Grand Theft Savage Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Do not open the thread under this one . Its horrifying. That sh*t ain't legal Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facingnorth Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 I can't believe someone posted that kind of sh*t in the other "Do not open this Thread". That's just down right horrible, mods need to fix that as soon as possible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilFuture Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 I hope the pathetic f*ck who posted that goes to jail and f*cking rots. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crystalballofyou Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badass nyuka Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Do not open the thread under this one . Its horrifying. Yeah, mods need to jump on that sh*t quick. I'm pretty sure that stuff is f*cking illegal. The sick fk posted naked kid pics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilFuture Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." Why the f*ck are you not banned yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minwager Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." The f*ck? Why in the f*ck is that legal? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death2Drugs Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Do not open the thread under this one . Its horrifying. Yeah, mods need to jump on that sh*t quick. I'm pretty sure that stuff is f*cking illegal. The sick fk posted naked kid pics. Under US Law that may be legal, but still that's f*cking sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nkjellman Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badass nyuka Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." I hope you rot in hell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crystalballofyou Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." The f*ck? Why in the f*ck is that legal? Because the US govt. are a bunch of horny pigs who love to fap to naked pictures of children. And hey, if it's legal, might as well enjoy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Death2Drugs Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." The f*ck? Why in the f*ck is that legal? Because the US govt. are a bunch of horny pigs who love to fap to naked pictures of children. And hey, if it's legal, might as well enjoy. Good lord you're f*cking sick. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facingnorth Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." I hope you rot in hell Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
minwager Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." The f*ck? Why in the f*ck is that legal? Because the US govt. are a bunch of horny pigs who love to fap to naked pictures of children. And hey, if it's legal, might as well enjoy. You're a sick f*ck, you know that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Odyssey Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Why do these threads get so many replies but actual good, well thought out ones don't? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badass nyuka Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." HE DID IT !! Request to ban him!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
crystalballofyou Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." The f*ck? Why in the f*ck is that legal? Because the US govt. are a bunch of horny pigs who love to fap to naked pictures of children. And hey, if it's legal, might as well enjoy. You're a sick f*ck, you know that? Oh come on, don't tell me you guys didn't find that a little bit sexy. It's the f*cking internet, let loose. It's called a taboo, we all secretly like these types of things, but it's all about being free and admitting you fap to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nebby Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Just let it go, guys. He'll be banned within the coming hours and his disgusting fetish mindset will be gone with him. No need to worry. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
badass nyuka Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Haha, chill out guys, I'm not going to jail anytime soon. "The U.S. Supreme Court has always ruled that the pictures in nudist magazines are not illegal or obscene. They are protected by the First Amendment and are not subject to local obscenity laws or ordinances. The depiction of adults and children nude in the visual media has enjoyed constitutional protection in the United States since 1958. The right to depict adults and children in innocent nude poses has been upheld without a pause for over 41 years. In case after case, the Supreme Court and lower courts have always upheld the constitutionality of "nudity without more," specifically referring to the nudist depiction as a fully constitutional form of expression." Don't drop the soap sicko. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
krammkracker Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Does "fap" mean "throw-up"? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EvilFuture Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Just let it go, guys. He'll be banned within the coming hours and his disgusting fetish mindset will be gone with him. No need to worry. Shouldn't he already be banned? His thread was deleted. I figured they would have banned him right then. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Vanzant Posted July 9, 2013 Share Posted July 9, 2013 Piss on this thread. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts