Torturing pedestrians

[warchild3529]

I wonder how realistic the gore will be. Will limbs come off? Will shotguns destroy someones face? Will shooting their bodies leave a hole in them? Will they bleed realistically?

 

What are your thoughts and expectations?

[TheDeaconBosco]

RDR levels of gore would be just fine.

[Dope_0110]

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

[CoyT92]

I hope that when you blast someone in the face with a shotgun, their head explodes like in the Manhunt games. In that series, blowing some schmuck's head off was so satisfying. In GTA IV...not so much. I keep waiting for the Scanners-style head explosion but...it never happens, guys. It never happens. *turns away, holding back tears*

[Racecarlock]

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

[Dale Nixon]

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

you know full well he was talking about the more 'realistic' era being far less cartoony than the previous era. no need be to a sarcastic douchebag breh go get a girl or something son

 

anyway i think it'll be a bit more gorier than in GTA IV but nothing too extreme

[Racecarlock]

I'm not saying I need mortal kombat levels of gore, but it is reasonable to expect a man's arm to rip off when he's being dragged by my car door and I slam him right into an oncoming vehicle.

[Lil_B_The Basedgod]

I'm not saying I need mortal kombat levels of gore, but it is reasonable to expect a man's arm to rip off when he's being dragged by my car door and I slam him right into an oncoming vehicle.

I finally agree with you on something! We want gore! We want gore!

[TyphoonJames]

Gears of War level gore please, R*. Including the skull-crunching headshot sound effect.

[Ermac_]

I hope to see wounds similar to the t-1000 when he gets shot. RDR had it for headshots but I also want it for the body.

[gta_fan28]

 

QUOTE (Dope_0110 @ Wednesday, Jun 19 2013, 21:55)

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

 

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

Don't you know how to respect others opinions and ideas? You're always complaining at something? I see most of your post and topics recently and most of them is about complaining and whining at something you don't like. Just because you don't the like the game to be more realistic that doesn't mean that most of us should also hate it and agree with you? What the f*ck is wrong with you? I really hope R* add some feature that you don't really like especially the fuel feature and traffic laws so that you will be disappointed...

Edited June 20, 2013 by gta_fan28

[Racecarlock]

QUOTE (Dope_0110 @ Wednesday, Jun 19 2013, 21:55)

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

 

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

Don't you know how to respect others opinions and ideas? You're always complaining at something? I see most of your post and topics recently and most of them is about complaining and whining at something you don't like. Just because you don't the like the game to be more realistic that doesn't mean that most of us should also hate it and agree with you? What the f*ck is wrong with you? I really hope R* add some feature that you don't really like especially the fuel feature and traffic laws so that you will be disappointed...

How are bodies that stay intact no matter how much force is exerted on them realistic? Real people get dismembered in accidents. I'm not whining about realism here. I'm whining about unrealism.

[gta_fan28]

QUOTE (Dope_0110 @ Wednesday, Jun 19 2013, 21:55)

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

 

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

Don't you know how to respect others opinions and ideas? You're always complaining at something? I see most of your post and topics recently and most of them is about complaining and whining at something you don't like. Just because you don't the like the game to be more realistic that doesn't mean that most of us should also hate it and agree with you? What the f*ck is wrong with you? I really hope R* add some feature that you don't really like especially the fuel feature and traffic laws so that you will be disappointed...

How are bodies that stay intact no matter how much force is exerted on them realistic? Real people get dismembered in accidents. I'm not whining about realism here. I'm whining about unrealism.

f*ck YOU always whining at something you don't like!!!! Fuel features, Traffic laws and other sh*t!!!!! You are the most pathetic member here that always whining on something!!!!!

[Racecarlock]

QUOTE (Dope_0110 @ Wednesday, Jun 19 2013, 21:55)

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

 

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

Don't you know how to respect others opinions and ideas? You're always complaining at something? I see most of your post and topics recently and most of them is about complaining and whining at something you don't like. Just because you don't the like the game to be more realistic that doesn't mean that most of us should also hate it and agree with you? What the f*ck is wrong with you? I really hope R* add some feature that you don't really like especially the fuel feature and traffic laws so that you will be disappointed...

How are bodies that stay intact no matter how much force is exerted on them realistic? Real people get dismembered in accidents. I'm not whining about realism here. I'm whining about unrealism.

f*ck YOU always whining at something you don't like!!!! Fuel features, Traffic laws and other sh*t!!!!! You are the most pathetic member here that always whining on something!!!!!

Wow, a person complaining about something they don't like? Newsflash, buddy. EVERYONE DOES THAT.

[gta_fan28]

QUOTE (Dope_0110 @ Wednesday, Jun 19 2013, 21:55)

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

 

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

Don't you know how to respect others opinions and ideas? You're always complaining at something? I see most of your post and topics recently and most of them is about complaining and whining at something you don't like. Just because you don't the like the game to be more realistic that doesn't mean that most of us should also hate it and agree with you? What the f*ck is wrong with you? I really hope R* add some feature that you don't really like especially the fuel feature and traffic laws so that you will be disappointed...

How are bodies that stay intact no matter how much force is exerted on them realistic? Real people get dismembered in accidents. I'm not whining about realism here. I'm whining about unrealism.

f*ck YOU always whining at something you don't like!!!! Fuel features, Traffic laws and other sh*t!!!!! You are the most pathetic member here that always whining on something!!!!!

Wow, a person complaining about something they don't like? Newsflash, buddy. EVERYONE DOES THAT.

I'm talking about you, you dickhead you always complaining and criticizing others ideas and opinion.. And for that I really f*cking hate you you piece of sh*t!!!!!

[Dope_0110]

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

You have misinterpreted me. It's partly my fault because I haven't made it clear what I meant. I meant HD era is graphically more realistic and that also came with a more realistic approach to gameplay and maybe even cause them to tone down on that extreme gore.

 

Of course it would be realistic for explosions to rip people's limbs off. And heavy car accidents can do it too. You can see from my comment I'm a fan of gore, but guess Rockstar may have been afraid of getting AO rating or something. Limb detachment was removed in Vice City and never appeared again.

 

As for headshots, it definitely is more realistic this way, though I'll always love going back to 3D era GTAs and popping them off to shower in their blood.

[RedDagger]

Realistic gore would be quite different to what some people would want - bullets don't leave gaping holes in bodies, only for the thinner parts like hands, plus the entrance wound is usually lost in blood.

 

Shooting limbs/head with a shotgun won't make them fly off or explode, but damn would there be lots of blood. A lot of realistic injury would pertain to broken bones and blood, since as a whole people are fairly good at staying in one piece, though it would be nice for some car accidents and explosions to be able to sever off body parts. All this would make weapons and cars more deadly than just 'lol ragdoll physics', though I'm sure it's not in GTA V.

 

If you want to start getting into soft-body physics for ragdolls, like getting crushed, that's a tad further away

[danny1027]

 

QUOTE (Dope_0110 @ Wednesday, Jun 19 2013, 21:55)

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

 

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

Don't you know how to respect others opinions and ideas? You're always complaining at something? I see most of your post and topics recently and most of them is about complaining and whining at something you don't like. Just because you don't the like the game to be more realistic that doesn't mean that most of us should also hate it and agree with you? What the f*ck is wrong with you? I really hope R* add some feature that you don't really like especially the fuel feature and traffic laws so that you will be disappointed...

How are bodies that stay intact no matter how much force is exerted on them realistic? Real people get dismembered in accidents. I'm not whining about realism here. I'm whining about unrealism.

f*ck YOU always whining at something you don't like!!!! Fuel features, Traffic laws and other sh*t!!!!! You are the most pathetic member here that always whining on something!!!!!

Wow, a person complaining about something they don't like? Newsflash, buddy. EVERYONE DOES THAT.

I'm talking about you, you dickhead you always complaining and criticizing others ideas and opinion.. And for that I really f*cking hate you you piece of sh*t!!!!!

Dude, eat a snickers, you get angry when your hungry.

[Racecarlock]

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

You have misinterpreted me. It's partly my fault because I haven't made it clear what I meant. I meant HD era is graphically more realistic and that also came with a more realistic approach to gameplay and maybe even cause them to tone down on that extreme gore.

 

Of course it would be realistic for explosions to rip people's limbs off. And heavy car accidents can do it too. You can see from my comment I'm a fan of gore, but guess Rockstar may have been afraid of getting AO rating or something. Limb detachment was removed in Vice City and never appeared again.

 

As for headshots, it definitely is more realistic this way, though I'll always love going back to 3D era GTAs and popping them off to shower in their blood.

I really do hate it when rockstar conforms to fox news's bullsh*t morality standards. Gears of war had a lesbian sex scene for god's sake. I think rockstar can get away with some gore.

[Dope_0110]

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

You have misinterpreted me. It's partly my fault because I haven't made it clear what I meant. I meant HD era is graphically more realistic and that also came with a more realistic approach to gameplay and maybe even cause them to tone down on that extreme gore.

 

Of course it would be realistic for explosions to rip people's limbs off. And heavy car accidents can do it too. You can see from my comment I'm a fan of gore, but guess Rockstar may have been afraid of getting AO rating or something. Limb detachment was removed in Vice City and never appeared again.

 

As for headshots, it definitely is more realistic this way, though I'll always love going back to 3D era GTAs and popping them off to shower in their blood.

I really do hate it when rockstar conforms to fox news's bullsh*t morality standards. Gears of war had a lesbian sex scene for god's sake. I think rockstar can get away with some gore.

Maybe.. I just threw a random plausible assumption there. GTA III had M rating with limb falling off. Though that could also be influenced by cartoony graphics. Or maybe it was some engine limitation when they made Vice City since peds were much improved over III's and their bodies were one proper piece instead of being separated like in III.

 

So it could be they had problem with making it work back then, released the game, saw the reaction was good and no one really cared much, so they never went back to it.. who knows.

[v17]

I want to be able to cut off peoples ears and wear them in a necklace every time I make a kill

 

 

 

Then I can lick them for good luck

[RedDragonsBOOM]

 

Probably same as IV. I miss the days of III when bombs would make their body parts fly all over the place, or those sweet sniper headshots from 3D era with a silly fountain of blood going up in the air.

 

But this is a bit more realistic era so they want to cut down on the gore and that's why I wouldn't expect nothing more than what was already in IV.

Because real violence doesn't have gore at all. Crushing someone against a wall works IRL just as it wood in IV. With a completely intact dead body.

 

Makes sense.

You have misinterpreted me. It's partly my fault because I haven't made it clear what I meant. I meant HD era is graphically more realistic and that also came with a more realistic approach to gameplay and maybe even cause them to tone down on that extreme gore.

 

Of course it would be realistic for explosions to rip people's limbs off. And heavy car accidents can do it too. You can see from my comment I'm a fan of gore, but guess Rockstar may have been afraid of getting AO rating or something. Limb detachment was removed in Vice City and never appeared again.

 

As for headshots, it definitely is more realistic this way, though I'll always love going back to 3D era GTAs and popping them off to shower in their blood.

I really do hate it when rockstar conforms to fox news's bullsh*t morality standards. Gears of war had a lesbian sex scene for god's sake. I think rockstar can get away with some gore.

I think its more the fact that its not something they want to be known for. I think they have turned a corner to be more mature not in content but in mentality. I just dont feel like its them conforming but more just them evolving as a franchise. Painting a room with severed limbs and blood is a redundant addition to the already insane amount of ways you can kill a person. It takes more work and I'd imagine you also take more sh*t for it than credit you gain for doing something like that.

 

To take something away isnt necessarily to conform, you can come to a conscious decision as a developer of your own project and say "You know what? It isnt worth it and its not the creative direction I want to go in". But I dont know to me Im not somebody who really cares about gore in GTA, I thought it was funny in the old games but I dont really notice it missing in GTA IV personally.

 

Edit: About sex or lesbian sex, do you really find it more offensive than Gears of War style gore? I know a lot of people see it that way though. I always thought you could get away with sex easier than gore if it depicted two consensual adults.

Edited June 20, 2013 by RedDragonsBOOM

[anzeyima]

I want to be able to cut off peoples ears and wear them in a necklace every time I make a kill

 

 

 

 

Then I can lick them for good luck

Oh God, why of all people do you have to be British. We really are a sickening piece of nation.

[v17]

I want to be able to cut off peoples ears and wear them in a necklace every time I make a kill

 

 

 

 

Then I can lick them for good luck

Oh God, why of all people do you have to be British. We really are a sickening piece of nation.

Lmao

[CoyT92]

I want to be able to cut off peoples ears and wear them in a necklace every time I make a kill

 

 

 

Then I can lick them for good luck

You...I like you.

[KiloBravo]

not too realistic... may take up system resources.

[SCOOBASTEEB]

IMO GTAIV was only enjoyable because of the ragdoll effect, there wasn't really any gore at all. You shot someone in head with a 50cal and they bleed a little. I think there should be gore like there was in Call of Duty:[email protected] Limbs departing when hit by a 50cal or explosion, still with the ragdoll ofcourse. Id be more than happy with this

 

 

[cyanidechrist]

i while ago i created topic in which i discussed whether we will be able to rape and kill humans in the game. the topic got deleted. wtf? f*cking hypocrites.

 

but yes, i think it would be nice i we can torture, rape and brutally kill people in the game.

 

imagine: you pick up hitchhikers, and bring them in your basement, tie them up, cut off their limbs (slowly), then force them to eat their own limbs. later you can just rape them orally (personal preference) and kill.

 

that's what it's all about guys.

[Frantz Fuchs]

Gears of War/Manhunt style would be good.

[Algonquin Assassin]

 

IMO GTAIV was only enjoyable because of the ragdoll effect, there wasn't really any gore at all. You shot someone in head with a 50cal and they bleed a little. I think there should be gore like there was in Call of Duty:[email protected] Limbs departing when hit by a 50cal or explosion, still with the ragdoll ofcourse. Id be more than happy with this 

A little? I don't call blood spraying over surfaces in close promixity a "little". Sure compared some newer games it's not that gorey, but for its time R* gave it a great balance without being weak or unecessarily violent.

 

 

Vlad's and Darko's executions aren't exactly hugs and kisses moments for example .

 

cyanidechrist: Wtf? It's not Saw.

Edited June 20, 2013 by Miamivicecity