TheGodDamnMaster Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Do we--again--get a city with only twelve cars in it when we're above sea level? They can only do so much with the limitations of the consoles. The draw-distance will be improved on PC, like IV. Do you really think it's a good use of resources to be rendering cars 2 miles away? I'd rather have a stable framerate. Intel Core i9-9900k | Seasonic FOCUS Plus 750W | 32GB Corsair Vengeance LPX 2666MHzMSI GeForce RTX2070 | WD Blue 1TB HDD | Samsung 950 PRO M.2 512GBAntec Nine Hundred Black Steel ATX Mid Tower | MSI MPG Z390 Gaming Pro Carbon AC Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
gevans81 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Judging by the trailer and screenshots, the game looks pretty terrible. Watch Dogs- How a game like this should look. The pre-rendered trailer you mean? Yeah right. Goddamnit.. you two make me cringe. Such a retardism. And the first trailer is not pre-rendered. Where do you get that sh*t from? And R* just confirmed it today in the comments section of the new article. Chill out, typical German. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
OJsAlibi Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 This certainly confirms the game is for current-gen consoles. Also: if people are right about the screens are from an early build of the game, then an impending release date is very unlikely right? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoonOnFire Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 The only way I will be impressed is if this is for a gameboy. Looks horrible and cannot wait to not buy this 2d looking garbage. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJORMANN Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Just for those graphics haters saying V and IV graphics are the same.. Here is GTAIV Middle park: http://images.wikia.com/gtawiki/images/0/0...thwestwards.jpg Now here is the park shown in the GTAV screenshot: http://media.gtanet.com/gallery/gta-5-trai..._1342100464.jpg Pretty big difference if you ask me... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Johan Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Oh whats that? It looks just like GTA 4 with the same overwhelming nothingness of repetitive city landscape. Graphics look terrible too. My god. Even when R* decides to do something for us people like you just shoot this sh*t down. It's obviously an early stage of the game. Yea. Bullsh*t. I can't formulate a proper opinion since I haven't played it, but then again, neither can any of you. Judging by the trailer and screenshots, the game looks pretty terrible. Watch Dogs- How a game like this should look. Watch Dogs was shown on a high end PC, these screen were taken from a console. An early build from the console Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoonOnFire Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Just for those graphics haters saying V and IV graphics are the same.. Here is GTAIV Middle park: http://images.wikia.com/gtawiki/images/0/0...thwestwards.jpg Now here is the park shown in the GTAV screenshot: http://media.gtanet.com/gallery/gta-5-trai..._1342100464.jpg Pretty big difference if you ask me... Thankfully, No one asked you. It's like comparing a piece of sh*t, to a piece of sh*t with corn in it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sup3rman Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Just for those graphics haters saying V and IV graphics are the same.. Here is GTAIV Middle park: http://images.wikia.com/gtawiki/images/0/0...thwestwards.jpg Now here is the park shown in the GTAV screenshot: http://media.gtanet.com/gallery/gta-5-trai..._1342100464.jpg Pretty big difference if you ask me... You have picked a sh*tty image from IV...somewhy it's very blurry. Also, can't really compare pictures that are taken from different distances and ground heights. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt_The_Snail Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Everyone who's worried about no pedestrians needs to calm down. The shot is obviously taken from pretty far up in the sky (Look how small the cars are for reference). In previous games, pedestrians have always disappeared when you're that high up. Hell, even when you're only half that high up they tend to disappear unless you're zooming in with a scope. The city looks huge and the water looks simply amazing. And for everyone else who is wondering why the game is taking so long, it's because minor details that look wrong get picked all to hell like this. Getting a game that is so realistic to not have them is an almost impossible task and I only put my faith in Rockstar to accomplish it. Any game that you could possibly mention will be pure dog crap when GTAV comes out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomNoun Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Do we--again--get a city with only twelve cars in it when we're above sea level? They can only do so much with the limitations of the consoles. The draw-distance will be improved on PC, like IV. Do you really think it's a good use of resources to be rendering cars 2 miles away? I'd rather have a stable framerate. But could they not have developed some way to mask that? Just 2D sprites could have replaced cars at a great distance, surely? That would have been better. Liberty City looked empty from the sky. Except at night--couldn't they do something similar, but in the day? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
KrushLTx10 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Just for those graphics haters saying V and IV graphics are the same.. Here is GTAIV Middle park: http://images.wikia.com/gtawiki/images/0/0...thwestwards.jpg Now here is the park shown in the GTAV screenshot: http://media.gtanet.com/gallery/gta-5-trai..._1342100464.jpg Pretty big difference if you ask me... Thankfully, No one asked you. It's like comparing a piece of sh*t, to a piece of sh*t with corn in it. You're trying too hard to bash these screens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cherrycola Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Just for those graphics haters saying V and IV graphics are the same.. Here is GTAIV Middle park: http://images.wikia.com/gtawiki/images/0/0...thwestwards.jpg Now here is the park shown in the GTAV screenshot: http://media.gtanet.com/gallery/gta-5-trai..._1342100464.jpg Pretty big difference if you ask me... I see one game running on a console and one game running (not pre-rendered) on a PC. Edit: Not that it matters to me though, I just like to get the facts straight. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoonOnFire Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Everyone who's worried about no pedestrians needs to calm down. The shot is obviously taken from pretty far up in the sky (Look how small the cars are for reference). In previous games, pedestrians have always disappeared when you're that high up. Hell, even when you're only half that high up they tend to disappear unless you're zooming in with a scope. The city looks huge and the water looks simply amazing. And for everyone else who is wondering why the game is taking so long, it's because minor details that look wrong get picked all to hell like this. Getting a game that is so realistic to not have them is an almost impossible task and I only put my faith in Rockstar to accomplish it. Any game that you could possibly mention will be pure dog crap when GTAV comes out. Yea, in previous games. But guess what, this isn't the past, but the present. Stop using "BUT DIS GAME DID DAT!" as an example. GROW UP AND ACCEPT IT YOU f*ckING BLOCK HEAD. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Makio Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 "We just have not been in a position to show more of the game than the trailer and will not be for a while yet. Prepare for another 10 months without nothing Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
coin-god Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Just for those graphics haters saying V and IV graphics are the same.. Here is GTAIV Middle park: http://images.wikia.com/gtawiki/images/0/0...thwestwards.jpg Now here is the park shown in the GTAV screenshot: http://media.gtanet.com/gallery/gta-5-trai..._1342100464.jpg Pretty big difference if you ask me... Thankfully, No one asked you. It's like comparing a piece of sh*t, to a piece of sh*t with corn in it. Weren't you the guy who made a topic saying how exited you were? Now you say it's sh*t and wont buy it? Obvious Troll is obvious. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cha Boy Jesus Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Oh whats that? It looks just like GTA 4 with the same overwhelming nothingness of repetitive city landscape. Graphics look terrible too. My god. Even when R* decides to do something for us people like you just shoot this sh*t down. It's obviously an early stage of the game. Yea. Bullsh*t. I can't formulate a proper opinion since I haven't played it, but then again, neither can any of you. Judging by the trailer and screenshots, the game looks pretty terrible. Watch Dogs- How a game like this should look. Watcg dogs was on a super pc clearly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
saintsrow Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Finally, Rockstar listened to my requests and issued some screenshots !!! I claim credit for this wonderful asset release Beautiful, beautiful !!!! PS: Since Rockstar calls these "asset releases" I will ask for asset releases in the future rather than info....that must have been the problem. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Turbojohn Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Sure watch dogs looks legit, You know what. The first saints row looked so good. It sucked. Driver Parallel lines was going to own SA... It didn't Saints row 3 was going to be the best free roam game ever. It wasn't Watch Dogs is going to be the best free roam game ever. IT'S NOT GOING TO BEAT GTA V. You can smell the car handling of Watch Dogs from miles, and its not that good, the game will have amazing graphics and all. But so did Driver Parallel lines at the time seem to have... Plus it's f*cking New York. I can't stand more video games around New f*cking York. GTA III, GTA LCS, GTA IV, Saint's Row 3 (Didn't play LOL), Prototype 1 and 2 (didn't play 2), driver parallel lines etc New York city is so overused it isn't even going to be fun... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
RandomNoun Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Watch Dogs is going to have a lacklustre story filled with cliches, and a two-dimensional atmosphere all-round. Even if GTA V looked no better than IV, it would still score high on the level of detail and attention to the writing and game world. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Grand Cannon Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Man you people are ungrateful and ignorant... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Salt_The_Snail Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Everyone who's worried about no pedestrians needs to calm down. The shot is obviously taken from pretty far up in the sky (Look how small the cars are for reference). In previous games, pedestrians have always disappeared when you're that high up. Hell, even when you're only half that high up they tend to disappear unless you're zooming in with a scope. The city looks huge and the water looks simply amazing. And for everyone else who is wondering why the game is taking so long, it's because minor details that look wrong get picked all to hell like this. Getting a game that is so realistic to not have them is an almost impossible task and I only put my faith in Rockstar to accomplish it. Any game that you could possibly mention will be pure dog crap when GTAV comes out. Yea, in previous games. But guess what, this isn't the past, but the present. Stop using "BUT DIS GAME DID DAT!" as an example. GROW UP AND ACCEPT IT YOU f*ckING BLOCK HEAD. I'm saying previous games DIDN'T show pedestrians, so why the hell would you expect this one too? It's 10 times more detailed 10 times the size, so don't expect pedestrians to start showing up when you're way up in the air. You know what else? The previous games didn't have detailed ants crawling on the ground when you're walking... do you expect that to change as well? From a detail point of view it's the exact same request. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoonOnFire Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Guys stop getting off topic this is about GTA V not Watch Dogs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MAJORMANN Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Sure watch dogs looks legit, You know what. The first saints row looked so good. It sucked. Driver Parallel lines was going to own SA... It didn't Saints row 3 was going to be the best free roam game ever. It wasn't Watch Dogs is going to be the best free roam game ever. IT'S NOT GOING TO BEAT GTA V. You can smell the car handling of Watch Dogs from miles, and its not that good, the game will have amazing graphics and all. But so did Driver Parallel lines at the time seem to have... Plus it's f*cking New York. I can't stand more video games around New f*cking York. GTA III, GTA LCS, GTA IV, Saint's Row 3 (Didn't play LOL), Prototype 1 and 2 (didn't play 2), driver parallel lines etc New York city is so overused it isn't even going to be fun... actually its chicago Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prometheus Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Just for those graphics haters saying V and IV graphics are the same.. Here is GTAIV Middle park: http://images.wikia.com/gtawiki/images/0/0...thwestwards.jpg Now here is the park shown in the GTAV screenshot: http://media.gtanet.com/gallery/gta-5-trai..._1342100464.jpg Pretty big difference if you ask me... Thankfully, No one asked you. It's like comparing a piece of sh*t, to a piece of sh*t with corn in it. Weren't you the guy who made a topic saying how exited you were? Now you say it's sh*t and wont buy it? Obvious Troll is obvious. They're just too stupid actually. As for the screens, definitely there's an improvement, but not a vast one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leftnutmystery Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 the guy flying the helicopter might be my father. I seen the pic and was like I know this man from somewhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Watinho Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 GTA's are and will remain the best free roam games Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butonu Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 Holy sh*t, over 230 users reading this topic! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jemoni2012 Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 That's alot of pepole viewing this topic. Anyways, It isn't that bad. Hell, It's an EARLY CONSOLE BUILD. Now let me eat my noodles in peace and pray to GabeN for the Steam Summer Sale. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GoonOnFire Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 the guy flying the helicopter might be my father. I seen the pic and was like I know this man from somewhere If I was your father I would have placed a trampoline under the rotor blades while the helicopter was on and then would have to you to jump as high as you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Eagle-Eye Posted July 12, 2012 Share Posted July 12, 2012 LETS MAKE THIS PAGE GO UP TO 69 AWWWW YEEEAH Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
