The Multiple TOWNS Argument

[kjacked]

 

first of all, no. second of all they went on vacation... they went from new york to l.a.! by your logic the map will include the continental united states

 

again, ill repeat myself, ill bet anyone here $100 that san fiero, las venturas, and san diego WILL NOT be in the game.

Stop bringing that suicide icon. They did the same with New York too, and it turned out Liberty city was in the game. Quite ironic how they did that all one year before GTA V was officially announced.

liberty city in gta v!? lol here, have some troll food

 

@josephene is 27 your unlucky number or something? what do you have against 27?

 

and just so we are clear, you are breaking my balls because i know there will be no other cities in the game, yet you just admitted there will be no other cities in the game?

I just edited it. And I swear if you bring that icon one more time. That's so annoying, and you claim your "27". How do you miss all those other smiles.

 

OT: we have seen paleto and sandy shores. im expecting 3 or 4 more town and villages. very curious to see where they are placed. im hoping for a map release on the official gta v website.

Edited July 22, 2013 by kjacked

[_Kindled_]

 

 

 

Seriously dude, it isn't funny. It's sad. Just stop.

 

"the way that you make yourself look more than a little silly in your little crusade against anyone who dares to speculate on there being another city. Here's what you're not getting; you saying over and over and over and over and over and over again that 'Rockstar said one city waah' carries absolutely null relevancy here. If you have nothing to add past that then I would suggest you stop making yourself look fanatical for a pretty dull cause." Reposted that just to show how immature you are.

[_Kindled_]

Let's just get this straight. Rockstar is untruthful of many things, there are many reasons to why there are other cities in GTA V(San Andreas) but you refuse to see it. This topic is clearly for speculation, not you type of people. Again, please leave.

[kjacked]

 

 

 

Seriously dude, it isn't funny. It's sad. Just stop.

 

"the way that you make yourself look more than a little silly in your little crusade against anyone who dares to speculate on there being another city. Here's what you're not getting; you saying over and over and over and over and over and over again that 'Rockstar said one city waah' carries absolutely null relevancy here. If you have nothing to add past that then I would suggest you stop making yourself look fanatical for a pretty dull cause." Reposted that just to show how immature you are.

you have added absolutely nothing to the topic other than you being one of the only people in this thread dumb enough to think sf, lv, and san diego will be included. many of us have tried to discuss what towns and villages will be included in the game only to have trolls like you barge in and start spouting off bullsh*t about some guy from rockstar once went on vacation in a city therefore that city must be in the game see what i did there? lol

 

also, did you double post just to be an ass or did you not know you can edit your previous post?

[_Kindled_]

 

 

 

Seriously dude, it isn't funny. It's sad. Just stop.

 

"the way that you make yourself look more than a little silly in your little crusade against anyone who dares to speculate on there being another city. Here's what you're not getting; you saying over and over and over and over and over and over again that 'Rockstar said one city waah' carries absolutely null relevancy here. If you have nothing to add past that then I would suggest you stop making yourself look fanatical for a pretty dull cause." Reposted that just to show how immature you are.

you have added absolutely nothing to the topic other than you being one of the only people in this thread dumb enough to think sf, lv, and san diego will be included. many of us have tried to discuss what towns and villages will be included in the game only to have trolls like you barge in and start spouting off bullshit about some guy from rockstar once went on vacation in a city therefore that city must be in the game see what i did there? lol

Many? Many? Right now, you're the only one that refuses to believe there are other cities. You come with the same thing, there is no SF, LV, or SD. But nothing to back that up, seriously? Again, please leave.

 

Edit: He didn't just vacation to California, it was for a reason.

[kjacked]

Many? Many? Right now, you're the only one that refuses to believe there are other cities. You come with the same thing, there is no SF, LV, or SD. But nothing to back that up, seriously? Again, please leave.

yes many of us including zulu who started the thread in the first place. and nothing to back up my statements? really? rockstar has told us numerous times now via game informer q and a and rockstar mouthoff emails posted to this very thread that there will be no other cities in the game. just small towns and villages. thats a fact. rockstar doesnt lie. as i said earlier they werent going to include properties, the fan base was upset, so they included properties and told us they had changed their minds and implemented purchasable properties. now every idiot on gta forums says "rockstar lies, the game will have every city on earth and space marines and you can fly to the moon in the dodo as claude from gta 3"

 

either you dont really believe there will be other cities in the game, or you are too big of a sally to take me up on the $100 bet that los santos is the only city in the game. care to tell us which?

[Proxima]

If it's going to be the most ambitious area R* has ever created, there has to be more than one city.

 

I really think that JUST LS as the only city in such a huge space would get boring after the new-game-and-hype-smell wears off.

 

That'd be far too much rural country-side for a GTA game imo.

 

And I agree with what was already said: "6 huge heists in one city? Nah."

[kjacked]

If it's going to be the most ambitious area R* has ever created, there has to be more than one city.

 

I really think that JUST LS as the only city in such a huge space would get boring after the new-game-and-hype-smell wears off.

 

That'd be far too much rural country-side for a GTA game imo.

 

And I agree with what was already said: "6 huge heists in one city? Nah."

no one said 6 huge heists in one city. if you take 5 min to watch the gameplay trailer you will see at least one of the heists takes place in paleto

[ChatterBoxFM]

What happened to this thread?

 

 

Oh, nothing. That's the problem.

 

 

 

 

Where is this?

 

 

 

 

Looks A LOT farther north east than where they have it on the mapping thread.

Edited July 22, 2013 by ChatterBoxFM

[kjacked]

What happened to this thread?

 

 

Oh, nothing. That's the problem.

 

 

 

 

Where is this?

 

 

 

 

Looks A LOT farther north east than where they have it on the mapping thread.

i strongly agree with you. this is the one pic that proves to me we havent seen a large portion of the map. im hoping there will be another town or two in the unseen section. i really have no clue where this would be located on the map. all i know is this pic coupled with the jumping out of the plane pic (clouds conveniently covering parts of the map we havent been shown) gets me excited for what rockstar is hiding from us. i know it wont be a big city, but im sure there are a few towns we havent been shown yet. im also hoping they are hiding a casino of some sort.

[PensFan]

whah

Edited July 22, 2013 by PensFan

[Ragref]

Everybody who says SD, LV, SF or even Tijuana in the game is stupid. Already been confirmed it's Los Santos and the surrounding towns and countryside. Your speculation BS is just as bad saying that a 4th singleplayer character will be in the game. What? You thought New Haven would be in IV?

 

/THREAD

 

 

[_Kindled_]

 

Everybody who says SD, LV, SF or even Tijuana in the game is stupid. Already been confirmed it's Los Santos and the surrounding towns and countryside. Your speculation BS is just as bad saying that a 4th singleplayer character will be in the game. What? You thought New Haven would be in IV?

 

/THREAD

Oh, you dumb people again. Just leave this damn thread please. No one ever speculated New Haven in GTA IV, or a 4th player.

Edited July 22, 2013 by _Kindled_

[kjacked]

Everybody who says SD, LV, SF or even Tijuana in the game is stupid. Already been confirmed it's Los Santos and the surrounding towns and countryside. Your speculation BS is just as bad saying that a 4th singleplayer character will be in the game. What? You thought New Haven would be in IV?

 

/THREAD

Oh, you dumb people again. Just leave this damn thread please.

no...

[Dope_0110]

Everybody who says SD, LV, SF or even Tijuana in the game is stupid. Already been confirmed it's Los Santos and the surrounding towns and countryside. Your speculation BS is just as bad saying that a 4th singleplayer character will be in the game. What? You thought New Haven would be in IV?

 

/THREAD

Oh, you dumb people again. Just leave this damn thread please. No one ever speculated New Haven in GTA IV, or a 4th player.

That was obviously exaggeration with a purpose, though a lot of people did suggest a fourth character, guest characters and all kinds of stupid theories.

[kjacked]

 

Everybody who says SD, LV, SF or even Tijuana in the game is stupid. Already been confirmed it's Los Santos and the surrounding towns and countryside. Your speculation BS is just as bad saying that a 4th singleplayer character will be in the game. What? You thought New Haven would be in IV?

 

/THREAD

Oh, you dumb people again. Just leave this damn thread please. No one ever speculated New Haven in GTA IV, or a 4th player.

That was obviously exaggeration with a purpose, though a lot of people did suggest a fourth character, guest characters and all kinds of stupid theories.

in all honesty i have wondered if your mp character (fourth slot on the wheel) will be available for free roam after the story is completed. i doubt it but it would be kinda neat.

[Zulu412]

 

either you dont really believe there will be other cities in the game, or you are too big of a sally to take me up on the $100 bet that los santos is the only city in the game. care to tell us which?

can I take the bet & win if there is a town sized area that's called Bay City, would that count, lol?

Also, I think Paleto is big enough that it could be called a city, but that's just my opinion.

 

I did start the thread. As we've seen more & more, despite some very speculative interpretations, the thread has sort of shifted.

So much so, that kjacked & I are on the same page, haha.

I honestly don't believe anything anywhere close to the size of LS will be included. (i.e. LV or SF or SD)

But if some people want to try & throw up some theories, more power to ya.

(at least have some minimal info to back it, like what's in the OP, even if it is a reach)

 

On the other hand I can still argue that other "cities" will be in, but my "cities" are another man's "towns".

Temecula (Grapeseed) is a great bet, but they could also go the way of wine country just being farms & such so spread out that its not even a town or village. Though Temecula does have a casino. Another good one would be any town with snow, based on the leaked vehicle list having a snow plow. & that could be the huge thing R* is hiding, for the people on that believe they're hiding something huge.

 

Regardless, there's probably going to be a lot we haven't seen come the 17th of Sept.

[kjacked]

either you dont really believe there will be other cities in the game, or you are too big of a sally to take me up on the $100 bet that los santos is the only city in the game. care to tell us which?

can I take the bet & win if there is a town sized area that's called Bay City, would that count, lol?

Also, I think Paleto is big enough that it could be called a city, but that's just my opinion.

 

I did start the thread. As we've seen more & more, despite some very speculative interpretations, the thread has sort of shifted.

So much so, that kjacked & I are on the same page, haha.

I honestly don't believe anything anywhere close to the size of LS will be included. (i.e. LV or SF or SD)

But if some people want to try & throw up some theories, more power to ya.

(at least have some minimal info to back it, like what's in the OP, even if it is a reach)

 

On the other hand I can still argue that other "cities" will be in, but my "cities" are another man's "towns".

Temecula (Grapeseed) is a great bet, but they could also go the way of wine country just being farms & such so spread out that its not even a town or village. Though Temecula does have a casino. Another good one would be any town with snow, based on the leaked vehicle list having a snow plow. & that could be the huge thing R* is hiding, for the people on that believe they're hiding something huge.

 

Regardless, there's probably going to be a lot we haven't seen come the 17th of Sept.

i agree with the fact that we havent seen a few large portions of the map. im sure there are a few other paletos and sandy shores out there and i pray to god there is a casino. i could see maybe a riverboat casino, or even a landbased casino. who knows, ill keep my fingers crossed

[_Kindled_]

Everybody who says SD, LV, SF or even Tijuana in the game is stupid. Already been confirmed it's Los Santos and the surrounding towns and countryside. Your speculation BS is just as bad saying that a 4th singleplayer character will be in the game. What? You thought New Haven would be in IV?

 

/THREAD

Oh, you dumb people again. Just leave this damn thread please.

no...

Okay...

[_Kindled_]

It's hard to believe that GTA V is 3x bigger than SA, RDR, and IV combined with just one city and small surrounding countryside. I've seen the mapping thread, the map looks puny.

[PoliceFarm]

It's hard to believe that GTA V is 3x bigger than SA, RDR, and IV combined with just one city and small surrounding countryside. I've seen the mapping thread, the map looks puny.

Totally, totally wrong. It's SA, RDR and GTA 4, not all of them 3 times, and that's including all the water and interiors. The map is effectively Liberty City and 2 RDRs combined in size, probably about 1.5 San Andreas' size.

[_Kindled_]

 

It's hard to believe that GTA V is 3x bigger than SA, RDR, and IV combined with just one city and small surrounding countryside. I've seen the mapping thread, the map looks puny.

Totally, totally wrong. It's SA, RDR and GTA 4, not all of them 3 times, and that's including all the water and interiors. The map is effectively Liberty City and 2 RDRs combined in size, probably about 1.5 San Andreas' size.

Rockstar said it's larger than those games. I can't find a link right now for it, but when I do, I'll show you.

Edited July 22, 2013 by _Kindled_

[tictac1982]

 

It's hard to believe that GTA V is 3x bigger than SA, RDR, and IV combined with just one city and small surrounding countryside. I've seen the mapping thread, the map looks puny.

Totally, totally wrong. It's SA, RDR and GTA 4, not all of them 3 times, and that's including all the water and interiors. The map is effectively Liberty City and 2 RDRs combined in size, probably about 1.5 San Andreas' size.

Rockstar did say "3" times larger than those games. I can't find a link right now for it, but when I do, I'll show you.

No, they did not.

 

December (2012) Issue of Game Informer:

http://www.gameinformer.com/b/news/archive...eft-auto-v.aspx

 

 

According to Rockstar, Grand Theft Auto V's Los Santos is bigger than Red Dead Redemption, San Andreas, and Grand Theft Auto IV combined. Yep. There's wilderness, a military base, and even an ocean floor to explore underwater.

 

Neither of those three are identical in square miles and thus, cannot be compared if multiplied by 3.

[Pleasure_Pier]

Liberty city is probably in

[kjacked]

It's hard to believe that GTA V is 3x bigger than SA, RDR, and IV combined with just one city and small surrounding countryside. I've seen the mapping thread, the map looks puny.

Totally, totally wrong. It's SA, RDR and GTA 4, not all of them 3 times, and that's including all the water and interiors. The map is effectively Liberty City and 2 RDRs combined in size, probably about 1.5 San Andreas' size.

Rockstar did say "3" times larger than those games. I can't find a link right now for it, but when I do, I'll show you.

my point exactly... this guy has no f*cking idea what hes talking about. they said gta v is bigger than gta san andreas, gta iv, and rdr combined with room to spare. they also said the landmass is 3.5x rdr, and the whole map (underwater area and interiors included) is 5x rdr.

[Dope_0110]

It's hard to believe that GTA V is 3x bigger than SA, RDR, and IV combined with just one city and small surrounding countryside. I've seen the mapping thread, the map looks puny.

Totally, totally wrong. It's SA, RDR and GTA 4, not all of them 3 times, and that's including all the water and interiors. The map is effectively Liberty City and 2 RDRs combined in size, probably about 1.5 San Andreas' size.

Rockstar did say "3" times larger than those games. I can't find a link right now for it, but when I do, I'll show you.

No buddy, you're the one who's wrong here. They sad IV, RDR and SA maps together with room to spare and also 3.5X RDR map for land area and 5X RDR map including the underwater area.

[_Kindled_]

It's hard to believe that GTA V is 3x bigger than SA, RDR, and IV combined with just one city and small surrounding countryside. I've seen the mapping thread, the map looks puny.

Totally, totally wrong. It's SA, RDR and GTA 4, not all of them 3 times, and that's including all the water and interiors. The map is effectively Liberty City and 2 RDRs combined in size, probably about 1.5 San Andreas' size.

Rockstar did say "3" times larger than those games. I can't find a link right now for it, but when I do, I'll show you.

my point exactly... this guy has no f*cking idea what hes talking about. they said gta v is bigger than gta san andreas, gta iv, and rdr combined with room to spare. they also said the landmass is 3.5x rdr, and the whole map (underwater area and interiors included) is 5x rdr.

You're responding to the wrong person, unless you're trying to say the other guy was wrong.

"27"

[kjacked]

It's hard to believe that GTA V is 3x bigger than SA, RDR, and IV combined with just one city and small surrounding countryside. I've seen the mapping thread, the map looks puny.

Totally, totally wrong. It's SA, RDR and GTA 4, not all of them 3 times, and that's including all the water and interiors. The map is effectively Liberty City and 2 RDRs combined in size, probably about 1.5 San Andreas' size.

Rockstar did say "3" times larger than those games. I can't find a link right now for it, but when I do, I'll show you.

my point exactly... this guy has no f*cking idea what hes talking about. they said gta v is bigger than gta san andreas, gta iv, and rdr combined with room to spare. they also said the landmass is 3.5x rdr, and the whole map (underwater area and interiors included) is 5x rdr.

You're responding to the wrong person, unless you're trying to say the other guy was wrong.

"27"

no... im responding to you. you are wrong as wrong can get. somebody already posted the link and myself as well as about 2 or 3 others have already pointed out the fact that you made the 3x bigger than all those game bullsh*t up. youre wrong. thats a fact!

[_Kindled_]

 

It's hard to believe that GTA V is 3x bigger than SA, RDR, and IV combined with just one city and small surrounding countryside. I've seen the mapping thread, the map looks puny.

Totally, totally wrong. It's SA, RDR and GTA 4, not all of them 3 times, and that's including all the water and interiors. The map is effectively Liberty City and 2 RDRs combined in size, probably about 1.5 San Andreas' size.

Rockstar did say "3" times larger than those games. I can't find a link right now for it, but when I do, I'll show you.

my point exactly... this guy has no f*cking idea what hes talking about. they said gta v is bigger than gta san andreas, gta iv, and rdr combined with room to spare. they also said the landmass is 3.5x rdr, and the whole map (underwater area and interiors included) is 5x rdr.

You're responding to the wrong person, unless you're trying to say the other guy was wrong.

"27"

no... im responding to you. you are wrong as wrong can get. somebody already posted the link and myself as well as about 2 or 3 others have already pointed out the fact that you made the 3x bigger than all those game bullsh*t up. youre wrong. thats a fact!

You have a serious problem. Some anger issues, I mean.

[kjacked]

It's hard to believe that GTA V is 3x bigger than SA, RDR, and IV combined with just one city and small surrounding countryside. I've seen the mapping thread, the map looks puny.

Totally, totally wrong. It's SA, RDR and GTA 4, not all of them 3 times, and that's including all the water and interiors. The map is effectively Liberty City and 2 RDRs combined in size, probably about 1.5 San Andreas' size.

Rockstar did say "3" times larger than those games. I can't find a link right now for it, but when I do, I'll show you.

my point exactly... this guy has no f*cking idea what hes talking about. they said gta v is bigger than gta san andreas, gta iv, and rdr combined with room to spare. they also said the landmass is 3.5x rdr, and the whole map (underwater area and interiors included) is 5x rdr.

You're responding to the wrong person, unless you're trying to say the other guy was wrong.

"27"

no... im responding to you. you are wrong as wrong can get. somebody already posted the link and myself as well as about 2 or 3 others have already pointed out the fact that you made the 3x bigger than all those game bullsh*t up. youre wrong. thats a fact!

You have a serious problem. Some anger issues, I mean.

wow! you can deduce temperament from reading text yet you have trouble reading. youre a strange cat! btw we are all still waiting on that link you were gonna post to back up your (false) statements......... .....