iNero Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Just red the Kotaku Preview. At the end of the Preview he said that the game he saw didnt look as good as the trailers. Also said the game wasnt as sharp as in the trailers. He suggested that R* captured it from a PC to get better visuals. He even said that after asking the R* guy twice and he said they capture their trailers always on the in-game engine with a mix of cutscenes and gameplay with different camera angles. But still the Kotaku guy said it did not look as good as in the trailers. I KNOW GTA IS NOT ABOUT GRAPHICS!!! But imo in the Trailers it looked pretty good but if its true that it isnt that sharp ( it wasnt that sharp in the trailers either) Im a bit worried tbh. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Capricornus Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Did they also say that the game still isn't finished yet? Because, you know, there are still some months left to iron these things out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RipGore Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Maybe it will get better. Its still considered at beta mode to this day Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Liberty2k7 Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 It couldn't have been recorded from PC, they said the game was shown on Dev consoles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
StockLoc Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Just red the Kotaku Preview. At the end of the Preview he said that the game he saw didnt look as good as the trailers. Also said the game wasnt as sharp as in the trailers. He suggested that R* captured it from a PC to get better visuals. He even said that after asking the R* guy twice and he said they capture their trailers always on the in-game engine with a mix of cutscenes and gameplay with different camera angles. But still the Kotaku guy said it did not look as good as in the trailers. I KNOW GTA IS NOT ABOUT GRAPHICS!!! But imo in the Trailers it looked pretty good but if its true that it isnt that sharp ( it wasnt that sharp in the trailers either) Im a bit worried tbh. I've also noticed that there are less peds in GTA IV Xbox 360 than there are in the PC version. I counted about two or three pedestrians with two cars every 10 feet or so on the Xbox 360 version which is NOTHING. Also the draw distance is horrible on the consoles. You literally won't see people 10 metres away. Either way, I don't care - it's WAY better than no GTA V at all. -Stock Loc Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raavi Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Everytime I read a topic like this I imagine a whale in a bathtub. – overeducated wonk who fetishises compromise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bomberlegend Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 And? Your point being? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNero Posted May 3, 2013 Author Share Posted May 3, 2013 Maybe it will get better. Its still considered at beta mode to this day Another weird thing: German "GamesAktuell" said that the aliasing was siginficantly less than in demo 1 and also there was almost no stuttering. German "GamePro" says that the game has VERY VERY strong aliasing and some pretty nasty texture loadingg delays. Doesnt aound good at all Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nickmajfc Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 CVG said it's brilliant, and they are the only good reviewers out there today. IGN and the others suck. I only trust CVG! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNero Posted May 3, 2013 Author Share Posted May 3, 2013 CVG said it's brilliant, and they are the only good reviewers out there today. IGN and the others suck. I only trust CVG! When a person says that theres stronv aliasing and texture loading delay you can most of the time see it coming true ( Aliasing is one of the wirst things that can happen cause it can totally destroy the flair with a not-clean look like BF3 on consoles has I would be fine with RDR aliasing ( although it had 2xAA on xbox) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil ski Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 "GTA V Graphics 2/10" "Would not play" -IGN Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeH1989 Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Whos to say it wasnt an earlier build for the demo..... geez and ign are going downhill for me ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Habs Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 It looks pretty good & the graphics are just fine... I just don't understand why the textures of the trees/grass/ect are that bad since the 1st GTA but anyway who cares about trees in a shooting/driving game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Majestic123 Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Ya I remember when Grand theft auto Iv dropped the day time graphics actually shocked me at how bad they looked compared to the trailers. The trees looked blurry and the shadows were literally crooked. I think the attention to details will make up for the blurriness and bad anti-liaising in V Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNero Posted May 3, 2013 Author Share Posted May 3, 2013 Ya I remember when Grand theft auto Iv dropped the day time graphics actually shocked me at how bad they looked compared to the trailers. The trees looked blurry and the shadows were literally crooked. I think the attention to details will make up for the blurriness and bad anti-liaising in V Imo the IV trailers didnt look better than the actual game. Trees and stuff were blurry even in the trailers. But imo aliasing and blurriness destroy the details and dont make them up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
skillz7855 Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Rockstar also said they showed him a early built of the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wooser Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 It looks pretty good & the graphics are just fine... I just don't understand why the textures of the trees/grass/ect are that bad since the 1st GTA but anyway who cares about trees in a shooting/driving game. Trees were fine in IV, I didn't really notice them. Only when an enemy is hiding behind them or the skinniest tree stops an APC at full speed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNero Posted May 3, 2013 Author Share Posted May 3, 2013 The only thing they need to say to make me calm is to say that it is on par with RDR ( the graphics) Then I would be happy. But as I just did read in another thread, IGN even said it looks like GTA4 with more shine and stuff Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
alucard2d Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 red dead redemption looked amazing, LA Noire even better, Max Payne excellent....im sure I will be satisfied with the graphics on my PS3 and 42" LED Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LeeH1989 Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Rockstar also said they showed him a early built of the game Well there we go people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Showstopper 26 Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Didn't CVG say it looked amazing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lelouch The Zero Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 TBH I would be satisfied if the Graphics were exactly like IV. Good enough for me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cilogy Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 IGN wants to complain because they like the attention, or their expectations are just ridiculously high. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CalgaryJay Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 German "GamePro" says that the game has VERY VERY strong aliasing and some pretty nasty texture loadingg delays. Doesnt aound good at all Hmm, if only they had a few more months to work out the kinks.. Frankly when does a game ever look as good as the previews? Sports games are especially notorious for this, for example. In all the hype of next gen, people need to check themselves and remember for all its hype, GTA V is still very much a current gen game, and will have its visual limitations, like any current gen game. In terms of graphics, I'm expecting it to look like a slightly better/sharper RDR. If that's the case, I'm satisfied. I remember back in 2010, graphics sluts saying it looked like junk. I don't care what those idiots think, that game was beautiful. So will GTA V. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNero Posted May 3, 2013 Author Share Posted May 3, 2013 Didn't CVG say it looked amazing? Seems like everyone has different opinion on it. Most of the time the vuys with the negatives are right After RDR and MP3 ( although its an action shooter) it would be a huge step back if it really looks like gta4 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chekoloco Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 JEEEESUUUUUSSSS!!!! GTA isn´t about graphics!!!! Lock this thread! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johan Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Did they also say that the game still isn't finished yet? Because, you know, there are still some months left to iron these things out. They did say that actually Most likely it'll look 100x better than what they saw in September. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
omer19992010 Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 Ign need to remember the Game is still in Devolopment. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distrom Posted May 3, 2013 Share Posted May 3, 2013 That demo was showed to them before the trailers came, and probably an older build of the game, but we can´t say anything about graphics right now. @omer19992010 IGN also has to know that this isn't a CoD game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNero Posted May 3, 2013 Author Share Posted May 3, 2013 German "GamePro" says that the game has VERY VERY strong aliasing and some pretty nasty texture loadingg delays. Doesnt aound good at all Hmm, if only they had a few more months to work out the kinks.. Frankly when does a game ever look as good as the previews? Sports games are especially notorious for this, for example. In all the hype of next gen, people need to check themselves and remember for all its hype, GTA V is still very much a current gen game, and will have its visual limitations, like any current gen game. In terms of graphics, I'm expecting it to look like a slightly better/sharper RDR. If that's the case, I'm satisfied. I remember back in 2010, graphics sluts saying it looked like junk. I don't care what those idiots think, that game was beautiful. So will GTA V. This. RDR graphics and im fine. But it had 2xAA on xbox. The previews I mentioned doesnt let me conclude that V does have AA or at leas as much as RDR Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now