_SMOKEY_ Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 I just noticed this poster while I was watching the ign trailer breakdown and I think it has to do with Victim, the clothing shop from San Andreas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
iNero Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 somehow I dont get the relation/connection Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkingsickness Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 nah, I don't think so. To vague Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
stranger44 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 What makes you think it has something to do with the clothes store in SA? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_SMOKEY_ Posted May 2, 2013 Author Share Posted May 2, 2013 nah, I don't think so. To vague no? It looks like a bloody shoe print which is what I thought connected with victim Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkingsickness Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 nah, I don't think so. To vague no? It looks like a bloody shoe print which is what I thought connected with victim so a bloody shoe print represents the Victim clothing store? I can understand it, but I think its a bit of a reach to associate the poster to that store. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_SMOKEY_ Posted May 2, 2013 Author Share Posted May 2, 2013 nah, I don't think so. To vague no? It looks like a bloody shoe print which is what I thought connected with victim so a bloody shoe print represents the Victim clothing store? I can understand it, but I think its a bit of a reach to associate the poster to that store. oh ok haha, I thought I was onto something lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil_B_The Basedgod Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 I just noticed this poster while I was watching the ign trailer breakdown and I think it has to do with Victim, the clothing shop from San Andreas. It reminded me more of pro laps. But, it could be victim as well. You might be onto something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red XIII Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 anna rex is confirmed to be in the game, which is a clothes shop Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_SMOKEY_ Posted May 2, 2013 Author Share Posted May 2, 2013 I just noticed this poster while I was watching the ign trailer breakdown and I think it has to do with Victim, the clothing shop from San Andreas. It reminded me more of pro laps. But, it could be victim as well. You might be onto something. oh yeah, completely forgot about pro laps Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkingsickness Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Alaannnn, watch out! Any minute you are going to have the "GTA unverse can't cross into the HD universe" or whatever the f*ck they cry about 6-7 times a day, just by mentioning Victim and how it wasn't in GTA IV so its not in the same universe BS Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
98 in 1 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Alaannnn, watch out! Any minute you are going to have the "GTA unverse can't cross into the HD universe" or whatever the f*ck they cry about 6-7 times a day, just by mentioning Victim and how it wasn't in GTA IV so its not in the same universe BS Except this thread isn't about returning main characters. That argument is completely irrelevant in this situation. Businesses and brands have already crossed over (Burger Shot and Cluckin Bell are prime examples in IV). As for that being a sign of Victim's existence, i'm more inclined to believe that it's Pro-Laps given the sporty-ness to it (We run Los Santos). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash_735 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 just by mentioning Victim and how it wasn't in GTA IV so its not in the same universe BS Actually moron, Victim WAS in GTA IV, it's had an image rebrand to, check it out on the in game internet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rjeev142 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 After seeing all the nice clothes Franklin has in his trailer, I don't doubt that stores like Victim won't be included. However, the "we run Los santos" flyer really doesn't confirm the existence of victim in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Saliva Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 I don't think there was a Victim in Los Santos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkingsickness Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 just by mentioning Victim and how it wasn't in GTA IV so its not in the same universe BS Actually moron, Victim WAS in GTA IV, it's had an image rebrand to, check it out on the in game internet. Ok calm down internet gangster. Didn't mean to rattle you Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash_735 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 Guys, guys, seriously, it was in GTA IV, it went under a rebrand, it's now known as VC / TM in 2008. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash_735 Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 just by mentioning Victim and how it wasn't in GTA IV so its not in the same universe BS Actually moron, Victim WAS in GTA IV, it's had an image rebrand to, check it out on the in game internet. Ok calm down internet gangster. Didn't mean to rattle you Yesterday I was called a Racist on here and yet now I'm being called an Internet Gangsta, hah, anyway, just correcting you, you're the one who went on the rant because you don't understand the Era theory correctly. Victim WAS around in GTA IV, as I said, it went under a rebrand and was known as VC / TM according to the in game internet, so, correction 1, Victim has already been shown in this era. Correction 2, Rockstar stated that eras only define characters and cities. Brands, Radio, etc, cross over as they don't really have anchor roots in their respective eras, they just happen to be in them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
walkingsickness Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 (edited) just by mentioning Victim and how it wasn't in GTA IV so its not in the same universe BS Actually moron, Victim WAS in GTA IV, it's had an image rebrand to, check it out on the in game internet. Ok calm down internet gangster. Didn't mean to rattle you Yesterday I was called a Racist on here and yet now I'm being called an Internet Gangsta, hah, anyway, just correcting you, you're the one who went on the rant because you don't understand the Era theory correctly. Victim WAS around in GTA IV, as I said, it went under a rebrand and was known as VC / TM according to the in game internet, so, correction 1, Victim has already been shown in this era. Correction 2, Rockstar stated that eras only define characters and cities. Brands, Radio, etc, cross over as they don't really have anchor roots in their respective eras, they just happen to be in them. You called that a RANT! HAHA!! You should see me in real life. Edit: I just responded because I was called a moron, and I'm drunk. Edited May 2, 2013 by walkingsickness Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lil_B_The Basedgod Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 I don't think there was a Victim in Los Santos Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killahmatic Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 How does your random theory somehow suggest that its confirmed? Do you even know what the word 'confirmed' means? In this case, it can either mean R* specifically tells us that YES there is a Victim, or if we see an actual Victim store in a trailer. Too many folks on here use the word confirmed when they're trying to suggest something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pepperjack Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 I for one think, It's a Shoe store, but it's a front for a mafia gang or some sh*t Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
_SMOKEY_ Posted May 2, 2013 Author Share Posted May 2, 2013 How does your random theory somehow suggest that its confirmed? Do you even know what the word 'confirmed' means? In this case, it can either mean R* specifically tells us that YES there is a Victim, or if we see an actual Victim store in a trailer. Too many folks on here use the word confirmed when they're trying to suggest something. I never said it was confirmed, which is why there's a question mark right after it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chekoloco Posted May 2, 2013 Share Posted May 2, 2013 NOPE Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now