Speed cameras should be introduced

[RichyB]

Maybe just a couple on long straight roads. Think about it, the game will need time to render the amazing map, and speed cameras are a less annoying way of slowing you down than great big road blocks or toll bridges like in GTA IV.

 

Sure, many people wont slow down and that's their choice, they get a small fine (no cops) and the map may not render fast enough, that's their punishment.

[yakprince]

Hell nah, I hated that even in SA-MP rp servers.

[E•MO•TION]

No.

[RichyB]

You're saying no but giving no reasons.

 

Is it more fun to be forcefully stopped at a toll bridge and get cops after you if you drive through without paying? Or be slowed down by a camera that will fine you a small amount if you go too fast?

 

You can't just drive as fast as you like everywhere in the game due to a phenomenon known as rendering and there has to be solutions that are less detrimental to the enjoyment of the game.

[MuXu96]

Would be just like the cops in Mafia 2, I hated it, I want to speed in open world games when I want to speed, would suck to get a star for it.

Would be quite alright if you just had to pay something I guess. but still, I'd rather not have this in the game^^

[wwinterj]

No because it would be pointless just like toll bridges and is just putting restrictions in place that don't need to be there. I always just smashed through those toll bridges.

[MuXu96]

yeah, if they do smth they should do moving bridges like the bridge in london (yeah I really don't know the name )

So you could at least still jump over it^^

[E•MO•TION]

You're saying no but giving no reasons.

 

Is it more fun to be forcefully stopped at a toll bridge and get cops after you if you drive through without paying? Or be slowed down by a camera that will fine you a small amount if you go too fast?

 

You can't just drive as fast as you like everywhere in the game due to a phenomenon known as rendering and there has to be solutions that are less detrimental to the enjoyment of the game.

I drove as fast as I could in IV and rendering was usually fine.

 

Come on now, these consoles have been around for ages. You don't think R* hasn't figured out how to minimize rendering issues by now?

[Racecarlock]

You're saying no but giving no reasons.

 

Is it more fun to be forcefully stopped at a toll bridge and get cops after you if you drive through without paying? Or be slowed down by a camera that will fine you a small amount if you go too fast?

 

You can't just drive as fast as you like everywhere in the game due to a phenomenon known as rendering and there has to be solutions that are less detrimental to the enjoyment of the game.

That has to be the worst reasoning ever. Being fined for speeding is just as bad as toll booths. Hell, it's worse. It's not fun to get speeding tickets from speed cameras.

 

I should not be punished for driving fast like I want to. That is complete bullsh*t.

[RichyB]

You're saying no but giving no reasons.

 

Is it more fun to be forcefully stopped at a toll bridge and get cops after you if you drive through without paying? Or be slowed down by a camera that will fine you a small amount if you go too fast?

 

You can't just drive as fast as you like everywhere in the game due to a phenomenon known as rendering and there has to be solutions that are less detrimental to the enjoyment of the game.

That has to be the worst reasoning ever. Being fined for speeding is just as bad as toll booths. Hell, it's worse. It's not fun to get speeding tickets from speed cameras.

 

I should not be punished for driving fast like I want to. That is complete bullsh*t.

You're a complete and utter f*cking moron.

 

As I keep saying, GTA V, like GTA IV will have rendering issues. It will probably have bigger rendering issues than IV on account of the size of the game.

 

They can't 'figure out' the issue until better hardware is available.

 

You're a f*cking moron because devices to slow you down, WILL, be in the game. Now what I'm suggesting is, do you want them to be forced or not?

 

I don't want to be made to slow down, of course not, which is why I hated the toll booths, which is why I hated the cranes in the city. The latter, you had no option but to slow down.

 

Speed camera, you slow down if you want, if you don't then nothing happens but a small fine. It's either that or they bring back toll booths and you get a wanted star if you don't stop.

 

You're not thinking about the alternatives, you don't understand that Rockstar will slow you down to give the game time to render. I know you don't like that but it's a fact and you need to get over it. And if you don't have the intelligence to COMPREHEND this then go away from my thread.

[Killerdude]

Why not photo-radar as a collectible type thing, Where you have to trip 100 Photo-radar stations all around the game, Getting them all unlcoks a unique police vehicle at all the safehouses.

[Racecarlock]

You're saying no but giving no reasons.

 

Is it more fun to be forcefully stopped at a toll bridge and get cops after you if you drive through without paying? Or be slowed down by a camera that will fine you a small amount if you go too fast?

 

You can't just drive as fast as you like everywhere in the game due to a phenomenon known as rendering and there has to be solutions that are less detrimental to the enjoyment of the game.

That has to be the worst reasoning ever. Being fined for speeding is just as bad as toll booths. Hell, it's worse. It's not fun to get speeding tickets from speed cameras.

 

I should not be punished for driving fast like I want to. That is complete bullsh*t.

You're a complete and utter f*cking moron.

 

As I keep saying, GTA V, like GTA IV will have rendering issues. It will probably have bigger rendering issues than IV on account of the size of the game.

 

They can't 'figure out' the issue until better hardware is available.

 

You're a f*cking moron because devices to slow you down, WILL, be in the game. Now what I'm suggesting is, do you want them to be forced or not?

 

I don't want to be made to slow down, of course not, which is why I hated the toll booths, which is why I hated the cranes in the city. The latter, you had no option but to slow down.

 

Speed camera, you slow down if you want, if you don't then nothing happens but a small fine. It's either that or they bring back toll booths and you get a wanted star if you don't stop.

 

You're not thinking about the alternatives, you don't understand that Rockstar will slow you down to give the game time to render. I know you don't like that but it's a fact and you need to get over it. And if you don't have the intelligence to COMPREHEND this then go away from my thread.

I get rendering stuff, no one likes pop-in, but traffic laws and speed cameras are DEFINITELY the wrong way to do it.

 

Also, it sounds as if this fine will be unavoidable, while the police are avoidable. That sounds more forced than anything.

[Bantri]

That sounds like a hassle. I don't want to lose all my money free roaming. I want to speed damn it. Laws are for real life.

[iNero]

I had no probs in GTA4 with the map when driving full speed. Some little textures had a very small delay but thats it. I dont want to get slowed down at all. These long straight roads we have seen is what I missed in IV. Just listen to ( hopefully customizable) soundtrack and drive full speed with the current car physics and damage visuals across the highways in the desert and countryside. That will be awesome. I just hope the framerate doesnt go down when doing that...

[Red Hat]

Nah..it would be weird for me.

[Rock Howard]

They won't be. Intoduced, that is. Because the addition of speed cameras would add nothing whatsoever to the gameplay and enjoyment of the game.

[Miss Darko]

Uhhh, OP. The game streams in detail in real-time. They don't have to slow you down to make it happen.

 

This reasoning doesn't even make sense. The player can easily speed through the toll booths at any time, so it's hardly an obstacle that will allow the game to load things better. The game's engine does this stuff on its own. It might not be perfect, but I highly doubt that's why R* put them in, because if it was, we wouldn't have a choice.

[Fail_At_GTA]

Just a really bad idea. I don't need to give a reason as everyone has done that already.

[MrcTOtheJ]

You're saying no but giving no reasons.

 

Is it more fun to be forcefully stopped at a toll bridge and get cops after you if you drive through without paying? Or be slowed down by a camera that will fine you a small amount if you go too fast?

 

You can't just drive as fast as you like everywhere in the game due to a phenomenon known as rendering and there has to be solutions that are less detrimental to the enjoyment of the game.

I drove as fast as I could in IV and rendering was usually fine.

 

Come on now, these consoles have been around for ages. You don't think R* hasn't figured out how to minimize rendering issues by now?

I'm with this guy, I drove like a bat out of hell most of the time in GTAIV, and slamed though Toll Booths like they were nothing at all, and had little to no rendering issues ever.

 

If speed cameras make it in they should work like Need For Speed Most Wanted (2012) just to tell me how fast I blew by that f*cker and nothing more really. Combine this with Killerdude8's idea and we have one hell of a fun collectable IMO.

[ugotsmoked]

Lets just make it so that the fastest car goes 55 mph

[MizzouRah16]

You're a speed camera.

[Myrskalle]

Yeah, and lets put a waiting period on buying guns as well; so the game has time to render.

[RichyB]

Yeah, and lets put a waiting period on buying guns as well; so the game has time to render.

How many guns do you buy while driving at 90mph down a straight road? You f*cking numbskull.

[aaronimpact]

No.

 

Because it's stupid and pointless. GTA has always been about the driving.

[TotesMagotes]

Edited May 11, 2013 by DirtyHarry44

[Kiffster]

Lol NO!

[thugzmansion]

Nah it just doesn't fit gta

[BlackNoise]

You're a complete and utter f*cking moron.

 

As I keep saying, GTA V, like GTA IV will have rendering issues. It will probably have bigger rendering issues than IV on account of the size of the game.

 

They can't 'figure out' the issue until better hardware is available.

 

You're a f*cking moron because devices to slow you down, WILL, be in the game. Now what I'm suggesting is, do you want them to be forced or not?

 

I don't want to be made to slow down, of course not, which is why I hated the toll booths, which is why I hated the cranes in the city. The latter, you had no option but to slow down.

 

Speed camera, you slow down if you want, if you don't then nothing happens but a small fine. It's either that or they bring back toll booths and you get a wanted star if you don't stop.

 

You're not thinking about the alternatives, you don't understand that Rockstar will slow you down to give the game time to render. I know you don't like that but it's a fact and you need to get over it. And if you don't have the intelligence to COMPREHEND this then go away from my thread.

So you just decided that R*'s first current gen open world game back in 2008 is the starting point of your logic?

 

Maybe you shouldn't call anybody a " complete and utter f*cking moron" until you learn what optimization is.

[satanicaleviathan]

You're saying no but giving no reasons.

 

Is it more fun to be forcefully stopped at a toll bridge and get cops after you if you drive through without paying? Or be slowed down by a camera that will fine you a small amount if you go too fast?

 

You can't just drive as fast as you like everywhere in the game due to a phenomenon known as rendering and there has to be solutions that are less detrimental to the enjoyment of the game.

That has to be the worst reasoning ever. Being fined for speeding is just as bad as toll booths. Hell, it's worse. It's not fun to get speeding tickets from speed cameras.

 

I should not be punished for driving fast like I want to. That is complete bullsh*t.

You're a complete and utter f*cking moron.

 

As I keep saying, GTA V, like GTA IV will have rendering issues. It will probably have bigger rendering issues than IV on account of the size of the game.

 

They can't 'figure out' the issue until better hardware is available.

 

You're a f*cking moron because devices to slow you down, WILL, be in the game. Now what I'm suggesting is, do you want them to be forced or not?

 

I don't want to be made to slow down, of course not, which is why I hated the toll booths, which is why I hated the cranes in the city. The latter, you had no option but to slow down.

 

Speed camera, you slow down if you want, if you don't then nothing happens but a small fine. It's either that or they bring back toll booths and you get a wanted star if you don't stop.

 

You're not thinking about the alternatives, you don't understand that Rockstar will slow you down to give the game time to render. I know you don't like that but it's a fact and you need to get over it. And if you don't have the intelligence to COMPREHEND this then go away from my thread.

i get why you're so upset, its only because you have no idea what you're talking about.

/

when you say cranes, do you mean the block long construction sites? because those weren't there to slow you down, they were there because in the states, every major us city usually has construction. and also, you get to blow one up in tbogt

 

and like others have said, you didn't have to stop for those tollbooths, they were there because those bridges and tunnels have real life counterpart with... you guessed it... toll booths.

 

not like they could even keep up through those areas 90% of the time.

 

 

rendering has to do with code, not a pixelated illusion of driving fast.

 

 

 

so uh... get it together OP.

[I<3GTAV]

I've never encountered any rendering issues with any Rockstar products. You're over exaggerating, Rockstar has been doing this for years, they know what they're doing.