DlZZEE Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 (edited) Here's link: http://www.gamespot.com/reviews/grand-theft-auto-online-review/1900-6415473/ Edited October 12, 2013 by DizzeeXL Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ry12111 Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 she male review Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thugzmansion Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 virus link?? !! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ry12111 Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 no it's real Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zroovy Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 A not corrupted reviewer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ry12111 Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 no ign review yet Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ola441 Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 (edited) How can they review it yet...no heists yet, content creator... Should there not be separate reviews? No bawsaq yet even... Edited October 12, 2013 by Ola441 Doland J. Trump 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BabyDontHurtMe Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 (edited) So what? Why do people care what reviewers think? If you think the game is a 10 then it is a 10, if you think it is a 0 then it is a 0. Edited October 12, 2013 by BabyDontHurtMe Ola441 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homemade Dynamite Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 Oh god, why did they let that shemale review more and more games? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattymcs Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 Reading the review you'd think she was going to give it a 9, she seems to really like it but then awards a 7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DatDudeDB Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 Kind of strange to review a online game that is so barebones. I would've at least waited until rockstar had time to add more features and fixes to the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toshio_maxoS Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 GTA online earned only 2/10. GTA Singleplayer 0/10. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolsamme Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 How can they review it yet...no heists yet, content creator... Should there not be separate reviews? No bawsaq yet even... This is how the game is at its launch, it's finished product, the product we payed for, the product that were supposed to come 1st October. 11 Days later, a review is rightful to come and let's be honest. GTA V ONLINE SUCKS HARD, not because of the technical issues but because of the fact you do nothing in this game. You do reptitive missions to get money to what? Buy houses? What do you use houses for? Oh yeah, if you get a house for 400GTA cash, (you get around 3k gold per mission if not lucky/replaying). Then, what do you use houses for? Heists? What do you use Heists for? Nothing, because the game has no proper goal and it's simply awful. They tried too hard and I believe it's hard for you fanboys to realize that, and arguments will come that it was free blablabla, it doesn't really matter. If they are going hotshot with an online mode, they better do it right. GTAspotter and CW_Wonder 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
creed200569 Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 Gta online will b great once they fix the bugs n start adding the heist n content n with heist u can almost guarantee they will.open more interiors like the casino. Like rockstar be patient with them n.stop giving them sh*t. This is a big project n.anyone out there who thought it would run smooth at launch is an idiot. This world is so big with so much going on its.gonna take.some time to get where they want it. If I were rockstar I would b adding some content to SP while they fix online like that beach bum pack Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bish0p2004 Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 The backlash is going to be strong here. It's almost like the GameSpot crew are trolling the fans lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DatDudeDB Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 How can they review it yet...no heists yet, content creator... Should there not be separate reviews? No bawsaq yet even... This is how the game is at its launch, it's finished product, the product we payed for, the product that were supposed to come 1st October. 11 Days later, a review is rightful to come and let's be honest. GTA V ONLINE SUCKS HARD, not because of the technical issues but because of the fact you do nothing in this game. You do reptitive missions to get money to what? Buy houses? What do you use houses for? Oh yeah, if you get a house for 400GTA cash, (you get around 3k gold per mission if not lucky/replaying). Then, what do you use houses for? Heists? What do you use Heists for? Nothing, because the game has no proper goal and it's simply awful. They tried too hard and I believe it's hard for you fanboys to realize that, and arguments will come that it was free blablabla, it doesn't really matter. If they are going hotshot with an online mode, they better do it right. It seems like you played gta online in order to do more story missions and have "story" goals rather than just have fun with your buddies screwing around. Also it sounds like your lower level ranked. Probably arouned 7-12ish? It gets better as you rank up believe me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gutslab Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 So what? Why do people care what reviewers think? If you think the game is a 10 then it is a 10, if you think it is a 0 then it is a 0. This. One should enjoy a game based on if they have fun playing it, not on what others say. BUT I do think there was a time in which game reviews actually meant something and gave you useful information, like in the 90s before the internet blew up. Now, I just look up gameplay footage on yt if I'm unsure about buying a certain game or want to see more. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thisnamehasnotbeentaken Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 How can they review it yet...no heists yet, content creator... Should there not be separate reviews? No bawsaq yet even... This is how the game is at its launch, it's finished product, the product we payed for, the product that were supposed to come 1st October. 11 Days later, a review is rightful to come and let's be honest. GTA V ONLINE SUCKS HARD, not because of the technical issues but because of the fact you do nothing in this game. You do reptitive missions to get money to what? Buy houses? What do you use houses for? Oh yeah, if you get a house for 400GTA cash, (you get around 3k gold per mission if not lucky/replaying). Then, what do you use houses for? Heists? What do you use Heists for? Nothing, because the game has no proper goal and it's simply awful. They tried too hard and I believe it's hard for you fanboys to realize that, and arguments will come that it was free blablabla, it doesn't really matter. If they are going hotshot with an online mode, they better do it right. I'm afraid I have to agree with this guy. So you make a ton of money, you buy an apartment and a car...then what? their is no real goal to reach for and everything gets incredibly repetitive after a few hours. RDR'S multiplayer though not as big, was so much more fun imo. Also I can see why that shemale only has 60% of her face in that picture, *shudder*. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaCtiCaLTommy Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 Does anyone actually care what someone else thinks about any game? Think for yourself wow. Do you guys buy games based on reviews? Sad if so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iKevhawk Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 LOL at taking Gamespot as a legitimate review source. I'm surprised not everyone sees them as a joke after the whole Kane and Lynch thing. Not to mention the score they give Zelda games for being 'repetitive' and the scores they give Call of Duty. f*cking stupid. How can you guys actually trust them? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thisnamehasnotbeentaken Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 I thought everyone just trolled gamespot reviews rather than actually taking them seriously?. Their reviewers are more retarded than IGN's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josephene123 Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 (edited) How can they review it yet...no heists yet, content creator... Should there not be separate reviews? No bawsaq yet even... This is how the game is at its launch, it's finished product, the product we payed for, the product that were supposed to come 1st October. 11 Days later, a review is rightful to come and let's be honest. GTA V ONLINE SUCKS HARD, not because of the technical issues but because of the fact you do nothing in this game. You do reptitive missions to get money to what? Buy houses? What do you use houses for? Oh yeah, if you get a house for 400GTA cash, (you get around 3k gold per mission if not lucky/replaying). Then, what do you use houses for? Heists? What do you use Heists for? Nothing, because the game has no proper goal and it's simply awful. They tried too hard and I believe it's hard for you fanboys to realize that, and arguments will come that it was free blablabla, it doesn't really matter. If they are going hotshot with an online mode, they better do it right. I'm afraid I have to agree with this guy. So you make a ton of money, you buy an apartment and a car...then what? their is no real goal to reach for and everything gets incredibly repetitive after a few hours. RDR'S multiplayer though not as big, was so much more fun imo. Also I can see why that shemale only has 60% of her face in that picture, *shudder*. Agreeing that there is no goal and that having no goal is a problem... and then proclaiming RDR's multiplayer was much better? Edited October 12, 2013 by josephene123 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iKevhawk Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 I thought everyone just trolled gamespot reviews rather than actually taking them seriously?. Their reviewers are more retarded than IGN's. The only people taking that gamespot review seriously are entitled whiners who know nothing about servers and expect everything to work perfectly on day one for the most anticipated game. It's a stupid age we live in. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYdreamz Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 (edited) i thought the review was fair.....im guessing with all the connection problems, disappearing players and other bugs the score went south ... but when its working its fun was all she was saying... Edited October 12, 2013 by NYdreamz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coolsamme Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 I thought everyone just trolled gamespot reviews rather than actually taking them seriously?. Their reviewers are more retarded than IGN's. The only people taking that gamespot review seriously are entitled whiners who know nothing about servers and expect everything to work perfectly on day one for the most anticipated game. It's a stupid age we live in. Oh? Because I have always thought the people saying it was expected to have server problems, were an issue of humanity because of their stupidity. They got 1 billion the first day of GTA V, yet their servers wasn't good enough. Why take a risk of it being less? Why not just make it really big so that it will surely survive? They had the money for it for sure. And Gamespot? Why is Gamespot bad? The Kane and Lynch reviewer got kicked you know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josephene123 Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 I thought everyone just trolled gamespot reviews rather than actually taking them seriously?. Their reviewers are more retarded than IGN's. The only people taking that gamespot review seriously are entitled whiners who know nothing about servers and expect everything to work perfectly on day one for the most anticipated game. It's a stupid age we live in. It's ridiculous sticking up for Rockstar on this matter. All the glitches and stuff, yeah, fine. The server issues? No. f*ck no. Do you really believe the whole pathetic 'We didn't realize it'd be so popular on first day' thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bish0p2004 Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 I thought everyone just trolled gamespot reviews rather than actually taking them seriously?. Their reviewers are more retarded than IGN's. The only people taking that gamespot review seriously are entitled whiners who know nothing about servers and expect everything to work perfectly on day one for the most anticipated game. It's a stupid age we live in. Are you talking about the gamers who are mad that it got a lower score than expected or the gamers who are happy that it got a low score? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thisnamehasnotbeentaken Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 How can they review it yet...no heists yet, content creator... Should there not be separate reviews? No bawsaq yet even... This is how the game is at its launch, it's finished product, the product we payed for, the product that were supposed to come 1st October. 11 Days later, a review is rightful to come and let's be honest. GTA V ONLINE SUCKS HARD, not because of the technical issues but because of the fact you do nothing in this game. You do reptitive missions to get money to what? Buy houses? What do you use houses for? Oh yeah, if you get a house for 400GTA cash, (you get around 3k gold per mission if not lucky/replaying). Then, what do you use houses for? Heists? What do you use Heists for? Nothing, because the game has no proper goal and it's simply awful. They tried too hard and I believe it's hard for you fanboys to realize that, and arguments will come that it was free blablabla, it doesn't really matter. If they are going hotshot with an online mode, they better do it right. I'm afraid I have to agree with this guy. So you make a ton of money, you buy an apartment and a car...then what? their is no real goal to reach for and everything gets incredibly repetitive after a few hours. RDR'S multiplayer though not as big, was so much more fun imo. Also I can see why that shemale only has 60% of her face in that picture, *shudder*. Agreeing that there is no goal and that having no goal is a problem... and then proclaiming RDR's multiplayer was much better? For me, I enjoyed reaching legendary and completing challenges that earned your character titles. Like hunting for legendary animals or collecting rare herbs etc. The unlockable characters and mounts were an awesome feature too, a mountable zebra? f*ck yes. Oh, and liars dice was hella fun. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RealTuff Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 How can you complain about her reviewing an unfinished game with an average score almost two weeks after the release date. I'm sure the reason it's written now rather than a week ago is because they were giving R* a chance to get their sh*t together, and I imagine it would have been something like a 4 or 5 if it was done on release week. NYdreamz 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NYdreamz Posted October 12, 2013 Share Posted October 12, 2013 (edited) How can you complain about her reviewing an unfinished game with an average score almost two weeks after the release date. I'm sure the reason it's written now rather than a week ago is because they were giving R* a chance to get their sh*t together, and I imagine it would have been something like a 4 or 5 if it was done on release week. this made so much sense.... I don't know If people were expecting a 10 but overall this review was done well ....also people are saying this review was done to early ??? should they wait to review it 6 months from now when most ppl are on next gen ? Edited October 12, 2013 by NYdreamz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now