How long can one person simply "be patient".

[Odesza]

 

 

 

It's the first month.

 

 

you aren't being patient lol.

Yeah lol. I mean, it's not like GTA is made by a amazing company and it's not the highest grossing game ever. It's also not like they had any weeks ahead of time to work on this.

 

My bad.

 

Should rename thread to "Anyone who thinks we should be patient with Rockstar/GTAO is an idiot, come at me"

You should stop trying to act like you're against childish posters when you're as much of a childish troll than any of the others.

 

"This is turning into an argument, I'm done... But let me provoke it even more."

 

Why should I expect more? Because it's their f*cking problem. They bit more than they chew. But the defenders of R* here are hilarious. "EACH GAME HAS ITS MISTAKES OMG."

 

So let's not voice the issues. Let's not voice displeasure. Let them find it themselves. Don't have an opinion or be fed up with the game. Just deal with it.

 

Seems as though if you can't forgive R* for their faults in a game that was hardly beta tested, and f I'm not mistaking they only did a test on the X-Box, you're in the wrong.

 

And yeah, how dare I be obsessed with cash in a game that's RAN by the need for money?

 

Want to go into a TDM? Money. Want to have a nice car? Money. Want to shoot people? Ammo. Costs money. Want to get a gun to stand a chance? Money. If you die? Money loss.

 

Yeah. How dare people care about the money? Not like it's needed.

 

You act like they are just sitting around watching TV and not working on fixing the issues, you don't actually understand the complications that might go into fixing most of the issues that seem like an "ez fix" for you.

 

Jesus, how can you be so childish and ignorant at the same time lol.

Edited October 21, 2013 by Odesza

[theadmiral]

My patience has indeed run a little thin lately. I've been able to play lately, but I'm still scared to see the dreaded "timed out" screen over and over and over and over again attempting to get in to missions or matches. It's bad enough that I get booted back to SP afterwards, but sometimes pressing X doesn't click and I get stuck on the "timed out" screen. Or hell, I get kicked out of lobbies for no reason in the slightest. It's been waaaaay too long for this sh*t to still be going on, which is already bad enough, but R*'s only answer so far is that "WELL, IT'S YOUR NAT" ... f*ck off, will ya. I have NAT 2 and I've been able to play with no problems in all AC games, Uncharted games, Modern Warfare 3, Super Street Fighter IV, Mortal Kombat and Brothers in Arms: Hells Highway. But no, suddenly it's my NAT.

This is interesting.

 

RDR had problems with my nat when no other game did. I'd get into online games with no one else in them constantly, couldn't ever find another player so gave up. But GTAV for some reason works fine with the exact same nat settings I had back then.

[73duster]

 

 

 

It's the first month.

 

 

you aren't being patient lol.

Yeah lol. I mean, it's not like GTA is made by a amazing company and it's not the highest grossing game ever. It's also not like they had any weeks ahead of time to work on this.

 

My bad.

 

Should rename thread to "Anyone who thinks we should be patient with Rockstar/GTAO is an idiot, come at me"

You should stop trying to act like you're against childish posters when you're as much of a childish troll than any of the others.

 

"This is turning into an argument, I'm done... But let me provoke it even more."

 

Why should I expect more? Because it's their f*cking problem. They bit more than they chew. But the defenders of R* here are hilarious. "EACH GAME HAS ITS MISTAKES OMG."

 

So let's not voice the issues. Let's not voice displeasure. Let them find it themselves. Don't have an opinion or be fed up with the game. Just deal with it.

 

Seems as though if you can't forgive R* for their faults in a game that was hardly beta tested, and f I'm not mistaking they only did a test on the X-Box, you're in the wrong.

 

And yeah, how dare I be obsessed with cash in a game that's RAN by the need for money?

 

Want to go into a TDM? Money. Want to have a nice car? Money. Want to shoot people? Ammo. Costs money. Want to get a gun to stand a chance? Money. If you die? Money loss.

 

Yeah. How dare people care about the money? Not like it's needed.

 

I can see that you are incredibly brilliant. Perhaps you should go to Rockstar directly and teach them how it's done.

[SUPAH JD]

 

 

 

It's the first month.

 

 

you aren't being patient lol.

Yeah lol. I mean, it's not like GTA is made by a amazing company and it's not the highest grossing game ever. It's also not like they had any weeks ahead of time to work on this.

 

My bad.

 

Yes, it is indeed your bad.

 

 

 

For not understanding that games are complicated beasts.

 

For not understanding that persistent online worlds aren't easy to maintain.

 

For not understanding that how much money made from the game has absolutely f*ck all to do with how many bugs it will ship with.

 

For not understanding that a lot of bugs couldn't of been noticed before the community got their hands on the game.

 

For not understanding that server load can not be accurately modeled when the amount of users is an unknown.

 

For not understanding that you haven't got the faintest idea about game development, or troubleshooting code problems.

 

For not understanding that for every glitch/bug/exploit you fix, another three potentially pop up as a direct result of fixing said glitch/bug/exploit.

 

And finally, yes, your bad, for not understanding that every opinion you have doesn't need it's own f*cking thread.

It's amazing how other games have handled it just fine.

 

But whatever. And hey, good to see you haven't replied to the reasonable post in my other thread that shut you up pretty f*cking quick. You will continue to jack R* off till the bitter end.

 

Question. You don't have to answer. If R* spit in your face, would you beg for more or would you just silently love it?

 

And no Admiral. You posting childish remarks isn't being a reasonable or mature poster. I can't make that claim. Neither can you.

 

Christ, it's like arguing with Bieber fans. Can't say anything negative about their glorious R*.

Edited October 21, 2013 by SideburnGuru

[LcplJarheadFi]

With Nat, I've only had problems with this, CoD, and Halo.

[Odesza]

Being 13 must be fun.

[theadmiral]

 

 

 

It's the first month.

 

 

you aren't being patient lol.

Yeah lol. I mean, it's not like GTA is made by a amazing company and it's not the highest grossing game ever. It's also not like they had any weeks ahead of time to work on this.

 

My bad.

 

Yes, it is indeed your bad.

 

 

 

For not understanding that games are complicated beasts.

 

For not understanding that persistent online worlds aren't easy to maintain.

 

For not understanding that how much money made from the game has absolutely f*ck all to do with how many bugs it will ship with.

 

For not understanding that a lot of bugs couldn't of been noticed before the community got their hands on the game.

 

For not understanding that server load can not be accurately modeled when the amount of users is an unknown.

 

For not understanding that you haven't got the faintest idea about game development, or troubleshooting code problems.

 

For not understanding that for every glitch/bug/exploit you fix, another three potentially pop up as a direct result of fixing said glitch/bug/exploit.

 

And finally, yes, your bad, for not understanding that every opinion you have doesn't need it's own f*cking thread.

It's amazing how other games have handled it just fine.

 

But whatever. And hey, good to see you haven't replied to the reasonable post in my other thread that shut you up pretty f*cking quick. You will continue to jack R* off till the bitter end.

 

Question. You don't have to answer. If R* spit in your face, would you beg for more or would you just silently love it?

 

And no Admiral. You posting childish remarks isn't being a reasonable or mature poster. I can't make that claim. Neither can you.

 

Christ, it's like arguing with Bieber fans. Can't say anything negative about their glorious R*.

 

 

Obviously you can't since you just told Odesza to go "Continue jacking R* off"

[Odesza]

 

My patience has indeed run a little thin lately. I've been able to play lately, but I'm still scared to see the dreaded "timed out" screen over and over and over and over again attempting to get in to missions or matches. It's bad enough that I get booted back to SP afterwards, but sometimes pressing X doesn't click and I get stuck on the "timed out" screen. Or hell, I get kicked out of lobbies for no reason in the slightest. It's been waaaaay too long for this sh*t to still be going on, which is already bad enough, but R*'s only answer so far is that "WELL, IT'S YOUR NAT" ... f*ck off, will ya. I have NAT 2 and I've been able to play with no problems in all AC games, Uncharted games, Modern Warfare 3, Super Street Fighter IV, Mortal Kombat and Brothers in Arms: Hells Highway. But no, suddenly it's my NAT.

This is interesting.

 

RDR had problems with my nat when no other game did. I'd get into online games with no one else in them constantly, couldn't ever find another player so gave up. But GTAV for some reason works fine with the exact same nat settings I had back then.

 

NAT problems as in your NAT Type being on mod/strict? Because if so that's a pretty simple fix.

[Kromix]

GTAO is a game that has been developed totally out of context to everything else that RS have done, with only a couple of slightly comparable titles on the market. I'd rather have a game dev try for something new and unique than do the same sh*t over and over again. It's like with the SP campaign - the three protag thing was an experiment, and I applaud them for it, even if I felt the SP was lackluster as far as story content goes.

 

Not really ... They took Red Dead Redemption, swapped the horses with cars and changed the setting a bit - and voila ... GTAO was born ... Not much revolution there buddy ...

[theadmiral]

 

 

My patience has indeed run a little thin lately. I've been able to play lately, but I'm still scared to see the dreaded "timed out" screen over and over and over and over again attempting to get in to missions or matches. It's bad enough that I get booted back to SP afterwards, but sometimes pressing X doesn't click and I get stuck on the "timed out" screen. Or hell, I get kicked out of lobbies for no reason in the slightest. It's been waaaaay too long for this sh*t to still be going on, which is already bad enough, but R*'s only answer so far is that "WELL, IT'S YOUR NAT" ... f*ck off, will ya. I have NAT 2 and I've been able to play with no problems in all AC games, Uncharted games, Modern Warfare 3, Super Street Fighter IV, Mortal Kombat and Brothers in Arms: Hells Highway. But no, suddenly it's my NAT.

This is interesting.

 

RDR had problems with my nat when no other game did. I'd get into online games with no one else in them constantly, couldn't ever find another player so gave up. But GTAV for some reason works fine with the exact same nat settings I had back then.

 

NAT problems as in your NAT Type being on mod/strict? Because if so that's a pretty simple fix.

 

The fix involved plugging my PS3 directly into the wall instead of using wireless and going through my overly complicated setup, and I just didn't care enough to do that. I think it was around the time Sony got hacked and I was paranoid or something.

 

No other game had an issue so I just wrote off RDR Multiplayer.

Edited October 21, 2013 by theadmiral

[SUPAH JD]

 

 

GTAO is a game that has been developed totally out of context to everything else that RS have done, with only a couple of slightly comparable titles on the market. I'd rather have a game dev try for something new and unique than do the same sh*t over and over again. It's like with the SP campaign - the three protag thing was an experiment, and I applaud them for it, even if I felt the SP was lackluster as far as story content goes.

Not really ... They took Red Dead Redemption, swapped the horses with cars and changed the setting a bit - and voila ... GTAO was born ... Not much revolution there buddy ...

You better watch out. The hounds of hell here will attack you for daring to say something negative.

 

Especially the kid who called me a 13 year old who also has an issue with accepting opinions. Then tries to say I do.

 

Funny, right?

[Pinnkiepie]

For SideGuru

 

[email protected]

We encourage you to please share your gameplay experience feedback with us at the email address above so that we may know what aspects you’re liking and disliking to help guide how the game will grow and evolve.

[DMC14]

 

 

 

It's the first month.

 

 

you aren't being patient lol.

Yeah lol. I mean, it's not like GTA is made by a amazing company and it's not the highest grossing game ever. It's also not like they had any weeks ahead of time to work on this.

 

My bad.

 

Yes, it is indeed your bad.

 

 

 

For not understanding that games are complicated beasts.

 

For not understanding that persistent online worlds aren't easy to maintain.

 

For not understanding that how much money made from the game has absolutely f*ck all to do with how many bugs it will ship with.

 

For not understanding that a lot of bugs couldn't of been noticed before the community got their hands on the game.

 

For not understanding that server load can not be accurately modeled when the amount of users is an unknown.

 

For not understanding that you haven't got the faintest idea about game development, or troubleshooting code problems.

 

For not understanding that for every glitch/bug/exploit you fix, another three potentially pop up as a direct result of fixing said glitch/bug/exploit.

 

And finally, yes, your bad, for not understanding that every opinion you have doesn't need it's own f*cking thread.

It's amazing how other games have handled it just fine.

 

But whatever. And hey, good to see you haven't replied to the reasonable post in my other thread that shut you up pretty f*cking quick. You will continue to jack R* off till the bitter end.

 

Question. You don't have to answer. If R* spit in your face, would you beg for more or would you just silently love it?

 

And no Admiral. You posting childish remarks isn't being a reasonable or mature poster. I can't make that claim. Neither can you.

 

Christ, it's like arguing with Bieber fans. Can't say anything negative about their glorious R*.

 

 

everyone is entitled to an opinion, but the way i see it rockstar have proven themselves in the past, they are communicating with us, it will come good i believe (that being said i have had no problems).

You've gotta be positive bro.

[theadmiral]

 

 

GTAO is a game that has been developed totally out of context to everything else that RS have done, with only a couple of slightly comparable titles on the market. I'd rather have a game dev try for something new and unique than do the same sh*t over and over again. It's like with the SP campaign - the three protag thing was an experiment, and I applaud them for it, even if I felt the SP was lackluster as far as story content goes.

Not really ... They took Red Dead Redemption, swapped the horses with cars and changed the setting a bit - and voila ... GTAO was born ... Not much revolution there buddy ...

You better watch out. The hounds of hell here will attack you for daring to say something negative.

 

Especially the kid who called me a 13 year old who also has an issue with accepting opinions. Then tries to say I do.

 

Funny, right?

 

Blatant trolling now.

[LcplJarheadFi]

 

 

My patience has indeed run a little thin lately. I've been able to play lately, but I'm still scared to see the dreaded "timed out" screen over and over and over and over again attempting to get in to missions or matches. It's bad enough that I get booted back to SP afterwards, but sometimes pressing X doesn't click and I get stuck on the "timed out" screen. Or hell, I get kicked out of lobbies for no reason in the slightest. It's been waaaaay too long for this sh*t to still be going on, which is already bad enough, but R*'s only answer so far is that "WELL, IT'S YOUR NAT" ... f*ck off, will ya. I have NAT 2 and I've been able to play with no problems in all AC games, Uncharted games, Modern Warfare 3, Super Street Fighter IV, Mortal Kombat and Brothers in Arms: Hells Highway. But no, suddenly it's my NAT.

This is interesting.

 

RDR had problems with my nat when no other game did. I'd get into online games with no one else in them constantly, couldn't ever find another player so gave up. But GTAV for some reason works fine with the exact same nat settings I had back then.

 

NAT problems as in your NAT Type being on mod/strict? Because if so that's a pretty simple fix.

 

Yeah. I know how to fix it, I was giving examples.

[R.R]

For SideGuru

 

[email protected]

We encourage you to please share your gameplay experience feedback with us at the email address above so that we may know what aspects you’re liking and disliking to help guide how the game will grow and evolve.

 

He won't get the attention from the forum that way.

[DMC14]

 

GTAO is a game that has been developed totally out of context to everything else that RS have done, with only a couple of slightly comparable titles on the market. I'd rather have a game dev try for something new and unique than do the same sh*t over and over again. It's like with the SP campaign - the three protag thing was an experiment, and I applaud them for it, even if I felt the SP was lackluster as far as story content goes.

 

Not really ... They took Red Dead Redemption, swapped the horses with cars and changed the setting a bit - and voila ... GTAO was born ... Not much revolution there buddy ...

 

what really happened was they took GTA added horses and took away the cities, voila red dead. f*cking moron what are you doing here if you dont like the games.

[05-BROCKY-05]

Well after 1.04 release I'm only just at rank 40 as of last night when i actually got to rank 40 3 days a go, it just hasn't been saving so technically i should be around rank 50 now, plus I've lost well over 100k also over the past few days. All i can do is wait.

[SUPAH JD]

 

 

 

 

GTAO is a game that has been developed totally out of context to everything else that RS have done, with only a couple of slightly comparable titles on the market. I'd rather have a game dev try for something new and unique than do the same sh*t over and over again. It's like with the SP campaign - the three protag thing was an experiment, and I applaud them for it, even if I felt the SP was lackluster as far as story content goes.

Not really ... They took Red Dead Redemption, swapped the horses with cars and changed the setting a bit - and voila ... GTAO was born ... Not much revolution there buddy ...

You better watch out. The hounds of hell here will attack you for daring to say something negative.

 

Especially the kid who called me a 13 year old who also has an issue with accepting opinions. Then tries to say I do.

 

Funny, right?

 

Blatant trolling now. The irony is painful.

[theadmiral]

You created a somewhat reasonable thread with a reasonable title, and waited for reasonable answers to what seemed like a legitimate question and then proceeded to tell everyone who answered how wrong they are, how they are sheep, how they are jacking R* off.

[Kromix]

 

 

GTAO is a game that has been developed totally out of context to everything else that RS have done, with only a couple of slightly comparable titles on the market. I'd rather have a game dev try for something new and unique than do the same sh*t over and over again. It's like with the SP campaign - the three protag thing was an experiment, and I applaud them for it, even if I felt the SP was lackluster as far as story content goes.

Not really ... They took Red Dead Redemption, swapped the horses with cars and changed the setting a bit - and voila ... GTAO was born ... Not much revolution there buddy ...

You better watch out. The hounds of hell here will attack you for daring to say something negative.

 

Especially the kid who called me a 13 year old who also has an issue with accepting opinions. Then tries to say I do.

 

Funny, right?

 

 

What can you do, the fanboys of Rockstar will stop at nothing to defend their honor ... Now wtf is that about ... Oh well, but imo they messed up the latest installment of GTA - they arent listening to the true fans of the original game and now they are just doing their own thing. GTAO is a joke, and saying that its ok cause its complicated is just retarded ... Besides - we have tested that engine for years playing RDR, they should get their sh*t together and stop selling more than they can deliver ...

[73duster]

 

 

 

It's the first month.

 

 

you aren't being patient lol.

Yeah lol. I mean, it's not like GTA is made by a amazing company and it's not the highest grossing game ever. It's also not like they had any weeks ahead of time to work on this.

 

My bad.

 

Yes, it is indeed your bad.

 

 

 

For not understanding that games are complicated beasts.

 

For not understanding that persistent online worlds aren't easy to maintain.

 

For not understanding that how much money made from the game has absolutely f*ck all to do with how many bugs it will ship with.

 

For not understanding that a lot of bugs couldn't of been noticed before the community got their hands on the game.

 

For not understanding that server load can not be accurately modeled when the amount of users is an unknown.

 

For not understanding that you haven't got the faintest idea about game development, or troubleshooting code problems.

 

For not understanding that for every glitch/bug/exploit you fix, another three potentially pop up as a direct result of fixing said glitch/bug/exploit.

 

And finally, yes, your bad, for not understanding that every opinion you have doesn't need it's own f*cking thread.

It's amazing how other games have handled it just fine.

 

But whatever. And hey, good to see you haven't replied to the reasonable post in my other thread that shut you up pretty f*cking quick. You will continue to jack R* off till the bitter end.

 

Question. You don't have to answer. If R* spit in your face, would you beg for more or would you just silently love it?

 

And no Admiral. You posting childish remarks isn't being a reasonable or mature poster. I can't make that claim. Neither can you.

 

Christ, it's like arguing with Bieber fans. Can't say anything negative about their glorious R*.

 

Before you start accusing anyone who disagrees with you as "Beiber like" fanatics of Rockstar, perhaps you should know who you are talking about.

I have posted about SEVERAL issues I have had with the game, so i'm not a blind loyalist to a company that pays me ZERO dollars. I don't owe Rockstar a damned thing, but I don't have to agree with someone I believe is unreasonable with their expectations.

You act as if this is the first time a game has shipped with bugs. There is no way to conduct a stress test that simulates what will happen when 2% of the entire planet attempts to play the game online. There are issues that can only be discovered on the fly, and as such, can only be resolved on the fly.

Nobody know how long it will take, or how many patches before the game is what YOU expect it to be.

I hate that there aren't as many interiors as I thought there would be. I have posted about it, but I didn't go apesh*t over it either.

[SUPAH JD]

 

For SideGuru

 

[email protected]

We encourage you to please share your gameplay experience feedback with us at the email address above so that we may know what aspects you’re liking and disliking to help guide how the game will grow and evolve.

 

He won't get the attention from the forum that way.

 

The irony from a man who claims I'm the attention seeker but has to continously post in my threads and whinge about me instead of doing anything productive is truly, past hilarious.

 

And to 73duster, forgive me but why the f*ck would they truly have issues with server overload? Should they have some? Sure, fine.

 

But they had two f*cking weeks. More then that, because they CAN see how the preorder sales are going. They should've known this game was going to have a massive, MASSIVE amount of players getting on it.

 

They had two weeks and more to prep for it. I'm sorry, but the amount of issues the game is having, WHILE the fact the beta test, and I know to the one user, "DA BETA TEST CAN'T DEAL WITH ALL ISSUES", is ridiculous. Especially since as I said, they were too f*cking lazy to do a damn test on the PS3, only the X-Box. And their laziness showed then when in the first week, polls were showing alot of the issues were coming from the PS3.

 

That was unprofressional too. Or is their excuses for that as well?

Edited October 21, 2013 by SideburnGuru

[Themonsterhunter]

Ahhh good old OP. Giving us quality threads since the creation of the sideburn.

[Matticus88]

I'm British, being patient is a standard trait for us lol that and queuing.

[theadmiral]

I'm British, being patient is a standard trait for us lol that and queuing.

Stiff upper lip too.

[madwullie]

There is no way they didn't do a beta test on ps3.

 

Some people just don't actually grasp what gtao is meant to be

[theadmiral]

Just noticed OP is running two of these threads at the same time. Check out the other one.

 

http://gtaforums.com/topic/634945-are-you-serious-jobs-require-money/

 

That takes some skill.

[LcplJarheadFi]

This thread burned out fast. -unfollows topic-

[iPone]

You pre ordered a Lego game? You are a hero

 

LOL I thought the same thing.