Quantcast
Jump to content
Search In
  • More options...
Find results that contain...
Find results in...
    1. Welcome to GTAForums!

    2. News

    1. Red Dead Redemption 2

    1. GTA Online

      1. After Hours
      2. Find Lobbies & Players
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Vehicles
      5. Content Creator
      6. Help & Support
    2. Crews

      1. Events
      2. Recruitment
    1. Grand Theft Auto Series

    2. GTA Next

    3. GTA V

      1. PC
      2. Guides & Strategies
      3. Help & Support
    4. GTA IV

      1. Episodes from Liberty City
      2. Multiplayer
      3. Guides & Strategies
      4. Help & Support
      5. GTA Mods
    5. GTA Chinatown Wars

    6. GTA Vice City Stories

    7. GTA Liberty City Stories

    8. GTA San Andreas

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    9. GTA Vice City

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    10. GTA III

      1. Guides & Strategies
      2. Help & Support
      3. GTA Mods
    11. Top Down Games

      1. GTA Advance
      2. GTA 2
      3. GTA
    12. Wiki

      1. Merchandising
    1. GTA Modding

      1. GTA V
      2. GTA IV
      3. GTA III, VC & SA
      4. Tutorials
    2. Mod Showroom

      1. Scripts & Plugins
      2. Maps
      3. Total Conversions
      4. Vehicles
      5. Textures
      6. Characters
      7. Tools
      8. Other
      9. Workshop
    3. Featured Mods

      1. DYOM
      2. OpenIV
      3. GTA: Underground
      4. GTA: Liberty City
      5. GTA: State of Liberty
    1. Red Dead Redemption

    2. Rockstar Games

    1. Off-Topic

      1. General Chat
      2. Gaming
      3. Technology
      4. Programming
      5. Movies & TV
      6. Music
      7. Sports
      8. Vehicles
    2. Expression

      1. Graphics / Visual Arts
      2. GFX Requests & Tutorials
      3. Writers' Discussion
      4. Debates & Discussion
    1. Forum Support

    2. Site Suggestions

Pyrrhic

Is This The Worst Game of the GTA 3 Era?

Is this the worst game in the GTA 3 Era? (3, VC, SA, A, LCS, VCS)  

503 members have voted

  1. 1. Is this the worst game in the GTA 3 Era? (3, VC, SA, A, LCS, VCS)

    • Yes
      77
    • No
      377


Recommended Posts

Chamberman20

No, it would have to be GTA advanced.

Edited by Chamberman20

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ribsey

Not at all. While LCS was a side-step in GTA's progression (returning to an altered Vice City engine) but the care was still there. The lighting in the game goes from doom 'n gloom to bright sunny days, even capturing the feel of a '90s era city (especially in certain areas at night). While I enjoyed it back in the day, GTA Advance doesn't feel as if much effort was put into it as a whole.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
George Costanza

Technically? No, it was first 3D portable gta after all. And VCS was lagging af on PSP.
Story wise? No
Voice acting? Yes, cuz recasting, cuz R* didn't give enough money to get right voice actors back.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
universetwisters

Voice acting? Yes, cuz recasting, cuz R* didn't give enough money to get right voice actors back.

I don't think they wanted Michael Madsen back after he did the lines for the Driv3r protagonist. That goddamn race traitor.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Rockstar Gamer 108

I've played GTA LCS PC Edition and completed all 7 missions. It's far better than GTA III, which is the WORST GTA EVER!

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
InkJaw

I don't think Liberty City Stories is the worst in the 3D era, just has limited features compared to SA since it was on a handheld. Worst would have to be GTA Advance, for sure.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
The Rockstar Gamer 108

For me, it's GTA III. Buying it was just a waste of damn cash..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
InkJaw

For me, it's GTA III. Buying it was just a waste of damn cash..

Well I mean, it was the first 3D era GTA. You can expect a lot of features from future games not to be present there. Still though, what makes you think buying GTA 3 was a waste of cash?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Mr_Rager

For me, it's GTA III. Buying it was just a waste of damn cash..

LCS was my first GTA, and I ended up going backwards and playing III after SA and VC. I never felt that the gap between the three was that far. III is simpler and has its own charm and feel to it that I love. I prefer LCS though. I understand why people would think that III was better in some ways...but LCS simply had more to do.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Snesgamer83

LCS is basically III with a map and a better, more well-acted story. What's not to love?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
SMACKED!

Despite the fact I changed my mind about this game a few days ago, LCS is right away from being the worst GTA from the 3d era, nothing can assimilate the bad old Advance. But I do believe that LCS was a downgrade in terms of features. A sh*tload of stuff put in San Andreas was removed and the game went back to the "III/VC style" than implementing a few more stuffs and go ahead like it did in 2008 when IV was released (IMO).

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
WorthlessYouth

No. That award goes to Vice City Stories. Hands down.

 

Liberty City Stories blew everybody away upon release. A fully 3D Grand Theft Auto experience on a handheld device was unfathomable at the time.

 

Of all the 3D-era entries into the series, Vice City Stories was the only one that brought nothing new to the table, and was simply more of the same.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jimmy

I don't think Liberty City Stories is the worst. The setting is good, the storyline is crisp and well connected to the previous games and is very less confusing. On top of that, you've a familiar city to explore with a great set of vehicles. And now, there's an Android/iOS port as well.

 

On the other hand, Vice City Stories is much worse. So many characters and poor attempting at connecting it to the events before Vice City. That's just my opinion though.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
DragonpokeZ

The worst one is VCS. Period

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ClaudeIzABadAzz

LCS is a pretty good game since it is still the worst, If you know what I mean -_-

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
B Dawg

The worst one is VCS. Period

VCS? Seriously? For me, when not counting Advance, it would be 3, with VC right behind it.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
piko

Not a fair comparison, but seeing as it's 'improved' version of GTA III, I don't see how it could be worse than that.

Edited by piko

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jeansowaty

I really find the game pretty good, but compared to other 3D Universe titles (Advance doesn't count as a GTA on its own to me), LCS came up really mediocre. The worst thing outta all was the dull story that brang nothing rather than force characters from former GTA's to re-appear. As one person said, LCS was the V of the 3D Universe.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
MiranK

QUOTE (RyujinXKaizer @ Saturday, May 19 2012, 10:29) The worst GTA III Era is GTA Advance. I second that.

Completely agreed

The worst one is VCS. Period

Why exactly?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Journey_95

Advance is the worst, then GTA 3 and finally LCS. Guess I'm no fan of 3D Era's Liberty City..

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jack Lupino

No

Edited by Jack Lupino

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Ohhh123r

No! It's not the worst GTA 3D era, It's GTA Advance, y,know why? GTA Liberty City Stories is better while GTA Advance sucks...

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Irrational

Wow, superb reasoning, that was truly eye-opening.

 

Thank you, my good sir/madame.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Crossbones

The worst game in 3d era is Advance. LCS is a masterpiece. Great storyline, awesome characters, fun side missions are just some to be mentioned. Although, the antagonist was the worst of all, doesn't means the game is worst.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
CoolMods
Posted (edited)

No GTA LCS is awesome. They missions are fun until the end. The end is not that exciting and it's very dull unlike GTA 3, GTA VC, SA and GTA VCS endings. The ending was basicaly nonsense. Why wouldn't the story end goodly, by resolving every bullsh*t? I think Vincenzo should be killed at the end.

Edited by CoolMods

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Jack Lupino

I was about to vote yes...but since gta advance is considered a 3D era game(although its 2D) i voted no.

While gta LCS had disappointing ending and lacklustre storyline,it stilll had fun sidemissions.

While there was not a single good thing about Advance,hell even the graphics looked like crap compared to gta1 and gta2.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
iguaan
Posted (edited)

As everyone said countless times, Advance is most definetly the worst one. The story in this game wasn't great, although I do prefer some side missions from this game over some of the others from other 3D era titles.

 

If Advance wouldn't be counted as a 3D universe game, then based on story alone it would have to be one of the Stories games (ironic).

Edited by iguaan

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Hmmm nice bike

I think calling it the "worst" of the III era is a little harsh. Especially given that it was Rockstar's first entry into making games on the PSP, and San Andreas was a tough act to follow. The story was definitely not the best compared to other III era titles, but overall, I still enjoyed LCS.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
ViceBoy69

To love GTA3 you had to be around when it launched im an older gamer so GTA3 was a revelation back in the day, it may look dated now but back then it looked amazing

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
AlexGRFan97
Posted (edited)

A lot of you are looking at this completely wrong. Games like these shouldn't be graded by subjectivity. They should instead be graded on how different they were from their predecessors and how much content they added.

  1. III was similar to Driver 2 which released the year prior, but instead of fitting the map around the missions, the missions were fit around the map. It was jawdropping at the time and completely alien to GTA 2 players but hasn't aged well in the long run.
  2. Vice City took what III built and expanded upon it. We got more outfits, a better soundtrack, aircraft, motorcycles, the kickass 80s atmosphere and the ability to use tools as weapons. Tommy was a memorable protagonist with a great VA.
  3. San Andreas added an obscene amount of content with all the RPG-style elements, 200+ vehicles, 100+ story missions and one of the largest maps on the PS2. You could take photos with the camera in one breath and fly around on a jetpack the next.
  4. Liberty City Stories was an unexpected step down. We all expected the next GTA would be based off of San Andreas' engine. Some of us even thought we'd see Upstate Liberty. They had the potential to make something truly great and didn't.
  5. When it came to Vice City Stories we knew exactly what to expect, and it's clear R* had fun making it. They reintroduced a swimming protagonist, added Empire building, and bought all the tracks they couldn't afford during VC's development.

So altogether

SA>VC>VCS>III>LCS

Edited by AlexGRFan97

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

×

Important Information

By using GTAForums.com, you agree to our Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.