Clash of the countrysides!

[Ferocious Banger]

Vote away!

[Ferocious Banger]

I think RDR will end up winning this poll. In my opinion, it deserves to win. It was such a great map.

 

I'm not saying GTAV's is bad ( in fact, it's absolutely splendid ), it's just that IMHO, RDR did more justice to the "out in the wilderness" feel.

[Mr.Arrow]

Dude , GTA 5 doesn't even have bears or horse .Lol

[ZeroZero]

All RDR for me.. perhaps its because here you come with a over powered 4x4 ignoring roads, crashing through fences.. the desert does not feel that big.. same with the "forest".

 

Now do the same on a horse..

[Ferocious Banger]

Also ( I might sound like a graphic whore here ), the textures were supersharp ( in comparison to V ) in RDR. RDR's countryside textures are better than V's.

 

However, the city in GTA V has glorious textures. I can see how a lot more effort went into the city, rather than the countryside ( in V ).

[Ferocious Banger]

All RDR for me.. perhaps its because here you come with a over powered 4x4 ignoring roads, crashing through fences.. the desert does not feel that big.. same with the "forest".

 

Now do the same on a horse..

Yeah, I'm not sure what R* were thinking when they were designing the map. Surely, almost every OWG of theirs have had maps that actually make them feel larger ( either by limited draw distance or complicated road layout ). I was pretty sure that they'd apply that principle to GTA V, too. However, they didn't. They roided up the draw distance and gave straight routes to pretty much everywhere!

[Ferocious Banger]

Grand Senora desert going to the top, I see. I love the desert in GTA V, but why do you prefer it? It feels a bit cluasterphobic with all the mountains ( and the lake ) around it. In RDR, the deserts felt like they would go on forever.

Edited October 1, 2013 by Ferocious Banger

[ivarblaauw]

First of all: They are both splendid games; I loved both of them;

but: RDR has given me the real western feeling (I really love westerns xD) and made my cry at the end.

 

RDR deserves to win; but still: Both games are excellent and I think they both deserve 100/100 ;-)

[Algonquin Assassin]

Dude , GTA 5 doesn't even have bears or horse .Lol

I don't know about bears, but I have seen a horse.

 

Both countrysides do a great job for their respective periods. I can't choose.

[Ferocious Banger]

 

Dude , GTA 5 doesn't even have bears or horse .Lol

I don't know about bears, but I have seen a horse.

 

Both countrysides do a great job for their respective periods. I can't choose.

 

Wait what? Really? Horses?!

[DODI3OG]

I like the countrysides in GTA V more than those in RDR, but RDR's countryside feels "wild" compared to the developed countryside in GTA V.

[l911]

Also ( I might sound like a graphic whore here ), the textures were supersharp ( in comparison to V ) in RDR. RDR's countryside textures are better than V's.

 

However, the city in GTA V has glorious textures. I can see how a lot more effort went into the city, rather than the countryside ( in V ).

It is I totally opposite in GTA V textures are better ,just look at desert rocks in RDR they looked flat in V they look way better,

RDR had more obiects on the map (small props)