Can this end the LS is small argument?

[Official General]

 

All I am saying is look how far away the city is from LAX. That, and we can't even see the southern mountains that surround the ghetto.

Nope, sorry still tells me nothing to counter my viewpoint. I still think that judging from the screenshots, LS just don't look like it's very big.

 

@ CalgaryJay

 

That was the whole point in the first place. We know downtown LA is not that big, LA is mostly massive urban sprawl. LS in GTA V does not appear to reflect that big urban sprawl seen in real-life LA, and that is why LS looks not so big to some of us.

Edited May 9, 2013 by Official General

[CalgaryJay]

Ah, I only read the first few posts. We will see I guess, I still think it'll be huge.

 

Besides, if it is small, look at the bright side: with a map 3.5 times the size of RDR, if LS really is small (which I really doubt, but for argument's sake let's run with it), then there's a very good chance another large city (SF? LV? SD? Phoenix/Tucson?) could make an appearance. No way that over 90% of the GTA V map is just going to be countryside and rural highways.

Edited May 9, 2013 by CalgaryJay