Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!   (85,824 visits to this link)

    2. News

    1. GTA Online

      1. Find Lobbies & Players
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Vehicles
      4. Content Creator
      5. Help & Support
    2. Crews

      1. Events
      2. Recruitment
    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

    2. GTA Next

    3. GTA V

      1. PC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    4. GTA IV

      1. Episodes from Liberty City
      2. Multiplayer
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
      5. GTA Mods
    5. GTA Chinatown Wars

    6. GTA Vice City Stories

    7. GTA Liberty City Stories

    8. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    9. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    10. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    11. Top Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    12. Wiki

      1. Merchandising
    1. GTA Modding

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    3. Featured Mods

      1. DYOM
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

    2. Red Dead Redemption

    3. Rockstar Games

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Programming
      5. Movies & TV
      6. Music
      7. Sports
      8. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    1. Forum Support

    2. Site Suggestions

DatDudeDB

I don't get the Love for San Andreas

Recommended Posts

DatDudeDB

Just started playing it now after my friend (who hasn't played it since he was in the 5th grade..he's graduating this year from college by the way) highly recommending it to me....

 

An, I honestly don't get this Tidal Wave of Love that this forum has for San Andreas.

 

1. The cities aren't detailed what so ever. Las Santos hardly resembles actual LA (I live in LA) besides the few landmark buildings like the Hollywood (VineWood) sign. Same goes for the other 2 cities.

 

2. Most of the buildings are copy/paste. Unlike GTA's this gen we have today where each building is unique, here you can see the blatant copy and pasting with few unique buildings in between.

 

3. It's all about the draw distance. The whole map isn't that big. It's probably the same size as Liberty City if not a tad smaller. What makes everything feel huge is that crappy draw distance they had to use with the ps2 tech.

 

4. The cities feel dead. Ghost towns at times, and the pedestrians are few variations and are brain dead.

 

5. CJ is very unlikeable IMO. It's NIGGA this, NIGGA that, and all of this gang stuff that makes everything feel to much like a "wanna be" than something that feels natural and realistic.

 

The only good things I can say about San Andreas is that it has alot of variety when it comes to side missions and side activities..but I can't help but feel it's more of a, "jack of all trades, master of none." and becomes quite a bit repetitive after a while of playing.

 

Also, having Nitros for cars is cool. Not sure why they excluded this from today's gta games...and the jet pack is cool to f*ck around in.

 

Other than that, I will say that San Andreas is AMBITIOUS with the amount of things to do....but in that same ambition all I see are 3 cities set in a cramped world, that looked highly undetailed, with cities that resemble more of ghosts town, than actual live and bustling cities.

 

I can't help but feel if Rockstar focused on simply 1 city, rather than 3 they could've created a more focused world.

 

Again this is playing with 2013 eyes..so they are admittedly a bit jaded to what we have today.

 

But I simply can't help but think many of these claimes of "San Andreas being the best gta to ever be made" simply stems from the fact that alot of you are reminiscing on your youth, when things were less complicated, and less stressful..and those memories of just kicking it back with your friends and enjoying san andreas on your summer break..and just looking at all the things to do..and how cool it was to have 3 cities..and I just feel alot of you are looking with Nostalgic Glasses..

 

Again my opinion.

 

 

 

 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
yonatan755

Its like playing half Life now and ssy it's bad because it's outdated.....

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Suppa K

Ok first off, these are the GTA V forums, not the San Andreas ones. I'm not sure if you are confused or did this on purpose because you know no one would probably read it in the SA sub forum.

 

Second, no one cares about your review of a game from 2004. San Andreas was amazing for it's time, and I have no idea why in Gods name you are comparing it to current gen GTA's? Are you f*cking mentally retarded? Wow the buildings in a 2004 game aren't all unique and varied as a game made in 2008-13. The map is small? Wow no f*cking sh*t it was made in 2004, what the f*ck am I reading. You are one kind of special retard that's for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
OGCFB

Like you said, you are playing it with 2013 eyes. The leap between VC and SA was huge and some people say the leap between IV and V was not nearly as notable. It's all about how people feel and people felt amazed when they played SA but with V it seems like a slightly upgraded IV set in a different location. Sure you like the game, but it could never capture the feeling of the massive leap from VC>SA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Marty892

Ok first off, these are the GTA V forums, not the San Andreas ones. I'm not sure if you are confused or did this on purpose because you know no one would probably read it in the SA sub forum.

 

Second, no one cares about your review of a game from 2004. San Andreas was amazing for it's time, and I have no idea why in Gods name you are comparing it to current gen GTA's? Are you f*cking mentally retarded? Wow the buildings in a 2004 game aren't all unique and varied as a game made in 2008-13. The map is small? Wow no f*cking sh*t it was made in 2004, what the f*ck am I reading. You are one kind of special retard that's for sure.

Because a lot of people keep saying here that SA was better than V in every way. I don't get that too!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jonkoroken420

Ofcourse when you play San Andreas compared to the games they have Now it doesn't seem like much.

Would you have started playing it when it first released, It would've probably been your favorite game as it was mine.

You compare too much, You're watching San Andreas from a view where a whole bunch of improved games are already released.

 

; I still think San Andreas is in some ways better than V is.

But Gta V is much more detailed, And its 9 years later.

Edited by jonkoroken420

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TVL257

Ask R* to remake GTA SA with today graphic with addition of small details .

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Odyssey

Ask R* to remake GTA SA with today graphic with addition of small details .

 

I would lose all respect in R* if they did this.

Not because San Andreas is a bad game, but because they would remake a game with only new graphics just for money.

Edited by thegtaman531

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jonkoroken420

There's actually a mod which makes San Andreas run in the same engine as in IV, Same vehicle handling, physics etc.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
hierbamala

You are comparing a 2004 game to a 2013

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vivalavendredi

I agree with everything the OP said.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
BURNFIREFLY

you moronic idiot it's a 2004 game.

 

in 2004 the map was HUGE because there was no other, graphics were great! cause there was no better for open world game. textures were amazing, eveything as incredible.

 

and you're playing 9 years later and complaining. are you retarded?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Fuzzknuckles

IT was a great game, but some people just can't let go. They're afraid of change and innovation, yet built up the highest expectations when V was pre-launch.

 

It's really dumb, and utterly pathetic to see them flip out about it.

 

I WANT NEW GAME BUT NEW GAME MUST BE OLD GAME OR I'M SETTING YOUR HOUSE ON FIRE.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Uhwoahnohuh

Our love for San Andreas was never about how alive the city was, It was about the nostalgia, characters, story, and layout of the city. Fine by me to go back once in a while to check it out

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Syrlis

You said it yourself. You had to be there for the shift from Vice City to San Andreas. Since you weren't you will NEVER understand why it is the best GTA and because of that this post is pointless.

 

GTA:5 comes close, but still falls a little short. For me San Andreas was the first (and only) game I have ever bought a stradegy guide for. Not for the missions, but so I could find my way through the overwhelming ammount of content the game provided.

 

Also, I do believe San Andreas was the first PS2 game to use a duel layer dvd (I could be wrong, but that's how I remember it). Comparatively GTA:4&5 haven't even come close to using all of a single layer blu-ray disc (let alone a duel layered one).

 

GTA:V is impressive on a techincal & detailed level, but it still feels like their could have been more content in this beautiful enviroment.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
caseclosedjk

I don't get the love for you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DatDudeDB

Our love for San Andreas was never about how alive the city was, It was about the nostalgia, characters, story, and layout of the city. Fine by me to go back once in a while to check it out

 

characters and story?

 

why are they so special? it's typical generic gangster characters...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jamieleng

you moronic idiot it's a 2004 game.

 

in 2004 the map was HUGE because there was no other, graphics were great! cause there was no better for open world game. textures were amazing, eveything as incredible.

 

and you're playing 9 years later and complaining. are you retarded?

Well that's not entirely true. Driv3r had better textures & graphics than all 3D GTA's. It also had driving physics closer to HD GTA'S. However, it didn't have any aerial vehicles, nowhere near the amount of content. Most importantly, it didn't have the social commentary, humour or that Rockstar magic.

Edited by jamieleng

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ryder_from_the_grave

you just had to play it at the time it was launched.GTA IV and V shouldnt even be in the same topic if you're comparing.it has to be compared to Vice City and III.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Lil ski

Man thats like playing Mario Bros for the first time and saying the graphics suck

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
woggleman

It was incredible for it's time and still is a great game. I just wish people would stop expecting R to recreate it and let other games stand on their own and be judged on their own merits.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AnDReJ98

 

Ask R* to remake GTA SA with today graphic with addition of small details .

I would lose all respect in R* if they did this.

Not because San Andreas is a bad game, but because they would remake a game with only new graphics just for money.

 

You're right. I don't agree with remaking SA. They could make game 'based' on their previous game like they did III = IV, SA = V. No more than that.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
jonkoroken420

Oh man, Compared to GTA-V the GTA-1 map is Soooo small, Nearly no details and the vehicles are so crappy!

Gta V is so much better, I don't get how people like Gta 1 !!!!

 

 

If you think this is serious, You're an ass.

Edited by jonkoroken420

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
TrustNo1

SA was the worst GTA.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Thisnamehasnotbeentaken

Another day another SA/GTA V flame war.

 

Only in gtaforums.com.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ArcherTheGreat

You know what I don't get? Why people are assuming that when we say San Andreas felt better than V, we dont actually mean that V is a bad game at all.

Edited by ArcherTheGreat

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
gmgo

 

Ok first off, these are the GTA V forums, not the San Andreas ones. I'm not sure if you are confused or did this on purpose because you know no one would probably read it in the SA sub forum.

 

Second, no one cares about your review of a game from 2004. San Andreas was amazing for it's time, and I have no idea why in Gods name you are comparing it to current gen GTA's? Are you f*cking mentally retarded? Wow the buildings in a 2004 game aren't all unique and varied as a game made in 2008-13. The map is small? Wow no f*cking sh*t it was made in 2004, what the f*ck am I reading. You are one kind of special retard that's for sure.

Because a lot of people keep saying here that SA was better than V in every way. I don't get that too!

 

 

 

Try to look at it as how good SA was in 2004 compared to how good GTAV is in 2013, and then you'll understand why SA's goodness is (arguably) better than V's

Edited by gmgo

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Algonquin Assassin

 

 

Ok first off, these are the GTA V forums, not the San Andreas ones. I'm not sure if you are confused or did this on purpose because you know no one would probably read it in the SA sub forum.

 

Second, no one cares about your review of a game from 2004. San Andreas was amazing for it's time, and I have no idea why in Gods name you are comparing it to current gen GTA's? Are you f*cking mentally retarded? Wow the buildings in a 2004 game aren't all unique and varied as a game made in 2008-13. The map is small? Wow no f*cking sh*t it was made in 2004, what the f*ck am I reading. You are one kind of special retard that's for sure.

 

Because a lot of people keep saying here that SA was better than V in every way. I don't get that too!

 

Try to look at it as how good SA was in 2004 compared to how good GTAV is in 2013, and then you'll understand why SA's goodness is (arguably) better than V's

I remember when SA was new and the first thing I thought when I played it? "This game looks worse than VC".

 

No joke that was my first impression.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
topdownshooter

San Andreas was good for its time but when put side to side with GTA V it is no contest, GTA V is the superior game.

 

/thread

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
vivalavendredi

 

 

 

Ok first off, these are the GTA V forums, not the San Andreas ones. I'm not sure if you are confused or did this on purpose because you know no one would probably read it in the SA sub forum.

 

Second, no one cares about your review of a game from 2004. San Andreas was amazing for it's time, and I have no idea why in Gods name you are comparing it to current gen GTA's? Are you f*cking mentally retarded? Wow the buildings in a 2004 game aren't all unique and varied as a game made in 2008-13. The map is small? Wow no f*cking sh*t it was made in 2004, what the f*ck am I reading. You are one kind of special retard that's for sure.

Because a lot of people keep saying here that SA was better than V in every way. I don't get that too!

Try to look at it as how good SA was in 2004 compared to how good GTAV is in 2013, and then you'll understand why SA's goodness is (arguably) better than V's

I remember when SA was new and the first thing I thought when I played it? "This game looks worse than VC".

 

No joke that was my first impression.

 

Mine too!

Something felt wrong in SA (imho)

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.