El Zodape Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Basically, ending A is just there for those who hate Trevor. lol *sigh* C'mon, you can do better than that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tonesta Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 The problem with Option C - as has been discussed many times before - is that the single biggest narrative thread of the storyline, the relationship between Michael and Trevor, isn't resolved. At all. Even if you buy the notion that Trevor has forgiven Michael for setting him up to be killed 10 years previously - you still know that Trevor is such an insane psychopath that he's never going to let Michael walk away and settle down, and eventually things between them are going to blow up again. That said, of the three it is the most satisfying and well written choice. It just doesn't conclude what is otherwise an excellent, gripping story as well as you'd hope it would. If you didn't pay attention. Trevor is now rich, whch is what he wanted from the beginning. He even say's to Michael we are good. They don't embrace or suck each other off, but the conflict felt resolved for the most part to me. I think for Trevor everything depended on the big one succeeding. Franklin got his big score and Michael could finally "retire". Wow. You think Trevor did it all for the money? That he's going to change now that he's rich? And I'm supposed to be the one who wasn't paying attention???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
grantelicious Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 The end was sh*t just the rest of the story, it all fell apart after the first heist and turned sh*t. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hooves07 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 The problem with Option C - as has been discussed many times before - is that the single biggest narrative thread of the storyline, the relationship between Michael and Trevor, isn't resolved. At all. Even if you buy the notion that Trevor has forgiven Michael for setting him up to be killed 10 years previously - you still know that Trevor is such an insane psychopath that he's never going to let Michael walk away and settle down, and eventually things between them are going to blow up again. That said, of the three it is the most satisfying and well written choice. It just doesn't conclude what is otherwise an excellent, gripping story as well as you'd hope it would. If you didn't pay attention. Trevor is now rich, whch is what he wanted from the beginning. He even say's to Michael we are good. They don't embrace or suck each other off, but the conflict felt resolved for the most part to me. I think for Trevor everything depended on the big one succeeding. Franklin got his big score and Michael could finally "retire". Wow. You think Trevor did it all for the money? That he's going to change now that he's rich? And I'm supposed to be the one who wasn't paying attention???? You think they didn't do it for the money? What do you think Trevor's goals were? Did you listen to the dialogue between Trevor and Ron, Michael at the end? If it was all about revenge for Trevor he could have taken Michael out at any point after finding him. He actually saves him. So what are you on about anyway? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr Rabbit Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 (edited) SPOILERS AHEAD to be safe i put it all in spoilers Ending C is the typical GTA ending and the typical ending to any game, movie, book, or any work of fiction: The antagonists die, in A and B the antagonists: devin, haines, stretch and cheng are all alive, in most pieces of fiction including every GTA the antagonists were dealt with not just swept under the rug and left alone (except Bulgarin in gta IV but he was dealt with in TBoGT). Also if you kill Trevor then the matter of Devin is not dealt with, does he just give up going after Michael? and do the FIB really jsut let go and keep their word after breaking their word on letting go countless times? neither one of those 2 scenarios seems likely. And what about the Stretch situation, that is not solved at all, so will Stretch stop trying to get frank and Lamar killed? and they just give up on Stretch? and what about Cheng? He does not know Trevor is dead so why would he just disappear and not come back to look for him? A lot of unanswered questions and idiotic assumptions have to be made for A to be counted as realistic, or B for that matter as you can say the same things with regards to Stretch, and Cheng (but with Trevor being alive) and also the FIB would jsut get their claws into franklin like they did Michael. They always say it is the last favour but it never is. Ending C is the only one that resolves these questions and these situations witht he characters, but with only one problem, it all seemed too easy to kill these guys, but that is pale in comparison to the assumptions you have to make in accepting the other 2 endings, and the questions and unresolved situations from the other 2 endings. Ending C resolves everything in the story and wraps it all up. Edited October 20, 2013 by NateShaw92 DeafMetal 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jonkoroken420 Posted October 20, 2013 Share Posted October 20, 2013 Let's be honest Killing Trevor is the most logical decision for Franklin to make. Why would he all of a sudden just kill Michael because some guy that didnt even pay him for a job (luxury car boosting) has asked him to. Michael showed him the ropes and had him making money that he had only dreamed about before. Theres no real reason at all for F to betray michael, it just wouldnt make sense. Now with Trevor, Franklin knows what a loose cannon he is and how he's always f*cking things up and getting the crew into sticky situations. He also knows the relationship between Michael and Trevor is a rough one and could lead to even more problems like Franklin or Michael being killed or having to serve jail time, it's just too risky and Franklin wouldnt wanna take that risk. Option C is a nice alternative for the player who wants to keep all 3 alive (I chose this option) but it's not a likely outcome IMO. But yeah in terms of narrative Killing Trevor defo makes the most sense. Ending C is the one realistic ending. Franklin likes both Michael, And Trevor. Michael and Trevor might have their differences, But Franklin was Neutral. As franklin says "He's my boy" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now