Icarus Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 I would love to see a COD in WW2. I'd love to see one set during World War I. Hell, I'd like to see any major shooting game set during World War I, because I don't think that war has been covered extensively by the gaming industry, whereas World War II and Vietnam have been played out tremendously. Trench warfare. That is all. No really, why on Earth would anyone want to play a game centered around WWI? Honestly, I think it would be better than some of the futuristic takes on war. Besides, who wouldn't want to throw a canister of mustard gas at the approaching enemy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tuareg Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 If it's like Black Ops 2 it will be great! This, but without that f*cking annoying lag compensation. If you have a good internet connection on Black Ops 2, you will have a sh*tty network connection on Black Ops 2. That sucks big time. Well that sucks then, because the insanely high lag compensation is here to stay. Although it's good to hear that it remained as an issue in BOII. Another good reason i didn't buy it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Roflkon Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 I was really hoping for a WWII game this year but I guess you can't have everything. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
fgcarva1 Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 I would love to see a COD in WW2. I'd love to see one set during World War I. Hell, I'd like to see any major shooting game set during World War I, because I don't think that war has been covered extensively by the gaming industry, whereas World War II and Vietnam have been played out tremendously. Trench warfare. That is all. No really, why on Earth would anyone want to play a game centered around WWI? Honestly, I think it would be better than some of the futuristic takes on war. Besides, who wouldn't want to throw a canister of mustard gas at the approaching enemy? Here you go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
the utah dude Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 I think COD when downhill after COD4 and i predicted it too. Even though COD4's multiplayer was amazing they were never gonna make it the same ever again. Black Ops II is the first COD i haven't bought and i continue to keep it that way. I'm sick of Activision's sh*t, they ruined what was once a great franchise into something repetitive. And another modern warfare? jesus christ, what r they gonna possibly do? I know people say WW2 is overplayed but i think the series was much better when they based the games around that war. I thought Black Ops was actually a jump in the right direction for single player but the maps were terrible. Nobody's gonna boycott it because blood thirsty 12 year olds will continue to buy the game cause they don't know any better, they never experienced the old games. Looks like it might even continue the new game every year trend into the next generation of consoles Thanks for giving me a great laught ! COD 4 in a nutshell is pretty much counter strike ++ with some random useless features. That was the first and probably the last i will buy. ps : Yes my opinion is a bit biased but i think that at this point other peoples who's disliked the game as much as me, will obviously explaint it better than me . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J32T3R Posted February 9, 2013 Share Posted February 9, 2013 Hopefully they bring back the MW2 type killstreaks, and get rid of the horrid score streak system Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Fromage Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I am 99% sure this new CoD will be set in WW2. But what I want to see is a different perspectif. We have allready played as the Americans, Brits and Sovjets. Maybe it is time to see the war thought the eyes of a German/Japanse soldier. Yes, they lost the war, but they also have won some awesome battles. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TOMAHAWKS Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 CoD is the same sh*t over and over. Black ops 2 is only one I have and the only one I need. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Fromage Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I see some people here only know the mw-series and black ops... Not all CoD are the same. Does noone know about CoD 1, 2, 3 or World at War? Everytime CoD is the subject, people start taking about the last 4 games ( that were bad) and no One even thinks about the other 5 CoD games that while those were better then most games... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coin-god Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I am 99% sure this new CoD will be set in WW2. But what I want to see is a different perspectif. We have allready played as the Americans, Brits and Sovjets. Maybe it is time to see the war thought the eyes of a German/Japanse soldier. Yes, they lost the war, but they also have won some awesome battles. Yeaaaaah, suree. Activision would do that... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I see some people here only know the mw-series and black ops...Not all CoD are the same. Does noone know about CoD 1, 2, 3 or World at War? Everytime CoD is the subject, people start taking about the last 4 games ( that were bad) and no One even thinks about the other 5 CoD games that while those were better then most games... You do realise that Call of Duty: World at War is a complete carbon copy of Call of Duty: Modern Warfare just set in World War II ?. Call of Duty's been the same for nearly seven years now and it's not going to change its spots anytime soon, it's not like you can't see were people are coming from when they say that they're sick and tired of the same old crap being peddled to them year after year after year. I mean come on, the only thing that differentiates what Treyarch makes compared Infinity Ward is the zombie mode and that's just about it. There hasn't been a single ounce of innovation in the Call of Duty series for over half a decade and that's never a good thing, it seems that Activision have begun to think that its fan base are just as mindless and moronic as the zombies in their games. The other thing that you've got to think about is just how cash hungry Activision actually is, at least in the way that it milks the crap out any series that shows average and above sales, Call of Duty unfortunately gets hit by this the hardest. So much so that Activision release a Call of Duty game every single year without fail. There's an old saying and it goes like this (coined by Shakespeare himself y'know !) "Too much of a good thing". That's Call of Duty's primary problem, the game has pretty much reached the limit of what it's going to achieve gameplay wise, but releasing the game every year with almost no noticeable difference between them things are going to get old for people pretty quickly so it's hardly surprising that Call of Duty and by extension Activision receive the hate that they do. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gtaghost22 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 The Call of Duty franchise continues to set the bar for innovation and we expect a new Call of Duty game in development for 2013 to raise that bar even higher Not even in the alternate reality. I'm surprised they're making another one. I really am, I swear to God. Please tell me you're not actually surprised that a sequel is being developed for the most profitable game franchise in the industry. I'm pretty that title belongs to Mario, right? CoD, while extremely popular this gen isn't even close as far as I know. Anyway, I'm not really a fan of military first person shooters, so I will be skipping this, yeah. Are you kidding me man ? Call of Duty's outsold Mario tenfold by now. They make at least one and half billion dollars or nearly one billion pounds per release, Mario couldn't even dream of selling that much. Nah, I'm not joking, CoD isn't even close, take a look at this, Mario as a franchise is in a league on it's own, nothing comes close really. http://www.vgchartz.com/article/250637/top...00m-games-sold/ Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 The Call of Duty franchise continues to set the bar for innovation and we expect a new Call of Duty game in development for 2013 to raise that bar even higher Not even in the alternate reality. I'm surprised they're making another one. I really am, I swear to God. Please tell me you're not actually surprised that a sequel is being developed for the most profitable game franchise in the industry. I'm pretty that title belongs to Mario, right? CoD, while extremely popular this gen isn't even close as far as I know. Anyway, I'm not really a fan of military first person shooters, so I will be skipping this, yeah. Are you kidding me man ? Call of Duty's outsold Mario tenfold by now. They make at least one and half billion dollars or nearly one billion pounds per release, Mario couldn't even dream of selling that much. Nah, I'm not joking, CoD isn't even close, take a look at this, Mario as a franchise is in a league on it's own, nothing comes close really. http://www.vgchartz.com/article/250637/top...00m-games-sold/ Well all I know is that Call of Duty: Black Ops II sold 7.5 million copies within eleven days of launching, it's estimated that it sold around twenty to thirty million in total and if you take both that and MW3. Black Ops and Modern Warfare 2 and put their total earnings and sales together it wouldn't surprise me if they totally toppled that entire list. Not to say that Mario's not a massively successful series, it's just that Call of Duty currently holds the record (and it's the only thing that's been able to brake its record) for the largest entertainment release of all time. No disrespect to Mario, but he can't (and even if he does he won't) hold a candle to Call of Duty's massive success, especially if it continues to rise every year Activision decides to bring one of them out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bread Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Oh my god, another one already? Can't I just enjoy Black Ops 2 much longer? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Oh my god, another one already? Can't I just enjoy Black Ops 2 much longer? Sure you can, I mean it's not the like the servers are just going to go down immediately after Call of Duty ten's released. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remix Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Oh my god, another one already? Can't I just enjoy Black Ops 2 much longer? Sure you can, I mean it's not the like the servers are just going to go down immediately after Call of Duty ten's released. Yeah, that's what was great about MW3 being terrible. I got two years out of Black Ops 1! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Finn 7 five 11 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 Oh my god, another one already? Can't I just enjoy Black Ops 2 much longer? Sure you can, I mean it's not the like the servers are just going to go down immediately after Call of Duty ten's released. Yeah, that's what was great about MW3 being terrible. I got two years out of Black Ops 1! Still playing it on PS3 with 80k people online still. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carbine23 Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 I think COD when downhill after COD4 and i predicted it too. Even though COD4's multiplayer was amazing they were never gonna make it the same ever again. Black Ops II is the first COD i haven't bought and i continue to keep it that way. I'm sick of Activision's sh*t, they ruined what was once a great franchise into something repetitive. And another modern warfare? jesus christ, what r they gonna possibly do? I know people say WW2 is overplayed but i think the series was much better when they based the games around that war. I thought Black Ops was actually a jump in the right direction for single player but the maps were terrible. Nobody's gonna boycott it because blood thirsty 12 year olds will continue to buy the game cause they don't know any better, they never experienced the old games. Looks like it might even continue the new game every year trend into the next generation of consoles Thanks for giving me a great laught ! COD 4 in a nutshell is pretty much counter strike ++ with some random useless features. That was the first and probably the last i will buy. ps : Yes my opinion is a bit biased but i think that at this point other peoples who's disliked the game as much as me, will obviously explaint it better than me . Yes i've heard that before but all i said was that the series went downhill from COD4. I still find it amazing that people still play on the COD2, COD3 & COD4 servers for xbox live. And i'm sure people still play COD1 & United Offensive for PC. And i seriously DOUBT they'll go back to WW2 even though that would make me happy. Plus i'm pretty sure most of the original people at infinity ward are gone who made the early ones. And basically COD has turned into a sh*tty hollywood action movie, they look all pretty with the effects but it's just a terrible movie. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kudoboi Posted February 10, 2013 Share Posted February 10, 2013 (edited) Oh my god, another one already? Can't I just enjoy Black Ops 2 much longer? Sure you can, I mean it's not the like the servers are just going to go down immediately after Call of Duty ten's released. Yeah, that's what was great about MW3 being terrible. I got two years out of Black Ops 1! Still playing it on PS3 with 80k people online still. not on PC black ops 1 for PC has a peak of 4K people per day.. most of the times in my timezone there are only 30+ http://store.steampowered.com/stats/ hell even black ops 2 in my timzone only has 50 to 100 for all the game types except TDM which has 1000 and domination which has about 450. and since there is a lack of proper servers in asia all the games are p2p and many of the 3rd world countries in SEA still use dial up so 2/3 of the games i play are super laggy with everbody getting a 1 to 2 bars. there are still some games i play that get 3 bars but never 4. Edited February 10, 2013 by kudoboi Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bread Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Oh my god, another one already? Can't I just enjoy Black Ops 2 much longer? Sure you can, I mean it's not the like the servers are just going to go down immediately after Call of Duty ten's released. But it won't be as fun since everyone will flock to the next COD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
nigelhere9901 Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 Will this bs ever stop? I'm not buying a single COD again, sh*tty franchise needs to die, It's as if it's been EA'd. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Twang. Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 And again we get a topic filled with 3 people who are excited/interested in the game, and 30 people who can only complain that there's a new Call of Duty coming out. And again, in 9 months, 20 of those people will have converted into raving fanboys for about 2 months until they start complaining about tacticool FPS' diluting the gaming industry again. I can't help but wonder if you'd all be singing the same tune if they dropped the "Call of Duty" name and they were two separate-but-nearly-identical series developed by two Activision owned studios. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Reaper. Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 I hate that the CoD Series has gone downhill. The last one I fully enjoyed was [email protected], but some of the recent games have had there moments. But I'd never buy them on release, I wait for a sale. The main thing that has turnt me off the series is the constant DLC. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secura Posted February 11, 2013 Share Posted February 11, 2013 (edited) I've got an idea though it may sound crazy to some but here it is, what if they made a brilliant and lengthy campaign based not only on action but also on character development. Wait sorry, I must be coming down with something as what I've just described is clearly the insane ramblings of a madman. It's a good question though, right ? I mean why don't they bother making a brilliant and lengthy campaign ? it's not like they don't have the time, money or resources to do so. Think about it, Activision's got over one thousand game developers working for them, if they had them work on a campaign even if it was just for a year they could probably make it bigger and better then anything else in the industry, I suppose that's what makes me so angry at them. Activision, Infinity Ward, Treyarch and whatever else you like to call them have more than enough resources to make a game that would stun the gaming world in terms of both replay-ability, story telling, graphical fidelity and game design. Yet they willingly choose not to and instead decide to churn out the old boring Hollywood style single player campaign and the same old fiddly multiplayer that gets boring within the first few hours of play. Edited February 11, 2013 by Lightning Strike Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Claude4Catalina Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 I posted this on the Call of Duty wiki's post reguarding the subject "anyway, I'd like to see IW's take on the Vietnam conflict. think COD 4 type missions in the 'Nam, the Marine mission being equal to a basic infantry squad search and destroy type missions, the SAS counterpart being something akin to LRRP or something Recondo-related. I was pumped for Black Ops Vietnam campaign and then bitterly dissapointed when it turned out to be a mishmash of Fight Club and a Uwe Boll movie. at least if IW took a COD 4 approach to Vietnam they could pay homage to Tour of Duty, Platoon, Full Metal Jacket and We Were Soldiers and keep an interesting yet grounded story. also, the please those wanting Australia in some form, if there was to be a Special Forces campaign, the SASR could be featured...and it'd mean the return of the FAL(L1A1)" following the idea of having two different campaigns running side by side, an American and an "other forces" side of the story, there could be the infantry platoon, just say a Marine platoon for arguments sake(equal to the Rangers of MW2) and then a Special Forces or SOG campaign featuring Green Berets, indigenous montagnard scouts, ARVN Rangers and a few SASR troopers making them an equal the Task Force 141 of MW2. this side of the campaign could be two sided, some missions would be done as an SASR doing forward recon, whereas some as this character would be during the SOG missions with other forces, hopping the fence into Cambodia. I also like the idea of changing the loadout in campaign, though I'd like to see certain weapons locked to the different military branches, for example the SASR have a different loadout screen, with the L1A1, M16, M60, M72 LAW and Browning HP are available, the US Forces having a similar loadout with M14's and M1911A1's instead of L1A1's and Browning's. the SOG forces would have the most expansive armoury, ranging from cut down SLR's, M16's and M60's to the M1 and M2 Carbine, AK's, and my favourite, the sawed off RPD. anyway, I'll quit harping about Vietnam Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Remix Posted February 15, 2013 Share Posted February 15, 2013 I mean why don't they bother making a brilliant and lengthy campaign ? it's not like they don't have the time, money or resources to do so. Think about it, Activision's got over one thousand game developers working for them, if they had them work on a campaign even if it was just for a year they could probably make it bigger and better then anything else in the industry, I suppose that's what makes me so angry at them. I'm not agreeing or disagreeing with your point, but did you play the Black Ops 2 campaign? It was significantly better than any previous CoD campaign. It was longer, had a wide variety of missions and had elements of choice throughout the story. It's hard to tread through the nonsensical comments from people who jump on the CoD hating bandwagon, but a lot of people praise CoD for their campaigns over certain other FPS's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
+ Dragonjack + Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 Maybe this it perhaps? Check it out. "Activision’s next Call of Duty title is reportedly called Call of Duty: Ghosts. The rumor comes via YouTube user Drift0r who claims that a “very legitimate” source provided him with information regarding the game’s announcement, modes and much more. According to Drift0r, Ghosts is straying away from the Modern Warfare brand but will similarly use present-day weaponry. The game is set in the future but a plot point will force characters to use weapons from the past. Ghosts will change player movement, allowing them to dash and slide while shooting, peek around corners and roll side-to-side while prone. Ghosts allegedly features dynamic loading screens (such as rappelling from a helicopter or breaking a window to enter an area) and has destructive environments in single-player (these may be implemented in multiplayer later). Spec Ops has also been replaced by a new mode. Ghosts will reportedly only be released on next-generation consoles and PC, which fits with previous rumors that Infinity Ward is creating a next-gen Call of Duty title. According to Drift0r, Ghosts is targeting early May for its announcement. We’ve reached out to Activision about the rumor and will update this story with any comment we receive" The source is at IGN. http://au.ign.com/articles/2013/03/22/next...y-called-ghosts On-topic: Any thought's about this? This actually sounds pretty neat to me. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sgt. Foley Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 As long as it's from IW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LosSantosHobbit Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 Shooting themselves in the foot if only next-gen consoles, pretty much. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullworthAcademy Posted March 25, 2013 Share Posted March 25, 2013 (edited) How can anyone believe that? Probably the fakest thing I have ever read. http://www.original-gamer.com/article/5322...ojects-debunked Edited March 25, 2013 by theomenofficial Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now