Travís. Posted March 21, 2013 Author Share Posted March 21, 2013 Yes, but it's not as prominent today as it was back then, not saying it doesn't happen, but Hispanics are running more hoods now than Black, and the war is between them, the whole bloods vs crips things is minor now compared to what it was in the early to mid-90s, so to waste more time rehashing that when there's more interesting wars to bring up relating to modern day LA would just be lazy on Rockstars behalf. im sure your not from the southern california-so i have to inform you as a current resident of ingelwood california black gang culture is still alive and active and still play a major part in the street culture and criminal underworld. so it would make perfect since if they keep grove st and the ballas in this game. .. You live in Inglewood too? Small world. OT: Anyways I wouldn't mind a reference to Grove St. in GTA V, whether it is a literal reference (the actual street) or a more 'spiritual' one. I'm kind of neutral when it comes to the gangs, because I know R* is going to implement them albeit on a lesser scale than SA. Like, it would be nice to see the Ballas/Grove St Fams/Vagos etc to return but I wouldn't care if all the gangs are new since they won't be the main focus anyways. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash_735 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Because the Liberty City gangs in III were just generic gangs. And that's what annoys me about San Andreas fanboys. Apparently Ballas and Grove Street are immortals and can not be touched. Let's flip it, WHY can't Rockstar just change their name, and make their history MORE like the actual real gangs? And again, this thread has gone WAY off topic, sad how derranged San Andreas fanboys hugging their Grove Street fan made stuff just can't let go. Haha. You just carry on their with your anti street gang crusade, and keep deflecting the argument. It's you alone who keeps taking it off topic. You're the only one who is clearly letting your personal biases inform your argument. and then keep trying to divert the actual topic to whether or not street gangs should be the focus, which it's already well established isn't the case. I already explained to you why i think they should reuse them.. Why don't you go ahead and tell me again i'm a deranged fan-boy instead of addressing the point... Exactly. WHAT, you agreed with me earlier, and now you don't, make up your mind dude. As for you Bill, I already did explain, if Streets Gangs are going to be there (which of course they are) then I want a complete redone version just like in GTA IV, new names, new history that's closer to the real life version, more serious and done properly, Grove Street and Ballas look like clowns compared to the real life gangs and as of that, they should be left in the GTA3-era where they belong. I'm not against Street Gangs, I just don't think they should be the main focus, as another user said up top, even Dan Houser himself has said it in an interview, the whole glamour of gang life from the 90s has faded away now, so the actual gangs should represent that how most are just drug pushing now, how most are under threat from latino and hispanic groups, etc and how Franklin himself just can't stand that lifestyle anymore and wants out, THAT'S interesting, Balls Vs Grove Street Yo Homies! etc, is not! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travís. Posted March 21, 2013 Author Share Posted March 21, 2013 Because the Liberty City gangs in III were just generic gangs. And that's what annoys me about San Andreas fanboys. Apparently Ballas and Grove Street are immortals and can not be touched. Let's flip it, WHY can't Rockstar just change their name, and make their history MORE like the actual real gangs? And again, this thread has gone WAY off topic, sad how derranged San Andreas fanboys hugging their Grove Street fan made stuff just can't let go. Haha. You just carry on their with your anti street gang crusade, and keep deflecting the argument. It's you alone who keeps taking it off topic. You're the only one who is clearly letting your personal biases inform your argument. and then keep trying to divert the actual topic to whether or not street gangs should be the focus, which it's already well established isn't the case. I already explained to you why i think they should reuse them.. Why don't you go ahead and tell me again i'm a deranged fan-boy instead of addressing the point... Exactly. WHAT, you agreed with me earlier, and now you don't, make up your mind dude. As for you Bill, I already did explain, if Streets Gangs are going to be there (which of course they are) then I want a complete redone version just like in GTA IV, new names, new history that's closer to the real life version, more serious and done properly, Grove Street and Ballas look like clowns compared to the real life gangs and as of that, they should be left in the GTA3-era where they belong. I'm not against Street Gangs, I just don't think they should be the main focus, as another user said up top, even Dan Houser himself has said it in an interview, the whole glamour of gang life from the 90s has faded away now, so the actual gangs should represent that how most are just drug pushing now, how most are under threat from latino and hispanic groups, etc and how Franklin himself just can't stand that lifestyle anymore and wants out, THAT'S interesting, Balls Vs Grove Street Yo Homies! etc, is not! Sorry I accidently used the whole quote instead of one bit of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NONative Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 A Grove Street Easter egg would be ok, bringing back street gangs seems like likely, because it being a big part of the west coast culture. But wanting it to be the Ballas and Families just doesn't make since. CJ isn't part of the HD era, so why bring something built in a universe the has no baring in this one. It would be a waste of disc space. I'm for the Easter eggs, aka the "Ballas" on the bench. But leave GTA:SA in the past, because if R* starts recycling ideas then GTA will become Call Of Duty. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bigbleezy Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 I'm gonna bypass what I just spent the last 30 minutes reading and answer your question the way I see it. I thhink, like already said, when people ask if Grove Street will be in they think the culdasac, the gang, the whole 9 yards. And I think those topics have been discussed 100 times over. So when the topic comes up, that's where they think its going. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honest Bill Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 Because the Liberty City gangs in III were just generic gangs. And that's what annoys me about San Andreas fanboys. Apparently Ballas and Grove Street are immortals and can not be touched. Let's flip it, WHY can't Rockstar just change their name, and make their history MORE like the actual real gangs? And again, this thread has gone WAY off topic, sad how derranged San Andreas fanboys hugging their Grove Street fan made stuff just can't let go. Haha. You just carry on their with your anti street gang crusade, and keep deflecting the argument. It's you alone who keeps taking it off topic. You're the only one who is clearly letting your personal biases inform your argument. and then keep trying to divert the actual topic to whether or not street gangs should be the focus, which it's already well established isn't the case. I already explained to you why i think they should reuse them.. Why don't you go ahead and tell me again i'm a deranged fan-boy instead of addressing the point... Exactly. WHAT, you agreed with me earlier, and now you don't, make up your mind dude. As for you Bill, I already did explain, if Streets Gangs are going to be there (which of course they are) then I want a complete redone version just like in GTA IV, new names, new history that's closer to the real life version, more serious and done properly, Grove Street and Ballas look like clowns compared to the real life gangs and as of that, they should be left in the GTA3-era where they belong. I'm not against Street Gangs, I just don't think they should be the main focus, as another user said up top, even Dan Houser himself has said it in an interview, the whole glamour of gang life from the 90s has faded away now, so the actual gangs should represent that how most are just drug pushing now, how most are under threat from latino and hispanic groups, etc and how Franklin himself just can't stand that lifestyle anymore and wants out, THAT'S interesting, Balls Vs Grove Street Yo Homies! etc, is not! As i mentioned already, they were actually based on real life gangs that were and still are present in LA. And since Rockstar is on record as saying they're shooting for realistic representation of LA, then they will have bloods and crips in there, they will very likely be sporting green and purple colours, essentially they will be in the game anyway. So tell me exactly what is it about using the terms 'families' and 'ballas' because they will be in the game anyway, is it really so important that they use a different term? It's already well established they will have different histories. As for how they look, well that will obviously be updated too. You're only real issue seems to be that you're hung up on using the same names. As for the last paragraph, again, you seem to be trying to focus on that same issue which we have all already established is irrelevant. And it's also confirmed not to be the case. So why do you keep reiterating it? Are you trying to start some 'my gang is better than yours' argument over the internet? because nobody is going to bite, we know street gangs have changed since the 90s, and we already know Franklin is trying to get out of the hood based on confirmed information so stop trying to divert the issue again Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dick Justice Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 You're both just crapping on back and forth now, refusing to make concessions while trying to find flaws in the other argument. Just cop that both of you have valid arguments then move the f*ck on. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ExtremoMania Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 GSF and Ballas should just be some easter eggs in V, but street names like Grove Street should just return. R* could create new gangs that traces it's influence in the west culture; never replicate the past universe iteration, but street names wouldn't hurt a bit IMO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash_735 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 As i mentioned already, they were actually based on real life gangs that were and still are present in LA. And Los Santos in San Andreas was based on the real LA, didn't stop them from scrapping that and making a new, better, more realistic one. Using that argument that they based it off a real thing doesn't hold, if an entire city that they said was realistically based on LA back in 2004 has been chugged away in favor of creating a bigger, MORE realistic version, then why would they recycle some old cartoon street gangs when they could make a new one that's also more realistic and STILL based off the same gangs (just like they did with GTA IV). Just saying, it's not like Rockstar to lazily rehash gangs, and Grove Street and Ballas shouldn't be excluded from that rule just because some people refuse to let them go. I mean you said it yourself, why create a new history, new design, new back story and members, events, etc, which you said they would do, ...and then use an old name? Hell, the Zaibatsu were a kick ass gang in GTA2, they ruled all, they were reduced to a pharmacy company in GTA3 and not even mentioned in GTA IV! There's more evidence for them creating a new gang based on the real life versions than there is for keeping a tired old gang name around from a previous era. Again, even if Ballas and GSF were based on the real Crips and Bloods, THEY CAN DO BETTER, let them wipe it clean and do a new gang based on the Crips and Bloods that fits within this new universe. Are you trying to start some 'my gang is better than yours' argument over the internet? What's my gang? Do you think I'm Latino or Hispanic because I keep bringing up how Latino and Hispanics are seen as a bigger threat in the hoods of modern day LA? No I'm just quoting facts my friend. As for Diverting, again, you're refusing to make the connection, the MAJORITY of people who want Grove Street Families and Ballas back still see LA as some early 90s rap video and think the gangs are still like that to this day, all this "YEAH WE WANT GROVE STREET BACK!" would be beyond what they expect anyway as they'd be expecting those early 90s gangs from San Andreas, NOT the reality of what they would be like today. That's a very important point here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
rjmthe2nd Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 I don't see why we can't have a Grove Street out of coincidence. If the different universes can have the same god damn vehicles and the same god damn brands of clothing, food chains, products, and actually have people on the radio such as Lazlow from the III era, then I don't see why we can't have one god damn motherf*cking street out of the 1,000 streets in Los Santos named Grove Street. lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LewisMiller Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 People getting upset when mentioning grove street will not be in GTAV? Why? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
theNGclan Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 People getting upset when mentioning grove street will not be in GTAV? Why? Congratulations. You just quoted the title of the topic. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicPunk Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 There should be gang wars and territories and all that. I think they will be under different names but similar colors. I thought it was fun to take the neighborhoods and would make something to do when the games done. There should be some territories that you can't take, but for the rest, after you take it, either they start working for you, or, you start seeing trevor, michael and franklins peoples there. I think when you take a neighborhood, after killing most of the goons, you should then have to enter the leaders lair and take him out. Then start peddling guns, drugs, hookers, and whatever else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TyphoonJames Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 We've gone over this with you before. It's because Rockstar founded the different eras system. Grove Street was home to the Grove Street Gang from GTA SA. No characters from the III era are returning in the IV/V era. It's not hard to understand. It is possible the STREET may come back, but when you talk about Grove St. it makes people think of the gang. Quit bringing it up. And it is for this reason people become pissy and defensive when "Grove Street" or "CJ" are mentioned, even as minor ester egg ideas, not fully returning to GTA V. Yes, everyone must that due to the separate eras concept, characters from the III era will not be returning. But equally, people should not immediately dismiss them returning as easter eggs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakeney Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 The MAJORITY of people who want Grove Street Families and Ballas back still see LA as some early 90s rap video and think the gangs are still like that to this day, all this "YEAH WE WANT GROVE STREET BACK!" would be beyond what they expect anyway as they'd be expecting those early 90s gangs from San Andreas, NOT the reality of what they would be like today. That's a very important point here. The funny bit is... the people in this thread you are pushing this on.. ALL have only mentioned the STREET as an EASTER EGG, so what are you chatting about the majority wanting x y or z lol? The majority of the world more than likely hasn't seen the trailers, know or care about gtaV, so can we consider that no ones care about GTAV and we should all preach to the forums that they shouldn't even bother releasing because of that.... ofc not, that is nonsense. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash_735 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 The funny bit is... the people in this thread you are pushing this on.. ALL have only mentioned the STREET as an EASTER EGG, so what are you chatting about the majority wanting x y or z lol? Re-read some of the posts above mine, mainly any by Bill and that e something guy, who both seem certain that Grove Street and Ballas WILL be back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honest Bill Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 The funny bit is... the people in this thread you are pushing this on.. ALL have only mentioned the STREET as an EASTER EGG, so what are you chatting about the majority wanting x y or z lol? Re-read some of the posts above mine, mainly any by Bill and that e something guy, who both seem certain that Grove Street and Ballas WILL be back. They will be back, the issue, as i said, is whether or not they use those terms for them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash_735 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 The funny bit is... the people in this thread you are pushing this on.. ALL have only mentioned the STREET as an EASTER EGG, so what are you chatting about the majority wanting x y or z lol? Re-read some of the posts above mine, mainly any by Bill and that e something guy, who both seem certain that Grove Street and Ballas WILL be back. They will be back, the issue, as i said, is whether or not they use those terms for them. But that won't be Grove Street and Ballas! OMG! They will be a new adaptation of the Crips and Bloods. What you're saying is that GTA V will have Grove Street and Ballas back but re-imagined to be more like the gang that the gangs were based on which are the Crips and Bloods. You can just cut the Grove Street and Ballas crap out and say they are a more realistic adaptation of the real gang. Grove Street and Ballas have no need to enter here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakeney Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 The funny bit is... the people in this thread you are pushing this on.. ALL have only mentioned the STREET as an EASTER EGG, so what are you chatting about the majority wanting x y or z lol? Re-read some of the posts above mine, mainly any by Bill and that e something guy, who both seem certain that Grove Street and Ballas WILL be back. They will be back, the issue, as i said, is whether or not they use those terms for them. But that won't be Grove Street and Ballas! OMG! They will be a new adaptation of the Crips and Bloods. What you're saying is that GTA V will have Grove Street and Ballas back but re-imagined to be more like the gang that the gangs were based on which are the Crips and Bloods. You can just cut the Grove Street and Ballas crap out and say they are a more realistic adaptation of the real gang. Grove Street and Ballas have no need to enter here. What he said was clear... "the issue, as i said, is whether or not they use those terms for them." So pretty much the same as what most on this thread barr 2 think... which is: Its set in LA so there will be street gang activity and included will be "versions" of the bloods and crips... whats up for debate is A: what TERMS/names R* give them THIS TIME (could be dogs & cats for all we know), and B: How much of a roll they will play. As I pointed out, everyone here has a brain so isn't giving it CJ OMG etc, so we are all aware this is set now, and to be real the two "gangs" will be realistic and be pretty much "silent" aka they wont be wandering round in "colours", and as in real life, they will be a lot more like the NYC/LC street gangs, and more interested in personal gain/wealth, whereas in the 90's LA it was all about "representin" and colours. How you keep misunderstanding where people on this thread are coming from is confusing me, and everything you have brought to the table so far to persuade me and others into NOT wanting Grove STREET in as an easter egg is comical. Guess what, not all of us or even most were scared of the nasty street thugs in SA, so a nod towards the street we all called home for 4 years seems fitting.... If you don't like that, it's your issue, no one elses. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash_735 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 (edited) and everything you have brought to the table so far to persuade me and others into NOT wanting Grove STREET in as an easter egg is comical. Guess what, not all of us or even most were scared of the nasty street thugs in SA, so a nod towards the street we all called home for 4 years seems fitting.... If you don't like that, it's your issue, no one elses. If you actually read what I said, I'm fine with an Easter Egg, I said I don't want them to return as Gangs, Reading comprehension seems to be hard for you guys! Somewhere along the line you people took that as "I don't want ANY Street gangs in GTA V" which is not true, I said I don't want them to be the main focus. Seriously, why even keep this up if all you're going to do is cherry pick what I say? And what's with the comment about being scared? I don't know if you're being sarcastic or something, it's gone beyond reasoning in this stupid thread now, but just WHAT? If anything I've been saying Hispanics and Latinos gangs in modern day LA are now seen as a bigger threat than blacks, how's that being scared? f*ck this forum drops all logic out of the window, I'm going back to the modding section where the normal people are. edit: Infact, I'll just list this so we can get on the right page: - I'm OK with a subtle Easter Egg giving a nod to Grove Street, Ballas, other Los Santos gangs of old era - I'm NOT OK with bringing any of these gangs back - I'm OK with Rockstar doing what they did in GTA IV and doing more realistic versions of current days gangs, which would include remaining Bloods and Crips - I'm NOT OK with gangs being the main focus for any part of the story, LA has such a varied crime history, and street gang Culture had it's game with San Andreas - I WOULD like to see a proper representation of current day gang culture in GTA V including his Latino and Hispanic gangs are seen as a bigger threat to the public compared to Blacks Clear enough? Edited March 21, 2013 by Ash_735 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
evoluon--720 Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 If you actually read what I said, I'm fine with an Easter Egg, I said I don't want them to return as Gangs, Reading comprehension seems to be hard for you guys! Somewhere along the line you people took that as "I don't want ANY Street gangs in GTA V" which is not true, I said I don't want them to be the main focus. Seriously, why even keep this up if all you're going to do is cherry pick what I say? And what's with the comment about being scared? I don't know if you're being sarcastic or something, it's gone beyond reasoning in this stupid thread now, but just WHAT? If anything I've been saying Hispanics and Latinos gangs in modern day LA are now seen as a bigger threat than blacks, how's that being scared? f*ck this forum drops all logic out of the window, I'm going back to the modding section where the normal people are. edit: Infact, I'll just list this so we can get on the right page: - I'm OK with a subtle Easter Egg giving a nod to Grove Street, Ballas, other Los Santos gangs of old era - I'm NOT OK with bringing any of these gangs back - I'm OK with Rockstar doing what they did in GTA IV and doing more realistic versions of current days gangs, which would include remaining Bloods and Crips - I'm NOT OK with gangs being the main focus for any part of the story, LA has such a varied crime history, and street gang Culture had it's game with San Andreas - I WOULD like to see a proper representation of current day gang culture in GTA V including his Latino and Hispanic gangs are seen as a bigger threat to the public compared to Blacks Clear enough? youre still being very close minded and one sided about this whole thing but ok.. im sure none of us will be complaining or debating about this topic in the next 5-6 months...gta 5 is going to be great with or without the old gangs. and there are more signs that point towards their return than there isnt so...we'lll see Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Honest Bill Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 The funny bit is... the people in this thread you are pushing this on.. ALL have only mentioned the STREET as an EASTER EGG, so what are you chatting about the majority wanting x y or z lol? Re-read some of the posts above mine, mainly any by Bill and that e something guy, who both seem certain that Grove Street and Ballas WILL be back. They will be back, the issue, as i said, is whether or not they use those terms for them. But that won't be Grove Street and Ballas! OMG! They will be a new adaptation of the Crips and Bloods. What you're saying is that GTA V will have Grove Street and Ballas back but re-imagined to be more like the gang that the gangs were based on which are the Crips and Bloods. You can just cut the Grove Street and Ballas crap out and say they are a more realistic adaptation of the real gang. Grove Street and Ballas have no need to enter here. I think i see where the confusion may be.. I mean 'families' and 'Ballas' . These two terms are not specific gangs, any more than, for example, one could say the Mafia is a gang. It's a bigger term, just like Mafia. In that there are many different 'Families' of Mafia that exist. In LC for example, the 'Mafia' did return, however the 'Leone Family' and 'Forelli Family' did not. They were all still based on Mafia Famiiies, but they were new gangs with new histories and new updated versions. Bloods and Crips are not just two gangs who fight each other. They have many different 'sets' (i believe that's the correct term) Families and Ballas are based on amalgamations of Bloods and Crips. But Grove Street Families, are a specific 'set' of Families in the same way that 'Leone Family' is just a 'subset' of 'The Mafia', just like there were multiple different 'sets' of Ballas. They brought 'The Mafia' back because it's a real life entity, but didn't bring back the Leones because they were a specific gang. Again i'm not suggesting that Grove Street Families will be used, but the larger terms i.e 'Families' and 'Ballas' with all new 'sets' and all new members. There is no real reason not to carry those terms over. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Marston Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 ...what's the point of the street if the gang doesn't exist? All it would be is an easter egg. Is that all you care about? This game is about something entirely different. Get with the f*cking times. ye, and the street can't exist without that gang? Times do change. Use your imagination. The street may look and feel different, but still be there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
blakeney Posted March 21, 2013 Share Posted March 21, 2013 (edited) - I'm OK with a subtle Easter Egg giving a nod to Grove Street, Ballas, other Los Santos gangs of old era- I'm NOT OK with bringing any of these gangs back - I'm OK with Rockstar doing what they did in GTA IV and doing more realistic versions of current days gangs, which would include remaining Bloods and Crips - I'm NOT OK with gangs being the main focus for any part of the story, LA has such a varied crime history, and street gang Culture had it's game with San Andreas - I WOULD like to see a proper representation of current day gang culture in GTA V including his Latino and Hispanic gangs are seen as a bigger threat to the public compared to Blacks Clear enough? Ok, I think we are reading off the same page now, in that you have changed from "it wont be the same gang names".. to "Im not ok with it" Other then that I Agree with you on all but point 2 and perhaps point 4 of your list, but now we're both in opinion realm.. that's fine. The reasons I disagree with them points is this: Point2: In the same vain that a BMW in Gta land is called a Sentinel, I personally think there is a 50-65% chance the Bloods and Crips Gta land names could stay the same. Point4: As much as I don't mind/care that's not, I wouldn't mind/care that it was focused on gang culture... But as stated, we are now in opinion realm, so as much as I disagree with those points, I respect the fact that they are not "wrong" or impossibilities. Edited March 21, 2013 by blakeney Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Travís. Posted April 3, 2013 Author Share Posted April 3, 2013 I just saw someone mention grove street, and several people shot him down, wow. I thought it was over now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V8 Engine Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Grove street is KING Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
73duster Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 Hell yeah the grove should make an appearance. There's NO reason that there couldn't be a street that is shaped exactly like Grove Street, complete with the cul de sac, but changed to look how it would look if it underwent a redevelopment. It could retain the same street shape, but be surrounded by an outlet of stores, or mall, or even a small housing project. The street could be RENAMED "Grove Place", and somewhere on the new property could be a plaque that has the original name and some history about the former neighborhood. How cool would THAT be? I think this whole idea of "different universes" is a bit dumb. Rockstar could do whatever they wanted, they wouldn't be breaking any federal laws, lol. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MikeyBelic Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 A post would be cool. BUT SA IS A CLASSIC, and by incorporating anything more into a new game nearly 10 years after the previous was released wouldn't be cool, San Andreas is a classic and should be remembered for what it did and V shouldn't have San Andreas reign on its light and should be remembered from what it will do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
killahmatic Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 I have no problem with a street named "Grove", but if R* adds all of the same houses it completely destroys their plan of old Los Santos not existing. I agree with R* that it should be kept separate in order for them to create something original. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
V8 Engine Posted April 3, 2013 Share Posted April 3, 2013 A post would be cool. BUT SA IS A CLASSIC, and by incorporating anything more into a new game nearly 10 years after the previous was released wouldn't be cool, San Andreas is a classic and should be remembered for what it did and V shouldn't have San Andreas reign on its light and should be remembered from what it will do. I think they should incorporate it but in a a different way nearly 21 ish years apart from the in game dates it should be changed a bit if they bring it into the game Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now