LotusRIP Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 PS3 is the superior console PS4 is the superior console and it's not even out yet... /end war Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyz Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Because it wasnt a direct sloppy 360 port that time. This holds true with every multiplatform game vs xbox and ps3.... people get mad when its brought up but its the truth. They give the ps3 version a xbox port as its easier to code for xbox than the sony Cell nonsence. But i think for V rockstar will be developing for each console seperate. I bloody hope so. They did an equally poor job with RDR for the ps3 and if the same sh*t happens again i will be fackin pissed. hat was wrong with RDR on the PS3? Are you blind?? The only difference were details like grass and minor lighting differences. I think he was exaggerating. Yeah. @LotusRIP True!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 PS3 is the superior console PS4 is the superior console and it's not even out yet... /end war Please tell me why the PS3 is superior sir. Please none of the obvious fanboy choices like "hurr durr free online" and "hurr durr blurayz" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSpooge Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 PS3 is the superior console PS4 is the superior console and it's not even out yet... /end war Please tell me why the PS3 is superior sir. Please none of the obvious fanboy choices like "hurr durr free online" and "hurr durr blurayz" Ah Sony Fanboys! The pinnacle of arrogant kids who feel powerful when they feel the need to describe there feelings. Can't all consoles just, get along? I mean.. Come on... Come on? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GourangaMaster Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Quit being a sh*t stirrer Lotus. @Erebos Its more than that mate. There is an obvious reso difference. Look at the image below and honestly tell me you cant see how cripser and defined the 360 shot is. Look at the creases on john marstons clothing and the main st sign. The differences are plain as day. Before anyone feels the need to bring up console war sh*t, stop right there because i own a ps3 and often play on my friends 360. I give a rats ass about which console is better but am just showing this example because i can objectively see a quality disparity in RDR. In saying that im hoping this does not happen again with GTAV. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Quit being a sh*t stirrer Lotus. @Erebos Its more than that mate. There is an obvious reso difference. Look at the image below and honestly tell me you cant see how cripser and defined the 360 shot is. Look at the creases on john marstons clothing and the main st sign. The differences are plain as day. Before anyone feels the need to bring up console war sh*t, stop right there because i own a ps3 and often play on my friends 360. I give a rats ass about which console is better but am just showing this example because i can objectively see a quality disparity in RDR. In saying that im hoping this does not happen again with GTAV. Can you post a link to the pic? My ipad isn't making the picture visible. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LotusRIP Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 (edited) Nice analysis but hey... I bet you can't even hear a difference between mp3 and wav But I can see what Dan Houser is saying. The PS3 anti aliasing does look a whole lot better in that RDR screenshot. The Xbox screen looks like somebody put it through photoshop and added a Sharpen filter... perhaps an xbox fan made that comparison and did this exact thing. But it looks too grainy and sharp and angular... I prefer the smoother look on PS3 personally. Graphics can come down to taste... But why not throw in an extra bluray player? And free online multiplayer? Bam - there's your winning console. To choose a console that does the exact same thing but minus these two huge features is a f*cking stupid mistake... Would you rather an amazing console that plays games. Or an amazing console that plays games, blurays, and multiplayer is free. The online community started out small for sure, but by now, it's on the same level as Xbox minus that crappy subscription fees and whatever other fees Microbucks will throw at you in the next gen. Edited June 3, 2013 by LotusRIP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyz Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Quit being a sh*t stirrer Lotus. @Erebos Its more than that mate. There is an obvious reso difference. Look at the image below and honestly tell me you cant see how cripser and defined the 360 shot is. Look at the creases on john marstons clothing and the main st sign. The differences are plain as day. Before anyone feels the need to bring up console war sh*t, stop right there because i own a ps3 and often play on my friends 360. I give a rats ass about which console is better but am just showing this example because i can objectively see a quality disparity in RDR. In saying that im hoping this does not happen again with GTAV. I see no difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSpooge Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Quit being a sh*t stirrer Lotus. @Erebos Its more than that mate. There is an obvious reso difference. Look at the image below and honestly tell me you cant see how cripser and defined the 360 shot is. Look at the creases on john marstons clothing and the main st sign. The differences are plain as day. Before anyone feels the need to bring up console war sh*t, stop right there because i own a ps3 and often play on my friends 360. I give a rats ass about which console is better but am just showing this example because i can objectively see a quality disparity in RDR. In saying that im hoping this does not happen again with GTAV. Can you post a link to the pic? My ipad isn't making the picture visible. I don't think the Picture is working since it ain't working on my PC either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GourangaMaster Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 (edited) here man. sorry to others for the large image. EDIT: Link appears to be cockblocking image linking so here it is. As i said the most immediate details to look at are the sign and the creases in the clothing, both of which are clear in the 360 shot, blurred in the ps3 one. Edited June 3, 2013 by GourangaMaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 It says I don't have permission. This is a good comparison too http://m.neogaf.com/showpost.php?p=21355476&postcount=704 You can clearly see a lot of details are missing on the PS3 due to lack of RAM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyz Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 My opinion, PS3 looks better. (look at the trees) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSpooge Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 It says I don't have permission. This is a good comparison too http://m.neogaf.com/showpost.php?p=21355476&postcount=704 You can clearly see a lot of details are missing on the PS3 due to lack of RAM. Is it just me or are all those pictures way to blurry to even make a comparison? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyz Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 (edited) It says I don't have permission. This is a good comparison too http://m.neogaf.com/showpost.php?p=21355476&postcount=704 You can clearly see a lot of details are missing on the PS3 due to lack of RAM. They look the same! @MrSpooge I know, they are really blurry! Edited June 3, 2013 by dyz Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GourangaMaster Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 @mr spooge and others - this is clearest one ive seen. Easy to see the detail in the clothing,sign and even walls of building in the background. much clearer in the 360. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
j.hunt Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 PC version looks better oh wait Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 It says I don't have permission. This is a good comparison too http://m.neogaf.com/showpost.php?p=21355476&postcount=704 You can clearly see a lot of details are missing on the PS3 due to lack of RAM. The look the same! Surely you jest? Like I said before, it's only the smaller details like the grass. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LotusRIP Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Quit being a sh*t stirrer Lotus. @Erebos Its more than that mate. There is an obvious reso difference. Look at the image below and honestly tell me you cant see how cripser and defined the 360 shot is. Look at the creases on john marstons clothing and the main st sign. The differences are plain as day. Before anyone feels the need to bring up console war sh*t, stop right there because i own a ps3 and often play on my friends 360. I give a rats ass about which console is better but am just showing this example because i can objectively see a quality disparity in RDR. In saying that im hoping this does not happen again with GTAV. I see no difference. Honestly, I bet it's the same screenshot. An Xbox fan just applied "Increase brightness" in photoshop. And because it's brighter, people automatically feel like it's better. Like music when it's louder/loudness war. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
d3ex2 Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Yawn. This was posted back in 2011 or early 2012. If it's new then he's just saying the same as he did back then. It makes sense to release it for current gen. They are more familiar with it and there are more owners. How many people will own a PS4/XBOX1 in September? 0. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GourangaMaster Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Im really gobsmacked you guys cant see that the ps3 version is so much blurrier than the 360 which indicates a reduced reso. i mean look at the trees in dyz shot. They are a smudge on the ps3 shot. @lotus its not about brightness its about clarity. A blurred line is not the same as a clear one. I guess some people just dont have an eye for detail unfortunately. :s Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LotusRIP Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 PC version looks better oh wait Have fun staring at your 1080p Start Menu on September 17. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyz Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Quit being a sh*t stirrer Lotus. @Erebos Its more than that mate. There is an obvious reso difference. Look at the image below and honestly tell me you cant see how cripser and defined the 360 shot is. Look at the creases on john marstons clothing and the main st sign. The differences are plain as day. Before anyone feels the need to bring up console war sh*t, stop right there because i own a ps3 and often play on my friends 360. I give a rats ass about which console is better but am just showing this example because i can objectively see a quality disparity in RDR. In saying that im hoping this does not happen again with GTAV. I see no difference. Honestly, I bet it's the same screenshot. An Xbox fan just applied "Increase brightness" in photoshop. And because it's brighter, people automatically feel like it's better. Like music when it's louder/loudness war. Yeah! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MrSpooge Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 You know, I actually hope it looks better on 360 so I can post to all these PS3 Fanboys to Suck It. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Im really gobsmacked you guys cant see that the ps3 version is so much blurrier than the 360 which indicates a reduced reso. i mean look at the trees in dyz shot. They are a smudge on the ps3 shot. @lotus its not about brightness its about clarity. A blurred line is not the same as a clear one. I guess some people just dont have an eye for detail unfortunately. :s Yeah the PS3 versions is blurred you can see it on Marston's hair in the screenshot above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LotusRIP Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Im really gobsmacked you guys cant see that the ps3 version is so much blurrier than the 360 which indicates a reduced reso. i mean look at the trees in dyz shot. They are a smudge on the ps3 shot. @lotus its not about brightness its about clarity. A blurred line is not the same as a clear one. I guess some people just dont have an eye for detail unfortunately. :s Like I said, anybody could have increased sharpness in Photoshop to make the Xbox image appear "better". But you realise that smoother look is actually what makes the PS3 screen look more realistic. The Xbox one you can see that graininess on the edges of everything... makes it all just look like a bunch of chiseled polygons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GourangaMaster Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 (edited) It says I don't have permission. This is a good comparison too http://m.neogaf.com/showpost.php?p=21355476&postcount=704 You can clearly see a lot of details are missing on the PS3 due to lack of RAM. The look the same! Surely you jest? Like I said before, it's only the smaller details like the grass. But thats a part of it erebos. The grass is most noticable because it is the most abundant object repeated in RDR. Examine that shot i posted and honestly tell me you cant see the 360 is clearer than the ps3 shot. as i said the main st sign, the house in the background and the creases in the clothing give it away. oh well i guess its a prefernce thing by the looks of it. I presonally like clean clear images, i dont like soft lines because on a large tv it looks bad and gives me a headache.. Edited June 3, 2013 by GourangaMaster Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyz Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Im really gobsmacked you guys cant see that the ps3 version is so much blurrier than the 360 which indicates a reduced reso. i mean look at the trees in dyz shot. They are a smudge on the ps3 shot. @lotus its not about brightness its about clarity. A blurred line is not the same as a clear one. I guess some people just dont have an eye for detail unfortunately. :s I prefer blurriness, on the clear version you can see the analysing more and it just looks bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dyz Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Im really gobsmacked you guys cant see that the ps3 version is so much blurrier than the 360 which indicates a reduced reso. i mean look at the trees in dyz shot. They are a smudge on the ps3 shot. @lotus its not about brightness its about clarity. A blurred line is not the same as a clear one. I guess some people just dont have an eye for detail unfortunately. :s Like I said, anybody could have increased sharpness in Photoshop to make the Xbox image appear "better". But you realise that smoother look is actually what makes the PS3 screen look more realistic. The Xbox one you can see that graininess on the edges of everything... makes it all just look like a bunch of chiseled polygons. It is funny how we think the same thing haha (maybe because we are right) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mista J Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Im really gobsmacked you guys cant see that the ps3 version is so much blurrier than the 360 which indicates a reduced reso. i mean look at the trees in dyz shot. They are a smudge on the ps3 shot. @lotus its not about brightness its about clarity. A blurred line is not the same as a clear one. I guess some people just dont have an eye for detail unfortunately. :s I prefer blurriness, on the clear version you can see the analysing more and it just looks bad. Not to be mean but you're clearly deluded. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GourangaMaster Posted June 3, 2013 Share Posted June 3, 2013 Im really gobsmacked you guys cant see that the ps3 version is so much blurrier than the 360 which indicates a reduced reso. i mean look at the trees in dyz shot. They are a smudge on the ps3 shot. @lotus its not about brightness its about clarity. A blurred line is not the same as a clear one. I guess some people just dont have an eye for detail unfortunately. :s Like I said, anybody could have increased sharpness in Photoshop to make the Xbox image appear "better". But you realise that smoother look is actually what makes the PS3 screen look more realistic. The Xbox one you can see that graininess on the edges of everything... makes it all just look like a bunch of chiseled polygons. It is funny how we think the same thing haha (maybe because we are right) It doesnt mean your right, it just means you have similar views. You both prefer a soft look as it tends to hide AA while i prefer clearer gfx because imo when upscaled it looks poor. There is no right or wrong on personal preference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts