Dutch Psycho Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Map size is f*cking pathetic "3.5x the size of Red Dead" that's sounds sh*t to me not surprised anyway, the Mapping LS thread already showed how small the map was gonna be, they even left famous gang hotspots like Baldwin Village and Watts out of the old III era Los Santos even the size of Inglewood and Compton in San Andreas was pathetic especially considering the whole game was about gang life, now it looks like Compton is one street long and all those other areas are as well. Other than that it looks like this is gonna be the best thing to be created on earth since Jesus popped out of Mary. Are you insane??? Rdr was already big,imagine 3.5 bigger. Go play JC 2 you unhappy gta fan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epicluca Posted May 2, 2013 Author Share Posted May 2, 2013 I´m a lil bit dissapointed because we still dont know how to save our custom cars... Is there a garage? Or a parkin Spot? I want the garages back! Garages have been confirmed as purchasable along with helipads Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Theft Savage Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Don't know... I'm not really disappointed by anything. Some of the stuff are just "meh" to me, but from what I'm hearing, GTA V has the potential to be the greatest game of all time. Yes, I said it. I doubt anything is going to top this... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Homemade Dynamite Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Does complaining about complainers on this forum count? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Distrom Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 regenerated health im gonna miss sprunk The health regenerates? It worked in fine in RDR, can someone give me the link please? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAaLEX117 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Checkpoints.They're for f*cking pussies, I don't want them in GTA V. When many of the missions will force you to rely on AI support...I think it's good to have them. That way you'll learn what to do and when the AI gets outnumbered. You'll also rage less if you happen to fail the missions because of them like...."All you had to do was follow the damn train CJ!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beee Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 i'm dissapointed that car customization and the property buying is now confirmed, so that all the ungratefull I***** can move on and whine about something else.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tobu24 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Pretentious characters and story lines. f*ck! I miss when the characters didn't whine about being criminals,thugs, and murders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
lol232 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Checkpoints.They're for f*cking pussies, I don't want them in GTA V. When many of the missions will force you to rely on AI support...I think it's good to have them. That way you'll learn what to do and when the AI gets outnumbered. You'll also rage less if you happen to fail the missions because of them like...."All you had to do was follow the damn train CJ!" I can't believe there are whiners like you, I honestly never had trouble with "Wrong Side of The Tracks", honestly, people should get some skill, it's too easy when there are Checkpoints. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_be Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Graphics aren't a huge deal to me, but I would much rather have graphics like GTA IV than what I've seen within this latest batch of screenshots. There was so much aliasing that I didn't even want to see them all.. The weather screens from March were WAY better than these. I don't know what Rockstar is doing, but I seriously hope that they can sort out the aliasing issues before release.. Don't get me wrong, some are better than others, but overall, I'm not at all impressed with this new set. And another thing is the fact that Rockstar is only showing off the PS3 version of the game.. If I were a game developer showing off a new title, it would be my goal to show off the absolute best looking product possible, without straight-up faking a demo, and if Rockstar is showing the PS3 version, which still got complaints from IGN, then the Xbox version will probably be even worse... Even with all the new features announced, I've lost quite a bit of my hype for this game.. I'll be shocked if the graphics get any better at this point. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kushi_Pete Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 I'm just dissapointed by the graphics, from what i've read they're not as good as shown in the trailers, which is extremely misleadingand apparently R* still have no intention to do a PC or Next-gen version, this seems really stubborn because they know they can make more money from doing so and I just hope that they change their minds like they did about properties and put it on next gen, now don't get me wrong i'm hyped for the game and don't want to seem like a spoilt brat but the journalists made it known that the graphics were worse on screen than in the trailer, implying R* for some reason touched the trailers up or made them look better somehow, what do you think of this and what did you find most dissapointing from the new info? They were playing it on a 60 inch TV. And did U know that graphics look sh*ttier the bigger the TV? I guess not. I had 0 disappointments. Only satisfaction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Technique Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 health regeneration... Yep it sucks, first they tell us how we will plan for the heists now it's useless to bring some body armor, hot dogs and sprunk to the missions Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GKP Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 mattb - I totally concur. WTF was with todays screens. Quite fuggly in parts. Just the way it is though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kurtburt94 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 The only problem i have is that we have to wait another 4 months to play it . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dontdieb4september Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Not dissapointed with anything. Also I don't understand why anyone gets upset over the nextgen/pc non announcements. Its simple business logic. Look beyond the trolls, the worries.. the know it alls who have been blown away by all the new info and think logically. The game releases on xbox360/ps3 the 2 most popular consoles.. Rockstar cashes in some mucho $$$.. PC then is announced a little later.. Rockstar makes some more $$$ .. The game is then eventually brought to the next generation.. and Rockstar makes another buttload of cash from the people with the new consoles and the people who eventually replace their old consoles. They can make good money from this one game long into the future. People are just far to impatient and paranoid and easily swayed by folks that are clearly trolling them, Relax and enjoy the summer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAaLEX117 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Checkpoints.They're for f*cking pussies, I don't want them in GTA V. When many of the missions will force you to rely on AI support...I think it's good to have them. That way you'll learn what to do and when the AI gets outnumbered. You'll also rage less if you happen to fail the missions because of them like...."All you had to do was follow the damn train CJ!" I can't believe there are whiners like you, I honestly never had trouble with "Wrong Side of The Tracks", honestly, people should get some skill, it's too easy when there are Checkpoints. Yeah...except my skill didn't matter. I drove the blo*dy bike perfectly every time and Sweet just kept on missing them because his AI programming was horrendous. Perfect example of an unfair mission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DontSnitch Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Map size is f*cking pathetic "3.5x the size of Red Dead" that's sounds sh*t to me not surprised anyway, the Mapping LS thread already showed how small the map was gonna be, they even left famous gang hotspots like Baldwin Village and Watts out of the old III era Los Santos even the size of Inglewood and Compton in San Andreas was pathetic especially considering the whole game was about gang life, now it looks like Compton is one street long and all those other areas are as well. Other than that it looks like this is gonna be the best thing to be created on earth since Jesus popped out of Mary. Are you insane??? Rdr was already big,imagine 3.5 bigger. Go play JC 2 you unhappy gta fan f*ck Just Cause, it takes about 6 minutes to get from one side of Red Dead to the other, X that by 3.5 = about 20 mins but in a car it would change to about 4mins in a plane 1 minute, that annoys me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kifflom112 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 (edited) Honestly, some of these complaints are kind of stupid, but it is a complaints thread so I will contribute: Okay, I don't care about multiplayer right? Why does pressing down on the D-pad send you there? What if I was simply enjoying a drive and accidentally pressed that? That would be annoying. Also if that is occupied - in a stupid way too - then how can I make the mini map zoom out? And I would rather use that button to put convertible tops up and down. Why the hell make it so complicated? And then those stupid slow motion special effects sound corny and useless. I hope they get rid of it as it's pretty unfitting. The flora detail and cloud detail in some shots piss me off - while some amaze me how beautiful they are. Some of the bushes look like they'll be 2D. Honestly. And some of those clouds look like TDU2 clouds, whic if you don't know look kind of mediocre. And then you got the physics for the cars. I don't know how they handle and sadly nobody addressed the handling today. If it handles like a crappy racing game then I will be more than pissed off. I don't want V to be one of those games where small detail like flora and textures are half assed and I don't want it to be a game that has nice cars but awful lifeless handling. Quantity is awesome but when it sacrifices quality that's when I get pissed. But believe it or not I am more than happy right now. Customization, lovely new cars, purchasing property and business. Edited May 2, 2013 by Kifflom112 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAaLEX117 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 mattb - I totally concur. WTF was with todays screens. Quite fuggly in parts. Just the way it is though. Compressed, low quality images. Here's the HD ones: http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co....em/#gallery-top Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
zainzombie Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Im sure the entire game is not completely polished by now maybe thats why in the demo it did not look like what we see in the trailers. There were a few posts and threads that showed that many shots taken from the recent 3 trailers looked different even when they were taken from the same scene (One was with the heat-like heist Van with different number-plates and the other I remember was a picture of Franklin talking to Lamar and that chick with glasses). I dont know how polishing works exactly but I assume a month before the game goes gold, game will look as good as most of the scenes from the trailers. I dont expect the game to look as good as the screenshots, they are CLEARLY photoshopped to look better and flashier but I do expect them to look exactly like the trailers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gtamann123 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Checkpoints.They're for f*cking pussies, I don't want them in GTA V. When many of the missions will force you to rely on AI support...I think it's good to have them. That way you'll learn what to do and when the AI gets outnumbered. You'll also rage less if you happen to fail the missions because of them like...."All you had to do was follow the damn train CJ!" I can't believe there are whiners like you, I honestly never had trouble with "Wrong Side of The Tracks", honestly, people should get some skill, it's too easy when there are Checkpoints. Yeah...except my skill didn't matter. I drove the blo*dy bike perfectly every time and Sweet just kept on missing them because his AI programming was horrendous. Perfect example of an unfair mission. Having checkpoints is a lot better than going all the way until the very end of a super long mission only to fail and have to start all over again. Like what was so common in San Andreas. Like completing vertical bird 95% and then crashing the plane when you get to verdant meadows and having it blow up into pieces failing the mission. Stuff like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAaLEX117 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Checkpoints.They're for f*cking pussies, I don't want them in GTA V. When many of the missions will force you to rely on AI support...I think it's good to have them. That way you'll learn what to do and when the AI gets outnumbered. You'll also rage less if you happen to fail the missions because of them like...."All you had to do was follow the damn train CJ!" I can't believe there are whiners like you, I honestly never had trouble with "Wrong Side of The Tracks", honestly, people should get some skill, it's too easy when there are Checkpoints. Yeah...except my skill didn't matter. I drove the blo*dy bike perfectly every time and Sweet just kept on missing them because his AI programming was horrendous. Perfect example of an unfair mission. Having checkpoints is a lot better than going all the way until the very end of a super long mission only to fail and have to start all over again. Like what was so common in San Andreas. Like completing vertical bird 95% and then crashing the plane when you get to verdant meadows and having it blow up into pieces failing the mission. Stuff like that. Exactly. Also, if you fail because of the AI you'll only get even angrier. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_be Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 mattb - I totally concur. WTF was with todays screens. Quite fuggly in parts. Just the way it is though. Compressed, low quality images. Here's the HD ones: http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co....em/#gallery-top Ok, so I took a look at these, and not much changed for me. One that still stands out is the one taken above the US Bank Tower. Take a look at the mountains in the background. Two of the hills are sold gray triangles. They have no detail whatsoever.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kifflom112 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 I'm just dissapointed by the graphics, from what i've read they're not as good as shown in the trailers, which is extremely misleadingand apparently R* still have no intention to do a PC or Next-gen version, this seems really stubborn because they know they can make more money from doing so and I just hope that they change their minds like they did about properties and put it on next gen, now don't get me wrong i'm hyped for the game and don't want to seem like a spoilt brat but the journalists made it known that the graphics were worse on screen than in the trailer, implying R* for some reason touched the trailers up or made them look better somehow, what do you think of this and what did you find most dissapointing from the new info? They were playing it on a 60 inch TV. And did U know that graphics look sh*ttier the bigger the TV? I guess not. I had 0 disappointments. Only satisfaction. Bullsh*t. I played IV on my 65" Mitsubitshi TV and it looks better than the IV trailers. You have no point, sir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTAaLEX117 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 mattb - I totally concur. WTF was with todays screens. Quite fuggly in parts. Just the way it is though. Compressed, low quality images. Here's the HD ones: http://www.officialplaystationmagazine.co....em/#gallery-top Ok, so I took a look at these, and not much changed for me. One that still stands out is the one taken above the US Bank Tower. Take a look at the mountains in the background. Two of the hills are sold gray triangles. They have no detail whatsoever.. You mean the nighttime shot? Well, yeah, it's at night. You shouldn't even see those mountains in real life. The sky is also kind of fuzzy in that screen, so I doubt it's from the final version. Either that...or something's wrong. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cmn1516 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 My complaint is that people still actually have complaints after today Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
epicluca Posted May 2, 2013 Author Share Posted May 2, 2013 Honestly, some of these complaints are kind of stupid, but it is a complaints thread so I will contribute:Okay, I don't care about multiplayer right? Why does pressing down on the D-pad send you there? What if I was simply enjoying a drive and accidentally pressed that? That would be annoying. Also if that is occupied - in a stupid way too - then how can I make the mini map zoom out? And I would rather use that button to put convertible tops up and down. Why the hell make it so complicated? And then those stupid slow motion special effects sound corny and useless. I hope they get rid of it as it's pretty unfitting. The flora detail and cloud detail in some shots piss me off - while some amaze me how beautiful they are. Some of the bushes look like they'll be 2D. Honestly. And some of those clouds look like TDU2 clouds, whic if you don't know look kind of mediocre. And then you got the physics for the cars. I don't know how they handle and sadly nobody addressed the handling today. If it handles like a crappy racing game then I will be more than pissed off. I don't want V to be one of those games where small detail like flora and textures are half assed and I don't want it to be a game that has nice cars but awful lifeless handling. Quantity is awesome but when it sacrifices quality that's when I get pissed. But believe it or not I am more than happy right now. Customization, lovely new cars, purchasing property and business. I agree with the multiplayer issue, it seems like they're trying too hard to make everything easy and fluid, even if there was a failsafe screen it would be annoying and off putting if you accidentally pressed the button, they should have just left it in the phone like it was in IV Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GKP Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 lol the so called 'high res ' shots are shopped to hell - smoothed way out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raavi Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 lol the so called 'high res ' shots are shopped to hell - smoothed way out. You'd be better of not buying the game, giving your immense amount of criticism on every single f*cking thing. – overeducated wonk who fetishises compromise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTASeriesFan Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 dude the graphics are amazing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now