justin428 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 GTA IV was 6.7gb and V is 18gb? Quite the difference! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PHOENIXZERO Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Just for the record, GTA isn't known to use pre-rendered cutscenes, so the 3gb isn't compressed video, it is most likely compressed audio as other have been saying They're not talking about pre-rendered cutscenes, it's about the TV/Movie and Internet Video content that's likely a bit less compressed along with maybe audio as was the case with GTA IV. The 3GB difference (the XB360 version is about 15GB according to Rockstar) amounts to nothing significant. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanTFC Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 The closer to the release, the more idiots show up on this forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Exquise Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 People need to stop worrying.. Playstation have Blu-Ray, Rockstar exploit that feature so they have higher quality video's within the game. That's it. No big deal, no major difference. The game will still be the same.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) Holy mother of God, so much stupidity... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
marcx Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 The closer to the release, the more idiots show up on this forum Joined: Aug 17, 2013 Yeah, you're right. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shon785 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) f*cking Idiots I tell ya. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevors685 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) Holy mother of God, so much stupidity... Wasn't the Xbox version of GTA IV smaller in size, yet ran true HD? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AlexJonesConspiracy Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Considering the space on a bluray they don't need to compress the files as much. my thoughts exactly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killerdude Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) Holy mother of God, so much stupidity... Wasn't the Xbox version of GTA IV smaller in size, yet ran true HD? 6.9gb compared to I believe 11gb(?) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash_735 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) Holy mother of God, so much stupidity... Wasn't the Xbox version of GTA IV smaller in size, yet ran true HD? Xbox 360: 6.8GB PS3: 10.4GB As I stated numerous times, the extra space came from Audio (44.1Khz ADPCM instead of 32Khz ADPCM) and BINK videos (the TV files being much less compressed), that's it. Nothing gameplay wise, no extra textures or high res stuff or more models, nope, just audio and video. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Flachbau Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I think I'm too late to say this but ... inb4 PS3 Fanboys OT: Not sure, maybe extra stuff I don't know. It is a digital download so maybe there is a theme or something. Possibly it could be the digital manual. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSPD-GTAV Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 I had a PS3 and it broke on me 5 times, switched to xbox and never had a problem with anything. End of argument, Xbox is better. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ClassicChamploo Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 but generally isn't Uncompressed better then Compressed files? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AshMan306 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 (edited) Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) Holy mother of God, so much stupidity... Wasn't the Xbox version of GTA IV smaller in size, yet ran true HD? Xbox 360: 6.8GB PS3: 10.4GB As I stated numerous times, the extra space came from Audio (44.1Khz ADPCM instead of 32Khz ADPCM) and BINK videos (the TV files being much less compressed), that's it. Nothing gameplay wise, no extra textures or high res stuff or more models, nope, just audio and video. Ash let them be if they wish to ignore facts and bash each other let em do it they will get tiered out soon. As for more new comers i agree there seems to be a rise of inbreeds on here. Iv already looked on Google and found info about the disk's size a put it on a prevues post. Edited August 22, 2013 by AshMan306 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mikecyclexxx Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 You guys do realise that the PS3 has an exclusive bonus soundtrack. Possibly other little things too. Haven't seen the PS3 + V bundle with the headset? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Brock Elvis Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) Holy mother of God, so much stupidity... Wasn't the Xbox version of GTA IV smaller in size, yet ran true HD? Xbox 360: 6.8GB PS3: 10.4GB As I stated numerous times, the extra space came from Audio (44.1Khz ADPCM instead of 32Khz ADPCM) and BINK videos (the TV files being much less compressed), that's it. Nothing gameplay wise, no extra textures or high res stuff or more models, nope, just audio and video. Ash let them be if they wish to ignore facts and bash each other let em do it they will get tiered out soon. As for more new comers i agree there seems to be a rise of inbreeds on here. Iv already looked on Google and found info about the disk's size a put it on a prevues post. The term is "imbred". Also I enjoy Xbox-fangirls "attempting" to prove a point about their supposed master-race, it's a good way to acquire my morning giggles. It makes me fall out of my chair when the worst console to date (even the Wii is better) has more praise than PS3 or even PCs for that matter. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KTR Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 PS3 is bigger because of uncompressed LPCM audio (24 bit 96 KHz audio), where as 360 is stuck with compressed Dolby Digital audio (16 bit 48 KHz audio). Can you show us your source, TIA. Assuming this is what is happening for V. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bluray#Audio It's required...that's why! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) Holy mother of God, so much stupidity... Wasn't the Xbox version of GTA IV smaller in size, yet ran true HD? Xbox 360: 6.8GB PS3: 10.4GB As I stated numerous times, the extra space came from Audio (44.1Khz ADPCM instead of 32Khz ADPCM) and BINK videos (the TV files being much less compressed), that's it. Nothing gameplay wise, no extra textures or high res stuff or more models, nope, just audio and video. Ash let them be if they wish to ignore facts and bash each other let em do it they will get tiered out soon. As for more new comers i agree there seems to be a rise of inbreeds on here. Iv already looked on Google and found info about the disk's size a put it on a prevues post. The term is "imbred". Also I enjoy Xbox-fangirls "attempting" to prove a point about their supposed master-race, it's a good way to acquire my morning giggles. It makes me fall out of my chair when the worst console to date (even the Wii is better) has more praise than PS3 or even PCs for that matter. Ah, a troll. What a surprise on this forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
trevors685 Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 (edited) Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) Holy mother of God, so much stupidity... Wasn't the Xbox version of GTA IV smaller in size, yet ran true HD? Xbox 360: 6.8GB PS3: 10.4GB As I stated numerous times, the extra space came from Audio (44.1Khz ADPCM instead of 32Khz ADPCM) and BINK videos (the TV files being much less compressed), that's it. Nothing gameplay wise, no extra textures or high res stuff or more models, nope, just audio and video. I know. I was just proving him wrong in a question format. Also, Brock, the f*cking word is INBRED. At least Google the sh*t before you try correcting someone's spelling. Edited August 22, 2013 by trevors685 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) Holy mother of God, so much stupidity... Wasn't the Xbox version of GTA IV smaller in size, yet ran true HD? Xbox 360: 6.8GB PS3: 10.4GB As I stated numerous times, the extra space came from Audio (44.1Khz ADPCM instead of 32Khz ADPCM) and BINK videos (the TV files being much less compressed), that's it. Nothing gameplay wise, no extra textures or high res stuff or more models, nope, just audio and video. Ash let them be if they wish to ignore facts and bash each other let em do it they will get tiered out soon. As for more new comers i agree there seems to be a rise of inbreeds on here. Iv already looked on Google and found info about the disk's size a put it on a prevues post. The term is "imbred". Also I enjoy Xbox-fangirls "attempting" to prove a point about their supposed master-race, it's a good way to acquire my morning giggles. It makes me fall out of my chair when the worst console to date (even the Wii is better) has more praise than PS3 or even PCs for that matter. Hahahahaha! What resolution did GTA IV and Red Dead run at compared to the 360 version? ROFL if I remember correctly GTA IV was 420p or somesh*t while RDR was 640p. There's no better console mate, it's all preference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Agni Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Xbox fan-girl argument: "Higher compression makes a game better." No. Compression actually reduces the quality of graphics and audio. So don't cry when the Xbox 360 version is pretty mediocre. I prefer the PlayStation 3 because it does not need the bullsh*t with compression, which lets games allow more content. Perfect examples are: The Last of Us and Uncharted (you don't see them on Xbox, do you?) Watching console fanboys act like their consoles are different in any respect (when they're basically the exact same thing in 95% of all categories) is hilarious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cinoy Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Ps3 Version is Better that's why this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Ps3 Version is Better that's why this You still leave milk and cookies out for Santa Clause? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAIVman Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Ps3 Version is Better that's why this They're both the same. R* even said it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkjellman Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 For me, I'll have to wait and see. I'm getting the Xbox 360 version because all my friends are on that platform so I have people to play online with. If the PS3 version has better visuals, I'll buy it when the price goes down. Edit: Do you guys think the PS3 version could have unused files? IV had left over files on PC and PS3 (I think) but not on the Xbox 360. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
williamcampbell Posted August 22, 2013 Share Posted August 22, 2013 Don't you love (read: hate) fanboys fighting over consoles instead of just friggin' enjoying the chance to play such fantastic game? Really. As long as it's the same as GTA IV was in terms of quality for the 360, I couldn't care less. I'm more interested in seeing what the gameplay has to offer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Killerdude Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 Hahahahaha! What resolution did GTA IV and Red Dead run at compared to the 360 version? ROFL if I remember correctly GTA IV was 420p or somesh*t while RDR was 640p. There's no better console mate, it's all preference. Well, Actually, It was 720p on Xbox and 640p on PS3 for GTA IV, Not too sure about RDR, But i'm pretty sure they both ran 720p. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 Hahahahaha! What resolution did GTA IV and Red Dead run at compared to the 360 version? ROFL if I remember correctly GTA IV was 420p or somesh*t while RDR was 640p. There's no better console mate, it's all preference. Well, Actually, It was 720p on Xbox and 640p on PS3 for GTA IV, Not too sure about RDR, But i'm pretty sure they both ran 720p. RDR was also 640p on Ps3, but it was 720p for both on Max Payne 3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GR0VEST4L1FE Posted August 23, 2013 Share Posted August 23, 2013 GTA IV Xbox 360: 6.2GB PS3: 11.1GB Best version: Xbox 360 GTA V: Xbox 360: 15.9GB PS3: 16.1 Best version: Both two Simple as that Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now