Ps3104 Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Is it going to be slow maybe the machine cant take it???? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonp92 Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 How would we know? The performance will be atleast 30 fps, but it could very well slow down in hectic moments. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
philley Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Yes, it will be slow,... I guess appr. 15-18 fps. R* will release a game that does not work properly,... Please close this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graven Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Don't use the slow-mo feature if You don't want it to be slow. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thugzmansion Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 This thread again huh? Developers LEARN how to get MORE out of a console over the lifetime. People say GTA IV pushed consoles to the limit? HAHA, nooo, GTA IV ran on a sh*tty engine that was only Xbox 360 focused at the time. It's been FIVE YEARS since we last saw a GTA Game on a console, that's HALF A DECADE. Compare GTA3 to San Andreas, both PS2 games, both amazingly different, that was only a three year difference. Rockstar have plowed a crap ton of money into RAGE to the point where Max Payne 3 really shown off what it can do (especially on PS3 and PC). Unlike GTA IV, the Max Payne 3 version of RAGE ran at full 1280x720p on BOTH consoles, used newer AA methods (instead of the outdated QxAA blur that GTA IV on PS3 suffered with) and hosted a whole heap of extra grap[hical options on the PC version. The Max Payne 3 version of RAGE was greatly enhanced to deal with stress and performance issues, both console versions ran safely around 30fps easily even hitting 35 and 40 at times, the PC version also ran smooth as butter compared to GTA IV, despite it using multiple forms of AA, SSAO, filters and effects, etc. Team Bondi did NOT use RAGE for L.A.Noire, they used an edited version of an existing engine and then customised it, initially, for PS3, the game performed best on the PS3, I'm sure Team Bondi would have also shared some knowledge with Rockstar on what tweaks they made to make the engine perform so well on the PS3. Look at other games, come on, seriously, compare titles from 2007 and early 2008 to titles released now, they get soo much more out of the hardware now, if that's what other companies can do, do you seriously think Rockstar Games would skimp out now? GTA V is going to end this gen with a bang, they're going to use this knowledge and work and make sure GTA V looks great, performs great and is just overall great NO MATTER WHAT PLATFORM IT'S ON. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
liasha Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 haha that is your consoles )) i,m waiting for pc gtx 680 16gbram i7 3820 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kudoboi Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 haha that is your consoles )) i,m waiting for pc gtx 680 16gbram i7 3820 yea wait 6 months and get spoiled by the entire story while ur at it. This is the reason why console gamers hate PC gamers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arran B Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 haha that is your consoles )) i,m waiting for pc gtx 680 16gbram i7 3820 Yeah, hope you have fun waiting for that while us people with consoles enjoy raping the f*ck out of V. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ps3104 Posted May 24, 2013 Author Share Posted May 24, 2013 then why did they say it would be released for ps3 if its going to be slow for that console? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graven Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 haha that is your consoles )) i,m waiting for pc gtx 680 16gbram i7 3820 whooaaa..all console players time to kneel down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Polish_Trucker Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Is it going to be slow maybe the machine cant take it???? Why would rockstar publish it then if it was slow..? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zeta87 Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Well...30 fps is the minimum for a smooth experience, i guess... i don't know if you felt GTA IV smooth on consoles, but 30 fps on PC was pretty bad...even 40 online...50 or more were fine by me... but because not everyone was forced to play at 30 fps and i actually felt a difference playing with 50 fps or more, instead of 30. I mean, online it made a huge difference for me: 50+ fps = 100 times better than 30 fps. On console: everyone forced to 30 fps... no advantage for someone. Sorry for my my english ( again ). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solofme Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Is it going to be slow maybe the machine cant take it???? Why would rockstar publish it then if it was slow..? For tha MONEYZ!!! No seriously it will be fine, I don't expect it to perform worse than IV; which I was ok with. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fuzzknuckles Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Is it going to be slow maybe the machine cant take it???? Not sure if trolling... Actually, totally sure you are. Signatures are dumb anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
simonp92 Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Is it going to be slow maybe the machine cant take it???? Why would rockstar publish it then if it was slow..? I don't know. Bethesda shouldn't really have released Skyrim for the PS3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
FutoDriver Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 haha that is your consoles )) i,m waiting for pc gtx 680 16gbram i7 3820 yea wait 6 months and get spoiled by the entire story while ur at it. This is the reason why console gamers hate PC gamers Hate? You can't even form a proper reason. "Yeah! I hate you for being patient, and trying to avoid the storylines being ruined for you!" DERP! Back on topic, Rockstar obviously feel confident enough to show off the PS3 version this time. Yes, it's going to drop frames when there's a lot of action on screen, it's never going to run at a constant frame rate of 30FPS. Memory constraints will also mean cars/peds appearing out of no where, and then vanishing again as you turn round. Go into the game expecting this sort of thing, you'll enhance your enjoyment of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mumbomum Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 haha that is your consoles )) i,m waiting for pc gtx 680 16gbram i7 3820 you'll also be waiting for gta v on pc for a very f*cking long time. i hate people who brag... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Don_Corleone Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 It will work fine, relax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freezer89 Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 haha that is your consoles )) i,m waiting for pc gtx 680 16gbram i7 3820 Thank you for starting the usual war and making us PC gamers look bad. Oh wait, we are already being hated by them. I don't see the point of this topic anyways. And why should only the PS3 suffer? Where is 360? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KemKel Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 This thread again huh? Developers LEARN how to get MORE out of a console over the lifetime. People say GTA IV pushed consoles to the limit? HAHA, nooo, GTA IV ran on a sh*tty engine that was only Xbox 360 focused at the time. It's been FIVE YEARS since we last saw a GTA Game on a console, that's HALF A DECADE. Compare GTA3 to San Andreas, both PS2 games, both amazingly different, that was only a three year difference. Rockstar have plowed a crap ton of money into RAGE to the point where Max Payne 3 really shown off what it can do (especially on PS3 and PC). Unlike GTA IV, the Max Payne 3 version of RAGE ran at full 1280x720p on BOTH consoles, used newer AA methods (instead of the outdated QxAA blur that GTA IV on PS3 suffered with) and hosted a whole heap of extra grap[hical options on the PC version. The Max Payne 3 version of RAGE was greatly enhanced to deal with stress and performance issues, both console versions ran safely around 30fps easily even hitting 35 and 40 at times, the PC version also ran smooth as butter compared to GTA IV, despite it using multiple forms of AA, SSAO, filters and effects, etc. Team Bondi did NOT use RAGE for L.A.Noire, they used an edited version of an existing engine and then customised it, initially, for PS3, the game performed best on the PS3, I'm sure Team Bondi would have also shared some knowledge with Rockstar on what tweaks they made to make the engine perform so well on the PS3. Look at other games, come on, seriously, compare titles from 2007 and early 2008 to titles released now, they get soo much more out of the hardware now, if that's what other companies can do, do you seriously think Rockstar Games would skimp out now? GTA V is going to end this gen with a bang, they're going to use this knowledge and work and make sure GTA V looks great, performs great and is just overall great NO MATTER WHAT PLATFORM IT'S ON. F*ck yeah, thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
heynow Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 GTA IV ran terribly on both 360 and PS3. Game wasnt exactly a looker. I think it actually ran a little better on PS3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
shadyslady Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Is it going to be slow maybe the machine cant take it???? It'll be like bullet time. The whole game. Nice join date and topic, troll. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lukijs Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 haha that is your consoles )) i,m waiting for pc gtx 680 16gbram i7 3820 Your rig will be outdated already when game releases,deal with it ,even if it releases for PC lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
solofme Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 GTA IV ran terribly on both 360 and PS3. Game wasnt exactly a looker.I think it actually ran a little better on PS3 It didn't ran terribly. I played IV on Xbox, PS3 and PC and the only version that ran considerably better was the PC (but that is logical). It that had performance drops and sometimes it was annoying but not the worst and very playable. R* has now a lot more knowledge on making games for this gen because they have done some experience with RDR, MP and LA Noire. So V will be fine Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Omarock Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 lol why console players are so sensitive when someone mention pc? "oh have fun waiting 6 months for the game" yeah I waited 2 years since gta v was announced I can wait another 6 months to get the definitive version of the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AuSsIeThUnDeR36 Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 GTA V will be the bees knees on the Ps3 they are using all of the consoles power! This is the problem all of yall comparing V To IV Well remember this of the Ps2 - San Andreas - Biggest map ever with the most missions and side missions at 30 fps and ALL of this operated with Ps2 now that's amazing. So with the Ps3 imagine the possibilities! It will be running smooth at 60 fps ok no problems. You can agree with me PREPARE TO BE BLOWN AWAY or not if you want - Ive got my drink on yall \_/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tupiz Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 Huh? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ed72o Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 I don't know. Bethesda shouldn't really have released Skyrim for the PS3. Actually it was the PS3's fault for the lag Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tupiz Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 I don't know. Bethesda shouldn't really have released Skyrim for the PS3. Actually it was the PS3's fault for the lag Aand that was because lazy developers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Memphys Posted May 24, 2013 Share Posted May 24, 2013 V's performance will be better than IV on PS3 but not as good as on X360. IV was postponed because of weak performance on PS3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now