Grand Theft Auto V? It's Metal Gear Solid V!

[StJimmy]

So like, why is this thread still open Just asking?

[TheKrigeron]

?? If you think I'm trying to troll your wrong, I'm just saying the truth

That statement is also overused. If you want to be a successful troll, you need to be subtle. You are mediocre at best.

I'm one of the most sucessful trolls on youtube you towel head, I can say whatever I want there unlike here

Youtube? Almost everyone is a good troll there, that place is for little kids like you You are just not successful here, now go under your bridge.

Because a place like this is FULL of adults. ¬_¬

Believe me, it's MUCH better than YouTube. And it hasn't been bad here recently tbh. I think GTAForums has improved, by a BIT.

Youtube is big, when you say youtube you mean every individual channel there

[Jakee.]

I thought MGSV was a new Red Dead title, I was very disappointed to find it wasn't.

 

 

[tranceking26]

You don't really mean that.

 

lol at the simpsons image

 

metal gear solid is NOTHING on GTA, for a start it was a totally different type of game, they just were probs scared of being whooooped so badly by other games they made it open world.

 

Either way GTA V will sell far more. snake is an old fart anyway

[Colonel Dre]

See MGS:V had my attention in the trailer..... Until it introduced the characters and decided to live up to the whacky japan sh*t. Like really? A mute sniper named Quiet? Are you f*cking kidding me? There's a f*cking 12 year old as a character!

 

So yeah, it had my attention and looked like an awesome game until all that sh*t showed up. Like f*cking Project Spark looks like a better game than MGS:V

I guess you never played MGS before. It's not a normal universe. It has some supernatural warriors (I guess that's what you're referring to as "whacky japan sh*t") and you get to fight them in boss battles.

No I haven't exactly because of that. It had my attention because it looked different

[Colonel Dre]

See MGS:V had my attention in the trailer..... Until it introduced the characters and decided to live up to the whacky japan sh*t. Like really? A mute sniper named Quiet? Are you f*cking kidding me? There's a f*cking 12 year old as a character!

 

So yeah, it had my attention and looked like an awesome game until all that sh*t showed up. Like f*cking Project Spark looks like a better game than MGS:V

This post needs more uses of the word "f*cking."

I'll try harder next time

 

And no, I'm not sorry about the f*cking double post. It's 3 in teh f*cking morning and I'm to lazy to grab each quote

[mikekolesar]

I started searching up on "GTA V" a week after GTA IV released and I was finished with the campaign. The only game I've waited longer/a long ass time for was a sequel to Halo 3 and I never felt careless about Halo 4 pre-launch, but comparing that wait to this one for GTA V I am a lot more careless and it seems I'm in the same boat as you.

 

A couple months ago I came to the realization that the graphics will be improved upon very little since it is indeed a 7th gen game. With that in mind I have came to the ultimate conclusion that the same issues with GTA IV are going to be in this game undeniably. Seeing the same boring peds every corner you turn or seeing the same set of cars in a certain area and after playing a couple hours getting used to the car sets (This was so annoying in GTA IV, seeing like 500 Dukes and Vincents in the airport and nothing else). With the loads of info we have gotten as well I have set realistic expectations and pretty much know already what the game will be like. This is kind of a stupid thing to say because the game hasn't come out but come on it is a 7th gen game. Also, that stuff you read in the previews about smart, unique peds in the street is BS. I remember the same sh*t was being spewed out from IGN and other sites about how amazing the peds are and how you'd "never see the same face." I don't remember specifically where and I don't care to search but that claim was thrown out the window when on launch night within a few minutes I was looking at the same people on the street over and over again.

 

But the most important factor as to why I have become more careless about GTA V is the next-gen consoles and games. The anticipation I have for the next-gen is huge and I can't wait to get my hands on a console and some games! Beyond this though in regards to finances I have to shell out several hundos for a new console, add another hundo in there for a mic + one game, and then I remember oh sh*t I have to pay $60 a couple months earlier in September for GTA V. GTA V has become an afterthought essentially.

Edited June 18, 2013 by mikekolesar

[GTAaLEX117]

Also, that stuff you read in the previews about smart, unique peds in the street is BS. I remember the same sh*t was being spewed out from IGN and other sites about how amazing the peds are and how you'd "never see the same face." I don't remember specifically where and I don't care to search but that claim was thrown out the window when on launch night within a few minutes I was looking at the same people on the street over and over again.

 

We don't really know if that's true. I trust R* over you though. And GTA IV really did have a pretty large number of unique pedestrians, though the reviewers were clearly exaggerating or were shown a beta version.

 

 

But the most important factor as to why I have become more careless about GTA V is the next-gen consoles and games. The anticipation I have for the next-gen is huge and I can't wait to get my hands on a console and some games!

 

Honestly, If you ask me, don't get the next gen on release date. It won't have any really proper titles on it for years, and same for graphics. They may be slightly improved, but I'm fairly sure the developers haven't even started to understand the system's overall limits.

[morx555]

Close this thread!!

GTA V is great and MGS is also great.

But you can't compare between those games because GTA is current-gen, and MGS is next-gen

[DS 17]

I have just seen this video on YouTube. Graphics are really amazing! The AI also. I know graphics won't be even almost like that, but I do really hope the AI in V will be smarter than it has been in IV.

[highnrich]

you play as big boss not solid snake

[SquireAustralia]

How is this fanboy thread still open!? If you want to talk about this, move to Konami's forum! That is a simple solution, isn't it?

[BrunoLK]

 

?? If you think I'm trying to troll your wrong, I'm just saying the truth

That statement is also overused. If you want to be a successful troll, you need to be subtle. You are mediocre at best.

I'm one of the most sucessful trolls on youtube you towel head, I can say whatever I want there unlike here

Youtube? Almost everyone is a good troll there, that place is for little kids like you You are just not successful here, now go under your bridge.

I'm not successful here? hahaha that's what you think, carl turtle is not my only acc, I have more and I get a lot of attention and rage mwhahaha

[tranceking26]

What The Actual f*ck is that picture all about HAHAHA

[trevors685]

?? If you think I'm trying to troll your wrong, I'm just saying the truth

That statement is also overused. If you want to be a successful troll, you need to be subtle. You are mediocre at best.

I'm one of the most sucessful trolls on youtube you towel head, I can say whatever I want there unlike here

Youtube? Almost everyone is a good troll there, that place is for little kids like you You are just not successful here, now go under your bridge.

I'm not successful here? hahaha that's what you think, carl turtle is not my only acc, I have more and I get a lot of attention and rage mwhahaha

[Zancudo]

 

How is this fanboy thread still open!? If you want to talk about this, move to Konami's forum! That is a simple solution, isn't it?

You absolutely misinterpret the reason for this topic.

 

I want to imply on how much Grand Theft Auto V is overrated by fanboys like you. People like you can't see sh*t beyond this game and you can't even accept the fact the game is most likely going to be 95% made of aspects that's been already featured in the latest Rockstar's games.

 

Basing on the previews, literally THE ONLY thing that happens to be something new to the series, is that we'll have to obey road rules. Everything else are the more advanced versions of things we've seen in GTA:SA, GTAIV, MC:LA and RDR.

 

Moreover, the game doesn't seem like something to seriously push forward the industry, like it was with GTA:SA or GTAIV. The plot looks just as a clone of Heat, only in more ridiculous and Hollywodish, "full-of-bombs-and-guns" edition, and the gameplay - like I said - is nothing more than a compilation of previous Rockstar's installments.

 

Meanwhile, there are games like Metal Gear Solid V, which tries to break the boundaries of taboo and deliver something mature, something much more intellectual, something artistic and thoughtful-provoking, or WATCH_DOGS which, aside from the city and the side-missions which are bound to be repeatable and rather meh (it's Ubisoft after all...), it aims to do something new to the games, to bring them on another level of storywriting, gameplay and rewrite the definition of multiplayer gaming.

 

While I still keep my GTA V pre-ordered, I'm only expecting a great mix of all the things Rockstar has done to date, but nothing more than that. As for tearing down the walls of innovations, I keep my eye on different titles.

 

And that's the problem of GTA V. This game was supposed to move the industry forward - but looking at the all 5 trailers, 234823 screenshots and reading 24982349 lines of previews, it doesn't seem like it will change something to the gaming.

Edited June 18, 2013 by Zancudo

[sSiL3NZz]

Not sure why people would make GTA-forum accounts if they dislike GTA and Rockstar

[nigelhere9901]

How is this fanboy thread still open!? If you want to talk about this, move to Konami's forum! That is a simple solution, isn't it?

You absolutely misinterpret the reason for this topic.

 

I want to imply on how much Grand Theft Auto V is overrated by fanboys like you. People like you can't see sh*t beyond this game and you can't even accept the fact the game is most likely going to be 95% made of aspects that's been already featured in the latest Rockstar's games.

 

Basing on the previews, literally THE ONLY thing that happens to be something new to the series, is that we'll have to obey road rules. Everything else are the more advanced versions of things we've seen in GTA:SA, GTAIV, MC:LA and RDR.

 

Moreover, the game doesn't seem like something to seriously push forward the industry, like it was with GTA:SA or GTAIV. The plot looks just as a clone of Heat, only in more ridiculous and Hollywodish, "full-of-bombs-and-guns" edition, and the gameplay - like I said - is nothing more than a compilation of previous Rockstar's installments.

 

Meanwhile, there are games like Metal Gear Solid V, which tries to break the boundaries of taboo and deliver something mature, something much more intellectual, something artistic and thoughtful-provoking, or WATCH_DOGS which, aside from the city and the side-missions which are bound to be repeatable and rather meh (it's Ubisoft after all...), it aims to do something new to the games, to bring them on another level of storywriting, gameplay and rewrite the definition of multiplayer gaming.

 

While I still keep my GTA V pre-ordered, I'm only expecting a great mix of all the things Rockstar has done to date, but nothing more than that. As for tearing down the walls of innovations, I keep my eye on different titles.

 

And that's the problem of GTA V. This game was supposed to move the industry forward - but looking at the all 5 trailers, 234823 screenshots and reading 24982349 lines of previews, it doesn't seem like it will change something to the gaming.

Nope.

[GTAfan786]

How is this fanboy thread still open!? If you want to talk about this, move to Konami's forum! That is a simple solution, isn't it?

You absolutely misinterpret the reason for this topic.

 

I want to imply on how much Grand Theft Auto V is overrated by fanboys like you. People like you can't see sh*t beyond this game and you can't even accept the fact the game is most likely going to be 95% made of aspects that's been already featured in the latest Rockstar's games.

 

Basing on the previews, literally THE ONLY thing that happens to be something new to the series, is that we'll have to obey road rules. Everything else are the more advanced versions of things we've seen in GTA:SA, GTAIV, MC:LA and RDR.

 

Moreover, the game doesn't seem like something to seriously push forward the industry, like it was with GTA:SA or GTAIV. The plot looks just as a clone of Heat, only in more ridiculous and Hollywodish, "full-of-bombs-and-guns" edition, and the gameplay - like I said - is nothing more than a compilation of previous Rockstar's installments.

 

Meanwhile, there are games like Metal Gear Solid V, which tries to break the boundaries of taboo and deliver something mature, something much more intellectual, something artistic and thoughtful-provoking, or WATCH_DOGS which, aside from the city and the side-missions which are bound to be repeatable and rather meh (it's Ubisoft after all...), it aims to do something new to the games, to bring them on another level of storywriting, gameplay and rewrite the definition of multiplayer gaming.

 

While I still keep my GTA V pre-ordered, I'm only expecting a great mix of all the things Rockstar has done to date, but nothing more than that. As for tearing down the walls of innovations, I keep my eye on different titles.

 

And that's the problem of GTA V. This game was supposed to move the industry forward - but looking at the all 5 trailers, 234823 screenshots and reading 24982349 lines of previews, it doesn't seem like it will change something to the gaming.

Sorry but you just sound like a MGS fanboy. So keep your false statements to yourself. You do realise Watch Dogs is in the same universe as AC? LOL. Your basically playing as a modern version of Altair, Ezio, Connor and etc. MGS is a good game, but it's a game that has a linear story and they just copied the open world from RDR. Simple.

[Zancudo]

 

How is this fanboy thread still open!? If you want to talk about this, move to Konami's forum! That is a simple solution, isn't it?

You absolutely misinterpret the reason for this topic.

 

I want to imply on how much Grand Theft Auto V is overrated by fanboys like you. People like you can't see sh*t beyond this game and you can't even accept the fact the game is most likely going to be 95% made of aspects that's been already featured in the latest Rockstar's games.

 

Basing on the previews, literally THE ONLY thing that happens to be something new to the series, is that we'll have to obey road rules. Everything else are the more advanced versions of things we've seen in GTA:SA, GTAIV, MC:LA and RDR.

 

Moreover, the game doesn't seem like something to seriously push forward the industry, like it was with GTA:SA or GTAIV. The plot looks just as a clone of Heat, only in more ridiculous and Hollywodish, "full-of-bombs-and-guns" edition, and the gameplay - like I said - is nothing more than a compilation of previous Rockstar's installments.

 

Meanwhile, there are games like Metal Gear Solid V, which tries to break the boundaries of taboo and deliver something mature, something much more intellectual, something artistic and thoughtful-provoking, or WATCH_DOGS which, aside from the city and the side-missions which are bound to be repeatable and rather meh (it's Ubisoft after all...), it aims to do something new to the games, to bring them on another level of storywriting, gameplay and rewrite the definition of multiplayer gaming.

 

While I still keep my GTA V pre-ordered, I'm only expecting a great mix of all the things Rockstar has done to date, but nothing more than that. As for tearing down the walls of innovations, I keep my eye on different titles.

 

And that's the problem of GTA V. This game was supposed to move the industry forward - but looking at the all 5 trailers, 234823 screenshots and reading 24982349 lines of previews, it doesn't seem like it will change something to the gaming.

Sorry but you just sound like a MGS fanboy. So keep your false statements to yourself. You do realise Watch Dogs is in the same universe as AC? LOL. Your basically playing as a modern version of Altair, Ezio, Connor and etc. MGS is a good game, but it's a game that has a linear story and they just copied the open world from RDR. Simple.

Well, I've got to admit this is one of the stupidest statements in this whole topic.

 

1. You call me an MGS fanboy, while your nickname is "GTAfan786".

2. Basically all you've just written about WATCH_DOGS being "just a modern version of AC" is so retarded I don't want to reply anything in that matter.

3. MGS has a linear story, but I've never seen any Rockstar game being analyzed in terms of storyline, like MGS. Besides, since when linear stories are worse? YOU IDIOT!

4. In MGSV you'll travel to many different open-world countries. And this game didn't copy RDR, it was just inspired by it. If that was stealing, then GTA V copies from GTA: San Andreas!

 

Stupid people.

Edited June 18, 2013 by Zancudo

[AceHigh11]

You absolutely misinterpret the reason for this topic.

 

I want to imply on how much Grand Theft Auto V is overrated by fanboys like you. People like you can't see sh*t beyond this game and you can't even accept the fact the game is most likely going to be 95% made of aspects that's been already featured in the latest Rockstar's games.

 

Basing on the previews, literally THE ONLY thing that happens to be something new to the series, is that we'll have to obey road rules. Everything else are the more advanced versions of things we've seen in GTA:SA, GTAIV, MC:LA and RDR.

 

Moreover, the game doesn't seem like something to seriously push forward the industry, like it was with GTA:SA or GTAIV. The plot looks just as a clone of Heat, only in more ridiculous and Hollywodish, "full-of-bombs-and-guns" edition, and the gameplay - like I said - is nothing more than a compilation of previous Rockstar's installments.

 

Meanwhile, there are games like Metal Gear Solid V, which tries to break the boundaries of taboo and deliver something mature, something much more intellectual, something artistic and thoughtful-provoking, or WATCH_DOGS which, aside from the city and the side-missions which are bound to be repeatable and rather meh (it's Ubisoft after all...), it aims to do something new to the games, to bring them on another level of storywriting, gameplay and rewrite the definition of multiplayer gaming.

 

While I still keep my GTA V pre-ordered, I'm only expecting a great mix of all the things Rockstar has done to date, but nothing more than that. As for tearing down the walls of innovations, I keep my eye on different titles.

 

And that's the problem of GTA V. This game was supposed to move the industry forward - but looking at the all 5 trailers, 234823 screenshots and reading 24982349 lines of previews, it doesn't seem like it will change something to the gaming.

You got a point there, but I won't go as far as saying R* doesn't do anything new this time. They do plenty new things like the 3 switchable protagonists, each one equally important as the other. That alone will make for a whole different dynamic unseen in any other game.

Another innovative thing is the detailed ocean floor. They didn't have to do that at all, but they did, because they do try new things and bring a new dynamic to the GTA universe.

[GTAfan786]

 

How is this fanboy thread still open!? If you want to talk about this, move to Konami's forum! That is a simple solution, isn't it?

You absolutely misinterpret the reason for this topic.

 

I want to imply on how much Grand Theft Auto V is overrated by fanboys like you. People like you can't see sh*t beyond this game and you can't even accept the fact the game is most likely going to be 95% made of aspects that's been already featured in the latest Rockstar's games.

 

Basing on the previews, literally THE ONLY thing that happens to be something new to the series, is that we'll have to obey road rules. Everything else are the more advanced versions of things we've seen in GTA:SA, GTAIV, MC:LA and RDR.

 

Moreover, the game doesn't seem like something to seriously push forward the industry, like it was with GTA:SA or GTAIV. The plot looks just as a clone of Heat, only in more ridiculous and Hollywodish, "full-of-bombs-and-guns" edition, and the gameplay - like I said - is nothing more than a compilation of previous Rockstar's installments.

 

Meanwhile, there are games like Metal Gear Solid V, which tries to break the boundaries of taboo and deliver something mature, something much more intellectual, something artistic and thoughtful-provoking, or WATCH_DOGS which, aside from the city and the side-missions which are bound to be repeatable and rather meh (it's Ubisoft after all...), it aims to do something new to the games, to bring them on another level of storywriting, gameplay and rewrite the definition of multiplayer gaming.

 

While I still keep my GTA V pre-ordered, I'm only expecting a great mix of all the things Rockstar has done to date, but nothing more than that. As for tearing down the walls of innovations, I keep my eye on different titles.

 

And that's the problem of GTA V. This game was supposed to move the industry forward - but looking at the all 5 trailers, 234823 screenshots and reading 24982349 lines of previews, it doesn't seem like it will change something to the gaming.

Sorry but you just sound like a MGS fanboy. So keep your false statements to yourself. You do realise Watch Dogs is in the same universe as AC? LOL. Your basically playing as a modern version of Altair, Ezio, Connor and etc. MGS is a good game, but it's a game that has a linear story and they just copied the open world from RDR. Simple.

Well, I've got to admit this is one of the stupidest statements in this whole topic.

 

1. You call me an MGS fanboy, while your nickname is "GTAfan786".

2. Basically all you've just written about WATCH_DOGS being "just a modern version of AC" is so retarded I don't want to reply anything in that matter.

3. MGS has a linear story, but I've never seen any Rockstar game to have such many analyzes and love for the stories told in MGS. The only analyzes I've seen so far for GTA series were for the gameplay.

4. In MGSV you'll travel to many different open-world countries. And it didn't copy RDR. It's called being inspired by, not stealing. And even if - so what? GTA V copies from GTA: San Andreas!

 

Stupid people.

1. Just because my username is GTAFan786 doesn't mean i'm biased.

2. BECAUSE IT IS, IT'S ALREADY BEEN SAID THAT IT'S IN THE SAME UNIVERSE. Get your facts right. That doesn't mean i'm saying the game is bad.

3. GTA is all about GAMEPLAY itself. The stories aren't too complicated but not too simple either. This time it's "Based" on Heat, doesn't mean they are copying it retard.

4. No you're not. You can only go to different countries through cut scenes. Your basically stuck in one place for the rest of the game while one or two missions or more will require you to go other countries. And I was only kidding about copying RDR. And GTA V didn't copy from SA, that's you being mad at R*.

 

Basically, you can't even compare the two. GTA V has LOTS of new things. Buying properties, Customizing cars and characters, Underwater Exploration, New vehicles, New map, New Weapons, New story, Better Physics and Improved graphics. Are you telling me they haven't brought anything new to this game? By the way, this does NOT mean i am hating on MGS V. I'm looking DAMN forward to the game myself, as well as Watch Dogs too.

Edited June 18, 2013 by GTAfan786

[Zancudo]

You got a point there, but I won't go as far as saying R* doesn't do anything new this time. They do plenty new things like the 3 switchable protagonists, each one equally important as the other. That alone will make for a whole different dynamic unseen in any other game.

Another innovative thing is the detailed ocean floor. They didn't have to do that at all, but they did, because they do try new things and bring a new dynamic to the GTA universe.

You got that right about the detailed ocean floor - that's something I've never seen before in games. The three switchable protagonists is also something different, although I think it won't differentiate much from GTA: EfLC, except that you'll switch through them but just a one simple click of a button, while in EfLC you had to go back all the way to menu to change the characters.

[Zancudo]

1. Just because my username is GTAFan786 doesn't mean i'm biased.

2. BECAUSE IT IS, IT'S ALREADY BEEN SAID THAT IT'S IN THE SAME UNIVERSE. Get your facts right. That doesn't mean i'm saying the game is bad.

3. GTA is all about GAMEPLAY itself. The stories aren't too complicated but not too simple either. This time it's "Based" on Heat, doesn't mean they are copying it retard.

4. No you're not. You can only go to different countries through cut scenes. Your basically stuck in one place for the rest of the game while one or two missions or more will require you to go other countries. And I was only kidding about copying RDR. And GTA V didn't copy from SA, that's you being mad at R*.

 

Basically, you can't even compare the two. GTA V has LOTS of new things. Buying properties, Customizing cars and characters, Underwater Exploration, New vehicles, New map, New Weapons, New story, Better Physics and Improved graphics. Are you telling me they haven't brought anything new to this game? By the way, this does NOT mean i am hating on MGS V.

1. But you are biased.

2. If it's nothing bad, then why did you imply that? What was the point of that statement then?

3. Explain to me again, why did you suggest MGS might be worse because it has a linear story?

4. Basically all you've written here is false, stupid and retarded.

[GTAaLEX117]

You got a point there, but I won't go as far as saying R* doesn't do anything new this time. They do plenty new things like the 3 switchable protagonists, each one equally important as the other. That alone will make for a whole different dynamic unseen in any other game.

Another innovative thing is the detailed ocean floor. They didn't have to do that at all, but they did, because they do try new things and bring a new dynamic to the GTA universe.

You got that right about the detailed ocean floor - that's something I've never seen before in games. The three switchable protagonists is also something different, although I think it won't differentiate much from GTA: EfLC, except that you'll switch through them but just a one simple click of a button, while in EfLC you had to go back all the way to menu to change the characters.

You can also switch between them during missions. Unlike EFLC, they have upgradeable stats and unique abilities, plus the fact that they can roam the city while you don't control them, and when you switch back to them you can find them in numerous circumstances.

 

Another pretty innovative features that wasn't in any of the previous games is the heist planning and hiring crews which get progressively better.

[GTAfan786]

 

1. Just because my username is GTAFan786 doesn't mean i'm biased.

2. BECAUSE IT IS, IT'S ALREADY BEEN SAID THAT IT'S IN THE SAME UNIVERSE. Get your facts right. That doesn't mean i'm saying the game is bad.

3. GTA is all about GAMEPLAY itself. The stories aren't too complicated but not too simple either. This time it's "Based" on Heat, doesn't mean they are copying it retard.

4. No you're not. You can only go to different countries through cut scenes. Your basically stuck in one place for the rest of the game while one or two missions or more will require you to go other countries. And I was only  kidding about copying RDR. And GTA V didn't copy from SA, that's you being mad at R*.

 

Basically, you can't even compare the two. GTA V has LOTS of new things. Buying properties, Customizing cars and characters, Underwater Exploration, New vehicles, New map, New Weapons, New story, Better Physics and Improved graphics. Are you telling me they haven't brought anything new to this game? By the way, this does NOT mean i am hating on MGS V.

1. But you are biased.

2. If it's nothing bad, then why did you imply that? What was the point of that statement then?

3. Explain to me again, why did you suggest MGS might be worse because it has a linear story?

4. Basically all you've written here is false, stupid and retarded.

You're ignoring my answers. Look who's biased now. Goodbye troll, it's clear now that you are mad at R* for a reason

 

Number 4 is confirmed. As a matter of fact, all of them are. You either choose to take the blue pill, or the red pill. Your choice.

[Happyness]

MGS is a good game, but it's a game that has a linear story and they just copied the open world from RDR. Simple.

JESUS CHRIST WHAT THE f*ck?!

 

Every open-world game is copying Rockstar and their sh*tty games, oh my God... I don't even know what to say. I respect you GTAfan768 but that statement is f*cking retarded.

 

Every game out there is copying Rockstar, yeah, right, because III was the first 3d open-world game and it brought innovation to gaming and hurr durr every other game sucks.

 

GTA fans disgust me. I will keep browsing this forums because of the other sections, but visiting this forum will become a rarer thing. Just reading sh*t like that posted makes me go mad that you people are nothing but a bunch of sheep that are buying sh*t from rockstar if they threw it for you. (Not everyone of course)

 

Get over yourselves and get over GTA, it's getting old. Nothing innovative in it.

[Zancudo]

 

You can also switch between them during missions. Unlike EFLC, they have upgradeable stats and unique abilities, plus the fact that they can roam the city while you don't control them, and when you switch back to them you can find them in numerous circumstances.

 

Another pretty innovative features that wasn't in any of the previous games is the heist planning and hiring crews which get progressively better.

Stats - haven't we had them already in San Andreas?

 

Finding protagonists doing things when you don't control them sounds great, but the truth is, it's going to get old very fast. I just can't find it any exciting that I'll be able to see that one of my protagonists is playing golf, and the other one is driving a car. Nothing much spectacular, if you imagine you will see this every time you'll switch through the characters.

 

Come on people, give me something more than the discoverable ocean floor and obeying the road rules. Because those are so far the only innovative aspects of this new GTA.

[Happyness]

You can also switch between them during missions. Unlike EFLC, they have upgradeable stats and unique abilities, plus the fact that they can roam the city while you don't control them, and when you switch back to them you can find them in numerous circumstances.

 

Another pretty innovative features that wasn't in any of the previous games is the heist planning and hiring crews which get progressively better.

Stats - haven't we had them already in San Andreas?

 

Finding protagonists doing things when you don't control them sounds great, but the truth is, it's going to get old very fast. I just can't find it any exciting that I'll be able to see that one of my protagonists is playing golf, and the other one is driving a car. Nothing much spectacular, if you imagine you will see this every time you'll switch through the characters.

 

Come on people, give me something more than the discoverable ocean floor and obeying the road rules.

There's nothing.

[Game2048]

This has nothing to do with GTA V. Close this bullsh*t