Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 @ Masterfocker Your name suits you very much, and I mean that literally indeed. Just a slight spelling change would perfect it. Where is the evidence that Red Dead Revolver was supposed to be about zombies in the first place, before it was made? I've done some online research and not seen any concrete evidence of your claim. I notice you have not even bothered to even provide a link to it. I actually think you are talking bullsh*t. From what I can see so far, the Red Dead series had always started out as a Western genre, not with f**king zombies like your dumb ass claims. Even if it did, so what ? The RDR series offically started out as Western genre whichever way you look at it - and that is what matters. Anyway, like I said already, I don't believe your claim unless you show me a link with concrete evidence. Don't tell me that " a zombie GTA V mode would only be a DLC and I don't have to buy it" crap. Like it's gonna make me feel better - it will not. The same time, effort and resources used to make that stupid zombie DLC could be put to better use for other added extra stuff in GTA V that actually has something to do with the game's original themes - maybe some real interesting, extra episodic content with new characters and more added new gameplay features. If that zombie rubbish was made instead, we'd be denied the much better extra stuff and DLC that is typical of what GTA games should be about. That would be a great waste in my view, because it's clear to see that zombies have f**king nothing to do with GTA. I am not sad, I am just fine thanks. Just because I don't want zombies in GTA it don't mean I got a crisis in my life going on. That I can assure you. If Rockstar make it then fine, I simply won't buy it. But I will certainly voice my opposition to it when and where ever I hear it and when I feel like it. Because really do think that zombies in GTA is a bullsh*t idea, I don't care how many people like it, it's what I think (from what I can see here, most people don't like it). And you obviously can't read. I never said it wasn't supposed to be Western, I even said it was supposed to be Western the whole time, but it was supposed to be super natural and have zombies in it. Read the other guy's post, he has a link for you. There's also an old topic with a sh*tload of links, but I don't feel like looking for it. I have better things to do. You're also basing things off of what you, and you only, would want to see in a DLC. Maybe what you would like in a DLC, others don't like. Would you be mad then, too? Also, it wouldn't be a waste of resources if it brought in a billion dollars, would it? And they'd easily bring in a billion dollars. That's like saying I wouldn't like it if GTA 5 'wasted resources' to make a silly little gun pack DLC, but instead of constantly bitching about it like you do, I'd tolerate it. Apparantly, tolerance isn't your strong-suit. Your logic and views are so flawed, it's like talking to a brick wall of ignorance. Whatever, just keep talking out your ass. You'll smarten up eventually. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 @ Masterfocker Your name suits you very much, and I mean that literally indeed. Just a slight spelling change would perfect it. Where is the evidence that Red Dead Revolver was supposed to be about zombies in the first place, before it was made? I've done some online research and not seen any concrete evidence of your claim. I notice you have not even bothered to even provide a link to it. I actually think you are talking bullsh*t. From what I can see so far, the Red Dead series had always started out as a Western genre, not with f**king zombies like your dumb ass claims. Even if it did, so what ? The RDR series offically started out as Western genre whichever way you look at it - and that is what matters. Anyway, like I said already, I don't believe your claim unless you show me a link with concrete evidence. Don't tell me that " a zombie GTA V mode would only be a DLC and I don't have to buy it" crap. Like it's gonna make me feel better - it will not. The same time, effort and resources used to make that stupid zombie DLC could be put to better use for other added extra stuff in GTA V that actually has something to do with the game's original themes - maybe some real interesting, extra episodic content with new characters and more added new gameplay features. If that zombie rubbish was made instead, we'd be denied the much better extra stuff and DLC that is typical of what GTA games should be about. That would be a great waste in my view, because it's clear to see that zombies have f**king nothing to do with GTA. I am not sad, I am just fine thanks. Just because I don't want zombies in GTA it don't mean I got a crisis in my life going on. That I can assure you. If Rockstar make it then fine, I simply won't buy it. But I will certainly voice my opposition to it when and where ever I hear it and when I feel like it. Because really do think that zombies in GTA is a bullsh*t idea, I don't care how many people like it, it's what I think (from what I can see here, most people don't like it). And you obviously can't read. I never said it wasn't supposed to be Western, I even said it was supposed to be Western the whole time, but it was supposed to be super natural and have zombies in it. Read the other guy's post, he has a link for you. There's also an old topic with a sh*tload of links, but I don't feel like looking for it. I have better things to do. You're also basing things off of what you, and you only, would want to see in a DLC. Maybe what you would like in a DLC, others don't like. Would you be mad then, too? Also, it wouldn't be a waste of resources if it brought in a billion dollars, would it? And they'd easily bring in a billion dollars. That's like saying I wouldn't like it if GTA 5 'wasted resources' to make a silly little gun pack DLC, but instead of constantly bitching about it like you do, I'd tolerate it. Apparantly, tolerance isn't your strong-suit. Your logic and views are so flawed, it's like talking to a brick wall of ignorance. Whatever, just keep talking out your ass. You'll smarten up eventually. Ironic, you must not have read the link. It shows that there wasn't going to be that kind of stuff in it. It was going to be cartoony, like Yosemite Sam and flying cowboys. Where did I provide proof of your zombies in that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzzbass Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 zombie mode is not necessary on this game, you always can use mods: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkylineGTRFreak Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Oh god no, all Zombie mods for any game do suck IMO. It's not the same. Crappy animations, spawns, no background story... Either an official DLC ornothing, but not another crappy mod... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Official General Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 (edited) @ Masterfocker Your name suits you very much, and I mean that literally indeed. Just a slight spelling change would perfect it. Where is the evidence that Red Dead Revolver was supposed to be about zombies in the first place, before it was made? I've done some online research and not seen any concrete evidence of your claim. I notice you have not even bothered to even provide a link to it. I actually think you are talking bullsh*t. From what I can see so far, the Red Dead series had always started out as a Western genre, not with f**king zombies like your dumb ass claims. Even if it did, so what ? The RDR series offically started out as Western genre whichever way you look at it - and that is what matters. Anyway, like I said already, I don't believe your claim unless you show me a link with concrete evidence. Don't tell me that " a zombie GTA V mode would only be a DLC and I don't have to buy it" crap. Like it's gonna make me feel better - it will not. The same time, effort and resources used to make that stupid zombie DLC could be put to better use for other added extra stuff in GTA V that actually has something to do with the game's original themes - maybe some real interesting, extra episodic content with new characters and more added new gameplay features. If that zombie rubbish was made instead, we'd be denied the much better extra stuff and DLC that is typical of what GTA games should be about. That would be a great waste in my view, because it's clear to see that zombies have f**king nothing to do with GTA. I am not sad, I am just fine thanks. Just because I don't want zombies in GTA it don't mean I got a crisis in my life going on. That I can assure you. If Rockstar make it then fine, I simply won't buy it. But I will certainly voice my opposition to it when and where ever I hear it and when I feel like it. Because really do think that zombies in GTA is a bullsh*t idea, I don't care how many people like it, it's what I think (from what I can see here, most people don't like it). And you obviously can't read. I never said it wasn't supposed to be Western, I even said it was supposed to be Western the whole time, but it was supposed to be super natural and have zombies in it. Read the other guy's post, he has a link for you. There's also an old topic with a sh*tload of links, but I don't feel like looking for it. I have better things to do. You're also basing things off of what you, and you only, would want to see in a DLC. Maybe what you would like in a DLC, others don't like. Would you be mad then, too? Also, it wouldn't be a waste of resources if it brought in a billion dollars, would it? And they'd easily bring in a billion dollars. That's like saying I wouldn't like it if GTA 5 'wasted resources' to make a silly little gun pack DLC, but instead of constantly bitching about it like you do, I'd tolerate it. Apparantly, tolerance isn't your strong-suit. Your logic and views are so flawed, it's like talking to a brick wall of ignorance. Whatever, just keep talking out your ass. You'll smarten up eventually. Ironic, you must not have read the link. It shows that there wasn't going to be that kind of stuff in it. It was going to be cartoony, like Yosemite Sam and flying cowboys. Where did I provide proof of your zombies in that? @ Masterfocker I'm gonna go one better than jnzooger and crush your argument AGAIN which is full of lies and contradictions. You say I can't read ?? OK Mister Focker man, I know you said that RDR was supposed to initially be about zombies because you said it in an earlier comment on page 8 of this thread. Go back and look. You said : " Yeah, it's been based on Western. The whole Red Dead series has been based on Zombies, however. That's how it started, and it's continued through Red Dead Redemption. Get that into my thick skull? Nah, I know I'm right in my normal skull, and that you're just raging, trying to be right, when you're really not. " You said exactly that. Me and jnzooger have clearly proved you wrong, as there is NO proof whatsoever that the original plan for RDR ever was supposed to be about zombies or ever included zombies. None at all. And furthermore, the fact that you cannot be bothered to provide evidence of your claims, just convinces me you had no proof in the first place and that YOU are the one talking about of your lying ass. RDR officially started as an ordinary Western action game once Rockstar took it over, THAT IS WHAT MATTERS, nothing else. And you can't say for sure if a zombie DLC will bring in a billion dollars, you are no f**king fortune teller. What if people are actually really fed up and tired of overused, boring zombie modes and the DLC sells very little and Rockstar make a quite a big loss ?? What will you say then ?? Bottom line - it's all speculation, it's meaningless. And again, Rockstar's finances have nothing to do with you, I don't know why you insist on bringing that money profit sh*t up. I am not ignorant, and I am indeed tolerant to some extent. I'm just not tolerant to bullsh*t wasteful ideas like zombie DLC and content in GTA when it has no place there, nor does it make sense to. Edited October 20, 2012 by Official General Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 (edited) @ Masterfocker Your name suits you very much, and I mean that literally indeed. Just a slight spelling change would perfect it. Where is the evidence that Red Dead Revolver was supposed to be about zombies in the first place, before it was made? I've done some online research and not seen any concrete evidence of your claim. I notice you have not even bothered to even provide a link to it. I actually think you are talking bullsh*t. From what I can see so far, the Red Dead series had always started out as a Western genre, not with f**king zombies like your dumb ass claims. Even if it did, so what ? The RDR series offically started out as Western genre whichever way you look at it - and that is what matters. Anyway, like I said already, I don't believe your claim unless you show me a link with concrete evidence. Don't tell me that " a zombie GTA V mode would only be a DLC and I don't have to buy it" crap. Like it's gonna make me feel better - it will not. The same time, effort and resources used to make that stupid zombie DLC could be put to better use for other added extra stuff in GTA V that actually has something to do with the game's original themes - maybe some real interesting, extra episodic content with new characters and more added new gameplay features. If that zombie rubbish was made instead, we'd be denied the much better extra stuff and DLC that is typical of what GTA games should be about. That would be a great waste in my view, because it's clear to see that zombies have f**king nothing to do with GTA. I am not sad, I am just fine thanks. Just because I don't want zombies in GTA it don't mean I got a crisis in my life going on. That I can assure you. If Rockstar make it then fine, I simply won't buy it. But I will certainly voice my opposition to it when and where ever I hear it and when I feel like it. Because really do think that zombies in GTA is a bullsh*t idea, I don't care how many people like it, it's what I think (from what I can see here, most people don't like it). And you obviously can't read. I never said it wasn't supposed to be Western, I even said it was supposed to be Western the whole time, but it was supposed to be super natural and have zombies in it. Read the other guy's post, he has a link for you. There's also an old topic with a sh*tload of links, but I don't feel like looking for it. I have better things to do. You're also basing things off of what you, and you only, would want to see in a DLC. Maybe what you would like in a DLC, others don't like. Would you be mad then, too? Also, it wouldn't be a waste of resources if it brought in a billion dollars, would it? And they'd easily bring in a billion dollars. That's like saying I wouldn't like it if GTA 5 'wasted resources' to make a silly little gun pack DLC, but instead of constantly bitching about it like you do, I'd tolerate it. Apparantly, tolerance isn't your strong-suit. Your logic and views are so flawed, it's like talking to a brick wall of ignorance. Whatever, just keep talking out your ass. You'll smarten up eventually. Ironic, you must not have read the link. It shows that there wasn't going to be that kind of stuff in it. It was going to be cartoony, like Yosemite Sam and flying cowboys. Where did I provide proof of your zombies in that? @ Masterfocker I'm gonna go one better than jnzooger and crush your argument AGAIN which is full of lies and contradictions. You say I can't read ?? OK Mister Focker man, I know you said that RDR was supposed to initially be about zombies because you said it in an earlier comment on page 8 of this thread. Go back and look. You said : " Yeah, it's been based on Western. The whole Red Dead series has been based on Zombies, however. That's how it started, and it's continued through Red Dead Redemption. Get that into my thick skull? Nah, I know I'm right in my normal skull, and that you're just raging, trying to be right, when you're really not. " You said exactly that. Me and jnzooger have clearly proved you wrong, as there is NO proof whatsoever that the original plan for RDR ever was supposed to be about zombies or ever included zombies. None at all. And furthermore, the fact that you cannot be bothered to provide evidence of your claims, just convinces me you had no proof in the first place and that YOU are the one talking about of your lying ass. RDR officially started as an ordinary Western action game once Rockstar took it over, THAT IS WHAT MATTERS, nothing else. And you can't say for sure if a zombie DLC will bring in a billion dollars, you are no f**king fortune teller. What if people are actually really fed up and tired of overused, boring zombie modes and the DLC sells very little and Rockstar make a quite a big loss ?? What will you say then ?? Bottom line - it's all speculation, it's meaningless. And again, Rockstar's finances have nothing to do with you, I don't know why you insist on bringing that money profit sh*t up. I am not ignorant, and I am indeed tolerant to some extent. I'm just not tolerant to bullsh*t wasteful ideas like zombie DLC and content in GTA when it has no place there, nor does it make sense to. Well, actually, I did the numbers. And a billion dollars was lowballing it. So, yeah, I know it would make a billion dollars. Probably a lot more. And here's your proof about Revolver having the zombies: http://www.dailyraider.com/index.php?id=2110 Happy now? Edited October 20, 2012 by Masterfocker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 And here's your proof about Revolver having the zombies: http://www.dailyraider.com/index.php?id=2110 Happy now? There is no proof anywhere in that "review", just a guy spouting nonsense about the game any way he can to make it sound worse than it is and then bashing Angel Studio/R* San Diego. He doesn't even realize that the Dead in the title is to do with Dead-Eye not the undead. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 (edited) And here's your proof about Revolver having the zombies: http://www.dailyraider.com/index.php?id=2110 Happy now? There is no proof anywhere in that "review", just a guy spouting nonsense about the game any way he can to make it sound worse than it is and then bashing Angel Studio/R* San Diego. He doesn't even realize that the Dead in the title is to do with Dead-Eye not the undead. So a reviewer has no idea what he's talking about? So I suppose IGN has no idea about the games they're reviewing too? Edit: Here's some more. Look in the trivia section http://reddead.wikia.com/wiki/Undead_Nightmare Whether you want to be ignorant or not, that's your choice. It's true, it happened, it got scrapped. I'm tired of looking for more links that you will just try and disprove, and inevitably fail Edited October 20, 2012 by Masterfocker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 And here's your proof about Revolver having the zombies: http://www.dailyraider.com/index.php?id=2110 Happy now? There is no proof anywhere in that "review", just a guy spouting nonsense about the game any way he can to make it sound worse than it is and then bashing Angel Studio/R* San Diego. He doesn't even realize that the Dead in the title is to do with Dead-Eye not the undead. So a reviewer has no idea what he's talking about? So I suppose IGN has no idea about the games they're reviewing too? Edit: Here's some more. Look in the trivia section http://reddead.wikia.com/wiki/Undead_Nightmare Whether you want to be ignorant or not, that's your choice. It's true, it happened, it got scrapped. I'm tired of looking for more links that you will just try and disprove, and inevitably fail Seriously, using a wiki as proof, when I gave you a quote from one of the original devs that said otherwise, then calling me ignorant. Supernatural does not mean horror, people don't understand this and added it as fact to a wiki. That does not make it a fact. I've been interested in RDR since the days of Capcom development, I followed it through Rockstar development, I own it on both consoles. Can you say any of that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 And here's your proof about Revolver having the zombies: http://www.dailyraider.com/index.php?id=2110 Happy now? There is no proof anywhere in that "review", just a guy spouting nonsense about the game any way he can to make it sound worse than it is and then bashing Angel Studio/R* San Diego. He doesn't even realize that the Dead in the title is to do with Dead-Eye not the undead. So a reviewer has no idea what he's talking about? So I suppose IGN has no idea about the games they're reviewing too? Edit: Here's some more. Look in the trivia section http://reddead.wikia.com/wiki/Undead_Nightmare Whether you want to be ignorant or not, that's your choice. It's true, it happened, it got scrapped. I'm tired of looking for more links that you will just try and disprove, and inevitably fail Seriously, using a wiki as proof, when I gave you a quote from one of the original devs that said otherwise, then calling me ignorant. Supernatural does not mean horror, people don't understand this and added it as fact to a wiki. That does not make it a fact. I've been interested in RDR since the days of Capcom development, I followed it through Rockstar development, I own it on both consoles. Can you say any of that? How does the quote in any way say otherwise? I don't see "There weren't any zombies in the game" in that quote. Yeah, ignorant Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Ok, fine, keep telling yourself that and thinking whatever you want. Doesn't matter if you are wrong, I won't be able to change your stubborn mind, and I won't try. You are a zealot, and I don't fight religious wars. (/awaits the you gave up, ha, I won, reply) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Ok, fine, keep telling yourself that and thinking whatever you want. Doesn't matter if you are wrong, I won't be able to change your stubborn mind, and I won't try. You are a zealot, and I don't fight religious wars. (/awaits the you gave up, ha, I won, reply) You know, you still haven't told me how that quote says otherwise. I don't expect you to though, since it doesn't. You can win when you tell me Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HOAXi Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 and the winner is... ... jnzooger, Official General and me. Better luck next time Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkyReaper2014 Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Why have an argument over this guys,personally id prefer aliens,but if others want zombies i say let them have it. Is it really the end of the world (no pun intended) if they do make a zombie dlc? While i agree they are overused id still download it because i know rockstar would find a way to make it fun. Just my 2 cents. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 and the winner is... ... jnzooger, Official General and me. Better luck next time You wish Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BattleExel Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 @ Masterfocker Your name suits you very much, and I mean that literally indeed. Just a slight spelling change would perfect it. Where is the evidence that Red Dead Revolver was supposed to be about zombies in the first place, before it was made? I've done some online research and not seen any concrete evidence of your claim. I notice you have not even bothered to even provide a link to it. I actually think you are talking bullsh*t. From what I can see so far, the Red Dead series had always started out as a Western genre, not with f**king zombies like your dumb ass claims. Even if it did, so what ? The RDR series offically started out as Western genre whichever way you look at it - and that is what matters. Anyway, like I said already, I don't believe your claim unless you show me a link with concrete evidence. Don't tell me that " a zombie GTA V mode would only be a DLC and I don't have to buy it" crap. Like it's gonna make me feel better - it will not. The same time, effort and resources used to make that stupid zombie DLC could be put to better use for other added extra stuff in GTA V that actually has something to do with the game's original themes - maybe some real interesting, extra episodic content with new characters and more added new gameplay features. If that zombie rubbish was made instead, we'd be denied the much better extra stuff and DLC that is typical of what GTA games should be about. That would be a great waste in my view, because it's clear to see that zombies have f**king nothing to do with GTA. I am not sad, I am just fine thanks. Just because I don't want zombies in GTA it don't mean I got a crisis in my life going on. That I can assure you. If Rockstar make it then fine, I simply won't buy it. But I will certainly voice my opposition to it when and where ever I hear it and when I feel like it. Because really do think that zombies in GTA is a bullsh*t idea, I don't care how many people like it, it's what I think (from what I can see here, most people don't like it). And you obviously can't read. I never said it wasn't supposed to be Western, I even said it was supposed to be Western the whole time, but it was supposed to be super natural and have zombies in it. Read the other guy's post, he has a link for you. There's also an old topic with a sh*tload of links, but I don't feel like looking for it. I have better things to do. You're also basing things off of what you, and you only, would want to see in a DLC. Maybe what you would like in a DLC, others don't like. Would you be mad then, too? Also, it wouldn't be a waste of resources if it brought in a billion dollars, would it? And they'd easily bring in a billion dollars. That's like saying I wouldn't like it if GTA 5 'wasted resources' to make a silly little gun pack DLC, but instead of constantly bitching about it like you do, I'd tolerate it. Apparantly, tolerance isn't your strong-suit. Your logic and views are so flawed, it's like talking to a brick wall of ignorance. Whatever, just keep talking out your ass. You'll smarten up eventually. Lol. Gotta love these ''internet-fighting'' midgets. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rafe Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 as an add on yes, not as part of the game proper. Red dead redemption zombie expansion was the best expansion i've ever purchased. A zombie invasion of San Andreas should not become part of the canon of GTA but a alternative temporary universe. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 @ Masterfocker Your name suits you very much, and I mean that literally indeed. Just a slight spelling change would perfect it. Where is the evidence that Red Dead Revolver was supposed to be about zombies in the first place, before it was made? I've done some online research and not seen any concrete evidence of your claim. I notice you have not even bothered to even provide a link to it. I actually think you are talking bullsh*t. From what I can see so far, the Red Dead series had always started out as a Western genre, not with f**king zombies like your dumb ass claims. Even if it did, so what ? The RDR series offically started out as Western genre whichever way you look at it - and that is what matters. Anyway, like I said already, I don't believe your claim unless you show me a link with concrete evidence. Don't tell me that " a zombie GTA V mode would only be a DLC and I don't have to buy it" crap. Like it's gonna make me feel better - it will not. The same time, effort and resources used to make that stupid zombie DLC could be put to better use for other added extra stuff in GTA V that actually has something to do with the game's original themes - maybe some real interesting, extra episodic content with new characters and more added new gameplay features. If that zombie rubbish was made instead, we'd be denied the much better extra stuff and DLC that is typical of what GTA games should be about. That would be a great waste in my view, because it's clear to see that zombies have f**king nothing to do with GTA. I am not sad, I am just fine thanks. Just because I don't want zombies in GTA it don't mean I got a crisis in my life going on. That I can assure you. If Rockstar make it then fine, I simply won't buy it. But I will certainly voice my opposition to it when and where ever I hear it and when I feel like it. Because really do think that zombies in GTA is a bullsh*t idea, I don't care how many people like it, it's what I think (from what I can see here, most people don't like it). And you obviously can't read. I never said it wasn't supposed to be Western, I even said it was supposed to be Western the whole time, but it was supposed to be super natural and have zombies in it. Read the other guy's post, he has a link for you. There's also an old topic with a sh*tload of links, but I don't feel like looking for it. I have better things to do. You're also basing things off of what you, and you only, would want to see in a DLC. Maybe what you would like in a DLC, others don't like. Would you be mad then, too? Also, it wouldn't be a waste of resources if it brought in a billion dollars, would it? And they'd easily bring in a billion dollars. That's like saying I wouldn't like it if GTA 5 'wasted resources' to make a silly little gun pack DLC, but instead of constantly bitching about it like you do, I'd tolerate it. Apparantly, tolerance isn't your strong-suit. Your logic and views are so flawed, it's like talking to a brick wall of ignorance. Whatever, just keep talking out your ass. You'll smarten up eventually. Lol. Gotta love these ''internet-fighting'' midgets. I think you mean the other guys Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
aliaseedful Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Why have an argument over this guys,personally id prefer aliens,but if others want zombies i say let them have it. Is it really the end of the world (no pun intended) if they do make a zombie dlc? While i agree they are overused id still download it because i know rockstar would find a way to make it fun. Just my 2 cents. I'd actually be interested in having an Alien or Easter Egg hunt mode. I've always been interested in that stuff IRL and, since I lost my soul to Rockstar, I need a way to live out every single hobby in GTA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Why have an argument over this guys,personally id prefer aliens,but if others want zombies i say let them have it. Is it really the end of the world (no pun intended) if they do make a zombie dlc? While i agree they are overused id still download it because i know rockstar would find a way to make it fun. Just my 2 cents. I'd actually be interested in having an Alien or Easter Egg hunt mode. I've always been interested in that stuff IRL and, since I lost my soul to Rockstar, I need a way to live out every single hobby in GTA. This. It would fit better with a GTA style world. A DLC subplot seeking out a government coverup of some sort would make sense because it wouldn't change the overall feel of the world like a zombie mode would. This is the main reason I didn't like San Andreas that much, a game about a gangsta suddenly owning a casino and a record label? Its just not logical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Why have an argument over this guys,personally id prefer aliens,but if others want zombies i say let them have it. Is it really the end of the world (no pun intended) if they do make a zombie dlc? While i agree they are overused id still download it because i know rockstar would find a way to make it fun. Just my 2 cents. I'd actually be interested in having an Alien or Easter Egg hunt mode. I've always been interested in that stuff IRL and, since I lost my soul to Rockstar, I need a way to live out every single hobby in GTA. This. It would fit better with a GTA style world. A DLC subplot seeking out a government coverup of some sort would make sense because it wouldn't change the overall feel of the world like a zombie mode would. This is the main reason I didn't like San Andreas that much, a game about a gangsta suddenly owning a casino and a record label? Its just not logical. It's a game, it doesn't need to be logical. So, did you not like Red Dead Redemption because they had a zombie DLC and it wasn't logical? Or did you not like it because a random westerner ended up working for a government? Or how he singlehandedly took down multiple fortresses? Come on man, saying it's not logical is a weak argument. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Why have an argument over this guys,personally id prefer aliens,but if others want zombies i say let them have it. Is it really the end of the world (no pun intended) if they do make a zombie dlc? While i agree they are overused id still download it because i know rockstar would find a way to make it fun. Just my 2 cents. I'd actually be interested in having an Alien or Easter Egg hunt mode. I've always been interested in that stuff IRL and, since I lost my soul to Rockstar, I need a way to live out every single hobby in GTA. This. It would fit better with a GTA style world. A DLC subplot seeking out a government coverup of some sort would make sense because it wouldn't change the overall feel of the world like a zombie mode would. This is the main reason I didn't like San Andreas that much, a game about a gangsta suddenly owning a casino and a record label? Its just not logical. It's a game, it doesn't need to be logical. So, did you not like Red Dead Redemption because they had a zombie DLC and it wasn't logical? Or did you not like it because a random westerner ended up working for a government? Or how he singlehandedly took down multiple fortresses? Come on man, saying it's not logical is a weak argument. A good story has to be cohesive, be it a game, movie, or book. Red Dead Redemption was fully cohesive, and Undead Nightmare was cohesive with it (albeit as a noncanon sidestory, it still made sense). BTW: Again with your "why not" attitude... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Why have an argument over this guys,personally id prefer aliens,but if others want zombies i say let them have it. Is it really the end of the world (no pun intended) if they do make a zombie dlc? While i agree they are overused id still download it because i know rockstar would find a way to make it fun. Just my 2 cents. I'd actually be interested in having an Alien or Easter Egg hunt mode. I've always been interested in that stuff IRL and, since I lost my soul to Rockstar, I need a way to live out every single hobby in GTA. This. It would fit better with a GTA style world. A DLC subplot seeking out a government coverup of some sort would make sense because it wouldn't change the overall feel of the world like a zombie mode would. This is the main reason I didn't like San Andreas that much, a game about a gangsta suddenly owning a casino and a record label? Its just not logical. It's a game, it doesn't need to be logical. So, did you not like Red Dead Redemption because they had a zombie DLC and it wasn't logical? Or did you not like it because a random westerner ended up working for a government? Or how he singlehandedly took down multiple fortresses? Come on man, saying it's not logical is a weak argument. A good story has to be cohesive, be it a game, movie, or book. Red Dead Redemption was fully cohesive, and Undead Nightmare was cohesive with it (albeit as a noncanon sidestory, it still made sense). BTW: Again with your "why not" attitude... So a gangster, who ended up helping a rich guy and getting a stake in a casino, isn't as cohere as one western guy who got recruited by the government to take down multiple fortresses, basically by himself, and do things all the time, by himself. Or zombies. My 'why not' attitude? No, it's called you having no idea what you're talking about, and clutching at straws Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redx165 Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 Why have an argument over this guys,personally id prefer aliens,but if others want zombies i say let them have it. Is it really the end of the world (no pun intended) if they do make a zombie dlc? While i agree they are overused id still download it because i know rockstar would find a way to make it fun. Just my 2 cents. I'd actually be interested in having an Alien or Easter Egg hunt mode. I've always been interested in that stuff IRL and, since I lost my soul to Rockstar, I need a way to live out every single hobby in GTA. This. It would fit better with a GTA style world. A DLC subplot seeking out a government coverup of some sort would make sense because it wouldn't change the overall feel of the world like a zombie mode would. This is the main reason I didn't like San Andreas that much, a game about a gangsta suddenly owning a casino and a record label? Its just not logical. It's a game, it doesn't need to be logical. So, did you not like Red Dead Redemption because they had a zombie DLC and it wasn't logical? Or did you not like it because a random westerner ended up working for a government? Or how he singlehandedly took down multiple fortresses? Come on man, saying it's not logical is a weak argument. A good story has to be cohesive, be it a game, movie, or book. Red Dead Redemption was fully cohesive, and Undead Nightmare was cohesive with it (albeit as a noncanon sidestory, it still made sense). BTW: Again with your "why not" attitude... So a gangster, who ended up helping a rich guy and getting a stake in a casino, isn't as cohere as one western guy who got recruited by the government to take down multiple fortresses, basically by himself, and do things all the time, by himself. Or zombies. My 'why not' attitude? No, it's called you having no idea what you're talking about, and clutching at straws You still never answer my question in why you want zombies in GTA V. It seems more don't want it from Reading all the posts. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jnzooger Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 So a gangster, who ended up helping a rich guy and getting a stake in a casino, isn't as cohere as one western guy who got recruited by the government to take down multiple fortresses, basically by himself, and do things all the time, by himself. Or zombies. My 'why not' attitude? No, it's called you having no idea what you're talking about, and clutching at straws First of all, its not a matter of how ridiculous the plot is, its how the story is told. Secondly, at the end of the old west era, G-men were blackmailing former bandits all the time, the main story could have really happened, and he didn't work single-handedly all the time, if you played the game, you should know that. As far as the zombie story, it was an ancient curse, that played out like any good ancient curse story, like something out of Marvel's old west comics. It wasn't flawless, but it was cohesive. And what I mean by your why not attitude is that you basically said, its a game, the rules don't matter. So why not ignore the rules just to please you. Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm done slapping you around, and I won't be replying to your nescient banter any longer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 (edited) Why have an argument over this guys,personally id prefer aliens,but if others want zombies i say let them have it. Is it really the end of the world (no pun intended) if they do make a zombie dlc? While i agree they are overused id still download it because i know rockstar would find a way to make it fun. Just my 2 cents. I'd actually be interested in having an Alien or Easter Egg hunt mode. I've always been interested in that stuff IRL and, since I lost my soul to Rockstar, I need a way to live out every single hobby in GTA. This. It would fit better with a GTA style world. A DLC subplot seeking out a government coverup of some sort would make sense because it wouldn't change the overall feel of the world like a zombie mode would. This is the main reason I didn't like San Andreas that much, a game about a gangsta suddenly owning a casino and a record label? Its just not logical. It's a game, it doesn't need to be logical. So, did you not like Red Dead Redemption because they had a zombie DLC and it wasn't logical? Or did you not like it because a random westerner ended up working for a government? Or how he singlehandedly took down multiple fortresses? Come on man, saying it's not logical is a weak argument. A good story has to be cohesive, be it a game, movie, or book. Red Dead Redemption was fully cohesive, and Undead Nightmare was cohesive with it (albeit as a noncanon sidestory, it still made sense). BTW: Again with your "why not" attitude... So a gangster, who ended up helping a rich guy and getting a stake in a casino, isn't as cohere as one western guy who got recruited by the government to take down multiple fortresses, basically by himself, and do things all the time, by himself. Or zombies. My 'why not' attitude? No, it's called you having no idea what you're talking about, and clutching at straws You still never answer my question in why you want zombies in GTA V. It seems more don't want it from Reading all the posts. Sorry about that. Why I want zombies in GTA 5? I think it'd be a whole new and fun experience. Yes, zombies are overused. So what? Everything in life is overused. However, zombies stay fun, it just depends on who does what with them. R*? They can do wonders with them. Undead Nightmare? Awesome DLC. Loved every second of it. Limited ammo, it was like a fight for survival, it added a whole new difficulty to it. Now imagine what you could do in a city, with cars, and a lot more zombies. Plus, add a great story and the awesome and funny characters that are usually associated with GTA games. It's a recipe for awesomeness. And yes, people on this forum may not want it, but the majority of people on this forum are stupid, or have no idea what they're talking about. They also, in no way, represent the GTA community as a whole. The only way to know how many people want a zombie DLC is to interview every single person that's gonna buy GTA 5, and that's never gonna happen. However, I already did the math on how successful it could be, even with only 30% wanting it. A billion dollars. Give or take a few hundred million, but you still have a massive amount of profit. And it's a DLC. So everyone that's bitching, is just being stupid, since they don't have to buy it. They can say 'it wastes time and resources' but every DLC does that to different kinds of people. BF3 has a Close Quarters DLC, and while a lot loved it, a lot hated it. It's a 2-way street, and is in no way a legitimate argument. jnzooger: That's why I said basically, but I'm sure you missed that to try and further your own argument. Guess what? Didn't work. Even though you had allies, you were still the one killing 99% of the people and doing everything dangerous. And if Undead Nightmare's story was so cohesive, why are you so against zombies in GTA 5? You think R*'s just gonna completely fail at making one, after they had massive success with UN? You never slapped me around, but whatever you want to tell yourself, I guess Edited October 20, 2012 by Masterfocker Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JoeM Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 (edited) This still going on? We get the idea, 4 people on an internet forum dont like an idea so therefor it's the worse idea ever and will ruin a game they havent played yet, a game that is set to more than likely be the best/most succesful game of all time to date. I dont understand how (a theroretical) optional DLC would ruin a game. But maybe thats me using logic again. Please Click Here if you are not aware of this mythical thing that is logic. It's a bit like me having the option of stabbing myself in the leg , but im pretty sure it would ruin my day so I wont. However some people may enjoy stabbing themselves in the leg and it may even make their day, but thats up to them. Edited October 20, 2012 by JoeM Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geralt of Rivia Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 This still going on? We get the idea, 4 people on an internet forum dont like an idea so therefor it's the worse idea ever and will ruin a game they havent played yet, a game that is set to more than likely be the best/most succesful game of all time to date. I dont understand how (a theroretical) optional DLC would ruin a game. But maybe thats me using logic again. Please Click Here if you are not aware of this mythical thing that is logic. It's a bit like me having the option of stabbing myself in the leg , but im pretty sure it would ruin my day so I wont. However some people may enjoy stabbing themselves in the leg and it may even make their day, but thats up to them. Thank you Some people just don't seem to get it Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowling...? Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 No zombies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DryJohnson45 Posted October 20, 2012 Share Posted October 20, 2012 1.Zombies mode will be fun as [email protected] and ill be playin it 2 they could put some ultra awsome survival thing in it 3.I wouldnt mind Aliens dinos or even bigfoots 4. GTA is originally a game of relistic and unrealistic fun 5. R* doesnt have to do it ide rather hear there opinion on this Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts