mars a substance or object.

 

Broken (In gaming industry terms): Something that does not work, or works, but is so bad that it's not even close to the intended result. For example: BF4 is still crashing for a lot of people. The game works, but it is broken for a lot of people.

 

So, flaw does not mean what you say it means, so most of your comment is already irrelevant. The police absolutely work the way they were intended, and of course there are some flaws with them. Do the cops come after you if you get a wanted star? Yes. Do they shoot you when you have 2 stars? Yes. Do helicopters come when you get 3+ stars? Yes. Do cops go away when you lose your wanted level? Yes.

 

So, yes, cops work as intended. Do they have flaws? Yes, but if they were broken, they would not work, or they wouldn't do all the stuff they do right. So...try again, I guess?

 

"it's all I see you say"

 

You should really get that vision checked out, I think you might need glasses or contacts or something.

 

"Come on, give me an intelligent response,"

 

I'm fairly sure every response I have given you is intelligent, because you still have yet to prove your argument is correct. On top of that, you like to focus on me saying "I have destroyed your argument" instead of something actually constructive that could help you.

 

"all you give me is the same thing,"

 

I give you the same thing because you give me the same thing.

 

"your vocabulary is terrible too"

 

How so?

 

"yet I'm the one who needs to improve?"

 

Well...yeah. Your eyesight and reading abilities seem to be a little off.

 

"Just shows how you think you're right. "

 

Again, I don't think, I know. And I find it funny you keep focusing on this, because a way to make me shut up would be to actually provide a counter argument, which you never do.

 

"You always want to start something"

 

I always want to start something? That's funny, because you're the one who starts it with your bullsh*t comments, and then at the end of every one, you put: "I'm ready for the hate I'm gonna get". And yet, I'm the one who wants to start it? Ok, whatever floats your boat buddy. The more you post, the more I believe you're like 16 or something.

 

"I offered to stop this as it's pointless, but you demand we continue, fine, but why here?"

 

You absolutely did not offer to stop. All you did was say it's pointless, and I never demanded we continue. There's your reading comprehension problems again. Or maybe, because you live in a fantasy world, it's just what you want to see? I dunno, you tell me.

 

"Wait, no, I know you won't do that, because that's the logical thing to do."

 

Mhmmm, so that's why you haven't done it either, right?

 

"I told you I was using a hyperbole (you most likely had no idea what that was), yet you insist I'm still overreacting."

 

So you didn't even read my response to that. Good to know.

 

"I guess you could say I... "destroyed your argument"."

 

Nope, because you didn't. If you want to think you did, and if you're nice, I might humor you

 

 

 

 

[gtaismyman]

[Geralt of Rivia]

If this thread gives you brain damage, this whole forum will give you an anuerysm

[Gnocchi Flip Flops]

I must admit, V definitely felt like one of the most limiting GTA's out there. You know I think V is good, but stuff like this is why I still gladly play IV a lot.

[ajrunke]

Aaahhh you assholes! It's not that "Oh they're so easy to escape bc I'm uber leet proz!!", it's the f*cking fact that you can be in the middle of NOWHERE and they MAGICALLY appear...you people are so dense. It's not fun when the police or omnipresent. It's simply annoying......