Gameplay Graphics comparison

[redx165]

it is my personal promise that when PC version comes out, I will be reproducing all the promo screens, and I will be playing the promo version of the game, not the blind man version.

The PC version doesn't exist yet. It's ported from the console version. The graphics will be the only thing that's better. As far as I know GTA IV when ported to the PC didn't add more tress and stuff. V won't either.

This is why I wish Rockstar would just say F*ck you to PC so this pathetic PC master race ( Geek Squad ) would just shut their mouth. At least its made for console and isn't a port.

[Mr. Sleepy]

I wish PCs never existed, then I'd love to see what you guys would play then.

 

Some of you console players are so freaking annoying. God damn it.

I got nothing against consoles, I think they're great for gamers blah blah.

 

But you're all flipping your sh*t out because we enjoy better graphics?

So because I want better graphics that makes me a low person or not a gamer? I'm sorry but that is so stupid.

[redx165]

 

I wish PCs never existed, then I'd love to see what you guys would play then.

 

Some of you console players are so freaking annoying. God damn it.

I got nothing against consoles, I think they're great for gamers blah blah.

 

But you're all flipping your sh*t out because we enjoy better graphics?

So because I want better graphics that makes me a low person or not a gamer? I'm sorry but that is so stupid.

Wanting better graphics makes you a graphics wh*ore. ( Back then NO one cared about graphics )

Some like controls while others like the mouse.

Some like consoles and some like PC.

 

I have nothing against PC gamers but this so called pathetic master race is what I got a problem with. If you believe you're better than a console gamer than you are pathetic and really need a life.

[Mr. Sleepy]

I'm sorry but if I pay something good for my PC then I expect the best experience and graphics on it.

I don't want to pay a sh*tload for my PC to get some mediocre graphics that are blurry. How does that make me a graphic whore? I've yet to understand.

 

If I'd go around and scream that I want life-like graphics then I'd understand you calling me a graphic whore.

But you're in no position to judge me and other PC players for wanting clear graphics on our system rather than some blurry graphics from a console.

You're trying to convince yourself that graphics do not matter, but actually yes, they do matter.

Would you enjoy V with SA graphics? I doubt it.

 

 

I know it is a sh*tty picture, but look underneath the helicopter at those buildings and you'll understand what I am saying.

[redx165]

I'm sorry but if I pay something good for my PC then I expect the best experience and graphics on it.

I don't want to pay a sh*tload for my PC to get some mediocre graphics that are blurry. How does that make me a graphic whore? I've yet to understand.

 

If I'd go around and scream that I want life-like graphics then I'd understand you calling me a graphic whore.

But you're in no position to judge me and other PC players for wanting clear graphics on our system rather than some blurry graphics from a console.

You're trying to convince yourself that graphics do not matter, but actually yes, they do matter.

Would you enjoy V with SA graphics? I doubt it.

 

 

I know it is a sh*tty picture, but look underneath the helicopter at those buildings and you'll understand what I am saying.

Lets compare GTA IV cause that's the ONLY GTA that's blurry?? Graphics don't matter compared to gameplay. That's why GTA IV got hated on so much cause the gameplay was lacked. If GTA V had SA graphics I would enjoy it cause they could make a GTA world.

 

Here's some questions for you.

 

Why do PC gamers always exaggerate with graphics?

Why do they believe they're gods?

Why do they think PC gaming is the ONLY gaming?

 

Maybe if PC gamers learn to shut their month maybe just maybe people would respect them more. We understand you like your PC's but please we don't care.

 

 

[Mr. Sleepy]

Let me ask YOU some questions then.

 

Why are console players so butthurt when us PC gamers discuss about graphics, which is rightfully ours since we want the best experience we can get.

Why do you console players believe you're the sh*t, because games got created for PS360 mostly?

And where do PC players think that PC gaming is the only gaming? Mind sharing some posts on GTAF that say that?

 

Maybe if console players learn to shut their mouth and stop going against PC players because we want the best graphical experience then maybe we'd respect you more.

 

Do you see me running around shouting PC MASTURR RACE HURR DURRR1!1!1!!

No.

 

And why shouldn't I compare GTA? It's a great thing to compare. Butthurt that I am comparing GTA IV or something? I don't really get it.

 

And I just noticed your last statement.

Yes, we like your PCs, and we don't care that you don't care, likewise we don't care about your consoles.

[brandrixco]

Finally more people talked about LOD (level of detail)and frame buffering...Its just buffering you fools! as in it has not yet loaded the details something allot of people don't understand... Go play any unreal game and you will see the same sh*t happening.

[Shayd80]

 

it is my personal promise that when PC version comes out, I will be reproducing all the promo screens, and I will be playing the promo version of the game, not the blind man version.

The PC version doesn't exist yet. It's ported from the console version. The graphics will be the only thing that's better. As far as I know GTA IV when ported to the PC didn't add more tress and stuff. V won't either.

This is why I wish Rockstar would just say F*ck you to PC so this pathetic PC master race ( Geek Squad ) would just shut their mouth. At least its made for console and isn't a port.

 

[Mr. Sleepy]

 

it is my personal promise that when PC version comes out, I will be reproducing all the promo screens, and I will be playing the promo version of the game, not the blind man version.

The PC version doesn't exist yet. It's ported from the console version. The graphics will be the only thing that's better. As far as I know GTA IV when ported to the PC didn't add more tress and stuff. V won't either.

This is why I wish Rockstar would just say F*ck you to PC so this pathetic PC master race ( Geek Squad ) would just shut their mouth. At least its made for console and isn't a port.

 

They can only wish. And I wish that one day console gamers will experience this too.

Edited July 14, 2013 by Sleepy187.

[brandrixco]

shark I literally have the same PC as you (I have 8 more gigs...) and I can tell you that the improvements are not that greater fro pc to console and it really depends on the game. Even with iencaner and a bunch if texture mods its still not that much better then consoles. Only games I know that actually impressed me on PC is the new tomb raider, Dear Esther, max payne 3 and of course crysis 1

[redx165]

 

Let me ask YOU some questions then.

 

Why are console players so butthurt when us PC gamers discuss about graphics, which is rightfully ours since we want the best experience we can get.

Why do you console players believe you're the sh*t, because games got created for PS360 mostly?

And where do PC players think that PC gaming is the only gaming? Mind sharing some posts on GTAF that say that?

 

Maybe if console players learn to shut their mouth and stop going against PC players because we want the best graphical experience then maybe we'd respect you more.

 

Do you see me running around shouting PC MASTURR RACE HURR DURRR1!1!1!!

No.

 

And why shouldn't I compare GTA? It's a great thing to compare. Butthurt that I am comparing GTA IV or something? I don't really get it.

 

And I just noticed your last statement.

Yes, we like your PCs, and we don't care that you don't care, likewise we don't care about your consoles.

I never said you are a part of the PC master race. You don't sound like it. I know some on here who are and I can't post about them sadly.

 

Cool story you don't care about our consoles but you shouldn't even be here. GTA V is coming out first on PS3 and 360. Maybe come back after 5-6 months or when ever they're about to release it. You are not helping the forum with your PC.

 

I won't bother answering your questions until mine are answered first.

 

GTA IV was a BAD PORT to PC. You compare a bad ported game to a developed one. That's why you shouldn't.

 

Seems like you're getting a little defense over your so called GOD like PC. Joke

 

Seems like you do like those life like graphics?

Edited July 14, 2013 by redx165

[Burchmore500]

Finally more people talked about LOD (level of detail)and frame buffering...Its just buffering you fools! as in it has not yet loaded the details something allot of people don't understand... Go play any unreal game and you will see the same sh*t happening.

Are you joking? I hope you don't mean this is running on the Unreal engine? It's running on the RAGE engine, as every Rockstar developed game has since 'Rockstar Games presents Table Tennis'. And if it hadn't loaded yet do you really think Rockstar would have used in the trailer? Really?

[Shayd80]

 

shark I literally have the same PC as you (I have 8 more gigs...) and I can tell you that the improvements are not that greater fro  pc to console and it really depends on the game. Even with iencaner and a bunch if texture mods its still not that much better then consoles. Only games I know that actually impressed me on PC is the new tomb raider, Dear Esther, max payne 3 and of course crysis 1

it's still look much better than consoles ...

 

But i really don't care about this, these guys make me laugh I have a 360 and i'll play the game day 1 and when / if it comes out on pc it will be mine too ahah

Edited July 14, 2013 by Sharks80fr

[Mr. Sleepy]

I never said you are a part of the PC master race. You don't sound like it. I know some on here who are and I can't post about them sadly.

 

Cool story you don't care about our consoles but you shouldn't even be here. GTA V is coming out first on PS3 and 360. Maybe come back after 5-6 months or when ever they're about to release it. You are not helping the forum with your PC.

 

I won't bother answering your questions until mine are answered first.

 

GTA IV was a BAD PORT to PC. You compare a bad ported game to a developed one. That's why you shouldn't.

 

Seems like you're getting a little defense over your so called GOD like PC.

 

Seems like you do like those life like graphics?

Joke

So, because I won't game on a console I shouldn't even be here? That's pathetic bro. I can be here and discuss V all I want. And I am very much contributing around here as you are.

 

Also the port from 360 to 3 had problems, which is why IV was delayed, and how was my comparison bad? because it wasn't bad at all.

 

I sure do like those life-like graphics, but that doesn't make me a graphics whore, because I don't run around complaining about how graphics suck in a game.

 

You seem to miss my and most of the PC gamers' point. It's not about getting life-like graphics, it's about getting the best experience out of a game. I don't like GTA IV's blurriness and I much prefer a PC version's crystal-clear graphics.

And because of that I am labeled by console fanboys a graphic whore.

 

Yes, I am getting defensive towards PCs, because all you console players do is get butthurt. Pathetic really.

 

I'll proudly stand my ground and defend the PCs as much as I need to. You're no better than me with your petty consoles.

[brandrixco]

Where on earth did I mention that gta 5 is running on unreal? Where? Its called a comparison you dumb ass some games handle texture memory in similar ways. It handles it by chunks at a time instead of processing all the memory footprints in a single shot, because xbox 360 and ps3 cannot handle that, since this gens consoles only have up to 512 mb of ram and would be slow as balls to access the textures in memory.

 

Here is an example with gta 4, since using an unreal engine game is apparently not useful here...2 second search and I found this clip

 

 

 

 

Edited July 14, 2013 by brandrixco

[John Footpenis]

This has quickly turned into a PC vs Console argument.

For those on PC, you'll obviously get better textures and post processing effects if your PC has the power. There's no reason to be complaining here since you know that even console versions look better than the PC version of IV.

 

Also, I highly doubt those trees were taken out because they were too taxing. If the game can load a highly detailed city with tons of buildings, peds, and traffic, I think a few trees out in the wilderness would be fine. It's probably an artistic direction to better represent the climate of the area.

 

This is what we're gonna get come this fall. If you don't like it, wait for the possible PC/next gen version or shut up and get used to it. All this complaining is going to do is ruin your experience with the game and make you look like a child. It's as simple as that.

[redx165]

I never said you are a part of the PC master race. You don't sound like it. I know some on here who are and I can't post about them sadly.

 

Cool story you don't care about our consoles but you shouldn't even be here. GTA V is coming out first on PS3 and 360. Maybe come back after 5-6 months or when ever they're about to release it. You are not helping the forum with your PC.

 

I won't bother answering your questions until mine are answered first.

 

GTA IV was a BAD PORT to PC. You compare a bad ported game to a developed one. That's why you shouldn't.

 

Seems like you're getting a little defense over your so called GOD like PC.

 

Seems like you do like those life like graphics? 

Joke

So, because I won't game on a console I shouldn't even be here? That's pathetic bro. I can be here and discuss V all I want. And I am very much contributing around here as you are.

 

Also the port from 360 to 3 had problems, which is why IV was delayed, and how was my comparison bad? because it wasn't bad at all.

 

I sure do like those life-like graphics, but that doesn't make me a graphics whore, because I don't run around complaining about how graphics suck in a game.

 

You seem to miss my and most of the PC gamers' point. It's not about getting life-like graphics, it's about getting the best experience out of a game. I don't like GTA IV's blurriness and I much prefer a PC version's crystal-clear graphics.

And because of that I am labeled by console fanboys a graphic whore.

 

Yes, I am getting defensive towards PCs, because all you console players do is get butthurt. Pathetic really.

 

I'll proudly stand my ground and defend the PCs as much as I need to. You're no better than me with your petty consoles.

Console gamers get it by september 17 while PC gamers don't. PS3 and 360 gamers help more with the forum than you PC gamers do UNTIL you get it.

 

That's why I said not to compare IV. It was a bad port all around. Compare GTA III, VC, SA, and when you get V.

 

We don't get butthurt. We tell the facts. While only PC gamers say we got better graphics ( Like a 10 year old child ). I'm not saying PC gaming is bad but the PC Master Race are.

 

Now on too the questions

1) Console gamers feel that graphics doesn't make a game. It's about the content in it. We really don't care about them while most PC gamers feel that's the MOST important feature in a game.

2) Most console gamers feel more important cause there are MORE people on PS3 and 360 then there are on PC. Which developers should focus more on them cause that's where everyone is at.

3) Look around the forum with that. I can't show you a direct post due to some reasons. If you must know look in this thread and you see the so called master race. Most of the time Mods clean up the forum. Should of been here yesterday with another so called PC master race member. ( Not a PC gamer but a Master Race member )

 

There's a difference with a PC gamer and Master Race.

 

PC Gamer - Doesn't care what others play on and enjoys what they do.

PC Master Race member - Brags about how good PC and says many other things to try to get you to PC.

 

Only good reasons for PC gamers to brag about are:

 

Graphics - Console gamers really don't care about that

Mods - Some console gamers feel its a form of cheating while others don't care.

Mouse - Well that comes down to what YOU like more a mouse or controller

[Mr. Sleepy]

Do you speak in the name of all console gamers when it is related to graphics? Or do you live in their mind to see what do they actually think?

I may post here saying that I don't care about graphics when in reality I do. See where I am trying to reach?

 

I bet some of those console gamers will be first in line to get GTA V just to experience better graphics and whatnot.

 

Mods? Form of cheating? How?

 

I hate console elitists and I hate PC elitists, a bunch of fools arguing.

I am a real gamer and I don't care what you game on.

But stop labeling PC gamers as graphic whores and then I won't argue with you anymore, you know?

 

I rest my case.

[Burchmore500]

Where on earth did I mention that gta 5 is running on unreal? Where? Its called a comparison you dumb ass some games handle texture memory in similar ways. It handles it by chunks at a time instead of processing all the memory footprints in a single shot, because xbox 360 and ps3 cannot handle that, since this gens consoles only have up to 512 mb of ram and would be slow as balls to access the textures in memory.

 

Here is an example with gta 4, since using an unreal engine game is apparently not useful here...2 second search and I found this clip

 

 

Shiiit I apologise. When you said "Go play any unreal game" I thought you were saying that this is something that happens with all unreal engine games and GTA V is going to be one of them because it runs on unreal. But yeah I know what you are referring to (When you spawn in like Gears of War and all the textures are ultra blurry).

 

Though that doesn't happen all the time. What I was saying was that if this is what happens to be the case in this gameplay trailer, surely Rockstar would have just done the flyby again or simply not used the footage, since they are trying to promote the game. I'm saying it's far more likely that the detail is not there simply because the consoles cannot handle it.

 

Also, the fact that there is a screenshot with so much detail leads me to believe that there is likely going to be a next-gen and PC version, because it seems like a lot of effort creating all that extra detail just to make it look better in these screenshots. Though having said that it's not like it hasn't been done before eg. Aliens Colonial Marines.

[brian.]

 

HAHAHAHAHAHA

 

"only contrast and bloom"

 

Are you blind? I will be the first to tell you: You desperately need glasses if you can't clearly and unequiviocally see those textures are smaller than the screenshot by half the size, cutting pixel density in half, minimum, and those trees are deleted, the bridge draws even less distance before LOD because the plane is way closer than the PC screenshot, and what makes you think it's coming from another direction? it is NOT.

 

The SCREENSHOT is pc version max settings, especially draw distance - the gameplay is low settings AKA console.

 

WHAT you are SEEING is

 

top screen: anistropic x16, draw, view, detail, foliage distance maxed, it is obvious too.

 

Bottom screen: Filtering crappy, so textures are blurred.

 

hey you know what - a console gamer is never going to understand anyway, they don't even KNOW what these settings do.

 

And it is my personal promise that when PC version comes out, I will be reproducing all the promo screens, and I will be playing the promo version of the game, not the blind man version.

Actually there are only two differences: the lack of vegetation, and the LOD time.

 

The textures are the same (you can clearly see that here: http://www.igta5.com/images/gameplay-1-the...ncudo-river.jpg ), they just aren't completely loaded in the picture because the player was flying into the area.

The draw distance is the same.

Honestly, we've never really seen the right part of the canyon in the HD screenshot to see if the textures really are poor. It's around here:

Thank you for noticing me you always do check it out,

 

It could definitely be a dynamic priority artifact, and maybe artifact is too strong of a word.

 

It may be that in cases of extremely fast flight or driving, just as was the case in the previous games, priority may be set to the overall image of moving fast in a big world, and less emphasis on constantly loading and unloading stuff that you will most certainly just zip by anyway.

 

However; if that is the case, that is very extreme. And I highly doubt the LOD's are textured in the same way and blended the same way as closer/full res sections - look at the seams. Those are produced from shrinking a texture, and perhaps not yet fixing the tiling artifacts you've created across the material in shifting them around to shrink the textures that make it up. Wheras if those were LOD models just not yet replaced with their close range versions:

 

1: it would not all be so uniform like that - the train, the trees, the bridge, the pieces of land, the blending disparities (low res hard edge looking texture blending poorly filtered instead of the high res from the screenshot) - some or at least one of those things would be improved. An LOD would not be blended, it would be rendered to the texture from the close range model that does blend.

 

It is of of obvious lower original resolution, where the promo screen shot was clearly done on 1920x1080 P and scaled down, and I would offer the challenge to any person who has seen quite a few shops in their day to prove otherwise lol. I can see that the 720p promo screen in question results from scaling down higher resolution screenshot of higher resolution settings/assets/textures/draw distances/and so on.

 

Any and all possible "speed and altitude" variables are negated entirely by knowing exactly what I am looking at in promo shots vs console gameplay footage. When I look at promo shots, I am seeing a higher resolution image across the board, downscaled. When I look at the gameplay video, I am looking at GTA V on a very old 256mb graphics card at a low resolution and compromised detail and view settings, and reduced texture size.

 

On the contrary, when I look at the official screenshots instead of the gameplay video, I see clearly and obviously, thanks to already being fooled once with GTA IV marketing, that those are far more indicitive of the PC version, and that the console version will never ever look that colorful (it will be more desaturated - As the gameplay video shows), it will never look that smooth and sharp, it will never draw details that far, and the textures have been cut in half in any place where where it would afford a performance increase for a 256mb graphics card.

 

I've had a couple 1 GB gfx cards over the past few years, and mine is getting old now.

 

When GTA IV came out on PC, I had the ability to max every multi platform game I owned except that one - I had a 512mb card, and needed to make sacrifices. I got higher settings than consoles, but slow downs and pop in sometimes - once I upgraded to 1gb like 5 years ago I can nearly max it and play at comfortable performance without any slow down anymore. And before I upgraded, my GTA IV looked like that GTA V gameplay video. After I upgraded, it looks like their promotional screenshots.

 

Everything is clearly visible and obvious if you have GTA IV on PC I suppose - if you have it on PC and console, you probably can fully understand. If you only having it on console, then the promotional screenshots are quite literally what you are missing while I guess fooling yourselves that the game will somehow break the rules of low resolution gaming, defy physics, and place more data in memory than those consoles even possess lol.

 

they are "optimizing" the game right now - which means they are taking everything that you saw in the screenshots and cutting it in half and removing things that are slowing down the game for 8 year old consoles.

 

What gets ripped out for the launch platforms will NOT be wasted however. You guys enjoy the thrill of being early adopters and please share vids and have a great time but I myself am going to hold off on my own experience until those original assets are released, and the game can be played like those screenshots, the way they developed it to look.

 

The only thing that saves that image is that other images and anything you are close to is going to look awesome. But I've seen other images that similarly show "GTA IV on lowest possible settings" view and detail distance and textures captured from that gameplay video in other threads and they are probably in this one too by now, that show that the huge sweeping wide world is not going to be like the screenshots, not on locked hardware it won't. It would be a travesty to leave the game only on ps3 and 360, it would be like, the saddest thing of all gaming history, to throw away that version we see in the screens, not gonna happen, it won't go to waste on optimization.

 

And early adopters should be praised though, not ostracized. It's one thing to try to help make aware that you can have an expanded and unadulterated experience on PC, it's another thing to pretend the millions and millions of people who will get this game on September 17th are stupid, which just isn't imaginably realistic in the least. They are getting in on a GTA on day one. There are lots of people who have never yet gotten to do that, let's try to make that day special for them, and at the same time, encourage people who otherwise wouldn't to open their eyes to another type of gaming, that gives them more, and doesn't limit them to constraints of living room boxes.

 

Thanks for your time everyone!

You PC gamers are lucky there is a new generation of consoles around the bend, otherwise you wouldn't see a PC version considering how poorly GTA IV sold on PC. Those screenshots are a better indication of what the game will look like on next-gen consoles, as a next-gen version is far more likely than a PC version.

You really think so? you have it ass backwards. This is the first time consoles will be seeing graphics like we have been seeing for 8 years. This will be the first time consoles will experience the "high" texture and other settings. ironically, while that's sweet, they will miss out on the "very high" settings.

 

For once, there will be - for the first time - less disparity between console and pc versions. But the PC and nvidia and ati will continue evolving, while the new consoles sit on the same graphics standards for 8 more years

 

When you see at launch of the current consoles that they did not look as good as the same games maxed on PC, what in the world makes you think that for the consoles upgrades, PC will not be upgrading the entire time before and after they come out? For any step forward consoles make every 5 to 10 years, PC's make leaping bounds yearly.

 

While console gamers get to play a given game first in some cases, PC players consistently are seeing what is new to gaming way before them. While those consoles provided lessened and optimized experience for their old hardware, we are constantly getting better and better performance. Games that were hard to max 4 years ago and you had to play them on console settings, are easy for my PC today.

 

While you might get some games first, you're always many years behind what the PC provides to gamers. The new consoles will introduce what PC gamers have seen up until a year ago. We'll already have better PC's by their launch available to buy, and within a year of two, they will be so far behind PC again that once again we're seeing all the new stuff first, but nothing is actually being innovated because the consoles once again put a cap on expectations, and people persist on paying more to play games, and pay monthly fees, instead of save money on a machine that does a lot more, and a lot better.

 

GTA IV is an example - it chugged on consoles. My PC laughs at GTA IV. And if IV struggled 6 years ago, what makes you think V will be much better? Whatever performance they gain on those consoles by "getting better at using them" is going to be washed away immediately by all the stuff they add to bog it down again. And whatever the case may be, the PC version is going to look like the promo screenshots (mark my words) because while things are compressed and downsized on consoles, all those remaining high reoslution assets will not go to waste...

 

Honestly, they talk so much sh*t about PC elitist this and master race that, but the console players are the vile ones who are on the offensive, defending platforms that truly have no leg to stand on, and are not in the same class as a personal computer. It's like, you can lead a horse to water, but if he doesn't even know what water is, you know. You can't get fooled again or whatever.

Edited July 14, 2013 by brian.

[Shayd80]

[Mr. Sleepy]

Sharks, you've been reported twice so far, I suggest you stop it.

[Shayd80]

Sharks, you've been reported twice so far, I suggest you stop it.

You are one of these talking about PC vs consoles in a thread " Gameplay Graphics comparison " and you'll report me ?? ahah that's funny

[skillz7855]

it is my personal promise that when PC version comes out, I will be reproducing all the promo screens, and I will be playing the promo version of the game, not the blind man version.

The PC version doesn't exist yet. It's ported from the console version. The graphics will be the only thing that's better. As far as I know GTA IV when ported to the PC didn't add more tress and stuff. V won't either.

This is why I wish Rockstar would just say F*ck you to PC so this pathetic PC master race ( Geek Squad ) would just shut their mouth. At least its made for console and isn't a port.

 

They can only wish. And I wish that one day console gamers will experience this too.

? next gen games will look better than this

[CTCCoco]

Some of the gameplay screens look way better, like the Bugstar one.

No...

[Mr. Sleepy]

Sharks, you've been reported twice so far, I suggest you stop it.

You are one of these talking about PC vs consoles in a thread " Gameplay Graphics comparison " and you'll report me ?? ahah that's funny

At least I am trying to talk to someone and share our opinions instead of fueling a flame war by posting a picture or whatever.

[Shayd80]

Sharks, you've been reported twice so far, I suggest you stop it.

You are one of these talking about PC vs consoles in a thread " Gameplay Graphics comparison " and you'll report me ?? ahah that's funny

At least I am trying to talk to someone and share our opinions instead of fueling a flame war by posting a picture or whatever.

well talk about it somewhere else, maybe via MP ? because if you wan't to play the " imma report you " this is not the place to talk about consoles vs PC ...

[redx165]

 

Do you speak in the name of all console gamers when it is related to graphics? Or do you live in their mind to see what do they actually think?

I may post here saying that I don't care about graphics when in reality I do. See where I am trying to reach?

 

I bet some of those console gamers will be first in line to get GTA V just to experience better graphics and whatnot.

 

Mods? Form of cheating? How?

 

I hate console elitists and I hate PC elitists, a bunch of fools arguing.

I am a real gamer and I don't care what you game on.

But stop labeling PC gamers as graphic whores and then I won't argue with you anymore, you know?

 

I rest my case.

Most of the people who are buying GTA V is cause of the content inside of that. We already had a GTA that was only about graphics and that was GTA IV. That's why you always see lots of people hate on it. GTA V has so much more that will last for a long time.

 

I got that mods form of cheating when watching GTA V youtube video. Someone said that in the comments. So I decide to put that in.

 

I will stop labeling PC gamers as graphics whores if all PC elites stop acting like gods.

 

PC gamers are not graphics whores just prefer to play on that system.

[Mr. Sleepy]

Sharks, you've been reported twice so far, I suggest you stop it.

You are one of these talking about PC vs consoles in a thread " Gameplay Graphics comparison " and you'll report me ?? ahah that's funny

At least I am trying to talk to someone and share our opinions instead of fueling a flame war by posting a picture or whatever.

well talk about it somewhere else, maybe via MP ? because if you wan't to play the " imma report you " this is not the place to talk about consoles vs PC ...

Well obviously my posts aren't usless ones like yours, just posting a picture that indicates "e-wars" which are quite pathetic I must say.

And why would I take it via PM when others can share ideas.

 

This is a forum, a forum is a place where people discuss things. If I can't discuss things then why is it called a forum? Makes no sense.

[CTCCoco]

 

it is my personal promise that when PC version comes out, I will be reproducing all the promo screens, and I will be playing the promo version of the game, not the blind man version.

The PC version doesn't exist yet. It's ported from the console version. The graphics will be the only thing that's better. As far as I know GTA IV when ported to the PC didn't add more tress and stuff. V won't either.

This is why I wish Rockstar would just say F*ck you to PC so this pathetic PC master race ( Geek Squad ) would just shut their mouth. At least its made for console and isn't a port.

You guys are really retarded, don't make post like that please you should be ashamed.

 

"The graphics will be the only thing that's better." Wait, what? Do you know what a mod is? Do you know something about MTA:SA or SA:MP? Do you know what is configuration? You have more pedestrians, vehicles on the street on the PC version, too. You'll have much more players online than the console version BY DEFAULT, and with the modification we could easily have like thousands of people online

 

Please, stupid kids, retardeds in general, abstain to post stupid things so people can't waste your time reading and trying to reply them.