JOSEPH X Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 One thing you can guarantee when you get your copy of GTA V, is that unless you've forked out over $100 you wont be getting the full game. Red Dead Redemption & Max Payne 3 shows us that there's no lengths Rockstar won't go to to nickel 'n' dime their customers. So here's some things to look forward to: map packs as day one DLC $8 more maps down the line $16 car packs $16 multiplayer racing as a separate DLC $20 weapon packs $16 weapon skins $4 player skins $8 potato skins $1 pigeons $2 a pair Yes, that's right. Prepare yourself for the biggest carve up in gaming history. And you know those soda machines? 10 microsoft points for a can-o-sprunk. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
abottig Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 Stop. Now. IV and RDR were INCREDIBLE on release. Their DLC packs are the best I've ever seen. EFLC and Undead Nightmare were WELL worth the money. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
huevos_benedicto_180 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 Cry me a river, sweetheart. It's pretty indisputable that Rockstar gives an incredible amount of content for your $60 compared to almost every other developer out there (Valve are perhaps the exception). EDIT: Oh, I didn't read the last sentence. He's trolling. Whatever. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JOSEPH X Posted May 2, 2012 Author Share Posted May 2, 2012 Stop. Now. IV and RDR were INCREDIBLE on release. Their DLC packs are the best I've ever seen. EFLC and Undead Nightmare were WELL worth the money. I never mentioned IV. When IV was released you got the whole package on the disk. No having to buy a can of pepsi to get the AK and whatnot which is what's going to happen with V. Face it. You're going to have to shell out a lot of cash to get the full game. @huevos How very dare you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mkey82 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 You'd have to spend a mighty amount of time on convincing me GTAIV didn't have the parachutes in the game from day one... tall buildings, lack of mission diversity... anyone? MS came around, shelled out $50M and said "leave out something special for the DLC". And so had been done. PS: not for one freaking second do I believe the parachutes were left out because they didn't fit Niko's personality, that was one major load of crap if I ever heard one. But I have to agree the EFLC pack, even if it was sold at a higher price point, runs circles easily around 99% of other dlc. I personally found both stories better then the original game, a lot more down to the point and classic GTA. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SmC12 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 Who wants to wager a bet on the amount of people who fail to realise sarcasm? I call £10! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Freezer89 Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 One thing you can guarantee when you get your copy of GTA V, is that unless you've forked out over $100 you wont be getting the full game. Define "full game". GTA IV had two DLCs/expansion packs. Does that mean GTA IV is not a full game without these? All the DLCs for Max Payne 3 are for multiplayer and only additions (maps, modes). And don't exaggerate with things like two or three weapons for 5$. R* is not Activision. I am convinced, that GTA V won't have that many DLCs like Max Payne 3. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted May 2, 2012 Share Posted May 2, 2012 You get what you pay for. Locked Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts