Ferocious Banger Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 @ferocious... did you not read anything rockstar released? as ive already stated that formula you posted means nothing. no one ever said gta=gta sa+gta iv+rdr.... no one... especially not rockstar Since you like "official stats" yourself, let me explain the mathematical impossibility ( at least, improbability ) here. Officially, San Andreas is 13.9 square miles.;GTA IV is 6.25 square miles and, if "Officially", RDR is 27.8 square miles, You get a size of 47.95 But GTA V is also 3.5 times * RDR. That would mean a size of 97.3 square miles, if RDR is 27.8 square miles. The two equations simply do not gel with each other. If RDR is 27.8 square miles ( twice as big as San Andreas ), GTA IV has to be.. 43.1 square miles. wrong again... he said roughly twice as big!lol good try though Okay, keep RDR to be 28 square miles - that is "roughly" twice the size of SA. Even that proves you totally wrong. You mean to tell me, the "room to spare" is about 40 square miles? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBelic Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 @ferocious... did you not read anything rockstar released? as ive already stated that formula you posted means nothing. no one ever said gta=gta sa+gta iv+rdr.... no one... especially not rockstar Since you like "official stats" yourself, let me explain the mathematical impossibility ( at least, improbability ) here. Officially, San Andreas is 13.9 square miles.;GTA IV is 6.25 square miles and, if "Officially", RDR is 27.8 square miles, You get a size of 47.95 But GTA V is also 3.5 times * RDR. That would mean a size of 97.3 square miles, if RDR is 27.8 square miles. The two equations simply do not gel with each other. If RDR is 27.8 square miles ( twice as big as San Andreas ), GTA IV has to be.. 43.1 square miles. Theres no way SA was bigger then IV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justgettinridiculous Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 @ferocious... did you not read anything rockstar released? as ive already stated that formula you posted means nothing. no one ever said gta=gta sa+gta iv+rdr.... no one... especially not rockstar Since you like "official stats" yourself, let me explain the mathematical impossibility ( at least, improbability ) here. Officially, San Andreas is 13.9 square miles.;GTA IV is 6.25 square miles and, if "Officially", RDR is 27.8 square miles, You get a size of 47.95 But GTA V is also 3.5 times * RDR. That would mean a size of 97.3 square miles, if RDR is 27.8 square miles. The two equations simply do not gel with each other. If RDR is 27.8 square miles ( twice as big as San Andreas ), GTA IV has to be.. 43.1 square miles. wrong again... he said roughly twice as big!lol good try though Okay, keep RDR to be 28 square miles - that is "roughly" twice the size of SA. Even that proves you totally wrong. You mean to tell me, the "room to spare" is about 40 square miles? are you dan houser? do you have any clue what he meant by "roughly"? didnt think so... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferocious Banger Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 @ferocious... did you not read anything rockstar released? as ive already stated that formula you posted means nothing. no one ever said gta=gta sa+gta iv+rdr.... no one... especially not rockstar Since you like "official stats" yourself, let me explain the mathematical impossibility ( at least, improbability ) here. Officially, San Andreas is 13.9 square miles.;GTA IV is 6.25 square miles and, if "Officially", RDR is 27.8 square miles, You get a size of 47.95 But GTA V is also 3.5 times * RDR. That would mean a size of 97.3 square miles, if RDR is 27.8 square miles. The two equations simply do not gel with each other. If RDR is 27.8 square miles ( twice as big as San Andreas ), GTA IV has to be.. 43.1 square miles. wrong again... he said roughly twice as big!lol good try though Okay, keep RDR to be 28 square miles - that is "roughly" twice the size of SA. Even that proves you totally wrong. You mean to tell me, the "room to spare" is about 40 square miles? are you dan houser? do you have any clue what he meant by "roughly"? didnt think so... Do you, Mr Genius?. Do you have any "clue"? Do you have any clue about what "roughly" in this context means? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justgettinridiculous Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 @ferocious... did you not read anything rockstar released? as ive already stated that formula you posted means nothing. no one ever said gta=gta sa+gta iv+rdr.... no one... especially not rockstar Since you like "official stats" yourself, let me explain the mathematical impossibility ( at least, improbability ) here. Officially, San Andreas is 13.9 square miles.;GTA IV is 6.25 square miles and, if "Officially", RDR is 27.8 square miles, You get a size of 47.95 But GTA V is also 3.5 times * RDR. That would mean a size of 97.3 square miles, if RDR is 27.8 square miles. The two equations simply do not gel with each other. If RDR is 27.8 square miles ( twice as big as San Andreas ), GTA IV has to be.. 43.1 square miles. wrong again... he said roughly twice as big!lol good try though Okay, keep RDR to be 28 square miles - that is "roughly" twice the size of SA. Even that proves you totally wrong. You mean to tell me, the "room to spare" is about 40 square miles? are you dan houser? do you have any clue what he meant by "roughly"? didnt think so... Do you, Mr Genius?. Do you have any "clue"? Do you have any clue about what "roughly" in this context means? yes... it means that red dead is bigger than san andreas... nuff said Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
soolight Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 troll? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferocious Banger Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 @ferocious... did you not read anything rockstar released? as ive already stated that formula you posted means nothing. no one ever said gta=gta sa+gta iv+rdr.... no one... especially not rockstar Since you like "official stats" yourself, let me explain the mathematical impossibility ( at least, improbability ) here. Officially, San Andreas is 13.9 square miles.;GTA IV is 6.25 square miles and, if "Officially", RDR is 27.8 square miles, You get a size of 47.95 But GTA V is also 3.5 times * RDR. That would mean a size of 97.3 square miles, if RDR is 27.8 square miles. The two equations simply do not gel with each other. If RDR is 27.8 square miles ( twice as big as San Andreas ), GTA IV has to be.. 43.1 square miles. wrong again... he said roughly twice as big!lol good try though Okay, keep RDR to be 28 square miles - that is "roughly" twice the size of SA. Even that proves you totally wrong. You mean to tell me, the "room to spare" is about 40 square miles? are you dan houser? do you have any clue what he meant by "roughly"? didnt think so... Do you, Mr Genius?. Do you have any "clue"? Do you have any clue about what "roughly" in this context means? yes... it means that red dead is bigger than san andreas... nuff said So, what do you think the size of Red Dead is? We are poor peasants. We have no idea about what "roughly" is. Please enlighten us, so that we can further prove the logical fallacy displayed by you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redx165 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Honestly if they would of had a bigger draw distance you would see how small GTA SA was. RDR you can see the whole map and it looks big. Plus GTA game was made on a different hardware with a different scale same goes with RDR. Only Rockstar knows how big RDR is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justgettinridiculous Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 troll? yes i believe ferocious is a troll. all i have posted are facts. no finger painted maps. just quotes from rockstar. rdr is bigger than san andreas. gta v is bigger than both of them plus gta iv with room to spare. those are the facts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Choco Taco Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 troll? Yeah. He's fun to play with though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
justgettinridiculous Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 troll? Yeah. He's fun to play with though. i agree. ferocious is fun to play with. as is choco taco. ive made him comment about the size of rdr vs sa at least 20x even though he "doesnt care about it" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferocious Banger Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 troll? Yeah. He's fun to play with though. i agree. ferocious is fun to play with. as is choco taco. ive made him comment about the size of rdr vs sa at least 20x even though he "doesnt care about it" So, what do you think the size of Red Dead is? We are poor peasants. We have no idea about what "roughly" is. Please enlighten us, so that we can further prove the logical fallacy displayed by you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonp92 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 @ferocious... did you not read anything rockstar released? as ive already stated that formula you posted means nothing. no one ever said gta=gta sa+gta iv+rdr.... no one... especially not rockstar Since you like "official stats" yourself, let me explain the mathematical impossibility ( at least, improbability ) here. Officially, San Andreas is 13.9 square miles.;GTA IV is 6.25 square miles and, if "Officially", RDR is 27.8 square miles, You get a size of 47.95 But GTA V is also 3.5 times * RDR. That would mean a size of 97.3 square miles, if RDR is 27.8 square miles. The two equations simply do not gel with each other. If RDR is 27.8 square miles ( twice as big as San Andreas ), GTA IV has to be.. 43.1 square miles. wrong again... he said roughly twice as big!lol good try though Okay, keep RDR to be 28 square miles - that is "roughly" twice the size of SA. Even that proves you totally wrong. You mean to tell me, the "room to spare" is about 40 square miles? are you dan houser? do you have any clue what he meant by "roughly"? didnt think so... Are you still going strong? So you actually believe RDR to be "roughly" 28sqm? because houser said it? But actual mathematical measurements of the map is wrong to you? There's absolutely no way in hell RDR's playable area is any bigger than 13sqm. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dxbrandon Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Don't know why I'm posting this here, I'm just am. Gta SA is and looks small with less Fog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBelic Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 This silences the arguments. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W5XHX91Botg Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Choco Taco Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Don't know why I'm posting this here, I'm just am. Gta SA is and looks small with less Fog. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dxbrandon Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Don't know why I'm posting this here, I'm just am. Gta SA is and looks small with less Fog. Ya Gta V still looks big in that pic for some reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaVaGe308 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 (edited) Don't know why I'm posting this here, I'm just am. Gta SA is and looks small with less Fog. That's a great picture. San Andreas is very small compared to Red Dead Redemption and this picture shows that perfectly. Good find OP: It's been said already I believe but GTA V is bigger than San Andreas. Much bigger. Its bigger than RDR, IV, and GTA SA combined with room to spare. R* also said the landmass for GTA V will be 3.5x RDR map and 5x the RDR map with the explorable underwater areas included. More than enough game to keep me entertained for a long time. I really dont see this game ever getting old with everything they have implemented this time around. Edited June 5, 2013 by SaVaGe308 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
josephene123 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Don't know why I'm posting this here, I'm just am. Gta SA is and looks small with less Fog. That's a great picture. San Andreas is very small compared to Red Dead Redemption and this picture shows that perfectly. Good find OP: It's been said already I believe but GTA V is bigger than San Andreas. Much bigger. Its bigger than RDR, IV, and GTA SA combined with room to spare. R* also said the landmass for GTA V will be 3.5x RDR map and 5x the RDR map with the explorable underwater areas included. More than enough game to keep me entertained for a long time. I really dont see this game ever getting old with everything they have implemented this time around. Give it a rest Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaVaGe308 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Don't know why I'm posting this here, I'm just am. Gta SA is and looks small with less Fog. That's a great picture. San Andreas is very small compared to Red Dead Redemption and this picture shows that perfectly. Good find OP: It's been said already I believe but GTA V is bigger than San Andreas. Much bigger. Its bigger than RDR, IV, and GTA SA combined with room to spare. R* also said the landmass for GTA V will be 3.5x RDR map and 5x the RDR map with the explorable underwater areas included. More than enough game to keep me entertained for a long time. I really dont see this game ever getting old with everything they have implemented this time around. Give it a rest OP: "I know they said it's bigger than LS, but will it be bigger than SA?" Do you have anything to add to the thread topic? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAfan786 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Some idiots here don't realise RDR only has a playable area of 6.5 sq miles of the map, and the total map size is 12. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ferocious Banger Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Some idiots here don't realise RDR only has a playable area of 6.5 sq miles of the map, and the total map size is 12. inb4 you get called a SA fanboy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gta player13 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 It will not only be bigger than SA, but it will be bigger than SA, IV and RDR combined. /thread Xaxa (asxeto) kai Ellinas,kai panathinaikos??? respect Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAfan786 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Some idiots here don't realise RDR only has a playable area of 6.5 sq miles of the map, and the total map size is 12. inb4 you get called a SA fanboy. Lol. I'm also a fan of SA but it doesn't mean you should hog the game all the time like some people here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaVaGe308 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 Some idiots here don't realise RDR only has a playable area of 6.5 sq miles of the map, and the total map size is 12. inb4 you get called a SA fanboy. Lol. I'm also a fan of SA but it doesn't mean you should hog the game all the time like some people here. I like GTA San Andreas too. Quite a bit actually. I like it much more than GTA IV. I like Red Dead Redemption equally I'd say. If it had a sanchez then that would probably push it over the edge for me However, none of this changes the fact that Red Dead Remeptions map is much bigger than GTA San Andreas. I get a kick out of all the people saying San Andreas is twice as big If GTA SA were twice as big is RDR as you people claim, then that would mean the landmass in GTA V was a little more than 1.5x the size of GTA SA....lol Give me a break people Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakeney Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 For goodness sake how long until people accept RDR was NOT bigger than SA, I've seen it said so many times This^ I think it's funny too... imagine we had sports cars in RDR, the map would feel tiny!! Also, it takes longer to go from one side of sa to the other in a sports car, then its does a horse in RDR... so how is it even remotely possible??? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
brian. Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 lol of course, San Andreas is really small compared to Red Dead Redemption. Actually it's not, and the playable area of RDR is a fair amount smaller. But GTA V as a whole is definitely larger. The news of it being "GTA IV, Red Dead Redemption, and San Andreas combined with room to spare" might not be true, but it's still quite large. I agree with Mr Darko, They said RDR map will be twice as big as San Andreas........ It wasnt. It will be bigger, but not as big as they are saying it will be. If you include all the non-playable area, isn't it bigger than SA then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaVaGe308 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 lol of course, San Andreas is really small compared to Red Dead Redemption. Actually it's not, and the playable area of RDR is a fair amount smaller. But GTA V as a whole is definitely larger. The news of it being "GTA IV, Red Dead Redemption, and San Andreas combined with room to spare" might not be true, but it's still quite large. I agree with Mr Darko, They said RDR map will be twice as big as San Andreas........ It wasnt. It will be bigger, but not as big as they are saying it will be. If you include all the non-playable area, isn't it bigger than SA then? Actually the playable area of Red Dead Redemption is quite a bit bigger than San Andreas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAfan786 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 lol of course, San Andreas is really small compared to Red Dead Redemption. Actually it's not, and the playable area of RDR is a fair amount smaller. But GTA V as a whole is definitely larger. The news of it being "GTA IV, Red Dead Redemption, and San Andreas combined with room to spare" might not be true, but it's still quite large. I agree with Mr Darko, They said RDR map will be twice as big as San Andreas........ It wasnt. It will be bigger, but not as big as they are saying it will be. If you include all the non-playable area, isn't it bigger than SA then? Actually the playable area of Red Dead Redemption is quite a bit bigger than San Andreas. What? Lmao. No it isn't. SA is 13.9 sq miles and all of it is playable. While RDR is a total of 12 sq miles and only 6.5sq miles is playable Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SaVaGe308 Posted June 5, 2013 Share Posted June 5, 2013 lol of course, San Andreas is really small compared to Red Dead Redemption. Actually it's not, and the playable area of RDR is a fair amount smaller. But GTA V as a whole is definitely larger. The news of it being "GTA IV, Red Dead Redemption, and San Andreas combined with room to spare" might not be true, but it's still quite large. I agree with Mr Darko, They said RDR map will be twice as big as San Andreas........ It wasnt. It will be bigger, but not as big as they are saying it will be. If you include all the non-playable area, isn't it bigger than SA then? Actually the playable area of Red Dead Redemption is quite a bit bigger than San Andreas. What? Lmao. No it isn't. SA is 13.9 sq miles and all of it is playable. While RDR is a total of 12 sq miles and only 6.5sq miles is playable That is your opinion and it is wrong. No one from rockstar ever gave concrete numbers on the size of RDR's map. In fact, the only thing they said was RDR's map is roughly twice as big as San Andreas map. By your wacky calculations grand theft auto v will be a little bigger than 1.5x san andreas which is ridiculous. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now