Boss Falcone Posted June 9, 2012 Author Share Posted June 9, 2012 (edited) Sorry For Double Post. Members of the Public(GTAF Members) Are allowed to close the case. A man name John was happily married and had 2 kids and the night he went out to the pub he was brutally Murdered and was murdered by a sledge Hammer this was comfirmed by the autopsy report for the coroner There are 2 suspects in the Case. Suspect 1: Has no convictions. Has got anger problem. She hated the person John who got murdered. A hammer was found in the suspects house but was not a sledge hammer. Suspect 2: Has got 1 conviction of Attempted Murder and went to jail for 7 years. He now runs a business. He only met John Twice. John used to work for Suspect 2 and got fired because of allegations against him. This case is being held State Criminal Court. There is 1 witness: What connection do you have with the John? She said he was a very good friend of mine and we use to work together in a factory. Have you ever saw suspect 1 or suspect 2? Yes i saw suspect 2 go to his house the night before the Murder. Did john have any enemies you are aware of? Yes suspect 1 because one day by mistake John crashed into her $75.000 Car and she was very angry. YOU must now decide the verdict and see who is innocent or guilty. Edited June 9, 2012 by Boss Falcone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Reaper. Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 I'm not 100% sure how this is meant to work. But, I say Suspect One is the killer, as Suspect Two has no motive for such an attack. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pucchiac Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Suspect 1 is innocent, she admitted to hating him when that would be self-incrimination if she did kill him. It's a trick question - their both innocent, suspect 2 also has no reason for such an attack. It had to be someone else. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Reaper. Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Suspect 1 is innocent, she admitted to hating him when that would be self-incrimination if she did kill him. It's a trick question - their both innocent, suspect 2 also has no reason for such an attack. It had to be someone else. She could feel guilt and remorse. I doubt it would be a trick question as then the entire post is pointless. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pucchiac Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Suspect 1 is innocent, she admitted to hating him when that would be self-incrimination if she did kill him. It's a trick question - their both innocent, suspect 2 also has no reason for such an attack. It had to be someone else. She could feel guilt and remorse. I doubt it would be a trick question as then the entire post is pointless. The two suspect are pointless, she would not half-ass admitting it. She would either admit or keep her mouth shut, she had no weapon in her house; and I hardly doubt a women can out-strength a man and beat him to death in public, without even making any noises. The fact that she's rich is enough to prove that she wouldn't do anything dirty like that, let alone have the strength for it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Falcone Posted June 9, 2012 Author Share Posted June 9, 2012 Alazone i like your point that you just gave out. Can't tell you which one though Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pucchiac Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Alazone i like your point that you just gave out. Can't tell you which one though When will you give out the result? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Falcone Posted June 9, 2012 Author Share Posted June 9, 2012 The results will be given out Pacific Time; 16.30(Afternoon) GMT Time; 00.30(Night Time in UK) Central Time; 18;30(Evening) In 6 Hours Let's just say that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn tha killer Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 [sgt.Conner] Twas a suacide let em go.[\stg.Conner] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pucchiac Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Ignore that post above. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Falcone Posted June 9, 2012 Author Share Posted June 9, 2012 [sgt.Conner] Twas a suacide let em go.[\stg.Conner] Glen it cleary says in the Case The victim was Murdered. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn tha killer Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Twas a suacide let them go! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pucchiac Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 [sgt.Conner] Twas a suacide let em go.[\stg.Conner] Glen it cleary says in the Case The victim was Murdered. I highly doubt you can beat yourself to death with a sledgehammer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Reaper. Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Suspect 1 is innocent, she admitted to hating him when that would be self-incrimination if she did kill him. It's a trick question - their both innocent, suspect 2 also has no reason for such an attack. It had to be someone else. She could feel guilt and remorse. I doubt it would be a trick question as then the entire post is pointless. The two suspect are pointless, she would not half-ass admitting it. She would either admit or keep her mouth shut, she had no weapon in her house; and I hardly doubt a women can out-strength a man and beat him to death in public, without even making any noises. The fact that she's rich is enough to prove that she wouldn't do anything dirty like that, let alone have the strength for it. There have been many cases were the killer has given hints towards the police about there involvement. Such as Stacy Castor with the 'anti-free' murders. As for out powering the man there is no need to out power, he was at the pub, he could've been pissed and he could've struck him with the sledge hammer from behind, an instant knock out if not kill. Also nothing said it was a public murder could've brought him home with offers of sex, or lured him to a dark ally. And as for not having the weapon in her home, no sh*t. I wouldn't bring home a blood coated sledge hammer. And as being too rich? Some of the dirtiest murders and by the wealthiness of people, as they feel there are entitled to get away with it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn tha killer Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Twas a suacide I say no more Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Falcone Posted June 9, 2012 Author Share Posted June 9, 2012 Mr.reaper i like the way you handled that you brought in a past law case and proved your point. The other thing i like is you analysing what could have happened while he was entering the pub or leaving it. Perfect. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn tha killer Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 He was on the old happy pils, so he was. Twas twenty minutes later that he pumpled him self repeatly. Anthor 20 mins past and he was stone dead. Swashed testicals and a mashed up face. Ah well Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Reaper. Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Twas a suacide I say no more If it wasn't listed a murder that could be possible. A drunken man has been killed by walking home under a construction site and bumping the scaffold causing a cinder block to fall and crack open his skull. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pucchiac Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Suspect 1 is innocent, she admitted to hating him when that would be self-incrimination if she did kill him. It's a trick question - their both innocent, suspect 2 also has no reason for such an attack. It had to be someone else. She could feel guilt and remorse. I doubt it would be a trick question as then the entire post is pointless. The two suspect are pointless, she would not half-ass admitting it. She would either admit or keep her mouth shut, she had no weapon in her house; and I hardly doubt a women can out-strength a man and beat him to death in public, without even making any noises. The fact that she's rich is enough to prove that she wouldn't do anything dirty like that, let alone have the strength for it. There have been many cases were the killer has given hints towards the police about there involvement. Such as Stacy Castor with the 'anti-free' murders. As for out powering the man there is no need to out power, he was at the pub, he could've been pissed and he could've struck him with the sledge hammer from behind, an instant knock out if not kill. Also nothing said it was a public murder could've brought him home with offers of sex, or lured him to a dark ally. And as for not having the weapon in her home, no sh*t. I wouldn't bring home a blood coated sledge hammer. And as being too rich? Some of the dirtiest murders and by the wealthiness of people, as they feel there are entitled to get away with it. It's a trick question, the only reason she hates him is because he crashed into her 75k dollar car, and we both know damn well it would have only costed a few thousand (1-20k) to fix that car. That's nothing to rich people such as herself, so why would she risk losing her fortune for murdering someone who cost her a small amount of money? He was a married man, with children. I think it's pretty safe to say he probably did not want to have sex with her. All he wanted to do was get a drink at the pub and got brutally murdered. What about the witness - she seems to like pointing fingers at other people and saying he went in so and so's house at such time; can we get info on her? Ezio - can you give us more info to work of here? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn tha killer Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Whats the purpose of this? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Falcone Posted June 9, 2012 Author Share Posted June 9, 2012 (edited) Ok i'l add 1 clue not more then. Members of the Public(GTAF Members) Are allowed to close the case. Edited October 8, 2012 by Boss Falcone Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr.Funny12 Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Templars attacked him with their sledge hammers they wear on their waists! He was really an assassin and they beat the sh*t out of him! Bang, figured it out! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pucchiac Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Templar What the f*ck is that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Falcone Posted June 9, 2012 Author Share Posted June 9, 2012 Ok added a witness. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Reaper. Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 It's a trick question, the only reason she hates him is because he crashed into her 75k dollar car, and we both know damn well it would have only costed a few thousand (1-20k) to fix that car. That's nothing to rich people such as herself, so why would she risk losing her fortune for murdering someone who cost her a small amount of money? He was a married man, with children. I think it's pretty safe to say he probably did not want to have sex with her. All he wanted to do was get a drink at the pub and got brutally murdered. What about the witness - she seems to like pointing fingers at other people and saying he went in so and so's house at such time; can we get info on her? Ezio - can you give us more info to work of here? It has nothing to do with money, merely her hate for him. Being rich just lets her feel she can get away with it. As for being married, pussy is pussy. Any man married or not wants pussy but being married you usually find the self control to resist such a temptation, he would've been drunk and lost all self control. That being said, you said she used pussy to lure him, could've been anything. Even chuck a can down the ally so he turns around and she can take that one fatal swing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rambo21k Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Templars attacked him with their sledge hammers they wear on their waists! He was really an assassin and they beat the sh*t out of him! Bang, figured it out! No, it was the Mercenaries i Hired to go kill Rodrigo Borgia, but they accidently attacked the wrong target. If you dont know what im talking about, may they have pity on your soul Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boss Falcone Posted June 9, 2012 Author Share Posted June 9, 2012 Guy's stick to the law case once law case is solved and closed you make talk about assassins creed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn tha killer Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Templars attacked him with their sledge hammers they wear on their waists! He was really an assassin and they beat the sh*t out of him! Bang, figured it out! Dun Dun Dun!! POPE POWER! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rambo21k Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Guy's stick to the law case once law case is solved and closed you make talk about assassins creed. ok, then it was Ezio Auditore de Firenze, during a beatdown he accidently beat the cheating husband too hard and killed him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
glenn tha killer Posted June 9, 2012 Share Posted June 9, 2012 Mu ha ha ha! I withnessed the attack and need a live interview asap. For real! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts