roundtheoutside Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 When GTA IV was released, several gaming sites made test confirming Xbox 360 edges PS3 a little bit with respect to graphics rendering, anti-aliasing and shadow overlays. While this may seem trivial, other players do take this matter seriously. Since GTA V would probably squeeze all the remaining juice from the two aging consoles, it’s normal for some fans to worry what if Playstation 3 fails this time considering it already faced minor issues running the previous game. Will PS3 suffer from the same lack of resolution, shadows and AA? Or will the 360 be the best platform again? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LegitSpades Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 It should be the same. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hydro_PlayboyX Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 we can't possibly know that, but delevoping the game is much easier on xbox, im sure there wont be noticable difference Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
southparkmayor Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 It better not be laggy or muddy on ps3 like gta iv Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AdvanceTrak RSC Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 It should be the same. Yes this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nopheros Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I think it will be about the same, depends on which one has the best specs "GTA V is pushing both consoles to the max" or something like that i've read. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roundtheoutside Posted January 17, 2013 Author Share Posted January 17, 2013 Lets hope each platform version is being made separately and that PS3 isnt getting another xbox port. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coolstream Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 That's a pretty neat way to make the Moderators think you're on neither side with that sig and avatar, I must say. OT: Both consoles will run the game at around 30FPS, it's standard for most console games around. Recently I got NFS Pro Street just for fun on PC, played around a bit and updated it to 1.1, BAM, constant 30FPS which is a nightmare on racing games. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roundtheoutside Posted January 17, 2013 Author Share Posted January 17, 2013 That's a pretty neat way to make the Moderators think you're on neither side with that sig and avatar, I must say. OT: Both consoles will run the game at around 30FPS, it's standard for most console games around. Recently I got NFS Pro Street just for fun on PC, played around a bit and updated it to 1.1, BAM, constant 30FPS which is a nightmare on racing games. its capped at 30fps, which is retarded because current gen games are childs play for a modern PC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DickieM Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 The screens provided by north have been all on PS3, but it should be just as good on 360. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roundtheoutside Posted January 17, 2013 Author Share Posted January 17, 2013 (edited) The screens provided by north have been all on PS3, but it should be just as good on 360. but we dont know if the 360 will run at a higher res, which it usually does with multi platform games Edited January 17, 2013 by roundtheoutside Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SpartanCoca Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 The screens provided by north have been all on PS3, but it should be just as good on 360. This hasn't been confirmed. Stop speculating. The Demo was on a PS3 however the origins of the screens are unconfirmed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Racecarlock Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Who cares? It'll do good enough. I already know where this is going. Fans of all 3 platforms will call each other peasants and people will go to great lengths to shame me for not having enough money for the PS3 or a decent gaming PC. It always goes down like that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roundtheoutside Posted January 17, 2013 Author Share Posted January 17, 2013 Who cares? we all care. we want to buy the best looking version, not a blurry inferior one Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Racecarlock Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Who cares? we all care. we want to buy the best looking version, not a blurry inferior one San Andreas looked like a freaking nintendo 64 game and that didn't stop it from being awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
B Dawg Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Rockstar have mastered the PS3 by now, it could turn out better than on the 360. But who knows? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coolstream Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 That's a pretty neat way to make the Moderators think you're on neither side with that sig and avatar, I must say. OT: Both consoles will run the game at around 30FPS, it's standard for most console games around. Recently I got NFS Pro Street just for fun on PC, played around a bit and updated it to 1.1, BAM, constant 30FPS which is a nightmare on racing games. its capped at 30fps, which is retarded because current gen games are childs play for a modern PC True, but it's only capped on consoles. Pro Street was a one of a kind where EA made a dick move instead of actually fixing the issues that were in the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Footpenis Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I think R* confirmed that each version is being developed at the same time. It should end up like Max Payne 3 where there's 720P for each console and few if any differences in quality at all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
STOGE Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 It better not be laggy or muddy on ps3 like gta iv i wasnt aware of any issues on PS3? im still playing it today and to state its laggy and muddy is bullsh*t!!!! yeah the occasional buildings pop up happens(on both consoles) which has always been the case with ALL gta,s due to its fast rendering status. apart from that i thought it was graphically amazing(for the time) i personally thought the lighting etc was really well done. To the original point, houser has already stated that "theres plenty of power in these machines" so i dont see any issues with any of the versions and dont expect a skyrim scenrio. rockstar have never done this. And on that basis i feel ur trying to flame by trying to edge the xbox version? The differences(if any) would be neglegent and therefore POINTLESS to even suggest them Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roundtheoutside Posted January 17, 2013 Author Share Posted January 17, 2013 Who cares? we all care. we want to buy the best looking version, not a blurry inferior one San Andreas looked like a freaking nintendo 64 game and that didn't stop it from being awesome. thats why I only played san andreas on PC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWDJ1992 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 RDR was uglier on PS3 than it was on Xbox 360, ran @ lower res & that ugly quincunx anti-aliasing yuck! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DeafMetal Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I'm sure some are going to bitch about it, but that would be like 0.05% of GTA players. Honestly, the difference between the two consoles in terms of running games is almost non-existent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hurrikane Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I think that both consoles will be just fine in terms of performance. I am there are a lot of talented people working on making the game run the best it can. I am not one to drive around and look at a tree in the forest, or highway, I'd rather focus on the gameplay of the world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roundtheoutside Posted January 17, 2013 Author Share Posted January 17, 2013 RDR was uglier on PS3 than it was on Xbox 360, ran @ lower res & that ugly quincunx anti-aliasing yuck! thats what im worried about. Almost all multiplatform games on PS3 are worse looking Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWDJ1992 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 RDR was uglier on PS3 than it was on Xbox 360, ran @ lower res & that ugly quincunx anti-aliasing yuck! thats what im worried about. Almost all multiplatform games on PS3 are worse looking yeah i know, that sucks, but look at how good all the first party games on PS3 look, Uncharted,Killzone , & the upcoming The Last Of Us, just all the third party games look & play better on X360. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
matt_be Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I've pointed this out before, but Rockstar said that they were developing GTA V side-by-side for both consoles. That way each game will be able to take full advantage of the hardware. And if you ask me for a link, I will go ahead and tell you now that I don't have one. But I think I read that in the GI article. If it wasn't there, it was probably at IGN.com Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BullworthAcademy Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Who cares? we all care. we want to buy the best looking version, not a blurry inferior one San Andreas looked like a freaking nintendo 64 game. What? San Andreas STILL looks amazing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
roundtheoutside Posted January 17, 2013 Author Share Posted January 17, 2013 I agree alot with Houser. The best games come at the end of the consoles lifespan. San Andreas pushed the hell out of the Ps2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MWDJ1992 Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 I've pointed this out before, but Rockstar said that they were developing GTA V side-by-side for both consoles. That way each game will be able to take full advantage of the hardware. And if you ask me for a link, I will go ahead and tell you now that I don't have one. But I think I read that in the GI article. If it wasn't there, it was probably at IGN.com good sign for PS3 users is that the GTA:V Demo was running on PS3, devs usally show games on the most stable, better looking console, my opinion is that they are in the middle of getting the X360 version down to 3 discs, remember LA Noire, that was on 5-6 X360 disc before they managed to cut it down to 3 for release. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fail_At_GTA Posted January 17, 2013 Share Posted January 17, 2013 Console wars are pointless bullsh*t. GTA 4 was fine on both the Xbox ans PS3, although people complained it was dark on the PS3, which is fixable by adjusting the brightness. Durr... Anyway, GTA 5 is being made on both Xbox and PS3 at the same time. They will be equal. Now the PS3/Xbox fanboys and PC elitiest kids can stop complaining and comparing the game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now