Would you rather have LS, LV and SF

[Official General]

I think the countryside guaranteed us a lot of fun. It will be only LS as city. Still, i am a little bit disappointed about no 2nd city in the map. (San Diego, Las Vegas, San Francisco, Tijuana). SF in SA was bad, but i think if they made the city this time for the 2nd time, it will be another story. It will be much better.

Los Santos is great, but I still wish we had one more city.

 

The countryside and wilderness in GTA V just looks stunning, and with added wildlife being such a massive bonus. For that reason, I really believe Rockstar should have at least included San Fierro in this game as the next major city. They could have done SF much better and more detailed, and the many miles of countryside and wilderness, (along with wildlife) between Los Santos and San Fierro would have made the road journeys between two cities very exciting and interesting.

 

Now imagine San Andreas had wildlife and much better wilderness areas, those long road trips from LS to SF and LV would have been much more of an experience.

[rare.steak]

Oh man another idiot. Who the hell is going to enjoy 3 vastly different cities crammed together with nothing to separate them in between? Really, just one look at the V section and you can see a dozen usernames of idiots who think they've come up with a smart topic.

[Official General]

 

Oh man another idiot. Who the hell is going to enjoy 3 vastly different cities crammed together with nothing to separate them in between? Really, just one look at the V section and you can see a dozen usernames of idiots who think they've come up with a smart topic.

Lool ha ha, but you are definitely right

 

I tried to point this out to the OP and explain to him that his discussion topic made no sense at all, but he just told me to chill and said I was overreacting.

 

Now people have begun to laugh and ridicule him and his topic.

[rare.steak]

 

Oh man another idiot. Who the hell is going to enjoy 3 vastly different cities crammed together with nothing to separate them in between? Really, just one look at the V section and you can see a dozen usernames of idiots who think they've come up with a smart topic.

Lool ha ha, but you are definitely right

 

I tried to point this out to the OP and explain to him that his discussion topic made no sense at all, but he just told me to chill and said I was overreacting.

 

Now people have begun to laugh and ridicule him and his topic.

I just went and read what he said about invisible walls and limited roads. Like having a countryside rendered just as a background visual that you cannot set foot on.

 

He doesn't even realise that just takes away any balance in his poll options, when one of them means ruining the key elements of GTA that is being fully explorable.

 

I hope this guy (the op) quits school. "Jeez". What a waste of his parents' money and educational resources. Maybe find a job at a supermarket or a warehouse, op. This Dutch clearly didn't stick to just the hash, and went on to do too much drugs for his own good.

[Official General]

I hope this guy (the op) quits school. "Jeez". What a waste of his parents' money and educational resources. Maybe find a job at a supermarket or a warehouse, op. This Dutch clearly didn't stick to just the hash, and went on to do too much drugs for his own good.

HA HA HA HA HA HA !! LOOOOOOL !!

 

I'm in major stitches right now