EvilFuture Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 I think you should take a look at this article here: http://www.snopes.com/politics/medical/microchip.asp It explains why all the "microchip" sh*t is false. I've read from so many sites that this is false. Now, for all the Christians, it says in Revelations that The Mark of the Beast will be in your right hand and forehead and if you get it, you will burn in hell (or something like that...) This chip is that. Obama is evil... I choose not to believe it from what I've read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
universetwisters Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Good. That would friggin suck if it were real Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KorinC Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 so 2007 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTASAddict Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Snopes is operated by a Canadian couple; therefore, I wouldn't heed a thing they spew about USA law. Laws always have vague, construable wording that can be distorted to mean many things, but a key part of the law says "Anything deemed appropriate by the Secretary of H&H services", so think about that. They want to implement "electronic medical records" and RFID microchips were discussed years ago as a "class II electronic medical information device". See now? March 23, 2013 is the day for which the Secretary must develop guidelines and implementation protocols, not the day the registry must be enforced. The full law isn't too be enacted until 2014. These microchips may not be mandated anytime soon, but I'd stake on it they will be in the not too distant future. Nobody likes to be wrong, but this is one thing I wish I was wrong about. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KorinC Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 This is so old news because I knew this sh*t 6 years ago and still nothing happened, or did it? 0_0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTASAddict Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 KorinC, this law did not exist "6 years ago" so think about that. Did you even read my previous post? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KorinC Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 The Microchips idea existed 6 years ago, tho. That's what I meant, I didn't know anything about the law, my bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GTASAddict Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 The idea actually existed since 2004 when the FDA approved the microchip for "medical purposes", but in 2010 a law that discusses its compulsory use was signed into law. Even though it was signed then, a big change such as this cannot be enacted immediately. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Mordecai Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 It seems like people will overanalyze just to sh*t on Obama/Government to make them look bad. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Dildo Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 nobody outside of the conservative blogosphere actually believed this crap. Obama was never going to force the population to be implanted with RFID's. it's just another conservative wet-dream based on their irrational hatred for the black man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
na89340qv0n34b09q340 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 It seems like people will overanalyze just to sh*t on Obama/Government to make them look bad. Dumb people do it all the time. Leftists will mock the right's apparent racism and religion-fanaticism, and the right will look for anything that makes the left look like big brother. It's not exactly noteworthy that snopes disproved this. edit: Who's dumb now!? "religious-fanaticism" is what I menat to say. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xylophobia Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Now I'm asking you all, if you were kinda forced to implant this kind of chip, would you do it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chukkles Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 The bible isn't true. We're not all going to be Satans bitches. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xylophobia Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 The bible isn't true.We're not all going to be Satans bitches. It's good that a science genius like you has coming to this conclusion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moonshield Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 The bible isn't true.We're not all going to be Satans bitches. It's good that a science genius like you has coming to this conclusion. It's well that Englishing is speaked from you good. But really, that's f*cking nutty that people legitimately refer to President Obama as the literary antichrist, when it's been generally understood that it was referred to as Nero. But Revelations was a pretty interesting read regardless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EscoLehGo Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Bush was the antichrist too, it's just more fervent with Obama because the right tends to thump their bibles harder plus he's colored and that doesn't sit well with some people on that side either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xylophobia Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 It's well that Englishing is speaked from you good. You little coward should know that English is not my first language. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
na89340qv0n34b09q340 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 Now I'm asking you all, if you were kinda forced to implant this kind of chip, would you do it? What do you mean by "kinda forced"? I wouldn't flee the country to avoid it, but I'd certainly try to help with any movement to get rid of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xylophobia Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 What do you mean by "kinda forced"? I wouldn't flee the country to avoid it, but I'd certainly try to help with any movement to get rid of them. You will be forced to have it under your skin sooner or later. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
na89340qv0n34b09q340 Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 What do you mean by "kinda forced"? I wouldn't flee the country to avoid it, but I'd certainly try to help with any movement to get rid of them. You will be forced to have it under your skin sooner or later. There'd still be a strong resistance movement. People would be passive until it actually happens, and then all hell would break loose when they are forced to have it under their skin. (Maybe not as extreme as I made it sound, but the majority of people would protest it.) I'd make myself part of that movement. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xylophobia Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 There'd still be a strong resistance movement. People would be passive until it actually happens, and then all hell would break loose when they are forced to have it under their skin. (Maybe not as extreme as I made it sound, but the majority of people would protest it.) I'd make myself part of that movement. Probably we'd see another "terrorist" attack in USA and therefore, the Government will implant the chips for "security reasons" against terrorists. People will be scared that they might lose their lifes and they will accept it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chukkles Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 The bible isn't true.We're not all going to be Satans bitches. It's good that a science genius like you has coming to this conclusion. Because the bible is so scientific. You see, I had to go into all that scientific technobabble or you may not have understood what was being said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Dildo Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 plus he's colored and that doesn't sit well with some people on that side either. Obama is colored? last time I checked, he's half white and half black. so which color are you referring to? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chukkles Posted March 19, 2013 Share Posted March 19, 2013 plus he's colored and that doesn't sit well with some people on that side either. Obama is colored? last time I checked, he's half white and half black. so which color are you referring to? His almost purple nut sack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EscoLehGo Posted March 20, 2013 Share Posted March 20, 2013 plus he's colored and that doesn't sit well with some people on that side either. Obama is colored? last time I checked, he's half white and half black. so which color are you referring to? Colored as in he'd have a hard time getting into a white's only bar in 1952. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now