Would You Take This Deal..

[Cazzer14]

If you ran R* I would be a Saints Row fan.

he sounds like the creators of SR

Not really, SR is stupid, over the top, no replay value. Basically it's sh*t.

 

I am just wondering if people wouldn't mind the graphic being a about Bully standard if it meant the gameplay was much better, more vechiles, more weapons, longer story line, motley cities and bigger map.

At this point the majority of the fans are super hyped about GTA V. Not just because it's pretty, but because it sounds like the gameplay will be amazing as well.

 

We'll have the most vehicles, weapons, and the biggest map we've ever had in a GTA game. So nobody knows what you're talking about.

This is a hypothetical situation, this hypothetical game would have better gameplay, more vechiles, more weapons and a larger map. For the case of the experiment that is a fact.

Define 'better gameplay'...

And "fact"

Mate I am saying that this 'hypothetical game' has better gameplay. This cannot be argued it is a term of the experiment, it this experiment it is a FACT that this 'hypothetical fictional game that has been created to test whether people prefer gameplay or graphics' had better gameplay. There is no point arguing this , I cannot prove it is the games fictional, I made it up on the pure basis that it must have better gameplay. I made the little story and added what era and what cities purely to try and make it look like a straight choice. But plain and simple you are either voting A with better graphics or B with better gameplay.

Dude, you're not even making sense anymore, you're just repeating nonsense

 

You keep mentioning 'better gameplay', but WHAT IS BETTER GAMEPLAY?

Whatever you consider gameplay, than this hypothetical game has better of it than Gta 5. I don't need to define. It's just that this hypothetical game has better gameplay be that through any view of what gameplay is.

If you don't define the parameters of 'better gameplay' how are we supposed to answer YOUR question of gameplay or graphics (a question you haven't actually asked), when we all have different questions to answer depending on our personal opinions of what better gameplay is?

[ChatterBoxFM]

i cant imagine the gameplay being that much better then it will already be just by making the graphics suck

[dxbrandon]

Listen the storyline aspect of it isn't important, it was about whether you would rather a game with better gameplay or a game with better graphics. Jesus it wasn't that hard to understand, it was just a little experiment to see what people prefer as I see people go on about graphics all the time but for me it is not that important, so I wondered if it was to the GTA community and obviously it is. So experiment complete 

That's not what you said though. You gave a specific scenario that included multiple cities and SA/Bully graphics etc.

 

We already are getting a game that favors better gameplay over better graphics. It's called GTA V. GTA has always been this way. R* could make it smaller or take away features to make it a little prettier, but they know how to balance it properly so we get the best of both.

This!! f*cking op, I'm excited for Gta V because of the gameplay and i don't want to go back to the same f*cking cities, i have all of em on my psn. YOU get it? So f*ck off with the stupid question. /Rant

[GTAMAN567]

If you ran R* I would be a Saints Row fan.

he sounds like the creators of SR

Not really, SR is stupid, over the top, no replay value. Basically it's sh*t.

 

I am just wondering if people wouldn't mind the graphic being a about Bully standard if it meant the gameplay was much better, more vechiles, more weapons, longer story line, motley cities and bigger map.

At this point the majority of the fans are super hyped about GTA V. Not just because it's pretty, but because it sounds like the gameplay will be amazing as well.

 

We'll have the most vehicles, weapons, and the biggest map we've ever had in a GTA game. So nobody knows what you're talking about.

This is a hypothetical situation, this hypothetical game would have better gameplay, more vechiles, more weapons and a larger map. For the case of the experiment that is a fact.

Define 'better gameplay'...

And "fact"

Mate I am saying that this 'hypothetical game' has better gameplay. This cannot be argued it is a term of the experiment, it this experiment it is a FACT that this 'hypothetical fictional game that has been created to test whether people prefer gameplay or graphics' had better gameplay. There is no point arguing this , I cannot prove it is the games fictional, I made it up on the pure basis that it must have better gameplay. I made the little story and added what era and what cities purely to try and make it look like a straight choice. But plain and simple you are either voting A with better graphics or B with better gameplay.

Dude, you're not even making sense anymore, you're just repeating nonsense

 

You keep mentioning 'better gameplay', but WHAT IS BETTER GAMEPLAY?

Whatever you consider gameplay, than this hypothetical game has better of it than Gta 5. I don't need to define. It's just that this hypothetical game has better gameplay be that through any view of what gameplay is.

If you don't define the parameters of 'better gameplay' how are we supposed to answer YOUR question of gameplay or graphics (a question you haven't actually asked), when we all have different questions to answer depending on our personal opinions of what better gameplay is?

Whatever you consider important in gameplay (cars,missions,weapons,soundtrack etc) it has the best. I can't say much more than that all I can say is for the terms of the experiment the graphics would be worse but the gameplay better in this hypothetical game.

 

[GTAMAN567]

Listen the storyline aspect of it isn't important, it was about whether you would rather a game with better gameplay or a game with better graphics. Jesus it wasn't that hard to understand, it was just a little experiment to see what people prefer as I see people go on about graphics all the time but for me it is not that important, so I wondered if it was to the GTA community and obviously it is. So experiment complete 

That's not what you said though. You gave a specific scenario that included multiple cities and SA/Bully graphics etc.

 

We already are getting a game that favors better gameplay over better graphics. It's called GTA V. GTA has always been this way. R* could make it smaller or take away features to make it a little prettier, but they know how to balance it properly so we get the best of both.

This!! f*cking op, I'm excited for Gta V because of the gameplay and i don't want to go back to the same f*cking cities, i have all of em on my psn. YOU get it? So f*ck off with the stupid question. /Rant

The question is would you take a GTA V that has worse graphics but better gameplay.

[Cazzer14]

I'm gonna end the comment train before it crashes into my house.

 

You've repeated yourself again, dude. If you can't narrow down the specifics of gameplay, then your hypothetical is invalid since the question is impossible to answer. It's stupid anyway, but now it's invalid.

 

GTA V ticks all the boxes anyway, graphics, gameplay, variety, music, mechanics, everything. Again, so your question is invalid

[GTAMAN567]

f*cking Hell! All I'm saying is would you take a GTA game with worse graphic but better gameplay. Gameplay from wiki: gameplay is considered to be the overall experience of playing a video game excluding factors like graphics and sound.

[Cazzer14]

f*cking Hell! All I'm saying is would you take a GTA game with worse graphic but better gameplay. Gameplay from wiki: gameplay is considered to be the overall experience of playing a video game excluding factors like graphics and sound.

Say GTA V has perfect gameplay for me, how could you improve it?

[ChatterBoxFM]

f*cking Hell! All I'm saying is would you take a GTA game with worse graphic but better gameplay. Gameplay from wiki: gameplay is considered to be the overall experience of playing a video game excluding factors like graphics and sound.

you dont get it

[GTAMAN567]

i cant imagine the gameplay being that much better then it will already be just by making the graphics suck

I don't even? What? Are you serious? I'm not offering an actual solution to Rockstar saying make your graphics suck and your gameplay will be better. No it is a hypothetical question where if you were given the choice of two GTAVs, one with better gameplay and one with better graphics which one would you take? It really isn't that hard people.

[Cazzer14]

i cant imagine the gameplay being that much better then it will already be just by making the graphics suck

I don't even? What? Are you serious? I'm not offering an actual solution to Rockstar saying make your graphics suck and your gameplay will be better. No it is a hypothetical question where if you were given the choice of two GTAVs, one with better gameplay and one with better graphics which one would you take? It really isn't that hard people.

But since you cannot define 'gameplay' for one individual person then it's an impossible, invalid and frankly stupid question

[ChatterBoxFM]

 

i cant imagine the gameplay being that much better then it will already be just by making the graphics suck

I don't even? What? Are you serious? I'm not offering an actual solution to Rockstar saying make your graphics suck and your gameplay will be better. No it is a hypothetical question where if you were given the choice of two GTAVs, one with better gameplay and one with better graphics which one would you take? It really isn't that hard people.

 

 

 

[GTAMAN567]

f*cking Hell! All I'm saying is would you take a GTA game with worse graphic but better gameplay. Gameplay from wiki: gameplay is considered to be the overall experience of playing a video game excluding factors like graphics and sound.

Say GTA V has perfect gameplay for me, how could you improve it?

Jesus Christ. Well if its perfect than it is impossible to improve obviously. But for this question the made up GTAV game has better gameplay, and the real GTAV has better graphics. Now what co you choose?

[Cazzer14]

f*cking Hell! All I'm saying is would you take a GTA game with worse graphic but better gameplay. Gameplay from wiki: gameplay is considered to be the overall experience of playing a video game excluding factors like graphics and sound.

Say GTA V has perfect gameplay for me, how could you improve it?

Jesus Christ. Well if its perfect than it is impossible to improve obviously. But for this question the made up GTAV game has better gameplay, and the real GTAV has better graphics. Now what co you choose?

WHY. DID. YOU. NOT. JUST. ASK. THIS. FIRST.?

[Rock Howard]

Since the game has not been released, we don't even know what it is like "as it is" right now.

[wwinterj]

So in short you're asking if I would like GTA V to have less graphics but more of everything else as opposed to what it is now? Nice backpedaling.

 

I don't care for graphics. Hell i still play retro games. I mean GTA has never had stellar graphics so I'd take more of everything else. Also for the record I'm currently playing Saints Row The Third: The full package and enjoying myself.

[GTAMAN567]

i cant imagine the gameplay being that much better then it will already be just by making the graphics suck

I don't even? What? Are you serious? I'm not offering an actual solution to Rockstar saying make your graphics suck and your gameplay will be better. No it is a hypothetical question where if you were given the choice of two GTAVs, one with better gameplay and one with better graphics which one would you take? It really isn't that hard people.

But since you cannot define 'gameplay' for one individual person then it's an impossible, invalid and frankly stupid question

Listen it's a question where you personal preference comes in. What is YOUR preference in gameplay, what do YOU consider is important. Now this hypothetical game takes yours and only your preference into account and makes gameplay that is in your opinion. Now would you take this hypothetical that has gameplay you consider better than GTA5, but has graphics that you consider worse that GTAV. What would you choose?

[TheFreightTrain]

 

 

To the op, normally I wouldn't say this but...it fits...

 

[GTAMAN567]

So in short you're asking if I would like GTA V to have less graphics but more of everything else as opposed to what it is now? Nice backpedaling.

 

I don't care for graphics. Hello i still play retro games. I mean GTA has never had stellar graphics so I'd take more of everything else. Also for the record I'm currently playing Saints Row The Third: The full package and enjoying myself.

Gameplay isn't everything else, but I short yes.

[G D]

 

If you ran R* I would be a Saints Row fan.

he sounds like the creators of SR

Not really, SR is stupid, over the top, no replay value. Basically it's sh*t.

 

I am just wondering if people wouldn't mind the graphic being a about Bully standard if it meant the gameplay was much better, more vechiles, more weapons, longer story line, motley cities and bigger map.

At this point the majority of the fans are super hyped about GTA V. Not just because it's pretty, but because it sounds like the gameplay will be amazing as well.

 

We'll have the most vehicles, weapons, and the biggest map we've ever had in a GTA game. So nobody knows what you're talking about.

This is a hypothetical situation, this hypothetical game would have better gameplay, more vechiles, more weapons and a larger map. For the case of the experiment that is a fact.

Define 'better gameplay'...

And "fact"

Mate I am saying that this 'hypothetical game' has better gameplay. This cannot be argued it is a term of the experiment, it this experiment it is a FACT that this 'hypothetical fictional game that has been created to test whether people prefer gameplay or graphics' had better gameplay. There is no point arguing this , I cannot prove it is the games fictional, I made it up on the pure basis that it must have better gameplay. I made the little story and added what era and what cities purely to try and make it look like a straight choice. But plain and simple you are either voting A with better graphics or B with better gameplay.

If that's what you meant, then i would chose "game play" (as you call it) but ONLY IF and again IF:

 

If it's as detailed as current V, has EVERYTHING it has, actually detailed characters thats has real depth, (not like CJ or Claude or Tommy even tho he's my third favorite GTA character) depth that we seen on R* current gen games, V's detailed underwater, detailed cities, not like JC2 *shudders* (a game can look bad and VERY DETAILED, and so on)

 

If it's all that + as good as V's content...

Then in that case i would chose your V.

 

BUT: if it has drastically improved Arcade driving, drastically improved 3 Era shooting, then i would stick with V. as it has drastically improved 'real as it gets' [] driving, ANDDD again drastically improved Shooting, Max Payne 3 nough said. LoLz.

 

 

What i meant, you must be specific.

 

What is "better gameplay"?

1. Improved 3 Era/RenderWare engine. Arcade Style

2. Improved 4 Era/RAGE engine. Realistic Style.

[GTAMAN567]

If you ran R* I would be a Saints Row fan.

he sounds like the creators of SR

Not really, SR is stupid, over the top, no replay value. Basically it's sh*t.

 

I am just wondering if people wouldn't mind the graphic being a about Bully standard if it meant the gameplay was much better, more vechiles, more weapons, longer story line, motley cities and bigger map.

At this point the majority of the fans are super hyped about GTA V. Not just because it's pretty, but because it sounds like the gameplay will be amazing as well.

 

We'll have the most vehicles, weapons, and the biggest map we've ever had in a GTA game. So nobody knows what you're talking about.

This is a hypothetical situation, this hypothetical game would have better gameplay, more vechiles, more weapons and a larger map. For the case of the experiment that is a fact.

Define 'better gameplay'...

And "fact"

Mate I am saying that this 'hypothetical game' has better gameplay. This cannot be argued it is a term of the experiment, it this experiment it is a FACT that this 'hypothetical fictional game that has been created to test whether people prefer gameplay or graphics' had better gameplay. There is no point arguing this , I cannot prove it is the games fictional, I made it up on the pure basis that it must have better gameplay. I made the little story and added what era and what cities purely to try and make it look like a straight choice. But plain and simple you are either voting A with better graphics or B with better gameplay.

If that's what you meant, then i would chose "game play" (as you call it) but ONLY IF and again IF:

 

If it's as detailed as current V, has EVERYTHING it has, actually detailed characters thats has real depth, (not like CJ or Claude or Tommy even tho he's my third favorite GTA character) depth that we seen on R* current gen games, V's detailed underwater, detailed cities, not like JC2 *shudders* (a game can look bad and VERY DETAILED, and so on)

 

If it's all that + as good as V's content...

Then in that case i would chose your V.

 

BUT: if it has drastically improved Arcade driving, drastically improved 3 Era shooting, then i would stick with V. as it has drastically improved 'real as it gets' [] driving, ANDDD again drastically improved Shooting, Max Payne 3 nough said. LoLz.

 

 

What i meant, you must be specific.

 

What is "better gameplay"?

1. Improved 3 Era/RenderWare engine. Arcade Style

2. Improved 4 Era/RAGE engine. Realistic Style.

If that's what you consider better gameplay than that's fine

[Cazzer14]

i cant imagine the gameplay being that much better then it will already be just by making the graphics suck

I don't even? What? Are you serious? I'm not offering an actual solution to Rockstar saying make your graphics suck and your gameplay will be better. No it is a hypothetical question where if you were given the choice of two GTAVs, one with better gameplay and one with better graphics which one would you take? It really isn't that hard people.

But since you cannot define 'gameplay' for one individual person then it's an impossible, invalid and frankly stupid question

Listen it's a question where you personal preference comes in. What is YOUR preference in gameplay, what do YOU consider is important. Now this hypothetical game takes yours and only your preference into account and makes gameplay that is in your opinion. Now would you take this hypothetical that has gameplay you consider better than GTA5, but has graphics that you consider worse that GTAV. What would you choose?

I repeat my previous message, you absolute moron.

[GTAMAN567]

i cant imagine the gameplay being that much better then it will already be just by making the graphics suck

I don't even? What? Are you serious? I'm not offering an actual solution to Rockstar saying make your graphics suck and your gameplay will be better. No it is a hypothetical question where if you were given the choice of two GTAVs, one with better gameplay and one with better graphics which one would you take? It really isn't that hard people.

But since you cannot define 'gameplay' for one individual person then it's an impossible, invalid and frankly stupid question

Listen it's a question where you personal preference comes in. What is YOUR preference in gameplay, what do YOU consider is important. Now this hypothetical game takes yours and only your preference into account and makes gameplay that is in your opinion. Now would you take this hypothetical that has gameplay you consider better than GTA5, but has graphics that you consider worse that GTAV. What would you choose?

I repeat my previous message, you absolute moron.

Right back at you mate

[Cazzer14]

i cant imagine the gameplay being that much better then it will already be just by making the graphics suck

I don't even? What? Are you serious? I'm not offering an actual solution to Rockstar saying make your graphics suck and your gameplay will be better. No it is a hypothetical question where if you were given the choice of two GTAVs, one with better gameplay and one with better graphics which one would you take? It really isn't that hard people.

But since you cannot define 'gameplay' for one individual person then it's an impossible, invalid and frankly stupid question

Listen it's a question where you personal preference comes in. What is YOUR preference in gameplay, what do YOU consider is important. Now this hypothetical game takes yours and only your preference into account and makes gameplay that is in your opinion. Now would you take this hypothetical that has gameplay you consider better than GTA5, but has graphics that you consider worse that GTAV. What would you choose?

I repeat my previous message, you absolute moron.

Right back at you mate

Now, if you'd asked this question first of all, instead of this cryptic confusing hypothetical sh*t, things would have been much, much simpler for everybody involved. Wow, just wow.

[GTAMAN567]

Please lock and ban

Edited June 5, 2013 by GTAMAN567

[MrSpooge]

So, why didn't just make the thread calling "Gameplay Vs Graphics" actually.. Why'd you make a thread at all when the obvious choice is Gameplay?

 

Edit - How about you just go jump of a fk'n bridge because I've seen you post about these past days on these forums and you've been nothing but a unintelligent prick to everybody and you've most certainly proved it now.

[Cazzer14]

Can someone ban my account? Had enough of this forum full of uneducated spivs

Namely, you

[Cazzer14]

So, why didn't just make the thread calling "Gameplay Vs Graphics" actually.. Why'd you make a thread at all when the obvious choice is Gameplay?

 

Edit - How about you just go jump of a fk'n bridge because I've seen you post about these past days on these forums and you've been nothing but a unintelligent prick to everybody and you've most certainly proved it now.

I concur.

[G D]

If it is the first option (Max Payne 3 shooting, IV driving) in my post than Yes.

Voted "GTA V with these changes".

[TheFreightTrain]

Here's a idea, just dont sign on to this site anymore, it'll be one less dumb ass here 0.o