MosquitoSmasher Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Performance. Not even nessecarily the look, if there's some aliasing, hey i can live with that. But with a terrible framerate that bogs down to sickening low numbers, i can't apreciate that or some serious screen tearing can really ruin the party. Far Cry 3 is out tomorrow in Europe and there have been some mixed reports on the performance. Some say the framerate doesn't drop much, but that the overall framerate is a bit on the low side, there's also some serious screen tearing now and then. I'll give an example of what i just said. Website Gamersyde has played the 360 version (and their videos are up) and have said this: As you'll see, this third installment is quite demanding for 7-year-old consoles, so don't be surprised to see a lot of aliasing, tearing issues and, maybe more importantly, rather low framerate (though it does not seem to drop) Many say that the game looks amazing but we don't think it looks that impressive compared to other games. Maybe we've gotten hard to please, you tell us. To be honest, the framerate of the console version gave me a bad headache. There are no real framerate drops from what I have seen, but the game doesn't look smooth for some reason. I think framerate is way below 30 fps. And it's not even 720p, as proven by the black lines on top and at the bottom of the screen. http://gamersyde.com/news_our_videos_of_fa...3-13618_en.html It's not so much that there's alot of tearing in the videos from Gamersyde, but Youtube videos of the console version show some really bad tearing now and then. Which brings me to GTA V. GTA V will be Rockstar's biggest open world yet, the city of LS will be full of tiny little details and the whole gameworld overall will be very lively. Ubi didn't manage to get FC3 running without framerate problems, but that gameworld, while huge, is not close to being as full of buildings and objects and details like GTA V. How is Rockstar going to manage to get it running smoothly? I know plenty of people apparently didn't realize or noticed the bad framerate frequently in GTA IV, but it really was there quite a bit. And i know since then the engine has been greatly optimized, as can be seen with RDR...but again..RDR contains alot of empty open spaces, the hardware doesn't really need to do hard work for that. Most previewers so far didn't say anything negative about the framerate, they said it was good but not perfect yet. But then again, very little reviewers also spoke about these framerate problems in FC3. As Gamersyde said..FC3 is quite demanding on the 7 year old consoles. How will GTA V fare? Anyone else in the same boat as me on this? Cause i'm honestly not worried about anything else. This is my only real concern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coolstream Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Is that issue on both consoles or is Far Cry 3 having issues with one of the consoles? That might be relevant to which platform I buy GTA V on. Edit: Nevermind, the X360 version. Think I'll go for the PS3 then, which was what I was thinking of going for either way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokrie Dela Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Many ubisofts games have screen tearing Don't think I've ever seen gta IV screen tear. A friend of mine explained it before and the revs can avoid it if they do it right - I expect rockstar would take measure to avoid it The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Click here to view my Poetry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosquitoSmasher Posted November 28, 2012 Author Share Posted November 28, 2012 Is that issue on both consoles or is Far Cry 3 having issues with one of the consoles? That might be relevant to which platform I buy GTA V on. Edit: Nevermind, the X360 version. Think I'll go for the PS3 then, which was what I was thinking of going for either way. I would not jump to that conclusion right away. Gamersyde simply doesn't have the PS3 version yet. But in Youtube videos both versions seem to suffer from this. I would not be surprised if the 360 version turns out to be the better version. Also a comment on that video says this, so again....don't make the decision yet : Both console games are capped at 30fps, but unfortunately the only way they can achieve this is by turning off v-lock altogether. Both versions have pretty bad screen-tear 'episodes' and frame-rate - weirdly - takes a big hit on internal scenes. However, 360 gets closer to maintaining 30fps, with a 10-to-15 per cent performance advantage over PS3 in challenging, like-for-like scenes. Screen-tear is the big dividing factor here, though. In our collection of test scenes, 360 on average typically tore less than 10 per cent of the console's 60Hz output - fewer than six torn frames in a second, as an average. On PS3, that zooms right up to 30 per cent, 20 torn frames. In the worst case scenario we measured, we saw screen-tear at 14 per cent on Xbox 360... a figure that ballooned all the way up to 43 per cent on the same video from PS3. To me sounds that the 360 version clearly has the edge. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apex Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Red Dead Redemption had absolutely amazing anti-aliasing for a console game, so I wouldn't worry to much. Rockstar knows what they're doing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coral_City Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 LOL @ Far Cry 3. Lemme guess, a sh*tty non-cohesive story, huge map with nothing to do, and infinitely spawning enemies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coolstream Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 I would not jump to that conclusion right away. Gamersyde simply doesn't have the PS3 version yet. But in Youtube videos both versions seem to suffer from this. I would not be surprised if the 360 version turns out to be the better version. Also a comment on that video says this, so again....don't make the decision yet : Thanks for clearing that up, still, PS3 is at the top of the list thanks to all the stuff like free multiplayer. We'll see though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosquitoSmasher Posted November 28, 2012 Author Share Posted November 28, 2012 LOL @ Far Cry 3. Lemme guess, a sh*tty non-cohesive story, huge map with nothing to do, and infinitely spawning enemies. Very wrong my friend. Apparently the store is quite better than FC2 with some really interesting characters, especially the antagonist. Everything that was a huge annoyance in FC2 has been removed...so... - No respawning enemies at checkpoint..clear a checkpoint and it becomes yours and friendlies will move there. - No malaria - No weapon degradation - Stealth works PERFECT And so on. As for RDR. Yes, great framerate and anti-aliasing, but the thing is...the gameworld is alot less crowded than a GTA game. I will be incredibly impressed if GTA V has a similar framerate to RDR. But with alittle aliasing...i can live. @Coolstream That's all up to you. I wouldn't buy FC3 for the multiplayer, cause according to several reports, it's cool but it's not really amazing or anything. I definitely get FC3 for the SP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coolstream Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 LOL @ Far Cry 3. Lemme guess, a sh*tty non-cohesive story, huge map with nothing to do, and infinitely spawning enemies. Very wrong my friend. Apparently the store is quite better than FC2 with some really interesting characters, especially the antagonist. Everything that was a huge annoyance in FC2 has been removed...so... - No respawning enemies at checkpoint..clear a checkpoint and it becomes yours and friendlies will move there. - No malaria - No weapon degradation - Stealth works PERFECT And so on. As for RDR. Yes, great framerate, but the thing is...the gameworld is alot less crowded than a GTA game. I will be incredibly impressed if GTA V has a similar framerate to RDR. Sweet Jesus, the malaria is gone? PARTEHH! Edit: MosquitoSmasher, didn't mean FC3 ^^ Meant GTA V Multiplayer Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosquitoSmasher Posted November 28, 2012 Author Share Posted November 28, 2012 LOL @ Far Cry 3. Lemme guess, a sh*tty non-cohesive story, huge map with nothing to do, and infinitely spawning enemies. Very wrong my friend. Apparently the store is quite better than FC2 with some really interesting characters, especially the antagonist. Everything that was a huge annoyance in FC2 has been removed...so... - No respawning enemies at checkpoint..clear a checkpoint and it becomes yours and friendlies will move there. - No malaria - No weapon degradation - Stealth works PERFECT And so on. As for RDR. Yes, great framerate, but the thing is...the gameworld is alot less crowded than a GTA game. I will be incredibly impressed if GTA V has a similar framerate to RDR. Sweet Jesus, the malaria is gone? PARTEHH! yep, all gone. But you will still need to press a button now and then to heal yourself, so you will see the whole bandage thing and stuff, but i don't mind that. Malaria however..while realistic i guess, just wasn't adding to the fun factor at all. GTA V.... If i remember correctly. It was Game Informer that said the framerate was very good, no slowdowns or lag as they called it. While that sounds amazing and i want to believe it...slightly different reports came from other sources saying it wasn't quite perfect yet and aliasing was present. But then again, i'm not expecting a perfect framerate in GTA V on consoles...not a whole lot of open world games have a perfect framerate anyway. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Coral_City Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 LOL @ Far Cry 3. Lemme guess, a sh*tty non-cohesive story, huge map with nothing to do, and infinitely spawning enemies. Very wrong my friend. Apparently the store is quite better than FC2 with some really interesting characters, especially the antagonist. Everything that was a huge annoyance in FC2 has been removed...so... - No respawning enemies at checkpoint..clear a checkpoint and it becomes yours and friendlies will move there. - No malaria - No weapon degradation - Stealth works PERFECT And so on. As for RDR. Yes, great framerate and anti-aliasing, but the thing is...the gameworld is alot less crowded than a GTA game. I will be incredibly impressed if GTA V has a similar framerate to RDR. But with alittle aliasing...i can live. @Coolstream That's all up to you. I wouldn't buy FC3 for the multiplayer, cause according to several reports, it's cool but it's not really amazing or anything. I definitely get FC3 for the SP. motherofgod.gif If enemies don't respawn after a checkpoint, this game is a day 1 purchase. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jamieleng Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 LOL @ Far Cry 3. Lemme guess, a sh*tty non-cohesive story, huge map with nothing to do, and infinitely spawning enemies. Very wrong my friend. Apparently the store is quite better than FC2 with some really interesting characters, especially the antagonist. Everything that was a huge annoyance in FC2 has been removed...so... - No respawning enemies at checkpoint..clear a checkpoint and it becomes yours and friendlies will move there. - No malaria - No weapon degradation - Stealth works PERFECT And so on. As for RDR. Yes, great framerate and anti-aliasing, but the thing is...the gameworld is alot less crowded than a GTA game. I will be incredibly impressed if GTA V has a similar framerate to RDR. But with alittle aliasing...i can live. @Coolstream That's all up to you. I wouldn't buy FC3 for the multiplayer, cause according to several reports, it's cool but it's not really amazing or anything. I definitely get FC3 for the SP. motherofgod.gif If enemies don't respawn after a checkpoint, this game is a day 1 purchase. You mean it's not out in Canada yet? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LotusRIP Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 GTA4 online doesn't allow for too many explosions at once Neither did San Andreas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gtaghost22 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 If the framerate is similar to Red Dead Redemption's then it's fine by me, i never had nay major drops on my PS3, i'm sure the same goes for the 360 version, not to mention it looked phenomenal aswell, i'm sure V will run just fine, don't worry, OP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trund Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Oh god, I wanted to seriously stop reading when I saw you comparing Far Cry 3 to GTA V, but I did keep reading, and honestly, ARE YOU SERIOUS? You can't compare games like that. GTA V will run fine on the consoles. It won't have a super amazing framerate, but it won't be worse than GTA 4 either, this isn't some idiotic company that rushes a game only to bring it out before Christmas, R* is serious when it comes to these things, so they take their time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosquitoSmasher Posted November 28, 2012 Author Share Posted November 28, 2012 Oh god, I wanted to seriously stop reading when I saw you comparing Far Cry 3 to GTA V, but I did keep reading, and honestly, ARE YOU SERIOUS? You can't compare games like that. GTA V will run fine on the consoles. It won't have a super amazing framerate, but it won't be worse than GTA 4 either, this isn't some idiotic company that rushes a game only to bring it out before Christmas, R* is serious when it comes to these things, so they take their time. Both have a huge open world, BUT the world in FC3 is alot more empty compared to a GTA. So no my friend, i think i have a valid concern. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trund Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Oh god, I wanted to seriously stop reading when I saw you comparing Far Cry 3 to GTA V, but I did keep reading, and honestly, ARE YOU SERIOUS? You can't compare games like that. GTA V will run fine on the consoles. It won't have a super amazing framerate, but it won't be worse than GTA 4 either, this isn't some idiotic company that rushes a game only to bring it out before Christmas, R* is serious when it comes to these things, so they take their time. Both have a huge open world, BUT the world in FC3 is alot more empty compared to a GTA. So no my friend, i think i have a valid concern. It's still a completely different company developing the game, running a completely different engine, and and and..... You can't really compare games like that. R* wouldn't dare to release a game that runs extremely crappy on consoles, when it's only made for consoles so far. Also R* has been working for years now on the Rage engine, and according to them GTA V also runs on a new version of that engine, so it will for sure not run any worse than on GTA 4, I see them being equal in the end, with the only change that GTA V will have the prettier graphics. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosquitoSmasher Posted November 28, 2012 Author Share Posted November 28, 2012 Oh god, I wanted to seriously stop reading when I saw you comparing Far Cry 3 to GTA V, but I did keep reading, and honestly, ARE YOU SERIOUS? You can't compare games like that. GTA V will run fine on the consoles. It won't have a super amazing framerate, but it won't be worse than GTA 4 either, this isn't some idiotic company that rushes a game only to bring it out before Christmas, R* is serious when it comes to these things, so they take their time. Both have a huge open world, BUT the world in FC3 is alot more empty compared to a GTA. So no my friend, i think i have a valid concern. It's still a completely different company developing the game, running a completely different engine, and and and..... You can't really compare games like that. R* wouldn't dare to release a game that runs extremely crappy on consoles, when it's only made for consoles so far. Also R* has been working for years now on the Rage engine, and according to them GTA V also runs on a new version of that engine, so it will for sure not run any worse than on GTA 4, I see them being equal in the end, with the only change that GTA V will have the prettier graphics. That is true. I have faith in Rockstar for sure, and as i said before, i would be extremely impressed if they manage to make it run as smoothly as RDR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golf wang Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Oh god, I wanted to seriously stop reading when I saw you comparing Far Cry 3 to GTA V, but I did keep reading, and honestly, ARE YOU SERIOUS? You can't compare games like that. GTA V will run fine on the consoles. It won't have a super amazing framerate, but it won't be worse than GTA 4 either, this isn't some idiotic company that rushes a game only to bring it out before Christmas, R* is serious when it comes to these things, so they take their time. Oh God, stop being so pretentious. People can compare whatever they want. Ubisoft is a serious game company, too. Fucking fanboy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AtomicPunk Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Is that issue on both consoles or is Far Cry 3 having issues with one of the consoles? That might be relevant to which platform I buy GTA V on. Edit: Nevermind, the X360 version. Think I'll go for the PS3 then, which was what I was thinking of going for either way. I would not jump to that conclusion right away. Gamersyde simply doesn't have the PS3 version yet. But in Youtube videos both versions seem to suffer from this. I would not be surprised if the 360 version turns out to be the better version. Also a comment on that video says this, so again....don't make the decision yet : Both console games are capped at 30fps, but unfortunately the only way they can achieve this is by turning off v-lock altogether. Both versions have pretty bad screen-tear 'episodes' and frame-rate - weirdly - takes a big hit on internal scenes. However, 360 gets closer to maintaining 30fps, with a 10-to-15 per cent performance advantage over PS3 in challenging, like-for-like scenes. Screen-tear is the big dividing factor here, though. In our collection of test scenes, 360 on average typically tore less than 10 per cent of the console's 60Hz output - fewer than six torn frames in a second, as an average. On PS3, that zooms right up to 30 per cent, 20 torn frames. In the worst case scenario we measured, we saw screen-tear at 14 per cent on Xbox 360... a figure that ballooned all the way up to 43 per cent on the same video from PS3. To me sounds that the 360 version clearly has the edge. A friend of mine was told directly by one of his friends at Ubi that the PS3 version looked better and ran better. He's not a fanboy either. I'd rather play it on PS3 just because of personal preference. There is screen tearing in both console versions but it's not as bad on PS3. I'm just telling you what I was told. I've been playing it for 2 days now and I haven't seen any bad tearing or too bad of framerate problems and I've had some bitchin' explosions, fires, and shootouts while animals are running everywhere. The gunfire & explosions are soooo good in this game. Definitely a worthy contender for GOTY. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golf wang Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Is that issue on both consoles or is Far Cry 3 having issues with one of the consoles? That might be relevant to which platform I buy GTA V on. Edit: Nevermind, the X360 version. Think I'll go for the PS3 then, which was what I was thinking of going for either way. I would not jump to that conclusion right away. Gamersyde simply doesn't have the PS3 version yet. But in Youtube videos both versions seem to suffer from this. I would not be surprised if the 360 version turns out to be the better version. Also a comment on that video says this, so again....don't make the decision yet : Both console games are capped at 30fps, but unfortunately the only way they can achieve this is by turning off v-lock altogether. Both versions have pretty bad screen-tear 'episodes' and frame-rate - weirdly - takes a big hit on internal scenes. However, 360 gets closer to maintaining 30fps, with a 10-to-15 per cent performance advantage over PS3 in challenging, like-for-like scenes. Screen-tear is the big dividing factor here, though. In our collection of test scenes, 360 on average typically tore less than 10 per cent of the console's 60Hz output - fewer than six torn frames in a second, as an average. On PS3, that zooms right up to 30 per cent, 20 torn frames. In the worst case scenario we measured, we saw screen-tear at 14 per cent on Xbox 360... a figure that ballooned all the way up to 43 per cent on the same video from PS3. To me sounds that the 360 version clearly has the edge. A friend of mine was told directly by one of his friends at Ubi that the PS3 version looked better and ran better. He's not a fanboy either. I'd rather play it on PS3 just because of personal preference. There is screen tearing in both console versions but it's not as bad on PS3. I'm just telling you what I was told. I've been playing it for 2 days now and I haven't seen any bad tearing or too bad of framerate problems and I've had some bitchin' explosions, fires, and shootouts while animals are running everywhere. The gunfire & explosions are soooo good in this game. Definitely a worthy contender for GOTY. I thought it wasn't out in the US until December 4? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DS 17 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 I've just seen Far Cry 3 will have its own map editor. Wow. It's looking very easy. Want that for GTA, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosquitoSmasher Posted November 28, 2012 Author Share Posted November 28, 2012 Is that issue on both consoles or is Far Cry 3 having issues with one of the consoles? That might be relevant to which platform I buy GTA V on. Edit: Nevermind, the X360 version. Think I'll go for the PS3 then, which was what I was thinking of going for either way. I would not jump to that conclusion right away. Gamersyde simply doesn't have the PS3 version yet. But in Youtube videos both versions seem to suffer from this. I would not be surprised if the 360 version turns out to be the better version. Also a comment on that video says this, so again....don't make the decision yet : Both console games are capped at 30fps, but unfortunately the only way they can achieve this is by turning off v-lock altogether. Both versions have pretty bad screen-tear 'episodes' and frame-rate - weirdly - takes a big hit on internal scenes. However, 360 gets closer to maintaining 30fps, with a 10-to-15 per cent performance advantage over PS3 in challenging, like-for-like scenes. Screen-tear is the big dividing factor here, though. In our collection of test scenes, 360 on average typically tore less than 10 per cent of the console's 60Hz output - fewer than six torn frames in a second, as an average. On PS3, that zooms right up to 30 per cent, 20 torn frames. In the worst case scenario we measured, we saw screen-tear at 14 per cent on Xbox 360... a figure that ballooned all the way up to 43 per cent on the same video from PS3. To me sounds that the 360 version clearly has the edge. A friend of mine was told directly by one of his friends at Ubi that the PS3 version looked better and ran better. He's not a fanboy either. I'd rather play it on PS3 just because of personal preference. There is screen tearing in both console versions but it's not as bad on PS3. I'm just telling you what I was told. I've been playing it for 2 days now and I haven't seen any bad tearing or too bad of framerate problems and I've had some bitchin' explosions, fires, and shootouts while animals are running everywhere. The gunfire & explosions are soooo good in this game. Definitely a worthy contender for GOTY. Hmmm that's interesting. The thing is that the tearing doesn't show up alot but just out of the blue, it seems. I've seen several Youtube videos where you see alot of tearing but in the Gamersyde videos not at all, or just very little. Ah well, soon enough i'll see it for myself. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mokrie Dela Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 - No respawning enemies at checkpoint..clear a checkpoint and it becomes yours and friendlies will move there. - No malaria - No weapon degradation - Stealth works PERFECT if thats true i might actually get it after all. The only true wisdom is in knowing you know nothing. Click here to view my Poetry Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MosquitoSmasher Posted November 28, 2012 Author Share Posted November 28, 2012 - No respawning enemies at checkpoint..clear a checkpoint and it becomes yours and friendlies will move there. - No malaria - No weapon degradation - Stealth works PERFECT if thats true i might actually get it after all. Very true. Read reviews Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gtaghost22 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 (edited) Oh god, I wanted to seriously stop reading when I saw you comparing Far Cry 3 to GTA V, but I did keep reading, and honestly, ARE YOU SERIOUS? You can't compare games like that. GTA V will run fine on the consoles. It won't have a super amazing framerate, but it won't be worse than GTA 4 either, this isn't some idiotic company that rushes a game only to bring it out before Christmas, R* is serious when it comes to these things, so they take their time. Oh God, stop being so pretentious. People can compare whatever they want. Ubisoft is a serious game company, too. Fucking fanboy. Rockstar fanboy..? He is absolutely right, Ubisoft do rush thier games to release it to the market every year, that is fact, i love Ubisoft but that is a fact. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassin's_Creed 2007: Assassin's Creed 2008: Assassin's Creed: Altair's Chronicles 2009: Assassin's Creed: Bloodlines 2009: Assassin's Creed II 2010: Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood 2011: Assassin's Creed: Revelations 2012: Assassin's Creed III 2012: Assassin's Creed Liberation Unlike you haters, we Rockstar "fanboys" as you like to call us always, always back up our claims with links. You're absolutely delusional if you think Ubisoft is half the developer Rockstar is. wheter you like it or not, Rockstar is the best developer in the gaming industry. Edited November 28, 2012 by Gtaghost22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golf wang Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 (edited) Oh god, I wanted to seriously stop reading when I saw you comparing Far Cry 3 to GTA V, but I did keep reading, and honestly, ARE YOU SERIOUS? You can't compare games like that. GTA V will run fine on the consoles. It won't have a super amazing framerate, but it won't be worse than GTA 4 either, this isn't some idiotic company that rushes a game only to bring it out before Christmas, R* is serious when it comes to these things, so they take their time. Oh God, stop being so pretentious. People can compare whatever they want. Ubisoft is a serious game company, too. Fucking fanboy. Rockstar fanboy..? He is absolutely right, Ubisoft do rush thier games to release it to the market every year, that is fact, i love Ubisoft but that is a fact. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassin's_Creed 2007: Assassin's Creed 2008: Assassin's Creed: Altair's Chronicles 2009: Assassin's Creed: Bloodlines 2009: Assassin's Creed II 2010: Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood 2011: Assassin's Creed: Revelations 2012: Assassin's Creed III 2012: Assassin's Creed Liberation You're absolutely delusional if you think Ubisoft is half the developer Rockstar is. wheter you like it or not, Rockstar is the best developer in the gaming industry. You're a fanboy too. You're same guy who believes Houser's statement that he doesn't care about profits. LOL I'm not a hater either. I love Rockstar and most of their games, I'm just not a fanboy. I'm not a fanboy of any company. Edited November 28, 2012 by golf wang Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hinti21 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 - No respawning enemies at checkpoint..clear a checkpoint and it becomes yours and friendlies will move there. - No malaria - No weapon degradation - Stealth works PERFECT if thats true i might actually get it after all. Very true. Read reviews Let's open a Far Cry 3-thread!^^ Ima buy it tomorrow...can't wait!! If I could have Far Cry 3 right now and for that never have GTA 5 I'd totally make that deal!!.......nah But seriously, I think FC3 is gonna be awesome! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gtaghost22 Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 (edited) Oh god, I wanted to seriously stop reading when I saw you comparing Far Cry 3 to GTA V, but I did keep reading, and honestly, ARE YOU SERIOUS? You can't compare games like that. GTA V will run fine on the consoles. It won't have a super amazing framerate, but it won't be worse than GTA 4 either, this isn't some idiotic company that rushes a game only to bring it out before Christmas, R* is serious when it comes to these things, so they take their time. Oh God, stop being so pretentious. People can compare whatever they want. Ubisoft is a serious game company, too. Fucking fanboy. Rockstar fanboy..? He is absolutely right, Ubisoft do rush thier games to release it to the market every year, that is fact, i love Ubisoft but that is a fact. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassin's_Creed 2007: Assassin's Creed 2008: Assassin's Creed: Altair's Chronicles 2009: Assassin's Creed: Bloodlines 2009: Assassin's Creed II 2010: Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood 2011: Assassin's Creed: Revelations 2012: Assassin's Creed III 2012: Assassin's Creed Liberation You're absolutely delusional if you think Ubisoft is half the developer Rockstar is. wheter you like it or not, Rockstar is the best developer in the gaming industry. You're a fanboy too. You're same guy who believe Houser's statement that he doesn't care about profits. LOL Let's see... -You called him a fanboy for saying Ubisoft rushes thier games to release it to the market every year, which is a fact. -I proved he was absolutely correct, with links. -You couldn't come up with a reply so you decided to call me a fanboy too. See how immature you look right now? Edited November 28, 2012 by Gtaghost22 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
golf wang Posted November 28, 2012 Share Posted November 28, 2012 Oh god, I wanted to seriously stop reading when I saw you comparing Far Cry 3 to GTA V, but I did keep reading, and honestly, ARE YOU SERIOUS? You can't compare games like that. GTA V will run fine on the consoles. It won't have a super amazing framerate, but it won't be worse than GTA 4 either, this isn't some idiotic company that rushes a game only to bring it out before Christmas, R* is serious when it comes to these things, so they take their time. Oh God, stop being so pretentious. People can compare whatever they want. Ubisoft is a serious game company, too. Fucking fanboy. Rockstar fanboy..? He is absolutely right, Ubisoft do rush thier games to release it to the market every year, that is fact, i love Ubisoft but that is a fact. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assassin's_Creed 2007: Assassin's Creed 2008: Assassin's Creed: Altair's Chronicles 2009: Assassin's Creed: Bloodlines 2009: Assassin's Creed II 2010: Assassin's Creed: Brotherhood 2011: Assassin's Creed: Revelations 2012: Assassin's Creed III 2012: Assassin's Creed Liberation You're absolutely delusional if you think Ubisoft is half the developer Rockstar is. wheter you like it or not, Rockstar is the best developer in the gaming industry. You're a fanboy too. You're same guy who believe Houser's statement that he doesn't care about profits. LOL Let's see... -You called him a fanboy for saying Ubisoft rushes thier games to release it to the market every year, which is fact. -I proved he was absolutely correct, with links. -You couldn't come up with a reply so you decided to call me a fanboy too. See how immature you look right now? I don't really care man. This is just a forum Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now