GTA V is gonna be the most hated GTA in 4 years

[user14]

This is worst gta so far

[marizzocos]

This is worst gta so far

gtfo kid go play sh*t row with your buddies

[user14]

 

This is worst gta so far

gtfo kid go play sh*t row with your buddies

Nah

[FrostKiller1]

So many people are ridiculous on these forums.

 

The jump from san andreas to IV was only a graphics overhaul. It suffered in content. Once you finished gta iv

there was nothing at all to do. Overall san andreas was a much better game than gta iv.

 

Gta V is a huge jump from IV in terms of graphics AND content. Everyone who says gta v has nothing to do after

it's finished is just an idiot.

That's not true. The step from SA to IV isn't only graphics. The phisics are much better in IV. It also introduced new features to the series such as the phone and the internet. However I agree with you about the content. There is less content in IV but I think the side missions like drug deliveries and car thefts were better than pizza boy or paramadics. However I don't like that they are hidden within the phone. But this was fixed in the DLCs. And GTA V being a huge jump from IV in terms of graphics and content. In content probably yes but the graphics weren't that revolutionary. Just better lightning and batter looking textures.

[golf wang]

I honestly don't get you guys. Am I the only one on here LOVING this game? My friends and I, we all love it waaay more than GTA IV. This game has added so much content and the map is so much bigger, how can this game even be considered a step back? Can someone explain that to me?

[LibertyKing]

I honestly don't get you guys. Am I the only one on here LOVING this game? My friends and I, we all love it waaay more than GTA IV. This game has added so much content and the map is so much bigger, how can this game even be considered a step back? Can someone explain that to me?

You're not the only one loving this game, but you are in the small minority on this forum looking at the good points before the bad points.

[KillaDanny]

 

I honestly don't get you guys. Am I the only one on here LOVING this game? My friends and I, we all love it waaay more than GTA IV. This game has added so much content and the map is so much bigger, how can this game even be considered a step back? Can someone explain that to me?

You're not the only one loving this game, but you are in the small minority on this forum looking at the good points before the bad points.

 

this...

 

a lot of people is loving this game it's just guys in here seem to focus on negative points instead of good points...

[R1C3W1N3]

IV's step up to SA = insane.

 

V's step up to IV = meh.

 

Nice to see a different opinion, can you say why?

 

Personally, then jump from SA to IV was "meh" and insane from IV to V

 

Talking overall

[cpterp]

I've owned and played every GTA from GTA III to V (minus LCS/VCS and the handheld games). My favorite is GTA Vice City because of the total immersion into the 80's/Miami/drugs scene. To me that was a 101% complete game with nearly every aspect of it pretty much perfect and an the highest replay value I've seen in a game at that time. I can't compare GTA III to any later GTA because it wouldn't be fair, but compared to any open world/action game available at the time it was hands-down the best (imho).

 

I definitely loved GTA San Andreas as well, but the atmosphere was less glamorous than VC (but that's a personal preference). The best things about that game was the immense size (at the time), the multiple cities, the vast amount of vehicles, and the fact that they pretty much carried over every activity from VC and added a ton more.

 

GTA IV was somewhat of a minor letdown, because it suffered a lot in replay value. However, the lack of activities, safehouses, businesses, etc was almost made up for the excellent graphics, the extremely detailed environment, and the more realistic and engaging story.

 

As for GTA V, it's clearly the most ambitious GTA game since San Andreas (and that's the problem begin). Rockstar pretty much created two games set in the same world. Not only that, but the world is about 4-5 times bigger than LC, has about twice as many vehicles, has faaaaar more activities, much better graphics, and three main characters. On top of that they create a revolutionary semi-MMO with potentially limitless possibilities. Just taking this into account it was pretty clear that things were bound to go round (even with a $100m budget). None of the problems with GTA V are (permanently) game-breaking and can't be fixed. If R* eventually manages to patch, fix, add most of the glaring errors/bugs/glitches/things left out that people complain about on these forums, GTA V will easily be the best GTA game ever (and one of the top 3 of the generation).

 

My advice is to give another month or two to iron out the bugs, add some missing content (interiors), offer some DLC before judging the game. Honestly I think most of the whiners on here (nearly all of which don't have accounts more than 3-4 weeks old) are EA/Activision employees/fans.

[xterrorist]

My guess is the people who love the game only breeze through the forums sometimes for tips or news while they are akc on a phone or something.

The people who do not love the game are spending most of thier time here making noise about it.

 

I think GTA 5 is fine.

The most hated game ever is Diablo III.

Over a year since release and people are still crying about it.

[Archvile78]

Nah, IV will still be my least favorite.

[73duster]

 

The only real judgement of GTAV comes from gathering REAL data about what the MAJORITY of people think.

People disappointed with the game stir up a lot of noise, and make it seem as if everyone is disappointed. The truth is, most people thought very highly of the game, even if it didn't have everything THEY were expecting. People upset with the game like to act as if they speak for the majority, when they DON'T.

I don't have any issues with people not liking the game, as not everyone is going to love any product unanimously. The only issue I have, is when people spread Bullsh*t designed to represent a small minority as being bigger than they are.

This forum is a magnet for complainers, as is EVIDENCED by the incredible amount of new membership. A large amount of complaints are from "members" who have joined less than 2 months ago. THAT, is a FACT.

It doesn't mean that their opinions are invalid, but it ALSO shows that this forum is where everyone comes to complain, and in turn, promote a FALSE theory about how much this game is "hated".

When you make claims about what people are "feeling" about this game, you need to take EVERYONE into account, not just the SMALL minority of people who agree with you.

Yes, i agree, but to clarify something, the haters are not "concentrated" all on this forum. I did my google research and some major criticism came out. In fact, a priori, it would make more sense that this forum would be filled of people glorifying the game because it's a GTA fans forum, so it would be a "biased population". Yes, some members are here for 2 months, like me, but i believe that the people who actually mind joining this forum and participate are mainly GTA fans for years now, so yeah, their arguments are not wrong just because of the join date...

 

The most relevant question is whether or not your statement about GTAV becoming the most hated gta in 4 years is true or false. YES, there ARE people outside of this forum who hate the game, and YES, a join date doesn't automatically make someone's opinions wrong.

I believe I was pretty clear in what I was saying about the join dates, which never claimed that EVERYONE who recently joined was just a disgruntled complainer looking to bash the game.

The bottom line is that the vast MAJORITY of people both IN and OUT of this forum do in fact like the game. To say that this will be the most hated gta In 4 years is just plain FALSE. I am simply addressing the fact that a MINORITY is trying to make it seem like they speak for most people, when they simply DON'T.

Opinions are one thing, FACTS are another, and even the biggest complainers who are honest would know they are in the minority.

[73duster]

 

I honestly don't get you guys. Am I the only one on here LOVING this game? My friends and I, we all love it waaay more than GTA IV. This game has added so much content and the map is so much bigger, how can this game even be considered a step back? Can someone explain that to me?

You're not the only one loving this game, but you are in the small minority on this forum looking at the good points before the bad points.

 

^^This is EXACTLY what I am referring to. People making absolutely FALSE statements saying that the majority of people don't like the game.

[ObiJ0hnkenobi]

 

 

The only real judgement of GTAV comes from gathering REAL data about what the MAJORITY of people think.

People disappointed with the game stir up a lot of noise, and make it seem as if everyone is disappointed. The truth is, most people thought very highly of the game, even if it didn't have everything THEY were expecting. People upset with the game like to act as if they speak for the majority, when they DON'T.

I don't have any issues with people not liking the game, as not everyone is going to love any product unanimously. The only issue I have, is when people spread Bullsh*t designed to represent a small minority as being bigger than they are.

This forum is a magnet for complainers, as is EVIDENCED by the incredible amount of new membership. A large amount of complaints are from "members" who have joined less than 2 months ago. THAT, is a FACT.

It doesn't mean that their opinions are invalid, but it ALSO shows that this forum is where everyone comes to complain, and in turn, promote a FALSE theory about how much this game is "hated".

When you make claims about what people are "feeling" about this game, you need to take EVERYONE into account, not just the SMALL minority of people who agree with you.

Yes, i agree, but to clarify something, the haters are not "concentrated" all on this forum. I did my google research and some major criticism came out. In fact, a priori, it would make more sense that this forum would be filled of people glorifying the game because it's a GTA fans forum, so it would be a "biased population". Yes, some members are here for 2 months, like me, but i believe that the people who actually mind joining this forum and participate are mainly GTA fans for years now, so yeah, their arguments are not wrong just because of the join date...

 

The most relevant question is whether or not your statement about GTAV becoming the most hated gta in 4 years is true or false. YES, there ARE people outside of this forum who hate the game, and YES, a join date doesn't automatically make someone's opinions wrong.

I believe I was pretty clear in what I was saying about the join dates, which never claimed that EVERYONE who recently joined was just a disgruntled complainer looking to bash the game.

The bottom line is that the vast MAJORITY of people both IN and OUT of this forum do in fact like the game. To say that this will be the most hated gta In 4 years is just plain FALSE. I am simply addressing the fact that a MINORITY is trying to make it seem like they speak for most people, when they simply DON'T.

Opinions are one thing, FACTS are another, and even the biggest complainers who are honest would know they are in the minority.

 

never a truer word spoken, appart from comming to this forum and seeing a bit of hate literally every person on my freinds list loves the game (appart from the odd little moan about MP) . Id say for every 1 person who doesnt like it theres a 100 that do. Im sorry to the haters but the game is seriously loved all over the world, your going to have to just suck it up.

[Jimmy Darmody]

The most relevant question is whether or not your statement about GTAV becoming the most hated gta in 4 years is true or false. YES, there ARE people outside of this forum who hate the game, and YES, a join date doesn't automatically make someone's opinions wrong.

I believe I was pretty clear in what I was saying about the join dates, which never claimed that EVERYONE who recently joined was just a disgruntled complainer looking to bash the game.

The bottom line is that the vast MAJORITY of people both IN and OUT of this forum do in fact like the game. To say that this will be the most hated gta In 4 years is just plain FALSE. I am simply addressing the fact that a MINORITY is trying to make it seem like they speak for most people, when they simply DON'T.

Opinions are one thing, FACTS are another, and even the biggest complainers who are honest would know they are in the minority.

 

Yes, i understand your point, and that's why i say it's gonna be in 4 years. It's not the most hated right now. But in 4 years, after the hype is gone, and people start looking at it more objectively it will be the most hated from my point of view (i never spoke for anyone, i gave my prediction and the point of the thread is discussing it). Simply because at the high of the hype (now) fans still seem to prefer GTA: SA and GTA: VC, and because GTA VI, since is a next gen game, it's probably gonna be a bit overwhelming for V's reputation.

[RX7K3VIN53]

IV's step up to SA = insane.

 

V's step up to IV = meh.

Yeah i agree with that

[GranThefTito]

To be fair, GTAForums is like the only place where I've seen overwhelmic majority hate for the game, nearly everywhere else love it save for a few complaints, most of whih stem from GTAOnline the past week.

most people in the gtaforums is the historic fanboys of rockstar games just we play every games grand theft auto in from the start just we expect good nice game just rockstar feeding the babies with the game grand theft auto 5 for the game is not that that the historic fanboys is wanting just the children playing games for nice graphic for the decoration for the tennis for the golf for the easy barbie world just the historic fanboy how i am i do not want this boring feature in the game just i want excellency after i playing good rockstar games company games red dead redemption grand theft auto san andreas

[VileClown]

Why?

 

- Because people still prefer older versions of GTA to GTA V, according to some threads in this forum.

 

- Because GTA 4 was either too good to some, letting people down because they expected GTA V to follow same characteristics as IV; or too bad too others, letting people expecting a lot on GTA V and only to be left down.

 

- GTA VI will represent a huge leap from V, because it's gonna be on next gen consoles, and because R* don't wanna make the same mistake they did with IV (huge leap from III series in terms of graphics, etc, with less features). Everybody will say that V is so sh*tty compared to VI, more than they did with V compared to IV.

 

Also got a gut feeling that hardcore fans won't forget V's bad marketeeing or GTA online issues...

Why does there have to be one AMAZING grand theft auto to end grand theft auto's can't we love all of the GTA's for our own reasons? Vice City has an amazing soundtrack and an amazing city to explore. San Andreas was a giant step up for most of the gameplay elements. Rockstar has shown that they can make interesting and mesmerizing storylines with even the most pish posh settings. Bully is one of my favorite games of all time. Why? Because of how damn simple the game was and how the storyline was actually an amazing parody of the media's take on school life.

But you know, if you want to pick ONE grand theft auto to love, that's fine, I'll just love them all and get days of entertainment for it.

[Irish Thunder Baby]

It was IV's lack of content and tiny map that disappointed people. GTA V was near perfect until Online ruined everything

[73duster]

 

The most relevant question is whether or not your statement about GTAV becoming the most hated gta in 4 years is true or false. YES, there ARE people outside of this forum who hate the game, and YES, a join date doesn't automatically make someone's opinions wrong.

I believe I was pretty clear in what I was saying about the join dates, which never claimed that EVERYONE who recently joined was just a disgruntled complainer looking to bash the game.

The bottom line is that the vast MAJORITY of people both IN and OUT of this forum do in fact like the game. To say that this will be the most hated gta In 4 years is just plain FALSE. I am simply addressing the fact that a MINORITY is trying to make it seem like they speak for most people, when they simply DON'T.

Opinions are one thing, FACTS are another, and even the biggest complainers who are honest would know they are in the minority.

 

Yes, i understand your point, and that's why i say it's gonna be in 4 years. It's not the most hated right now. But in 4 years, after the hype is gone, and people start looking at it more objectively it will be the most hated from my point of view (i never spoke for anyone, i gave my prediction and the point of the thread is discussing it). Simply because at the high of the hype (now) fans still seem to prefer GTA: SA and GTA: VC, and because GTA VI, since is a next gen game, it's probably gonna be a bit overwhelming for V's reputation.

 

I disagree, in FACT, I believe the OPPOSITE will be true in 4 years time.

If anything, people are PANICKING right now, because of all the issues with a just released product that isn't working as expected. The more time that passes, the more people will begin to discover everything this game has to offer.

 

Even MORE importantly, the issues that are plaguing the game will slowly but surely get addressed and modified. This is not to say the game will be perfect, but many of the bigger problems will get fixed, and as Rockstar said, the game will take shape as they learn what people want, and don't want.

4 years from now, people will laugh at the overreaction this game is receiving from a minority group.

On a side note, I may not agree with your opinion, but I commend you on your civility. I wish others would take notice that you can have a rational disagreement without the usual "haters" vs. "fanboys" garbage.

[chilleverest]

It will be always about the time and contents delivered in regards to the times these games were release. If you look at gta san andreas,

 

it was released in 2004: time when gaming industry was delivering the most and it was all about providing value to the customer.

 

content: the amount of things you could do was in such abundance that the game is still being played by those who cherished it. Gym, tattoo, hair, vehicle modding, conspiracies, secrets, vehicles, map.

 

the world: ''welcome to las venturas'', one of the city among others, the game and its presentation made it look like it was a massive world. you go drive around modding vehicle appreciating sceneries.

STORY: HOW BAD DID YOU WANT TENNPENNY DEAD? iconic voice actors with a solid story line, i got into it so bad i couldn't wait to see what would happen, and not to mention ''the introduction'' movie released in the collectors edition that would set the mood.

Conclusion: No matter how much you new school kids would say gta v superior it never will be equal to san andreas. And im a 24 year old gamer. I grew up in times where there were no dlc or patches, neither did people bitch about playing multiplayer in games like GTA. GTA v world might be huge but it just doenst make or presents itself as what it boasts to be. not to mention the radio stations that has been slashed for dlc i mean how many times do the songs repeat? gta v by no means is a bad game, it is a beautiful game that makes you sometimes get out of your vehicle and appreciate the sunset but it simply is no revolution for what san andreas was to its time.

Edited October 7, 2013 by chilleverest

[VileClown]

It will be always about the time and contents delivered in regards to the times these games were release. If you look at gta san andreas,

 

it was released in 2004: time when gaming industry was delivering the most and it was all about providing value to the customer.

content: the amount of things you could do was in such abundance that the game is still being played by those who cherished it. Gym, tattoo, hair, vehicle modding, conspiracies, secrets, vehicles, map.

the world: ''welcome to las venturas'', one of the city among others, the game and its presentation made it look like it was a massive world. you go drive around modding vehicle appreciating sceneries.

 

STORY: HOW BAD DID YOU WANT TENNPENNY DEAD? iconic voice actors with a solid story line, i got into it so bad i couldnt wait to see what would happen, and not to mention ''the intorduction'' movie released in the collectors edition that would set the mood.

 

Conclusion: No matter how much you new school kids would say gta v superior it never will be equal to san andreas. And im a 24 year old gamer. I grew up in times where there were no dlc or patches, neither did people bitch about playing multiplayer in games like GTA. GTA v world might be huge but it just doenst make or presents itself as what it boasts to be. not to mention the radio stations that has been slashed for dlc i mean how many times do the songs repeat? gta v by no means is a bad game, it is a beautiful game that makes you sometimes get out of your vehicle and appreciate the sunset but it simply is no revolution for what san andreas was to its time.

How about you get off your high horse? Nobody cares how old you are or how long you have been playing video games. Your opinions are just that, your opinions. They are in no way fact, so why don't you go back to the fifth grade with your nostalgia-boner mind and your horrid spelling.

[RockstarMark]

I loved IV and find V to be far superior.

 

Rockstar pretty much made the perfect blend of III era GTA and GTA IV. Not everyone is going to be happy and it is human nature to complain and complain about several bad points and completely neglect the million other positives. F***ing annoying!

 

Secondly how does GTA Online's server issues make GTA V's single player experience bad. People are bashing Online a lot and speaking as if it includes the single player aspect. Yes, online has it's issues, but when it works the game is great...

Edited October 7, 2013 by RockstarMark

[lickylickyballbags]

its sh*t

[chilleverest]

 

It will be always about the time and contents delivered in regards to the times these games were release. If you look at gta san andreas,

 

it was released in 2004: time when gaming industry was delivering the most and it was all about providing value to the customer.

content: the amount of things you could do was in such abundance that the game is still being played by those who cherished it. Gym, tattoo, hair, vehicle modding, conspiracies, secrets, vehicles, map.

the world: ''welcome to las venturas'', one of the city among others, the game and its presentation made it look like it was a massive world. you go drive around modding vehicle appreciating sceneries.

 

STORY: HOW BAD DID YOU WANT TENNPENNY DEAD? iconic voice actors with a solid story line, i got into it so bad i couldnt wait to see what would happen, and not to mention ''the intorduction'' movie released in the collectors edition that would set the mood.

 

Conclusion: No matter how much you new school kids would say gta v superior it never will be equal to san andreas. And im a 24 year old gamer. I grew up in times where there were no dlc or patches, neither did people bitch about playing multiplayer in games like GTA. GTA v world might be huge but it just doenst make or presents itself as what it boasts to be. not to mention the radio stations that has been slashed for dlc i mean how many times do the songs repeat? gta v by no means is a bad game, it is a beautiful game that makes you sometimes get out of your vehicle and appreciate the sunset but it simply is no revolution for what san andreas was to its time.

How about you get off your high horse? Nobody cares how old you are or how long you have been playing video games. Your opinions are just that, your opinions. They are in no way fact, so why don't you go back to the fifth grade with your nostalgia-boner mind and your horrid spelling.

 

i understand your fear kid, i understand what if feels like when you see an alpha male around, i still stick to my point and if you have something relative about this post then speak otherwise keep you piehole shut, you need it the next time you fight with your mom.

Edited October 7, 2013 by chilleverest

[VileClown]

 

 

It will be always about the time and contents delivered in regards to the times these games were release. If you look at gta san andreas,

 

it was released in 2004: time when gaming industry was delivering the most and it was all about providing value to the customer.

content: the amount of things you could do was in such abundance that the game is still being played by those who cherished it. Gym, tattoo, hair, vehicle modding, conspiracies, secrets, vehicles, map.

the world: ''welcome to las venturas'', one of the city among others, the game and its presentation made it look like it was a massive world. you go drive around modding vehicle appreciating sceneries.

 

STORY: HOW BAD DID YOU WANT TENNPENNY DEAD? iconic voice actors with a solid story line, i got into it so bad i couldnt wait to see what would happen, and not to mention ''the intorduction'' movie released in the collectors edition that would set the mood.

 

Conclusion: No matter how much you new school kids would say gta v superior it never will be equal to san andreas. And im a 24 year old gamer. I grew up in times where there were no dlc or patches, neither did people bitch about playing multiplayer in games like GTA. GTA v world might be huge but it just doenst make or presents itself as what it boasts to be. not to mention the radio stations that has been slashed for dlc i mean how many times do the songs repeat? gta v by no means is a bad game, it is a beautiful game that makes you sometimes get out of your vehicle and appreciate the sunset but it simply is no revolution for what san andreas was to its time.

How about you get off your high horse? Nobody cares how old you are or how long you have been playing video games. Your opinions are just that, your opinions. They are in no way fact, so why don't you go back to the fifth grade with your nostalgia-boner mind and your horrid spelling.

 

i understand your fear kid, i understand what if feels like when you see an alpha male around, i still stick to my point and if you have something related about this post then speak or just keep you piehole shut, you need it the next time you fight with your mom.

 

What a badass, I bet you are one of those people who pick fights with the elderly to make an example of your basic, unrefined "instincts." I understand you were too busy juicing up and wanking to actually pay attention in class. Sorry that I have a different opinion, you rico suave, gorilla ass looking mon chi chi.

[Hakosuka]

The only reason people are disappointed with V is because they built up an immense hype inside themselves and the game didn't live up to it. The only thing that I'm disappointed with in this game is the fact that I can't buy safehouses; that's it. So many people put up San Andreas on such a high pedestal and praise it that they can't see the good in most games, such as V. Sure, San Andreas had a lot more content than V, but how many of those were actually detailed and well thought out? Most of these people worshipping SA also played it when they were younger and for some, it was their first GTA. My first GTA game was III and I played it in like 2006 (pretty late, I know) when I was about 11 years old. The game was amazing for me at the time because it was my first GTA, now going back to it and actually playing it, it's not that fun. I'm sure if most of these people actually go back and play San Andreas again they won't have as much fun with it as they did before. V is an amazing game. Sure it's not the best, but it's still pretty damn good and is worthy of all the praise it's getting.

[PlasmicSnake]

I will never consider gta4 better than Gta5, gta4 to me is the worst GTA ever, Id rather Play Gta london 1969. GTA5 is exactly what people wanted, over the top craziness like we saw in SA and the past ones. 4 was too serious and boring, with practically no variety in missions or scenery. I think alot of people have forgotten how 4 really was or are using the fun theyve had in gta4 online to cloud what the SP was like. People enjoyed the gay tony expansion because it was going back to how gta was. GTA isn't a serious game its not meant to be, were suppose to go on rampages and do stupid UNREALISTIC stuff, thats why people enjoy this franchise, for the freedom and not the limitations which Id say GTA4 implemented alot of.

[DaRkL3AD3R]

That's just a bunch of kids who grew up playing 4, in the real world I don't know anyone who claimed GTA 4 revolutionary.

I'm 26 years old, been playing GTA since I was like 12. GTA IV WAS the most revolutionary one, including 3. The amount of work that went into that game is unbelievable and it still has more detail than even GTA V, it's supposed successor.

 

GTA VI won't be as big a jump as SA -> IV because we're hitting a wall in performance/detail in game. What you can expect is probably slightly more vegetation, higher poly counts and maybe, just maybe, true 1080p instead of the sh*tty blurry 720p garbage current gen has been pumping out for the last 8 years. Although given the fact that the hardware hasn't changed in these boxes in that many years, it's insane that they're able to get 720p/30fps out of them.

[ThePie69]

^^ I will say that GTA V added some cool stuff that I like a lot. But there are some things that I don't like. One big thing I noticed above is GTA has always had a realism side to it. If you don't want realism than go play Saints Row. Also GTA is more about online than it is single player. The online is what people remember cause its the most fun that you have in a game.

 

Rest of my info I have to share is in my signature below.