To kill kids or not kill kids

[B Dawg]

Why not give kids guns and convince them they're in a dream so they go on a killing spree.

[018361]

When i make a game, i would let people kill as many kiddies as their "sick" hearts desire. whether it be by burning them alive, drowning them, slowly cutting their throat open, murdering their parents in front of them and strangle them to death, electrocuting them, poisoning them, scaring them to death, toss them into a vat of acid, force them to drink chemicals, force them to kill themselves, force brother and sister to kill each other, running them over, tossing them into a meat grinder and serve their remains to their family, bury them alive, slowly cut them in half with a saw, put them into a crate and ship them somewhere that will take them days/weeks to get to, get a dog to rip their body to shreds, lock the car door in the forest and let them get mauled by a bear,crucify them, hang them, feed it to a lion in a zoo, starve them to death, and many other ways i have yet to think of!

 

OT: I vote yes! Because i completely agree that it is just a video game and will not matter in real life.

Edited August 17, 2012 by 018361

[The Fur]

@Gtaghost22 lol I see that the community is very tight-knit here...

 

 

Children are a symbol of innocence.

 

[sarcasm]Yes kids these days are so innocent[/sarcasm] as they curse, yell, scream, complain, eat/sleep, and more... so innocent.

Kids have always done those things, drop the superiority complex. Even so, what does eating/sleeping have to do with innocence? Your mind is messed up.

[Exkabewbikadid]

2. It's such a trivial detail. I have been playing GTA since gta 3 andd not once have I ever thought. "Gee sure would be nice if could steam roll thought a bunch of toddlers at a playground!"

Indeed. While I'm certainly not opposed to the inclusion of killable kids, it would add nothing worthwhile to the game and give politicians and hack lawyers something to attack in the eyes of the media to further their own personal agendas. Not worth it.

[Gtaghost22]

When i make a game, i would let people kill as many kiddies as their "sick" hearts desire. whether it be by burning them alive, drowning them, slowly cutting their throat open, murdering their parents in front of them and strangle them to death, electrocuting them, poisoning them, scaring them to death, toss them into a vat of acid, force them to drink chemicals, force them to kill themselves, force brother and sister to kill each other, running them over, tossing them into a meat grinder and serve their remains to their family, bury them alive, slowly cut them in half with a saw, put them into a crate and ship them somewhere that will take them days/weeks to get to, get a dog to rip their body to shreds, lock the car door in the forest and let them get mauled by a bear,crucify them, hang them, feed it to a lion in a zoo, starve them to death, and many other ways i have yet to think of!

 

OT: I vote yes! Because i completely agree that it is just a video game and will not matter in real life.

Not sure if serious...

You must be a troll, nobody is that sick to even think about doing all of this sick sh*t.

[highgrade89]

i dont see why kids shouldnt be in the game, its not like every time you run down a fat kid or fire an RPG at a kids feet it would actualy happen... its a video game lol

Edited August 18, 2012 by highgrade89

[Frantz Fuchs]

Both options on 163. Looks like a divided community.

[Secura]

Yeah, sure add kids. I personally don't see why they haven't already been added; If I can kill a group of old people by setting on fire with a molotov cocktail then should also be able to run children in my taxi. They're all just bunches of 1's and 0's anyway.

[cinco1127]

kill kill kill

[Chunkyluva53]

When i make a game, i would let people kill as many kiddies as their "sick" hearts desire. whether it be by burning them alive, drowning them, slowly cutting their throat open, murdering their parents in front of them and strangle them to death, electrocuting them, poisoning them, scaring them to death, toss them into a vat of acid, force them to drink chemicals, force them to kill themselves, force brother and sister to kill each other, running them over, tossing them into a meat grinder and serve their remains to their family, bury them alive, slowly cut them in half with a saw, put them into a crate and ship them somewhere that will take them days/weeks to get to, get a dog to rip their body to shreds, lock the car door in the forest and let them get mauled by a bear,crucify them, hang them, feed it to a lion in a zoo, starve them to death, and many other ways i have yet to think of!

 

OT: I vote yes! Because i completely agree that it is just a video game and will not matter in real life.

[Ruscris2]

You should've put another option: I don't care.

[goh13]

You should've put another option: I don't care.

1- What is the point of that? It does not show us anything to add to the data. If you do not care, simply skip the thread. I am not talking to you, I am talking to everyone who asks for such options. Rarely does this options become legit to use.

2- Use the Null Vote. It is pretty much the "I do not give a f*ck" button. Your vote still counts but not for any of the options.

 

Just something I wanted to say, not an insult in anyway.

[ToTheWorld]

It's an unnecessary addition in my opinion, we don't need that and it won't take anything away from the game - it will, however, add unneeded controversy.

[BlackandWhite23]

When i make a game, i would let people kill as many kiddies as their "sick" hearts desire. whether it be by burning them alive, drowning them, slowly cutting their throat open, murdering their parents in front of them and strangle them to death, electrocuting them, poisoning them, scaring them to death, toss them into a vat of acid, force them to drink chemicals, force them to kill themselves, force brother and sister to kill each other, running them over, tossing them into a meat grinder and serve their remains to their family, bury them alive, slowly cut them in half with a saw, put them into a crate and ship them somewhere that will take them days/weeks to get to, get a dog to rip their body to shreds, lock the car door in the forest and let them get mauled by a bear,crucify them, hang them, feed it to a lion in a zoo, starve them to death, and many other ways i have yet to think of!

 

OT: I vote yes! Because i completely agree that it is just a video game and will not matter in real life.

He's probably Trolling you know how people are on the internet they think their gods with their magic keyboard so they could write anything stupid discusting or even worse.Its very sad

[Jakee.]

It breaks my immersion in the game, you know.. seeing parks and basketball courts with no children in them, but it would be worse if there were kids in the game that were like walking Juggernauts who could not be killed and just clipped through your car.

 

If Rockstar added the ability for a child to die, the media would jump on them like a pack of wild wolves, remember the little scene of the little girl blowing up in MW3? The media was in uproar over that one.

[jestajest]

It's rockstar! Let's kill some kids (in GTA V)! PEW PEW!

[LUK4]

I say kill'em all XD